Molecular characterisation of four echinostomes (Digenea: Echinostomatidae) from birds in New Zealand, with descriptions of Echinostoma novaezealandense n. sp. and Echinoparyphium poulini n. sp

. 2017 May ; 94 (4) : 477-497. [epub] 20170324

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid28341929
Odkazy

PubMed 28341929
DOI 10.1007/s11230-017-9712-x
PII: 10.1007/s11230-017-9712-x
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Morphological and molecular characterisation of echinostome specimens (Digenea: Echinostomatidae) recovered in one Anas platyrhynchos L. and one Cygnus atratus (Latham) (Anseriformes: Anatidae) from New Zealand revealed the presence of two known species, Echinostoma miyagawai Ishii, 1932 and Echinoparyphium ellisi (Johnston & Simpson, 1944) and two species new to science. Comparative morphological and phylogenetic analyses supported the distinct species status of Echinostoma novaezealandense n. sp. ex Branta canadensis (L.), A. platyrhynchos and C. atratus, and Echinoparyphium poulini n. sp. ex C. atratus. Echinostoma novaezealandense n. sp., a species of the "revolutum" species complex characterised by the possession of a head collar armed with 37 spines, keyed down to E. revolutum but was distinguished from the latter in having a much narrower body with almost parallel margins, longer oesophagus, wider cirrus-sac, larger seminal vesicle, much smaller ventral sucker, ovary, Mehlis' gland and testes, more anteriorly located ovary and testes, and distinctly smaller eggs (81-87 × 42-53 vs 106-136 × 55-70 µm). This new species appears similar to Echinostoma acuticauda Nicoll, 1914 described in Australia but differs in having a longer forebody, more posteriorly located ovary and testes, and much smaller eggs (81-87 × 42-53 vs 112-126 × 63-75 µm). Echinoparyphium poulini n. sp. is differentiated from the four species of Echinoparyphium possessing 37 collar spines considered valid as follows: from E. chinensis Ku, Li & Chu, 1964 in having a much smaller body, four (vs five) angle spines and simple seminal vesicle (vs bipartite); from E. schulzi Matevosyan, 1951 in having a less robust body at a comparable body length, much smaller ventral sucker, ovary and testes, and longer but narrower eggs (87-109 × 50-59 vs 70-85 × 60-84 µm); and from the two smaller forms, E. serratum Howell, 1968 and E. aconiatum Dietz, 1909, in a number of additional metrical features correlated with body size and especially in the possession of much larger collar spines. Partial fragments of the mitochondrial nad1 and 28S rRNA genes were amplified for representative isolates of the four species and analysed together with sequences for Echinostoma spp. and Echinoparyphium spp. available on GenBank. Phylogenetic analyses based on the mitochondrial nad1 gene revealed congruence between the molecular data and species identification/delineation based on morphology; this was corroborated by the 28S rDNA sequence data.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 10;97(21):11359-64 PubMed

Parasitology. 1995 Dec;111 ( Pt 5):609-15 PubMed

Syst Biol. 2012 May;61(3):539-42 PubMed

Syst Parasitol. 2000 Feb;45(2):81-108 PubMed

Int J Parasitol. 1998 Mar;28(3):493-502 PubMed

Syst Parasitol. 2000 Jan;45(1):1-15 PubMed

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 May;55(2):611-20 PubMed

Zookeys. 2012;(219):1-10 PubMed

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Aug;79(2):248-55 PubMed

J Parasitol. 1978 Feb;64(1):52-8 PubMed

Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Dec;30(12):2725-9 PubMed

Science. 2001 Dec 14;294(5550):2310-4 PubMed

Parasit Vectors. 2014 Nov 27;7:520 PubMed

Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):696-704 PubMed

Syst Parasitol. 2015 Jan;90(1):1-25 PubMed

Int J Parasitol. 2003 Jul;33(7):733-55 PubMed

Parasitology. 2009 Feb;136(2):241-52 PubMed

Int J Parasitol. 2016 Mar;46(3):171-185 PubMed

Parasitology. 1998 Mar;116 ( Pt 3):289-97 PubMed

Syst Parasitol. 2003 Sep;56(1):1-15 PubMed

Parasitology. 2015 Feb;142(2):406-15 PubMed

Adv Parasitol. 2001;49:163-210 PubMed

Comp Cytogenet. 2015 Jun 03;9(2):257-70 PubMed

Syst Parasitol. 2003 Mar;54(3):159-76 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2012 Dec;98(6):1148-55 PubMed

Parasit Vectors. 2013 Mar 13;6:64 PubMed

Syst Biol. 2010 May;59(3):307-21 PubMed

Nat Methods. 2012 Jul 30;9(8):772 PubMed

Syst Parasitol. 2016 Mar;93(3):295-306 PubMed

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Jul;48(1):369-71 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...