Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
- Klíčová slova
- ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, AE = adverse event, AP = anteroposterior, ASD = adjacent-segment disease, BMI = body mass index, COI = conflict of interest, COR = center of rotation, FJD = facet joint degeneration, HO = heterotopic ossification, NDI = Neck Disability Index, Neck Disability Index, RCT = randomized controlled trial, ROM = range of motion, VAS = visual analog scale, activ C, adjacent-segment degeneration, cTDR = cervical total disc replacement, cervical spine, clinical outcome, degenerative disc disease, heterotopic ossification, long-term results, range of motion, total disc replacement, visual analog scale,
- MeSH
- artroplastika meziobratlové ploténky * přístrojové vybavení metody MeSH
- bolest krku diagnostické zobrazování etiologie chirurgie MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- chirurgická dekomprese metody MeSH
- degenerace meziobratlové ploténky komplikace diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- diskektomie metody MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- krční obratle * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lordóza diagnostické zobrazování etiologie chirurgie MeSH
- měření bolesti MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- posuzování pracovní neschopnosti MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- protézy kloubů * MeSH
- software MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
OBJECTIVE Recent studies have described encouraging outcomes after cervical total disc replacement (cTDR), but there are also critical debates regarding the long-term effects of heterotopic ossification (HO) and the prevalence of adjacent-level degeneration. The aim in this paper was to provide 4-year clinical and radiographic outcome results on the activ C disc prosthesis. METHODS A total of 200 subjects underwent single-level activ C (Aesculap AG) implantation between C-3 and C-7 for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease. Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed preoperatively, intraoperatively, at discharge, and again at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 4 years. Radiographic evaluations were done by an independent core laboratory using a specific software for quantitative motion analysis. RESULTS Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) score for neck and arm pain decreased significantly from baseline to the 4-year follow-up. The mean improvement for NDI was 20, for VAS severity and frequency of neck pain 26.4 and 28, and for VAS severity and frequency of arm pain 30.7 and 35.1, respectively. The neurological situation improved for the majority of patients (86.4%); 76.1% of cases were asymptomatic. Subsequent surgical interventions were reported in 7% of the cases, including device removals in 3%. In 2.5% a subsidence greater than 3 mm was recorded; 1 of these cases also had a migration greater than 3 mm. No device displacement, expulsion, disassembly, loose or fractured device, osteolysis, or facet joint degeneration at the index level was observed. Segmental lordotic alignment changed from -2.4° preoperatively to -6.2° at 4 years, and postoperative height was maintained during the follow-up. Advanced HO (Grade III and IV) was present in 27.1% of the cases; 82.4% showed segmental mobility. A progression of radiographic adjacent-segment degeneration occurred in 28.2%, but only 4.5% required surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS The activ C is a safe and effective device for cervical disc replacement confirming the encouraging results after cTDR. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02492724 ( clinicaltrials.gov ).
Abteilung für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie Sana Kliniken Sommerfeld Kremmen Germany
Center for Spine Surgery Motol University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Neurosurgery BG Clinic Bergmannstrost Halle Germany
Department of Neurosurgery University of Helsinki Finland
Department of Neurosurgery University of Rostock Germany; and
Neurocentre Regional Hospital Liberec Czech Republic
Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery Spine Center Berlin Germany
Neurosurgery Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Rome Italy
Neurosurgical Department Hospital Maz Zaragoza Spain
Spinal Surgery Katholisches Klinikum Koblenz Germany
Spinal Surgery Warrington District General Hospital Warrington United Kingdom; and
Zentrum für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie Vivantes Auguste Viktoria Klinikum Berlin Germany
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02492724