International comparisons of the associations between objective measures of the built environment and transport-related walking and cycling: IPEN Adult Study
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
R01 CA127296
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 HL067350
NHLBI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
28111613
PubMed Central
PMC5240634
DOI
10.1016/j.jth.2016.02.010
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- IPEN, built environment, cycling, international, transport, walking,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Mounting evidence documents the importance of urban form for active travel, but international studies could strengthen the evidence. The aim of the study was to document the strength, shape, and generalizability of relations of objectively measured built environment variables with transport-related walking and cycling. METHODS: This cross-sectional study maximized variation of environments and demographics by including multiple countries and by selecting adult participants living in neighborhoods based on higher and lower classifications of objectively measured walkability and socioeconomic status. Analyses were conducted on 12,181 adults aged 18-66 years, drawn from 14 cities across 10 countries worldwide. Frequency of transport-related walking and cycling over the last seven days was assessed by questionnaire and four objectively measured built environment variables were calculated. Associations of built environment variables with transport-related walking and cycling variables were estimated using generalized additive mixed models, and were tested for curvilinearity and study site moderation. RESULTS: We found positive associations of walking for transport with all the environmental attributes, but also found that the relationships was only linear for land use mix, but not for residential density, intersection density, and the number of parks. Our findings suggest that there may be optimum values in these attributes, beyond which higher densities or number of parks could have minor or even negative impact. Cycling for transport was associated linearly with residential density, intersection density (only for any cycling), and land use mix, but not with the number of parks. CONCLUSION: Across 14 diverse cities and countries, living in more densely populated areas, having a well-connected street network, more diverse land uses, and having more parks were positively associated with transport-related walking and/or cycling. Except for land-use-mix, all built environment variables had curvilinear relationships with walking, with a plateau in the relationship at higher levels of the scales.
Centre for Design Innovation Swinburne University of Technology Australia
Department of Family Medicine and Public Health University of California San Diego USA
Department of Movement and Sports Sciences Ghent University Belgium
Department of Public Health School of Medicine Universidad de los Andes Bogota Colombia
Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics University of Southern Denmark Denmark
Institute of Active Lifestyle Palacký University Czech Republic
McCaughey VicHealth Community Wellbeing Unit The University of Melbourne Australia
Pontiff Catholic University of Parana Brasil; Federal University of Parana Brasil
School of Nutrition and Health Promotion Arizona State University USA
The Human Potential Centre Auckland University of Technology New Zealand
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Adams M, Frank L, Schipperijn J, Smith G, Chapman J, Christiansen L, Coffee N, Salvo D, du Toit L, Dygryn J, Hino AA, Lai P-c, Mavoa S, Pinzon J, Van de Weghe N, Cerin E, Davey R, Macfarlane D, Owen N, Sallis J. International variation in neighborhood walkability, transit, and recreation environments using geographic information systems: the IPEN adult study. International Journal of Health Geographics. 2014;13:43. PubMed PMC
Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJF, Martin BW. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? The Lancet. 2012;380:258–271. PubMed
Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Horton R, Adams C, Alleyne G, Asaria P, Baugh V, Bekedam H, Billo N, Casswell S, Cecchini M, Colagiuri R, Colagiuri S, Collins T, Ebrahim S, Engelgau M, Galea G, Gaziano T, Geneau R, Haines A, Hospedales J, Jha P, Keeling A, Leeder S, Lincoln P, McKee M, Mackay J, Magnusson R, Moodie R, Mwatsama M, Nishtar S, Norrving B, Patterson D, Piot P, Ralston J, Rani M, Reddy KS, Sassi F, Sheron N, Stuckler D, Suh I, Torode J, Varghese C, Watt J. Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis. The Lancet. 377:1438–1447. PubMed
Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer; 2002.
Cao X, Handy S, Mokhtarian P. The Influences of the Built Environment and Residential Self-Selection on Pedestrian Behavior: Evidence from Austin, TX. Transportation. 2006;33:1–20.
Cerin E, Cain KL, Conway TL, Van Dyck D, Hinckson E, Schipperijn J, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Owen N, Davey RC, Hino AAF, Mitas J, Orzanco-Garralda R, Salvo D, Sarmiento OL, Christiansen LB, MacFarlane DJ, Schofield G, Sallis JF. Neighborhood Environments and Objectively Measured Physical Activity in 11 Countries. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46:2253–2264. PubMed PMC
Cervero R, Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment. 1997;2:199–219.
Cervero R, Sarmiento OL, Jacoby E, Gomez LF, Neiman A. Influences of Built Environments on Walking and Cycling: Lessons from Bogotá. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 2009;3:203–226.
Christchurch City Council. Christchurch Transport Strategic Plan. Christchurch; New Zealand: 2012.
Christiansen LB, Madsen T, Schipperijn J, Ersbøll AK, Troelsen J. Variations in active transport behavior among different neighborhoods and across adult life stages. Journal of Transport & Health. 2014;1:316–325. PubMed PMC
Ding D, Gebel K. Built environment, physical activity, and obesity: what have we learned from reviewing the literature? Health Place. 2012;18:100–105. PubMed
Durand CP, Andalib M, Dunton GF, Wolch J, Pentz MA. A systematic review of built environment factors related to physical activity and obesity risk: implications for smart growth urban planning. Obesity Reviews. 2011;12:e173–e182. PubMed PMC
Eid J, Overman HG, Puga D, Turner MA. Fat city: Questioning the relationship between urban sprawl and obesity. Journal of Urban Economics. 2008;63:385–404.
Ewing R, Cervero R. Travel and the Built Environment. J Am Plann Assoc. 2010;76:265–294.
Forsyth A, Krizek K. Promoting Walking and Bicycling: Assessing the Evidence to Assist Planners. Built Environment. 2010;36
Fox J, Weisberg S. An R Companion to Applied Regression. SAGE Publications; 2011.
Frank LD, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Leary L, Cain K, Conway TL, Hess PM. The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:924–933. PubMed
Gehl J. Cities for people. Island Press; Washington, DC: 2010.
Heinen E, van Wee B, Maat K. Commuting by Bicycle: An Overview of the Literature. Transport Reviews. 2009;30:59–96.
Ivory VC, Russell M, Witten K, Hooper CM, Pearce J, Blakely T. What shape is your neighbourhood? Investigating the micro geographies of physical activity. Soc Sci Med. 2015;133:313–321. PubMed
Kaczynski AT, Henderson KA. Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity: A Review of Evidence about Parks and Recreation. Leisure Sciences. 2007;29:315–354.
Kaczynski AT, Potwarka LR, Saelens BE. Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1451–1456. PubMed PMC
Kennett J, Wall B, Kennett B. Ride : the story of cycling in New Zealand. Kennett Brothers; Wellington [N.Z.]: 2004.
Kerr J, Sallis JF, Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cerin E, Sugiyama T, Reis R, Sarmiento O, Frömel K, Mitáš J, Troelsen J, Christiansen LB, Macfarlane D, Salvo D, Schofield G, Badland H, Guillen-Grima F, Aguinaga-Ontoso I, Davey R, Bauman A, Saelens B, Riddoch C, Ainsworth B, Pratt M, Schmidt T, Frank L, Adams M, Conway T, Cain K, Van Dyck D, Bracy N. Advancing Science and Policy Through a Coordinated International Study of Physical Activity and Built Environments: IPEN Adult Methods. Journal of physical activity & health. 2013;10:581–601. PubMed
Kerr JE, JA, Badland H, Reis R, Sarmiento O, Carlson J, Sallis JF, Cerin E, Cain K, Conway T, Schofield G, Macfarlane DJ, Christiansen LB, Van Dyck D, Davey R, Aguinaga-Ontoso I, Salvo D, Sugiyama T, Owen N, Mitas J, Natarajan L. Perceived Neighborhood Environmental Attributes Associated with Walking and Cycling for Transport among Adult Residents of 17 Cities in 12 Countries: The IPEN Study. Environ Health Perspect 2015. 2015 Jul 17; T - aheadofprint. PubMed PMC
Koohsari MJ, Mavoa S, Villanueva K, Sugiyama T, Badland H, Kaczynski AT, Owen N, Giles-Corti B. Public open space, physical activity, urban design and public health: Concepts, methods and research agenda. Health & Place. 2015;33:75–82. PubMed
Krenn PJ, Oja P, Titze S. Route choices of transport bicyclists: a comparison of actually used and shortest routes. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2014;11 PubMed PMC
Kwan MP. The Uncertain Geographic Context Problem. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2012;102:958–968.
Lee ACK, Maheswaran R. The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. Journal of Public Health. 2011;33:212–222. PubMed
Lee C, Moudon AV. The 3Ds + R: Quantifying land use and urban form correlates of walking. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2006;11:204–215.
McCormack G, Shiell A. In search of causality: a systematic review of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity among adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:125. PubMed PMC
Nielsen TAS, Olafsson AS, Carstensen TA, Skov-Petersen H. Environmental correlates of cycling: Evaluating urban form and location effects based on Danish micro-data. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment. 2013;22:40–44.
Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis JF. Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:67–76. PubMed
R Development Core Team; Computing, t.R.F.f.S. (Ed.), editor R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: 2011.
Saelens B, Handy S. Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:S550–S566. PubMed PMC
Sallis JF, Floyd MF, Rodríguez DA, Saelens BE. Role of Built Environments in Physical Activity, Obesity, and Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation. 2012;125:729–737. PubMed PMC
Salvo D, Reis RS, Sarmiento OL, Pratt M. Overcoming the challenges of conducting physical activity and built environment research in Latin America: IPEN Latin America. Prev Med. 2014a;69(Supplement):S86–S92. PubMed PMC
Salvo D, Reis RS, Stein AD, Rivera J, Martorell R, Pratt M. Characteristics of the Built Environment in Relation to Objectively Measured Physical Activity Among Mexican Adults, 2011. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2014b;11 PubMed PMC
Seattle Department of Transportation. Seattle Bicycle Master Plan. Seattle, US: 2007.
Van Holle V, Deforche B, Van Cauwenberg J, Goubert L, Maes L, Van de Weghe N, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Relationship between the physical environment and different domains of physical activity in European adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:807. PubMed PMC
Warnes GR. Various R programming tools for model fitting, version 2.15.4.1. 2014.
Witten K, Blakely T, Bagheri N, Badland H, Ivory V, Pearce J, Mavoa S, Hinckson E, Schofield G. Neighborhood built environment and transport and leisure physical activity: findings using objective exposure and outcome measures in New Zealand. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:971–977. PubMed PMC
Wood S. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Taylor & Francis; 2006.
Wood S, Scheipl F. Generalized additive mixed models using mgcv and lme4 2014
Kommune Aarhus. Cykelhandlingsplan (Actionplan for Bicycle Use) Aarhus, Denmark: 2007.