Femorotibial kinematics and load patterns after total knee arthroplasty: An in vitro comparison of posterior-stabilized versus medial-stabilized design
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
26945720
DOI
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.02.002
PII: S0268-0033(16)00035-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Femorotibial pressure distribution, In vitro study, Knee kinematics, Medial stabilized, Posterior stabilized, Total knee arthroplasty,
- MeSH
- biomechanika MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- femur fyziologie chirurgie MeSH
- kolenní kloub fyziologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mrtvola MeSH
- protézy - design * MeSH
- protézy kolene * MeSH
- rozsah kloubních pohybů fyziologie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- tibie fyziologie chirurgie MeSH
- tlak MeSH
- totální endoprotéza kolene přístrojové vybavení MeSH
- zatížení muskuloskeletálního systému fyziologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Femorotibial kinematics and contact patterns vary greatly with different total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs. Therefore, guided motion knee systems were developed to restore natural knee kinematics and make them more predictable. The medial stabilized TKA design is supposed to replicate physiological kinematics more than the posterior-stabilized TKA system. We conducted this study to compare a newly developed medial stabilized design with a conventional posterior-stabilized design in terms of femorotibial kinematics and contact patterns in vitro. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen knee specimens were tested in a weight-bearing knee rig after implantation of a posterior stabilized and medial-stabilized total knee arthroplasty under a loaded squat from 20° to 120° of flexion. Femorotibial joint contact pressures in the medial and lateral compartments were measured by pressure sensitive films and knee kinematics were recorded by an ultrasonic 3-dimensional motion analysis system. FINDINGS: The medial stabilized design showed a reduction of medial femorotibial translation compared to posterior-stabilized design (mean 3.5mm compared to 15.7 mm, P<0.01). In the lateral compartment, both designs showed a posterior translation of the femur with flexion, but less in the medial stabilized design (mean 14.7 mm compared to 19.0mm, P<0.01). In the medial femorotibial compartment of medial stabilized design, we observed an enlarged contact area and lower peak pressure, in contrast in the lateral compartment there was a reduced contact area and an increased peak pressure. INTERPRETATION: While posterior-stabilized design enforces a medio-lateral posterior translation, the medial stabilized arthroplasty system enables a combination of a lateral translation with a medial pivot, which restores the physiological knee kinematics better.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org