Pathoanatomy and computed tomography classification of glenoid fossa fractures based on ninety patients

. 2016 Nov ; 40 (11) : 2383-2392. [epub] 20160330

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid27026622
Odkazy

PubMed 27026622
DOI 10.1007/s00264-016-3169-4
PII: 10.1007/s00264-016-3169-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

PURPOSE: The aim of the article is to present the pathoanatomy and a new classification of glenoid fractures developed on the basis of analysis of 3D computed tomography (CT) examinations and intra-operative findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 90 patients (69 men and 21 women) who sustained glenoid fractures. Mean patient age was 47 years (17-92). In 77 nonpolytraumatised patients, anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of the affected shoulder girdle were taken, including Neer I and II views. All 90 patients underwent CT examination, combined in 73 of them with 3D CT reconstruction including subtraction of the humeral head, ribs and clavicle, from the anterior and posterolateral views. In total, 52 patients (58 %) were operated on and 38 42 %) were treated non-operatively. RESULTS: In total, five basic types of injuries to the glenoid were identified based on analysis of the separated portion of the glenoid fossa: including fractures of the superior glenoid (14 cases, 16 %), the anterior glenoid (23 cases, 23 %), the posterior rim of the glenoid (5 cases, 6 %), the inferior glenoid (38 cases, 42 %) and the entire glenoid (10 cases, 11 %). CONCLUSION: The proposed classification of glenoid fractures defines five basic types of fractures verified by 3D CT reconstructions and intra-operative findings. It respects the anatomical architecture of scapula, fracture mechanism, associated injuries to the shoulder girdle and, where appropriate, the preferred surgical approach.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Feb;(347):122-30 PubMed

Unfallchirurg. 2004 Dec;107(12 ):1124-33 PubMed

Rozhl Chir. 2009 Feb;88(2):84-8 PubMed

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Mar;20(3):130-41 PubMed

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Mar;16(3):326-32 PubMed

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Oct;89(10):1347-51 PubMed

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984 Nov;66(5):725-31 PubMed

Injury. 2015 Apr;46(4):699-702 PubMed

Injury. 1993 May;24(5):324-8 PubMed

J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Aug;22(7):487-93 PubMed

Int Orthop. 2016 Jan;40(1):213-22 PubMed

Int Orthop. 2016 Feb;40(2):377-84 PubMed

Orthopade. 1992 Apr;21(2):158-62 PubMed

J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Mar;20(3):227-9 PubMed

Arthroscopy. 2006 May;22(5):569.e1-6 PubMed

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Sep;129(9):1245-9 PubMed

Int Orthop. 2014 Oct;38(10 ):2163-73 PubMed

J Orthop Trauma. 2002 Jan;16(1):7-11 PubMed

Int Orthop. 2002;26(3):150-3 PubMed

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004 Nov;12 (6):568-73 PubMed

Rozhl Chir. 2013 Jul;92 (7):385-8 PubMed

Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Dec;36(10):1009-14 PubMed

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Apr 4;94(7):645-53 PubMed

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct;91(10):2492-510 PubMed

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Aug;(269):174-80 PubMed

Injury. 2008 Mar;39(3):271-83 PubMed

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Apr;22(4):512-20 PubMed

J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Mar;20(3):230-3 PubMed

Acta Orthop Scand. 1995 Oct;66(5):395-7 PubMed

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Mar;84(2):173-7 PubMed

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Feb;25(2):269-75 PubMed

J Orthop. 2013 Nov 21;10(4):188-92 PubMed

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Sep;91(9):2222-8 PubMed

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Feb;74(2):299-305 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...