Impact of daclizumab versus interferon beta-1a on patient-reported outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
28104250
DOI
10.1016/j.msard.2016.11.005
PII: S2211-0348(16)30199-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Daclizumab, Multiple sclerosis, Patient-reported outcomes, Relapsing-remitting,
- MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Daclizumab MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Double-Blind Method MeSH
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures MeSH
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use MeSH
- Immunoglobulin G therapeutic use MeSH
- Immunologic Factors therapeutic use MeSH
- Interferon beta-1a therapeutic use MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting drug therapy MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Daclizumab MeSH
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized MeSH
- Immunoglobulin G MeSH
- Immunologic Factors MeSH
- Interferon beta-1a MeSH
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide information on treatment effects from the patient's perspective that complement outcomes on clinical measures. In DECIDE, daclizumab demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing relapses, 24-week confirmed disability progression, and brain lesions (assessed by magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of daclizumab versus interferon beta-1a on PROs in DECIDE. METHODS: DECIDE was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 study comparing daclizumab 150mg subcutaneous every 4 weeks with interferon beta-1a 30mcg intramuscular once weekly. The 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) and EuroQoL 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) were assessed at baseline and every 24 weeks. Mean changes from baseline were analyzed using analysis of covariance models. Individual items for the MSIS-29 physical (PHYS) and psychological (PSYCH) subscales were analyzed post hoc. RESULTS: Daclizumab treatment resulted in greater mean improvements relative to baseline in MSIS-29 PHYS and PSYCH scores starting at week 24 that persisted over 96 weeks. Mean improvements from baseline in MSIS-29 PHYS and PSYCH scores were significantly greater for daclizumab versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a at week 96. Daclizumab-treated patients showed steady improvements in EQ-5D health utility index and EQ-5D visual analog scale scores over the study period, with significantly greater improvements versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a at week 96 (p=0.0048 and p=0.0006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in patient-reported physical and psychological functioning and general health status with daclizumab compared with intramuscular interferon beta-1a are consistent with outcomes on clinical and brain MRI lesion measures in DECIDE (NCT01064401).
References provided by Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01064401