The spermatozoon is the most diverse cell type known and this diversity is considered to reflect differences in sperm function. How the diversity in sperm morphology arose during speciation and what role the different specializations play in sperm function, however, remain incompletely characterized. This work reviews the hypotheses proposed to explain sperm morphological evolution, with a focus on some aspects of sperm morphometric evaluation; the ability of morphometrics to predict sperm cryoresistance and male fertility is also discussed. For this, the evaluation of patterns of change of sperm head morphometry throughout a process, instead of the study of the morphometric characteristics of the sperm head at different stages, allows a better identification of the males with different sperm cryoconservation ability. These new approaches, together with more studies employing a greater number of individuals, are needed to obtain novel results concerning the role of sperm morphometry on sperm function. Future studies should aim at understanding the causes of sperm design diversity and the mechanisms that generate them, giving increased attention to other sperm structures besides the sperm head. The implementation of scientific and technological advances could benefit the simultaneous examination of sperm phenotype and sperm function, demonstrating that sperm morphometry could be a useful tool for sperm assessment.

Biomedical Center Medical Faculty in Pilsen Charles University Prague Pilsen Czech Republic

Department of Molecular Biology University of León León Spain

Faculty of Pharmacy Albacete Spain

Institute for Animal Health and Cattle Development University of León León Spain

Regional Center of Animal Selection and Reproduction JCCM Valdepeñas Spain

SaBio IREC Albacete Spain

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Jamieson BG. Progress in Male Gamete Ultrastructure and Phylogeny. Part A. IX. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 1999a. Reproductive biology of invertebrates.

Jamieson BG, editor. The Male Gamete: From Basic Science to Clinical Applications. Vienna: Cache River Press; 1999b. Spermatozoal phylogeny of the vertebrata; pp. 301–31.

Pitnick S, Hosken DJ, Birkhead TR, editors. Sperm Biology and Evolutionary Perspective. Oxford, UK: Academic Press; 2009. Sperm morphology diversity; pp. 69–149.

Franzén JR. Sperm structure with regard to fertilization biology and phylogenetics. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges. 1977;70:123–38.

Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S, editors. Sperm Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective. London: Academic Press; 2009. p. 674.

Franzén A. On spermiogenesis, morphology of the spermatozoon and biology of fertilization among invertebrates. Zool Bidr Upps. 1956;31:355–482.

Parker GA. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in insects. Biol Rev. 1970;45:525–67.

Sperm shape and size: Evolutionary processes in mammals. In: Roldan ER, editor; Baccetti B, editor. Comparative Spermatology, 20 Years After. New York: Raven Press; 1991. pp. 1001–10.

Roldan ER, Gomendio M, Vitullo AD. The evolution of eutherian spermatozoa and underlying selective forces: female selection and sperm competition. Biol Rev. 1992;67:551–93. PubMed

Sánchez-Partida LG, Windsor DP, Eppleston J, Setchell BP, Maxwell WM. Fertility and its relationship to motility characteristics of spermatozoa in ewes after cervical, transcervical, and intrauterine insemination with frozen-thawed ram semen. J Androl. 1999;20:280–8. PubMed

Foote RH. Fertility estimation: a review of past experience and future prospects. Anim Reprod Sci. 2003;75:119–39. PubMed

Love CC. Relationship between sperm motility, morphology and the fertility of stallions. Theriogenology. 2011;76:547–57. PubMed

David I, Kohnke P, Lagriffoul G, Praud O, Plouarboué F, et al. Mass sperm motility is associated with fertility in sheep. Anim Reprod Sci. 2015;161:75–81. PubMed

Holt C, Holt WV, Moore HD, Reed HC, Curnock RM. Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations: results of two fertility trials. J Androl. 1997;18:312–23. PubMed

Martínez-Pastor F, Tizado EJ, Garde JJ, Anel L, de Paz P. Statistical series: opportunities and challenges of sperm motility subpopulation analysis. Theriogenology. 2011;75:783–95. PubMed

Amann RP, Waberski D. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): capabilities and potential developments. Theriogenology. 2014;81:5–17. PubMed

Cordelli E, Eleuteri P, Leter G, Rescia M, Spanó M. Flow cytometry applications in the evaluation of sperm quality: semen analysis, sperm function and DNA integrity. Contraception. 2005;72:273–9. PubMed

Martínez-Pastor F, Mata-Campuzano M, Álvarez-Rodriguez M, Alvarez M, Anel L, et al. Probes and techniques for sperm evaluation by flow cytometry. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010;45:67–78. PubMed

Hallap T, Nagy S, Haard M, Jaakma U, Johannisson A, et al. Sperm chromatin stability in frozen-thawed semen is maintained over age in AI bulls. Theriogenology. 2005;63:1752–63. PubMed

García-Macías V, Martinez-Pastor F, Alvarez M, Borragan S, Chamorro CA, et al. Seasonal changes in sperm chromatin condensation in ram (Ovis aries), Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus), and brown bear (Ursus arctos) J Androl. 2006;27:837–46. PubMed

Kummer AB, Gaggini TS, Bernardi ML, McManus C, Gonçales EM, et al. Multivariate analyses for determining the association of field porcine fertility with sperm motion traits analysed by computer-assisted semen analysis and with sperm morphology. Reprod Domest Anim. 2013;48:747–54. PubMed

Rodriguez-Martinez H. Can we increase the estimated value of semen assessment? Reprod Domest Anim. 2006;41:2–10. PubMed

Ramon M, Soler AJ, Ortiz JA, García-Álvarez O, Maroto-Morales A, et al. Sperm population structure and male fertility: an intraspecific study of sperm design and velocity in red deer. Biol Reprod. 2013;89:110–4. PubMed

Maroto-Morales A, Ramon M, García-Álvarez O, Montoro V, Soler AJ, et al. Sperm head phenotype and male fertility in ram semen. Theriogenology. 2015;84:1536–41. PubMed

Gravance CG, Vishwanath R, Pitt C, Garner DL, Casey PJ. Effects of cryopreservation on bull sperm head morphometry. J Androl. 1998;19:704–9. PubMed

Ramon M, Pérez-Guzmán MD, Jiménez-Rabadán P, Esteso MC, García-Álvarez O, et al. Sperm cell population dynamics in ram semen during the cryopreservation process. PLoS One. 2013b;8:e59189. PubMed PMC

Jamieson BG. The Ultrastructure and Phylogeny of Insect Spermatozoa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.

Jamieson BG. Ultrastructure and phylogeny of crustacean spermatozoa. Mem Qld Mus. 1991;31:109–42.

Jamieson BG. Fish Evolution and Systematics: Evidence from Spermatozoa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.

Jamieson BG, editor. Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Birds. Part A. Phylogeny, Morphology and Fertilization. Enfield: Science Publishers, Inc; 2007. Avian spermatozoa: Structure and phylogeny; pp. 349–511.

Bedford JM, Hoskins DD. The mammalian spermatozoon: Morphology, biochemistry and physiology. In: Lamming GE, editor. Marshall's Physiology of Reproduction. II Reproduction in the Male. UK: Longman; 1990. pp. 379–568.

Gage MJ. Mammalian sperm morphometry. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1998;265:97–103. PubMed PMC

Cohen J. Reproduction. London: Butterworths; 1977.

Briskie JV, Montgomerie R. Sperm size and sperm competition in birds. Proc Roy Soc B. 1992;247:89–95. PubMed

Pitnick S, Miller GT, Schneider K, Markow TA. Ejaculate-female coevolution in Drosophila mojavensis. Proc Roy Soc B. 2003;270:1507–12. PubMed PMC

Morrow EH, Gage MJ. The evolution of sperm length in moths. Proc Roy Soc B. 2000;267:307–13. PubMed PMC

Anderson MJ, Dixon AS, Dixon AF. Mammalain sperm and oviducts are sexually selected: evidence for co_evolution. J Zool. 2006;270:682–6.

Higginson DM, Miller KB, Segraves KA, Pitnick S. Female reproductive tract form drives the evolution of complex sperm morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:4538–43. PubMed PMC

Pitnick S, Miller GT, Schneider K, Markow TA. Ejaculate-female coevolution in Drosophila mojavensis. Proc Roy Soc B. 2003;270:1507–12. PubMed PMC

Gomendio M, Roldan ER. Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals. Proc Roy Soc B. 1991;243:181–5. PubMed

Gage MJ, Cook PA. Sperm size or numbers? Effects of nutritional stress upon eupyrene and apyrene sperm production strategies in the moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: pytalidea) Funct Ecol. 1994;8:594–9.

Byrne PG, Simmons LW, Roberts JD. Sperm competition and the evolution of gamete morphology in frogs. Proc Roy Soc B. 2003;270:2079–86. PubMed PMC

Gomendio M, Roldan ER. Implications of diversity in sperm size and function for sperm competition and fertility. Int J Dev Biol. 2008;52:439–47. PubMed

Tourmente M, Gomendio M, Roldan ER. Sperm competition and the evolution of sperm design in mammals. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11:12. PubMed PMC

Birkhead TR, Møller AP. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press; 1998.

Simmons LW. Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in Insects. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press; 2001.

Parker GA, Pizzari T. Sperm competition and ejaculate economics. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010;85:897–934. PubMed

Gomez Montoto L, Magana C, Tourmente M, Martin-Coello J, Crespo C, et al. Sperm competition, sperm numbers and sperm quality in muroid rodents. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18173. PubMed PMC

Parker GA. Why are there so many tiny sperm. Sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexes? J Theor Biol. 1982;96:281–94. PubMed

Fitzpatrick JL, Montgomerie R, Desjardins JK, Stiver KA, Kolm N, et al. Female promiscuity promotes the evolution of faster sperm in cichlid fishes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:1128–32. PubMed PMC

Lüpold S, Calhim S, Immler S, Birkhead TR. Sperm morphology and sperm velocity in passerine birds. Proc Roy Soc B. 2009;276:1175–81. PubMed PMC

Tourmente M, Delbarco-Trillo J, Roldan ER. No evidence of tradeoffs in the evolution of sperm numbers and sperm size in mammals. J Evol Biol. 2015;28:1816–27. PubMed

Tourmente M, Gomendio M, Roldan ER, Giojalas LC, Chiaraviglio M. Sperm competition and reproductive mode influence sperm dimensions and structure among snakes. Evolution. 2009;63:2513–24. PubMed

Tourmente M, Gomendio M, Roldan ER. Mass-specific metabolic rate and sperm competition determine sperm size in marsupial mammals. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21244. PubMed PMC

Ramon M, Jiménez-Rabadán P, García-Álvarez O, Maroto-Morales A, Soler AJ, et al. Understanding sperm heterogeneity: biological and practical implications. Reprod Domest Anim. 2014;49:30–6. PubMed

Esteso MC, Soler AJ, Fernández-Santos MR, Quintero-Moreno AA, Garde JJ. Functional significance of the sperm head morphometric size and shape for determining freezability in Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) epididymal sperm samples. J Androl. 2006;27:662–70. PubMed

Esteso MC, Fernández-Santos MR, Soler AJ, Montoro V, Martínez-Pastor F, et al. Identification of sperm-head morphometric subpopulations in Iberian red deer epididymal sperm samples. Reprod Domest Anim. 2009;44:206–11. PubMed

Morrell J, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Practical applications of sperm selection techniques as a tool for improving reproductive efficiency. Vet Med Int 2010. 2011 [pii: 894767] PubMed PMC

Morrell JM, Rodriguez_Martinez H. Biomimetic techniques for improving sperm quality in animal breeding: a review. Open Androl J. 2009;1:1–9.

García_Álvarez O, Maroto_Morales A, Ramón M, del Olmo E, Montoro V, et al. Analysis of selected sperm by density gradient centrifugation might aid in the estimation of in vivo fertility of thawed ram spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2010;74:979–88. PubMed

Ombelet W, Menkveld R, Kruger TF, Steeno O. Sperm morphology assessment: historical review in relation to fertility. Hum Reprod Update. 1995;1:543–57. PubMed

Kruger TF, Coetzee K. The role of sperm morphology in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 1999;5:172–8. PubMed

Gago C, Perez-Sanchez F, Yeung C, Tablado L, Cooper T, et al. Standardization of sampling and staining methods for the morphometric evaluation of sperm heads in the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) using computer-assisted image analysis. Int J Androl. 1998;21:169–76. PubMed

Yániz JL, Soler C, Santolaria P. Computer assisted sperm morphometry in mammals: a review. Anim Reprod Sci. 2015;156:1–12. PubMed

Banaszewska D, Andraszek K, Czubaszek M, Biesiada-Drzazga B. The effect of selected staining techniques on bull sperm morphometry. Anim Reprod Sci. 2015;159:17–24. PubMed

Davis RO, Gravance CG, Casey P. Automated morphometric analysis of stallion spermatozoa. Am J Vet Res. 1993;54:1808–11. PubMed

Esteso MC, Rodríguez E, Toledano-Díaz A, Castaño C, Pradiee J, et al. Descriptive analysis of sperm head morphometry in Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica): optimum sampling procedure and staining methods using Sperm-Class Analyzer®. Anim Reprod Sci. 2015;155:42–9. PubMed

García-Herreros M, Aparicio IM, Barón FJ, García-Marín LJ, Gil MC. Standardization of sample preparation, staining and sampling methods for automated sperm head morphometry analysis of boar spermatozoa. Int J Androl. 2006;29:553–63. PubMed

Goulart AR, de Alencar Hausen M, Monteiro-Leal LH. Comparison of three computer methods of sperm head analysis. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:625–30. PubMed

Maree L, du Plessis SS, Menkveld R, van der Horst G. Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1369–82. PubMed

Villaverde-Morcillo S, Esteso MC, Castaño C, Toledano Díaz A, López-Sebastián A, et al. Influence of staining method on the values of avian sperm head morphometric variables. Reprod Domest Anim. 2015;50:750–5. PubMed

Gravance CG, Davis RO. Automated sperm morphometry analysis (ASMA) in the rabbit. J Androl. 1995;16:88–93. PubMed

Gravance CG, Vishwanath R, Pitt C, Casey PJ. Computer automated morphometric analysis of bull sperm heads. Theriogenology. 1996;46:1205–15. PubMed

Rijsselaere T, Van Soom A, Hoflack G, Maes D, de Kruif A. Automated sperm morphometry and morphology analysis of canine semen by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser. Theriogenology. 2004;62:1292–306. PubMed

Sancho M, Perez-Sanchez F, Tablado L, de Monserrat J, Soler C. Computer assisted morphometric analysis of ram sperm heads: evaluation of different fixative techniques. Theriogenology. 1998;50:27–37. PubMed

Yániz JL, Vicente-Fiel S, Capistrós S, Palacín I, Santolaria P. Automatic evaluation of ram sperm morphometry. Theriogenology. 2012;77:1343–50. PubMed

Coetzee K, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ. Repeatability and variance analysis on multiple computer-assisted (IVOS) sperm morphology readings. Andrologia. 1999;31:163–8. PubMed

Gravance CG, Garner DL, Pitt C, Vishwanath R, Sax-Gravance SK, et al. Replicate and technician variation associated with computer aided bull sperm head morphometry analysis (ASMA) Int J Androl. 1999;22:77–82. PubMed

Garrett C, Baker HW. A new fully automated system for the morphometric analysis of human sperm heads. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:1306–17. PubMed

Soler C, Gadea B, Soler A, Fernández_Santos M, Esteso M, et al. Comparison of three different staining methods for the assessment of epididymal red deer sperm morphometry by computerized analysis with ISAS. Theriogenology. 2005;64:1236–43. PubMed

Yániz JL, Capistrós S, Vicente_Fiel S, Soler C, Nuñez de Murga J, et al. Study of nuclear and acrosomal sperm morphometry in ram using a computer_assisted sperm morphometry analysis fluorescence (CASMA_F) method. Theriogenology. 2014;82:921–4. PubMed

Soler C, García A, Sancho M, Contell J, Nuñez M, et al. A new technique for human sperm morphology analysis in unstained cells from raw semen. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016;28:428–33. PubMed

Soler C, García A, Contell J, Silvestre MA, Sancho M. The Trumorph® system: the new universal technique for the observation and analysis of the morphology of living sperm. Anim Reprod Sci. 2015;158:1–10. PubMed

Gravance CG, Champion ZJ, Casey PJ. Computer_assisted sperm head morphometry analysis (ASMA) of cryopreserved ram spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 1998;49:1219–30. PubMed

Davis RO, Gravance CG. Standardization of specimen preparation, staining, and sampling methods improves automated sperm-head morphometry analysis. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:412–7. PubMed

Buendia P, Soler C, Paolicchi F, Gago G, Urquieta B, et al. Morphometric characterization and classification of alpaca sperm heads using the Sperm-Class Analyzer (R) computer-assisted system. Theriogenology. 2002;57:1207–18. PubMed

Verstegen J, Iguer-Ouada M, Onclin K. Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology. 2002;57:149–79. PubMed

de Paz P, Mata-Campuzano M, Tizado EJ, Alvarez M, Alvarez-Rodríguez M, et al. The relationship between ram sperm head morphometry and fertility depends on the procedures of acquisition and analysis used. Theriogenology. 2011;76:1313–25. PubMed

Vicente_Fiel S, Palacín I, Santolaria P, Fantova E, Quintín_Casorrán FJ, et al. In vitro assessment of sperm quality from rams of high and low field fertility. Anim Reprod Sci. 2014;146:15–20. PubMed

Ros_Santaella JL, Pintus E, Garde JJ. Intramale variation in sperm size: functional significance in a polygynous mammal. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1478. PubMed PMC

Yániz JL, Palacín I, Vicente-Fiel S, Sánchez Nadal JA, Santolaria P. Sperm population structure in high and low field fertility rams. Anim Reprod Sci. 2015;154:128–34. PubMed

Maroto-Morales A, Ramón M, García-Alvarez O, Soler AJ, Esteso MC, et al. Characterization of ram (Ovis aries) sperm head morphometry using the Sperm-Class Analyzer. Theriogenology. 2010;73:437–48. PubMed

Maroto-Morales A, Ramón M, García-Álvarez O, Soler AJ, Fernández-Santos MR, et al. Morphometrically-distinct sperm subpopulations defined by a multistep statistical procedure in ram ejaculates: intra- and inter-individual variation. Theriogenology. 2012;77:1529–39. PubMed

Santolaria P, Vicente-Fiel S, Palacín I, Fantova E, Blasco ME, et al. Predictive capacity of sperm quality parameters and sperm subpopulations on field fertility after artificial insemination in sheep. Anim Reprod Sci. 2015;163:82–8. PubMed

Martinez-Pastor F. Use of misleading statistics in method comparison analyses. J Androl. 2010;31:323. PubMed

Watson PF, Petrie A. Method agreement analysis: a review of correct methodology. Theriogenology. 2010;73:1167–79. PubMed

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10. PubMed

Malo AF, Garde JJ, Soler AJ, Garcia AJ, Gomendio M, et al. Male fertility in natural population of red deer is determined by sperm velocity and the proportion of normal spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 2005;72:822–9. PubMed

Malo AF, Gomendio M, Garde J, Lang_Lenton B, Soler AJ. Sperm design and sperm function. Biol Lett. 2006;2:246–9. PubMed PMC

Marco_Jiménez F, Vicente JS, Lavara R, Balasch S, Viudes_de_Castro MP. Poor prediction value of sperm head morphometry for fertility and litter size in rabbit. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010;45:e118–23. PubMed

Vicente-Fiel S, Palacín I, Santolaria P, Hidalgo CO, Silvestre MA, et al. A comparative study of the sperm nuclear morphometry in cattle, goat, sheep, and pigs using a new computer-assisted method (CASMA-F) Theriogenology. 2013;79:436–42. PubMed

Lavara R, Vicente JS, Baselga M. Genetic variation in head morphometry of rabbit sperm. Theriogenology. 2013;80:313–8. PubMed

Saravia F, Núñez-Martínez I, Morán JM, Soler C, Muriel A, et al. Differences in boar sperm head shape and dimensions recorded by computer-assisted sperm morphometry are not related to chromatin integrity. Theriogenology. 2007;68:196–203. PubMed

Carvalho JO, Silva LP, Sartori R, Dode MA. Nanoscale differences in the shape and size of X and Y chromosome-bearing bovine sperm heads assessed by atomic force microscopy. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59387. PubMed PMC

Petrunkina AM, Topfer_Petersen E. Heterogeneous osmotic behaviour in boar sperm populations and its relevance for detection of changes in plasma membrane. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2000;12:297–305. PubMed

García_Herreros M, Leal CL. Comparative study of sperm washing and selection methods after cryopreservation and its influence on sperm subpopulational structure in a bovine model. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2014;60:338–47. PubMed

García-Herreros M, Leal CL. Sperm volumetric dynamics during in vitro capacitation process in bovine spermatozoa. Animal. 2015;9:1016–24. PubMed

Blässe AK, Oldenhof H, Ekhlasi-Hundrieser M, Wolkers WF, Sieme H, et al. Osmotic tolerance and intracellular ion concentrations of bovine sperm are affected by cryopreservation. Theriogenology. 2012;78:1312–20. PubMed

Ros-Santaella JL, Domínguez-Rebolledo AE, Garde JJ. Sperm flagellum volume determines freezability in red deer spermatozoa. PLoS One. 2014;9:e112382. PubMed PMC

Santiago-Moreno J, Esteso MC, Pradiee J, Castaño C, Toledano-Díaz A, et al. Giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) sperm morphometry and function after repeated freezing and thawing. Andrologia. 2016;48:470–4. PubMed

Thompson LA, Brook PF, Warren M, Barrat C, Cooke I. A morphometric comparison of the nuclear morphology of fresh and frozen-thawed human zona-bound and unbound sperm. J Androl. 1994;15:337–42. PubMed

Gravance CG, Casey ME, Case PJ. Pre-freeze bull sperm head morphometry related with post-thaw fertility. Anim Reprod Sci. 2009;114:81–8. PubMed

Peña FJ, Saravia F, García_Herreros M, Núñez_martínez I, Tapia JA, et al. Identification of sperm morphometric subpopulations in two different portions of the boar ejaculate and its relation to post_thaw quality. J Androl. 2005;26:716–23. PubMed

García_Herreros M, Barón FJ, Aparicio IM, Santos AJ, García_Marín LJ, et al. Morphometric changes in boar spermatozoa induced by cryopreservation. Int J Androl. 2008;31:490–8. PubMed

Hidalgo M, Rodríguez I, Dorado JM. The effect of cryopreservation on sperm head morphometry in Florida male goat related to sperm freezability. Anim Reprod Sci. 2001;100:61–72. PubMed

Marco-Jiménez F, Viudes-de-Castro MP, Balasch S, Mocé E, Silvestre MA, et al. Morphometric changes in goat sperm heads induced by cryopreservation. Cryobiology. 2006;52:295–304. PubMed

Arruda RP, Ball BA, Gravance CG, Garcia RP, Liu IK. Effects of extenders and cryoprotectants on stallion sperm head morphometry. Theriogenology. 2002;58:252–6.

Rijsselaere T, Van Soom A, Maes D, Nizanski W. Computer-assisted sperm analysis in dogs and cats: an update after 20 years. Reprod Domest Anim. 2012;47(Suppl 6):204–7. PubMed

Alvarez M, Garcia-Macias V, Martinez-Pastor F, Martinez F, Borragan S, et al. Effects of cryopreservation on head morphometry and its relation with chromatin status in brown bear (Ursus arctos) spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2008;70:1498–506. PubMed

Curry MR, Kleinhans FW, Watson PF. Measurement of the water permeability of the membranes of boar, ram, and rabbit spermatozoa using concentration-dependent self-quenching of an entrapped fluorophore. Cryobiology. 2000;41:167–73. PubMed

Peña AI, Lugilde LL, Barrio M, Herradon PG, Quintela LA. Effects of Equex from different sources on post_thaw survival, long_ evity and intracelular Ca2+concentration of dog spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2003;59:1725–39. PubMed

Thomas C, Garner D, DeJarnette J, Marshall C. Fluorometric assessments of acrosomal integrity and viability in cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 1997;56:991–8. PubMed

Holt WV. Fundamental aspects of sperm cryobiology: the importance of species and individual differences. Theriogenology. 2000;53:47–58. PubMed

Thurston LM, Watson PF, Holt WV. Sperm cryopreservation: a genetic explanation for species and individual variation. Cryo Letters. 2002;23:255–62. PubMed

Soler AJ, García AJ, Fernández-Santos MR, Esteso MC, Garde JJ. Effects of thawing procedure on postthawed in vitro viability and in vivo fertility of red deer epididymal spermatozoa cryopreserved at −196°C. J Androl. 2003;24:746–56. PubMed

Esteso MC, Fernández-Santos MR, Soler AJ, Montoro V, Quintero-Moreno A, et al. The effects of cryopreservation on the morphometric dimensions of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) epididymal sperm heads. Reprod Domest Anim. 2006;41:241–6. PubMed

Druart X. Sperm interaction with the female reproductive tract. Reprod Domest Anim. 2012;4:348–52. PubMed

Mortom KM, Rowe AM, Maxwell WM, Evans G. In vitro and in vivo survival of bisected sheep embryos derived from frozen-thawed unsorted, and frozen-thawed sex-sorted and refrozen thawed ram spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2006;65:1333–45. PubMed

Bedford JM. Significance of the need for sperm capacitation before fertilization in eutherian mammals. Biol Reprod. 1983;28:108–20. PubMed

García-Vázquez FA, Hernández-Caravaca I, Yánez-Quintana W, Matás C, Soriano-Úbeda C, et al. Morphometry of boar sperm head and flagellum in semen backflow after insemination. Theriogenology. 2015;84:566–74. PubMed

Hernández-Caravaca I, Soriano-Úbeda C, Matás C, Izquierdo-Rico MJ, García-Vázquez FA. Boar sperm with defective motility are discriminated in the backflow moments after insemination. Theriogenology. 2015;83:655–61. PubMed

Humphries ST, Evans JP, Simmons LW. Sperm competition: linking form to function. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:319–29. PubMed PMC

Gomendio M, Malo AF, Garde J, Roldan ER. Sperm traits and male fertility in natural populations. Reproduction. 2007;134:19–29. PubMed

Fitzpatrick JL, Garcia-Gonzalez F, Evans JP. Linking sperm length and velocity: the importance of intramale variation. Biol Lett. 2010;6:797–9. PubMed PMC

Martin_Coello J, Dopazo H, Arbiza L, Ausió J, Roldan ER, et al. Sexual selection drives weak positive selection in protamine genes and high promoter divergence, enhancing sperm competitiveness. Proc Biol Sci. 2009;27:2427–36. PubMed PMC

Lüke L, Vicens A, Tourmente M, Roldan ER. Evolution of protamine genes and changes in sperm head phenotype in rodents. Biol Reprod. 2014;90:67. PubMed

Gómez Montoto L, Varea Sánchez M, Tourmente M, Martín-Coello J, Luque-Larena JJ, et al. Sperm competition differentially affects swimming velocity and size of spermatozoa from closely related muroid rodents: head first. Reproduction. 2011;142:819–30. PubMed

Vernocchi V, Morselli MG, Lange Consiglio A, Faustini M, Luvoni GC. DNA fragmentation and sperm head morphometry in cat epididymal spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2014;82:982–7. PubMed

Larson KL, Brannian JD, Singh NP, Burbach JA, Jost LK, et al. Chromatin structure in globozoospermia: a case report. J Androl. 2001;22:424–31. PubMed

Thurston LM, Watson PF, Mileham AJ, Holt WV. Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation. J Androl. 2001;22:382–94. PubMed

Severa L, Machal L, Svabova L, Mamica O. Evaluation of shape variability of stallion sperm heads by means of image analysis and Fourier descriptors. Anim Reprod Sci. 2010;119:50–5. PubMed

Varea Sánchez M, Bastir M, Roldan ER. Geometric morphometrics of rodent sperm head shape. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80607. PubMed PMC

Ghasemian F, Mirroshandel SA, Monji-Azad S, Azarnia M, Zahiri Z. An efficient method for automatic morphological abnormality detection from human sperm images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015;122:409–20. PubMed

Shojaei Saadi HA, van Riemsdijk E, Dance AL, Rajamanickam GD, Kastelic JP, et al. Proteins associated with critical sperm functions and sperm head shape are differentially expressed in morphologically abnormal bovine sperm induced by scrotal insulations. J Proteomics. 2013;82:64–80. PubMed

Blasi T, Hennig H, Summers HD, Theis FJ, Cerveira J, et al. Label-free cell cycle analysis for high-throughput imaging flow cytometry. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10256. PubMed PMC

Characterization of Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) Sperm Based on Morphometric Traits