Social media and scientific research are complementary-YouTube and shrikes as a case study
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
28540595
PubMed Central
PMC5443854
DOI
10.1007/s00114-017-1470-8
PII: 10.1007/s00114-017-1470-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Behaviour, Citizen science limits, Shrikes, Social media,
- MeSH
- audiovizuální záznam statistika a číselné údaje trendy MeSH
- chování zvířat fyziologie MeSH
- internet * MeSH
- Passeriformes fyziologie MeSH
- sociální média normy trendy MeSH
- výzkum normy trendy MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Fascination with animals and their behaviour is one the most prominent patterns persisting in all human cultures. During the last decades, however, technological development and public access to the Internet have increased the speed and the extent of information sharing at an unprecedented rate, in some cases even challenging the traditional methods used in science. In order to understand the extent of this influence, we focused on the behaviour of shrikes. Shrikes are an enigmatic group of songbirds with a unique behaviour of impaling prey. We employed an extensive Internet search on YouTube (YT), a very popular and increasingly important source of information worldwide, for videos recording shrikes. Our analyses revealed that the number of shrike videos on YT is strongly positively correlated with classical knowledge on shrikes from books and scientific articles. Our results also suggest that in some cases YT may provide an alternative source of information on shrike ecology and behaviour. YT videos may thus provide new insights into the study of certain species or subjects and help identify gaps in ecological studies, especially in poorly studied species.
Ben Gurion University of the Negev Eilat Campus P O Box 272 88000 Eilat Israel
Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Viničná 7 128 43 Praha Czech Republic
Institute of Zoology Poznań University of Life Sciences Wojska Polskiego 71C 60 625 Poznań Poland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Aelian C. De natura animalium. San Antonio: Trinity University Press; 2011.
Arts K, van der Wal R, Adams WM. Digital technology and the conservation of nature. Ambio. 2015;44:661–673. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0705-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Botero CA, Boogert NJ, Vehrencamp SL, Lovette IJ. Climatic patterns predict the elaboration of song displays in mockingbirds. Curr Biol. 2009;19:1151–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.04.061. PubMed DOI PMC
Brown JS. Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: foraging under predation risk. Evol Ecol Res. 1999;1:49–71.
Buffon M (1800) The system of natural history. Vol. 1. Ruthven, pp. 252–253.
Burgess J, Green J. YouTube: online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2013.
Burke SC, Snyder SL. YouTube: an innovative learning resource for college health education courses. Int Electron J Health Educ. 2008;11:39–46.
Caro T, Darwin J, Forrester T, Ledoux-Bloom C, Wells C. Conservation in the Anthropocene. Conserv Biol. 2012;26:185–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01752.x. PubMed DOI
Chapron G. Wildlife in the cloud: a new approach for engaging stakeholders in wildlife management. Ambio. 2015;44:550–556. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0706-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Choi I, Nisbett RE, Norenzayan A. Causal attribution across cultures: variation and universality. Psychol Bull. 1999;125:47–63. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.47. DOI
Clemmons JR, Buchholz R. Behavioral approaches to conservation in the wild. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
Cooper C, Dickinson J, Phillips T, Bonney R. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol Soc. 2007;12:11. doi: 10.5751/ES-02197-120211. DOI
Core Team R. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015.
Daume S. Mining twitter to monitor invasive alien species—an analytical framework and sample information topologies. Ecol Inform. 2016;31:70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.11.014. DOI
Di Minin E, Tenkanen H, Toivonen T. Prospects and challenges for social media data in conservation science. Front Environ Sci. 2015;3:63. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2015.00063. DOI
Dyderski MK, Bieganska A, Krolik K, Rydzinska S, Zychlinska A, Kamieniarz R, Skubis J. Potential of data from the Internet search engine to analyze of biological invasion intensity on the example of Procyon lotor. Sylwan. 2016;160:822–828.
Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Miroslav D, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, Overton JMC, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson K, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberón J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. 2006;29:129–151. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x. DOI
ESRI (2012) ArcGIS Desktop: release 10.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands
Galán-Díaz C, Edwards P, Nelson JD, van der Wal R. Digital innovation through partnership between nature conservation organisations and academia: a qualitative impact assessment. Ambio. 2015;44:538–549. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0704-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Garg N, Venkatraman A, Pandey A, Kumar N. YouTube as a source of information on dialysis: a content analysis. Nephrology. 2015;20:315–320. doi: 10.1111/nep.12397. PubMed DOI
Glowinski SL. Bird-watching, ecotourism, and economic development: a review of the evidence. Appl Res Econ Dev. 2008;5:65–77.
Graham CH, Ferrierc S, Huettmand F, Moritzb C, Petersone AT. New developments in museum based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004;19:497–503. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.006. PubMed DOI
Harris T, Franklin K. Shrikes and bush-shrikes: including wood-shrikes, helmet-shrikes, flycatcher-shrikes, philentomas, batises and wattle-eyes. London: A&C Black Publisher Ltd; 2000.
Houlihan PF. The birds of ancient Egypt. Warminster: Aris & Phillips; 1986.
Karakoyun F, Yapici IÜ. Use of digital storytelling in biology teaching. UnivJ Educ Res. 2016;4:895–903.
Knight E, Intzandt B, MacDougall A, Saunders TJ. Information seeking in social media: a review of YouTube for sedentary behavior content. Interact J Med Res. 2015;4:e3. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3835. PubMed DOI PMC
Konstantinidis S, Fernandez-Luque L, Bamidis P, Karlsen R. The role of taxonomies in social media and the semantic web for health education. Method Inform Med. 2013;52:168–179. doi: 10.3414/ME12-02-0005. PubMed DOI
Krebs JR, Davies NB. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
Lawrence EA. Human perceptions of animals and animal awareness: the cultural dimension. In: Fox MW, Mickley L, editors. Advances in animal welfare science 1985. Netherlands: Springer; 1986. pp. 285–295.
Leighton GR, Hugo PS, Roulin A, Amar A. Just Google it: assessing the use of Google images to describe geographical variation in visible traits of organisms. Methods Ecol Evol. 2016;7:1060–1070. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12562. DOI
Lorenz K, von Saint Paul U. Die entwicklung des Spiessens und Klemmens bei den drei Wurgerarten Lanius collurio, L. senator und L. excubitor. J Ornithol. 1968;109:137–156. doi: 10.1007/BF01671344. DOI
Mak KK, Lai CM, Watanabe H, Kim DI, Bahar N, Ramos M, Young KS, Ho RC, Aum NR, Cheng C. Epidemiology of Internet behaviors and addiction among adolescents in six Asian countries. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17:720–728. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0139. PubMed DOI
Manfredo MJ. Who cares about wildlife? New York: Springer-Verlag; 2008.
Marini S, de Faucamberge É, Katab MN. Discover of a rock art site in Cyrenaica (Libya): Kaf Tahr. l’Anthropologie. 2010;114:275–287. doi: 10.1016/j.anthro.2010.03.005. DOI
Mayer RE. Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
Mikula P, Tryjanowski P. Internet searching of bird–bird associations: a case of bee-eaters hitchhiking large African birds. Biodivers Obs. 2016;7(80):1–6.
Mikula P, Morelli F, Lučan RK, Jones DN, Tryjanowski P. Bats as prey of diurnal birds: a global perspective. Mammal Rev. 2016;46:160–174. doi: 10.1111/mam.12060. DOI
Morelli F, Bussière R, Goławski A, Goławski A, Tryjanowski P, Yosef R. Saving the best for last: differential usage of impaled prey by red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) during the breeding season. Behav Process. 2015;119:6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.07.006. PubMed DOI
Mori E, Menchetti M, Tella JL, Jackson HA, Reino L, Kleunen AV, Figueira R, Ancillotto L. Worldwide distribution of non-native Amazon parrots and temporal trends of their global trade. Anim Biodivers Conserv. 2017;40(1):49–62.
Morris MW, Peng K. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67:949–971. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.949. DOI
Nagpal SJ, Karimianpour A, Mukhija D, Mohan D, Brateanu A. YouTube videos as a source of medical information during the Ebola hemorrhagic fever epidemic. SpringerPlus. 2015;4:1. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-4-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Newman G, Wiggins A, Crall A, Graham E, Newman S, Crowston K. The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Front Ecol Environ. 2012;10:298–304. doi: 10.1890/110294. DOI
Pande S, Pande SA. Fauna and deities. Pune: ELA Foundation and Maharashtra Forestry Department; 2016.
Panov EN. The true shrikes (Laniidae) of the world: ecology, behavior and evolution. Sofia: Pensoft; 2011.
Pereira JLB, Batalini F, Kubben PL, de Albuquerque LAF, Andrada B, Magalhães P, de Carvalho GTC, Figueiredo EG. Neurosurgical videos on YouTube. Arq Bras Neurocir. 2016;35:013–017. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1564419. DOI
Reddy CS, Yosef R. Living on the edge: attitudes of rural communities towards Bengal tigers (Panthera tigris) in Central India. Anthrozoös. 2016;29:311–322. doi: 10.1080/08927936.2016.1152763. DOI
Russell N, During BS. Worthy is the lamb: a double burial at Neolithic Çatalhöyük (Turkey) Paléorient. 2006;32:73–84. doi: 10.3406/paleo.2006.5171. DOI
Saito K, Nakamura K, Ueta M, Kurosawa R, Fujiwara A, Kobayashi HH, Nakayama M, Toko A, Nagahama K. Utilizing the Cyberforest live sound system with social media to remotely conduct woodland bird censuses in Central Japan. Ambio. 2015;44:572–583. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0708-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Satyaprakasha CV, Sudhanshu Y. Effect of multimedia teaching on achievement in biology. IJREP. 2014;3:41–45. doi: 10.14810/ijrap.2014.3203. DOI
Silvertown J. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24:467–471. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017. PubMed DOI
Sodhi NS, Liow LH. Improving conservation biology research in Southeast Asia. Conserv Biol. 2000;14:1211–1212. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99416.x. DOI
Stephens DW. Decision ecology: foraging and the ecology of animal decision making. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008;8:475–484. doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.4.475. PubMed DOI
Valcanis T (2011) An iPhone in every hand: media ecology, communication structures, and the global village. et cetera 68:33
Valenzuela D, Santoro CM, Capriles JM. Consumption of animals beyond diet in the Atacama Desert, northern Chile (13,000–410BP): comparing rock art motifs and archaeofaunal records. J Anthropol Archaeol. 2015;40:250–265. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2015.09.004. DOI
van der Wal R, Arts K. Digital conservation: an introduction. Ambio. 2015;44:517–521. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0701-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Visser V, Langdon B, Pauchard A, Richardson DM. Unlocking the potential of Google Earth as a tool in invasion science. Biol Invasions. 2014;16:513–534. doi: 10.1007/s10530-013-0604-y. DOI
Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2009.
Wilson EO. Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1989.
Yosef R, McPherson LE. Taxon-specific prey handling by the loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) Acta Ethol. 2016;19:147–150. doi: 10.1007/s10211-016-0234-3. DOI
Yosef R, Pinshow B. Impaling in true shrikes (Laniidae): a behavioral and ontogenetic perspective. Behav Process. 2005;69:363–367. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.02.023. PubMed DOI
Zárybnická M, Sklenicka P, Tryjanowski P. A webcast of bird nesting as a state-of-the-art citizen science. PLoS Biol. 2017;15:e2001132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001132. PubMed DOI PMC
Leveraging social media and other online data to study animal behavior
Number of syllables in cuckoo Cuculus canorus calls: A test using a citizen science project