Social media and scientific research are complementary-YouTube and shrikes as a case study

. 2017 Jun ; 104 (5-6) : 48. [epub] 20170524

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid28540595
Odkazy

PubMed 28540595
PubMed Central PMC5443854
DOI 10.1007/s00114-017-1470-8
PII: 10.1007/s00114-017-1470-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Fascination with animals and their behaviour is one the most prominent patterns persisting in all human cultures. During the last decades, however, technological development and public access to the Internet have increased the speed and the extent of information sharing at an unprecedented rate, in some cases even challenging the traditional methods used in science. In order to understand the extent of this influence, we focused on the behaviour of shrikes. Shrikes are an enigmatic group of songbirds with a unique behaviour of impaling prey. We employed an extensive Internet search on YouTube (YT), a very popular and increasingly important source of information worldwide, for videos recording shrikes. Our analyses revealed that the number of shrike videos on YT is strongly positively correlated with classical knowledge on shrikes from books and scientific articles. Our results also suggest that in some cases YT may provide an alternative source of information on shrike ecology and behaviour. YT videos may thus provide new insights into the study of certain species or subjects and help identify gaps in ecological studies, especially in poorly studied species.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Aelian C. De natura animalium. San Antonio: Trinity University Press; 2011.

Arts K, van der Wal R, Adams WM. Digital technology and the conservation of nature. Ambio. 2015;44:661–673. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0705-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Botero CA, Boogert NJ, Vehrencamp SL, Lovette IJ. Climatic patterns predict the elaboration of song displays in mockingbirds. Curr Biol. 2009;19:1151–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.04.061. PubMed DOI PMC

Brown JS. Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: foraging under predation risk. Evol Ecol Res. 1999;1:49–71.

Buffon M (1800) The system of natural history. Vol. 1. Ruthven, pp. 252–253.

Burgess J, Green J. YouTube: online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2013.

Burke SC, Snyder SL. YouTube: an innovative learning resource for college health education courses. Int Electron J Health Educ. 2008;11:39–46.

Caro T, Darwin J, Forrester T, Ledoux-Bloom C, Wells C. Conservation in the Anthropocene. Conserv Biol. 2012;26:185–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01752.x. PubMed DOI

Chapron G. Wildlife in the cloud: a new approach for engaging stakeholders in wildlife management. Ambio. 2015;44:550–556. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0706-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Choi I, Nisbett RE, Norenzayan A. Causal attribution across cultures: variation and universality. Psychol Bull. 1999;125:47–63. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.47. DOI

Clemmons JR, Buchholz R. Behavioral approaches to conservation in the wild. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

Cooper C, Dickinson J, Phillips T, Bonney R. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol Soc. 2007;12:11. doi: 10.5751/ES-02197-120211. DOI

Core Team R. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015.

Daume S. Mining twitter to monitor invasive alien species—an analytical framework and sample information topologies. Ecol Inform. 2016;31:70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.11.014. DOI

Di Minin E, Tenkanen H, Toivonen T. Prospects and challenges for social media data in conservation science. Front Environ Sci. 2015;3:63. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2015.00063. DOI

Dyderski MK, Bieganska A, Krolik K, Rydzinska S, Zychlinska A, Kamieniarz R, Skubis J. Potential of data from the Internet search engine to analyze of biological invasion intensity on the example of Procyon lotor. Sylwan. 2016;160:822–828.

Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Miroslav D, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, Overton JMC, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson K, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberón J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. 2006;29:129–151. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x. DOI

ESRI (2012) ArcGIS Desktop: release 10.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands

Galán-Díaz C, Edwards P, Nelson JD, van der Wal R. Digital innovation through partnership between nature conservation organisations and academia: a qualitative impact assessment. Ambio. 2015;44:538–549. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0704-2. PubMed DOI PMC

Garg N, Venkatraman A, Pandey A, Kumar N. YouTube as a source of information on dialysis: a content analysis. Nephrology. 2015;20:315–320. doi: 10.1111/nep.12397. PubMed DOI

Glowinski SL. Bird-watching, ecotourism, and economic development: a review of the evidence. Appl Res Econ Dev. 2008;5:65–77.

Graham CH, Ferrierc S, Huettmand F, Moritzb C, Petersone AT. New developments in museum based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004;19:497–503. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.006. PubMed DOI

Harris T, Franklin K. Shrikes and bush-shrikes: including wood-shrikes, helmet-shrikes, flycatcher-shrikes, philentomas, batises and wattle-eyes. London: A&C Black Publisher Ltd; 2000.

Houlihan PF. The birds of ancient Egypt. Warminster: Aris & Phillips; 1986.

Karakoyun F, Yapici IÜ. Use of digital storytelling in biology teaching. UnivJ Educ Res. 2016;4:895–903.

Knight E, Intzandt B, MacDougall A, Saunders TJ. Information seeking in social media: a review of YouTube for sedentary behavior content. Interact J Med Res. 2015;4:e3. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3835. PubMed DOI PMC

Konstantinidis S, Fernandez-Luque L, Bamidis P, Karlsen R. The role of taxonomies in social media and the semantic web for health education. Method Inform Med. 2013;52:168–179. doi: 10.3414/ME12-02-0005. PubMed DOI

Krebs JR, Davies NB. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

Lawrence EA. Human perceptions of animals and animal awareness: the cultural dimension. In: Fox MW, Mickley L, editors. Advances in animal welfare science 1985. Netherlands: Springer; 1986. pp. 285–295.

Leighton GR, Hugo PS, Roulin A, Amar A. Just Google it: assessing the use of Google images to describe geographical variation in visible traits of organisms. Methods Ecol Evol. 2016;7:1060–1070. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12562. DOI

Lorenz K, von Saint Paul U. Die entwicklung des Spiessens und Klemmens bei den drei Wurgerarten Lanius collurio, L. senator und L. excubitor. J Ornithol. 1968;109:137–156. doi: 10.1007/BF01671344. DOI

Mak KK, Lai CM, Watanabe H, Kim DI, Bahar N, Ramos M, Young KS, Ho RC, Aum NR, Cheng C. Epidemiology of Internet behaviors and addiction among adolescents in six Asian countries. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17:720–728. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0139. PubMed DOI

Manfredo MJ. Who cares about wildlife? New York: Springer-Verlag; 2008.

Marini S, de Faucamberge É, Katab MN. Discover of a rock art site in Cyrenaica (Libya): Kaf Tahr. l’Anthropologie. 2010;114:275–287. doi: 10.1016/j.anthro.2010.03.005. DOI

Mayer RE. Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001.

Mikula P, Tryjanowski P. Internet searching of bird–bird associations: a case of bee-eaters hitchhiking large African birds. Biodivers Obs. 2016;7(80):1–6.

Mikula P, Morelli F, Lučan RK, Jones DN, Tryjanowski P. Bats as prey of diurnal birds: a global perspective. Mammal Rev. 2016;46:160–174. doi: 10.1111/mam.12060. DOI

Morelli F, Bussière R, Goławski A, Goławski A, Tryjanowski P, Yosef R. Saving the best for last: differential usage of impaled prey by red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) during the breeding season. Behav Process. 2015;119:6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.07.006. PubMed DOI

Mori E, Menchetti M, Tella JL, Jackson HA, Reino L, Kleunen AV, Figueira R, Ancillotto L. Worldwide distribution of non-native Amazon parrots and temporal trends of their global trade. Anim Biodivers Conserv. 2017;40(1):49–62.

Morris MW, Peng K. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67:949–971. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.949. DOI

Nagpal SJ, Karimianpour A, Mukhija D, Mohan D, Brateanu A. YouTube videos as a source of medical information during the Ebola hemorrhagic fever epidemic. SpringerPlus. 2015;4:1. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-4-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Newman G, Wiggins A, Crall A, Graham E, Newman S, Crowston K. The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Front Ecol Environ. 2012;10:298–304. doi: 10.1890/110294. DOI

Pande S, Pande SA. Fauna and deities. Pune: ELA Foundation and Maharashtra Forestry Department; 2016.

Panov EN. The true shrikes (Laniidae) of the world: ecology, behavior and evolution. Sofia: Pensoft; 2011.

Pereira JLB, Batalini F, Kubben PL, de Albuquerque LAF, Andrada B, Magalhães P, de Carvalho GTC, Figueiredo EG. Neurosurgical videos on YouTube. Arq Bras Neurocir. 2016;35:013–017. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1564419. DOI

Reddy CS, Yosef R. Living on the edge: attitudes of rural communities towards Bengal tigers (Panthera tigris) in Central India. Anthrozoös. 2016;29:311–322. doi: 10.1080/08927936.2016.1152763. DOI

Russell N, During BS. Worthy is the lamb: a double burial at Neolithic Çatalhöyük (Turkey) Paléorient. 2006;32:73–84. doi: 10.3406/paleo.2006.5171. DOI

Saito K, Nakamura K, Ueta M, Kurosawa R, Fujiwara A, Kobayashi HH, Nakayama M, Toko A, Nagahama K. Utilizing the Cyberforest live sound system with social media to remotely conduct woodland bird censuses in Central Japan. Ambio. 2015;44:572–583. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0708-y. PubMed DOI PMC

Satyaprakasha CV, Sudhanshu Y. Effect of multimedia teaching on achievement in biology. IJREP. 2014;3:41–45. doi: 10.14810/ijrap.2014.3203. DOI

Silvertown J. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24:467–471. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017. PubMed DOI

Sodhi NS, Liow LH. Improving conservation biology research in Southeast Asia. Conserv Biol. 2000;14:1211–1212. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99416.x. DOI

Stephens DW. Decision ecology: foraging and the ecology of animal decision making. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008;8:475–484. doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.4.475. PubMed DOI

Valcanis T (2011) An iPhone in every hand: media ecology, communication structures, and the global village. et cetera 68:33

Valenzuela D, Santoro CM, Capriles JM. Consumption of animals beyond diet in the Atacama Desert, northern Chile (13,000–410BP): comparing rock art motifs and archaeofaunal records. J Anthropol Archaeol. 2015;40:250–265. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2015.09.004. DOI

van der Wal R, Arts K. Digital conservation: an introduction. Ambio. 2015;44:517–521. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0701-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Visser V, Langdon B, Pauchard A, Richardson DM. Unlocking the potential of Google Earth as a tool in invasion science. Biol Invasions. 2014;16:513–534. doi: 10.1007/s10530-013-0604-y. DOI

Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2009.

Wilson EO. Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1989.

Yosef R, McPherson LE. Taxon-specific prey handling by the loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) Acta Ethol. 2016;19:147–150. doi: 10.1007/s10211-016-0234-3. DOI

Yosef R, Pinshow B. Impaling in true shrikes (Laniidae): a behavioral and ontogenetic perspective. Behav Process. 2005;69:363–367. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.02.023. PubMed DOI

Zárybnická M, Sklenicka P, Tryjanowski P. A webcast of bird nesting as a state-of-the-art citizen science. PLoS Biol. 2017;15:e2001132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001132. PubMed DOI PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...