Associations between parental perceptions of neighbourhood environments and active travel to school: IPEN Adolescent study

. 2025 May 15 ; 22 (1) : 55. [epub] 20250515

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, pozorovací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid40375328

Grantová podpora
R01 HL111378 NIH HHS - United States
R01 HL083454 NIH HHS - United States
FWO12/ASP/102 Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
306836/2011-4 Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
GA14-26896S Grantová Agentura České Republiky
GA17-24378S Grantová Agentura České Republiky
JG_2023_007 Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci
10111501 Food and Health Bureau
916/12 Israel Science Foundation
FCT UID/DTP/00617/2020 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
SFRH/BPD/105071/2014 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
GV-2013-087 Generalitat Valenciana
100046 Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
FT140100085 Australian Research Council

Odkazy

PubMed 40375328
PubMed Central PMC12079927
DOI 10.1186/s12966-025-01738-3
PII: 10.1186/s12966-025-01738-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: Studies of correlates of active transport to and from school (ATS) focus mainly on children, have a limited conceptualisation of ATS trips, lack heterogeneity in built environments, and rarely consider effect modifiers. This study aimed to estimate associations of parent-perceived neighbourhood environment characteristics with self-reported ATS among adolescents from 14 countries, and whether associations differ by sex, city/region, and distance to school. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional design. Data were from the International Physical activity and Environment Network (IPEN) Adolescent study and included 6302 adolescents (mean age 14.5 ± 1.7 years, 54% girls) and a caretaker from 16 diverse sites. Adolescents self-reported usual travel to and from school by walking and bicycling (days/week) and time it would take to walk. Parents completed the Neighbourhood Environment Walkability Scale for Youth (13 scores computed). Generalised additive mixed models estimated associations of parent neighbourhood perceptions with 1) any active transport to/from school, 2) regular walking (5-10 times/week), 3) regular cycling to/from school, and 4) profiles of ATS generated using latent profile analyses. Interactions were also explored. RESULTS: Overall, 58.7% reported any ATS, 39.9% regularly walked, 7.7% regularly cycled, and four profiles of ATS were identified: walk to and from school; walk from school; cycle to and from school; no ATS. Distance to school was negatively associated with all outcomes, though evidence was weak for regular cycling to/from school. Land use mix - diversity was positively related to all ATS outcomes except those related to cycling. Accessibility and walking facilities were associated with higher odds of any ATS, regular walking to/from school, and the profile walking to and from school. Residential density was negatively related to regular cycling to/from school. Positive associations were observed between traffic safety and any ATS, and between safety from crime, aesthetics, and odds of regular cycling to/from school. Distance to school, adolescent sex, and city moderated several associations. CONCLUSIONS: Parent perceptions of compact, mixed-use development, walking facilities, and both traffic and crime-related safety were important supportive correlates of a range of ATS outcomes among adolescents in high- and low-middle-income countries. Policies that achieve these attributes should be prioritised to support more widespread ATS.

College of Health Solutions Arizona State University Phoenix USA

Department of Architecture Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology Dhaka Bangladesh

Department of Movement and Sports Sciences Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ghent University Ghent Belgium

Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

Department of Teaching of Physical Education Arts and Music AFIPS Research Group University of Valencia Valencia Spain

Epidemiology and Environmental Health Joint Research Unit FISABIO UJI UV Valencia Spain

Graduate School of Public Health Alma Ata University Yogyakarta Indonesia

Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health University of California San Diego San Diego USA

Hudson Institute of Medical Research Monash University Clayton Australia

Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences Deakin University Geelong Australia

Institute of Active Lifestyle Faculty of Physical Culture Palacký University Olomouc Czech Republic

Institute of Physical Education and Sport at P J Šafarik Košice Slovakia

Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Healthporto Porto Portugal

Madras Diabetes Research Foundation Chennai India

Mary Mackillop Institute for Health Research Australian Catholic University Melbourne Australia

People Health and Place Unit Prevention Research Center School of Public Health Washington University in St Louis St Louis USA

Research Centre in Physical Activity Health and Leisure Faculty of Sport University of Porto Porto Portugal

School of Public Health Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences University of Haifa Haifa Israel

School of Public Health the University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China

School of Sport and Recreation Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences Auckland University of Technology Auckland New Zealand

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Biddle SJ, Ciaccioni S, Thomas G, Vergeer I. Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: an updated review of reviews and an analysis of causality. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;42:146–55.

McDonough DJ, Liu W, Gao Z. Effects of physical activity on children’s motor skill development: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8160756. PubMed PMC

Larouche R, Saunders TJ, Faulkner G, Colley R, Tremblay M. Associations between active school transport and physical activity, body composition, and cardiovascular fitness: a systematic review of 68 studies. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11:206–27. PubMed

Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Borghese MM, Carson V, Chaput JP, Janssen I, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41:S197-239. PubMed

Wyszynska J, Ring-Dimitriou S, Thivel D, Weghuber D, Hadjipanayis A, Grossman Z, et al. Physical activity in the prevention of childhood obesity: the position of the european childhood obesity group and the european academy of pediatrics. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:53ss5705. PubMed PMC

Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1.6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4:23–35. PubMed PMC

Prince SA, Lancione S, Lang JJ, Amankwah N, de Groh M, Garcia AJ, Merucci K, Geneau R. Are people who use active modes of transportation more physically active? An overview of reviews across the life course. Transp Rev. 2022;42:645–71.

Schoeppe S, Duncan MJ, Badland H, Oliver M, Curtis C. Associations of children’s independent mobility and active travel with physical activity, sedentary behaviour and weight status: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16:312–9. PubMed

Martin A, Boyle J, Corlett F, Kelly P, Reilly JJ. Contribution of walking to school to individual and population moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2016;28:353–63. PubMed

Campos-Garzon P, Sevil-Serrano J, Garcia-Hermoso A, Chillon P, Barranco-Ruiz Y. Contribution of active commuting to and from school to device-measured physical activity levels in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2023;33:2110–24. PubMed

Mizdrak A, Blakely T, Cleghorn CL, Cobiac LJ. Potential of active transport to improve health, reduce healthcare costs, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions: a modelling study. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0219316. PubMed PMC

Denstel KD, Broyles ST, Larouche R, Sarmiento OL, Barreira TV, Chaput JP, et al. Active school transport and weekday physical activity in 9–11-year-old children from 12 countries. Int J Obes. 2015;5(Suppl 2):S100–6. PubMed PMC

Larouche R, Sarmiento OL, Broyles ST, Denstel KD, Church TS, Barreira TV, et al. Are the correlates of active school transport context-specific? Int J Obes. 2015;5(Suppl 2):S89-99. PubMed PMC

Maulida R, Ikeda E, Oni T, van Sluijs EMF. Descriptive epidemiology of the prevalence of adolescent active travel to school in Asia: a cross-sectional study from 31 countries. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e057082. PubMed PMC

Haug E, Smith ORF, Bucksch J, Brindley C, Pavelka J, Hamrik Z, et al. 12-Year trends in active school transport across four European countries-findings from the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:2118. PubMed PMC

Nordbø ECA, Nordh H, Raanaas RK, Aamodt G. Promoting activity participation and well-being among children and adolescents: a systematic review of neighborhood built-environment determinants. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18:370–458. PubMed

Gálvez-Fernández P, Chillón P, Saucedo-Araujo RG, Faulkner G, Huertas-Delgado FJ, Herrador-Colmenero M. Higher independent mobility to school among adolescents: a secondary analysis using cross-sectional data between 2010 and 2017 in Spanish youth. Acta Paediatr. 2023;112:469–76. PubMed PMC

Prince SA, Lancione S, Lang JJ, Amankwah N, de Groh M, Jaramillo Garcia A, et al. Examining the state, quality and strength of the evidence in the research on built environments and physical activity among children and youth: an overview of reviews from high income countries. Health Place. 2022;76:102828. PubMed

Mandic S, García Bengoechea E, Hopkins D, Coppell K, Spence JC. Adolescents’ perceptions of walking and cycling to school differ based on how far they live from school. J Transp Health. 2022;24:101316.

Barnett A, Akram M, Sit CH, Mellecker R, Carver A, Cerin E. Predictors of healthier and more sustainable school travel mode profiles among Hong Kong adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16:48. PubMed PMC

Pizarro AN, Schipperijn J, Andersen HB, Ribeiro JC, Mota J, Santos MP. Active commuting to school in Portuguese adolescents: Using PALMS to detect trips. J Transp Health. 2016;3:297–304.

Giles-Corti B, Timperio A, Bull F, Pikora T. Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: increased specificity for ecological models. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005;33:175–81. PubMed

Parker KE, Salmon J, Costigan SA, Villanueva K, Brown HL, Timperio A. Activity-related behavior typologies in youth: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16:44. PubMed PMC

Loa P, Hossain S, Mashrur SM, Liu Y, Wang K, Ong F, et al. Exploring the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on modality profiles for non-mandatory trips in the Greater Toronto Area. Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021;110:71–85. PubMed PMC

Cain KL, Salmon J, Conway TL, Cerin E, Hinckson E, Mitas J, et al. International physical activity and built environment study of adolescents: IPEN Adolescent design, protocol and measures. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e046636. PubMed PMC

National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U.S.). Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity. KidsWalk-to-School : a guide to promote walking to school. 2000.

Kerr J, Rosenberg D, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Conway TL. Active commuting to school: associations with environment and parental concerns. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:787–94. PubMed

Rosenberg D, Ding D, Sallis JF, Kerr J, Norman GJ, Durant N, et al. Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale for Youth (NEWS-Y): reliability and relationship with physical activity. Prev Med. 2009;49:213–8. PubMed

Cerin E, Conway TL, Barnett A, Smith M, Veitch J, Cain KL, et al. Development and validation of the neighborhood environment walkability scale for youth across six continents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16:122. PubMed PMC

Muthen B. Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In: Kaplan D, editor. The SAGE handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2004. p. 345–68.

Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO. deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Equation Model. 2007;14:535–69.

Akaike H. A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification. In: Parzen E, Tanabe K, Kitagawa G, editors. Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. New York: Springer New York; 1998. p. 215–22.

Jung T, Wickrama KAS. An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2007;2:302–17.

Wood SN. Generalized Additive Models - An introduction with R. 2 ed. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press; 2017.

Sallis JF, Cerin E, Conway TL, Adams MA, Frank LD, Pratt M, et al. Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2016;387:2207–17. PubMed PMC

R Core Team. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.

Van Buuren S. Flexible Imputation of Missing Data. 2nd Ed. ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018.

Yang L, Sahlqvist S, McMinn A, Griffin SJ, Ogilvie D. Interventions to promote cycling: systematic review. BMJ. 2010;341:c5293. PubMed PMC

Prince SA, Lancione S, Lang JJ, Amankwah N, de Groh M, Jaramillo Garcia A, et al. Examining the state, quality and strength of the evidence in the research on built environments and physical activity among adults: an overview of reviews from high income countries. Health Place. 2022;77:102874. PubMed

Christiansen LB, Cerin E, Badland H, Kerr J, Davey R, Troelsen J, et al. International comparisons of the associations between objective measures of the built environment and transport-related walking and cycling: IPEN Adult Study. J Transp Health. 2016;3:467–78. PubMed PMC

Forsyth A. What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design. Urban Des Int. 2015;20:274–92.

Moran MR, Plaut P, Baron Epel O. Do children walk where they bike? Exploring built environment correlates of children's walking and bicycling. J Transp Land Use. 2015;9:43–65.

Ikeda E, Mavoa S, Cavadino A, Carroll P, Hinckson E, Witten K, et al. Keeping kids safe for active travel to school: a mixed method examination of school policies and practices and children’s school travel behaviour. Travel Behav Soc. 2020;21:57–68. PubMed PMC

Pont K, Ziviani J, Wadley D, Bennett S, Abbott R. Environmental correlates of children’s active transportation: a systematic literature review. Health Place. 2009;15:827–40. PubMed

Panter JR, Jones AP, van Sluijs EMF, Griffin SJ. Attitudes, social support and environmental perceptions as predictors of active commuting behaviour in school children. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64:41–8. PubMed PMC

Trapp GS, Giles-Corti B, Christian HE, Bulsara M, Timperio AF, McCormack GR, et al. On your bike! a cross-sectional study of the individual, social and environmental correlates of cycling to school. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:123. PubMed PMC

Pearson L, Reeder S, Gabbe B, Beck B. What a girl wants: a mixed-methods study of gender differences in the barriers to and enablers of riding a bike in Australia. Transp Res Part F Traff Psychol Behav. 2023;94:453–65.

Aldred R, Elliott B, Woodcock J, Goodman A. Cycling provision separated from motor traffic: a systematic review exploring whether stated preferences vary by gender and age. Transp Rev. 2017;37:29–55. PubMed PMC

Kingsly A, Timperio A, Veitch J, Salmon J, Pradeepa R, Ranjani H, et al. Individual, social and environmental correlates of active school travel among adolescents in India. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:7496. PubMed PMC

McDonald NC. Is there a gender gap in school travel? An examination of US children and adolescents. J Transp Geogr. 2012;20:80–6.

van Sluijs EMF, Ekelund U, Crochemore-Silva I, Guthold R, Ha A, Lubans D, et al. Physical activity behaviours in adolescence: current evidence and opportunities for intervention. The Lancet. 2021;398:429–42. PubMed PMC

Rissel C, Curac N, Greenaway M, Bauman A. Physical activity associated with public transport use–a review and modelling of potential benefits. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9:2454–78. PubMed PMC

Salvo D, Jáuregui A, Adlakha D, Sarmiento OL, Reis RS. When moving is the only option: the role of necessity versus choice for understanding and promoting physical activity in low- and middle-income countries. Annu Rev Pub Health. 2023;44:151–69. PubMed

Gebel K, Bauman AE, Sugiyama T, Owen N. Mismatch between perceived and objectively assessed neighborhood walkability attributes: prospective relationships with walking and weight gain. Health Place. 2011;17:519–24. PubMed

Tristram C, Reimers AK, Renninger D, Beck F, Demetriou Y, Marzi I. Parental perspectives on the decision-makig process on transport mode choice. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1227612. PubMed PMC

Loureiro N, Loureiero V, Grao-Cruces A, Martins J, de Gaspar Matos M. Correlates of active commuting to school among Portuguese adolescents: an ecological model approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:2733. PubMed PMC

World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world. Geneva: WHO; 2018.

Barr S. Personal mobility and climate change. WIREs Clim Change. 2018;9:e542.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...