PURPOSE: The pupil light reflex is considered to be a simple subcortical reflex. However, many studies have proven that patients with isolated occipital lesions with homonymous hemianopia show pupillary hemihypokinesia. Our hypothesis is that the afferent pupillary system consists of two pathways: one via intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), the other running through the normal RGCs via the visual cortex. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis of these two separate pupillomotor pathways. METHODS: 12 patients (59.1 ± 18.8 years) with homonymous hemianopia due to post-geniculate lesions of the visual pathway and 20 normal controls (58.6 ± 12.9 years) were examined using chromatic pupillography: stimulus intensity was 28 lx corneal illumination, stimulus duration was 4.0 s, and the stimulus wavelengths were 420 ± 20 nm (blue) and 605 ± 20 nm (red), respectively. The examined parameters were baseline pupil diameter, latency, and relative amplitudes (absolute amplitudes compared to baseline), measured at maximal constriction, at 3 s after stimulus onset, at stimulus offset, and at 3 s and 7 s after stimulus offset. RESULTS: The relative amplitudes for the red stimulus were significantly smaller for hemianopia patients compared to the normal controls [maximal constriction: 35.6 ± 5.9% (hemianopia) to 42.3 ± 5.7% (normal); p = 0.004; 3 s after stimulus onset: p = 0.004; stimulus offset: p = 0.001]. No significant differences in any parameter were found between the two groups using the blue stimulus. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the hypothesis that the ipRGC pathway is mainly subcortical, whereas a second, non-ipRGC pathway via the occipital cortex exists.

Department of Optometry and Orthoptics Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Orthoptics and Visual Sciences Faculty of Medical Technology Niigata University of Health and Welfare Niigata Japan

Institute for Ophthalmic Research University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany

Pupil Research Group Centre for Ophthalmology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Nature. 2005 Feb 17;433(7027):749-54 PubMed

Exp Brain Res. 1998 Oct;122(4):475-80 PubMed

Science. 2002 Feb 8;295(5557):1065-70 PubMed

Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;56(2):181-6 PubMed

Vision Res. 2010 Jan;50(1):72-87 PubMed

Arch Ophthalmol. 1981 Sep;99(9):1654 PubMed

Vis Neurosci. 1989 Aug;3(2):139-53 PubMed

Nature. 2002 Jan 31;415(6871):493 PubMed

Science. 2003 Jan 10;299(5604):245-7 PubMed

J Comp Neurol. 2006 Jul 20;497(3):326-49 PubMed

Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1979 Jan 15;209(3):199-208 PubMed

Vis Neurosci. 1993 May-Jun;10(3):563-83 PubMed

Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1985;29(1):63-70 PubMed

J Neuroophthalmol. 1999 Jun;19(2):89-99 PubMed

Brain. 2009 Mar;132(Pt 3):628-34 PubMed

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;254(4):745-56 PubMed

Ophthalmology. 2009 Aug;116(8):1564-73 PubMed

Vision Res. 2007 Mar;47(7):946-54 PubMed

Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;56(5):502-10 PubMed

Eur J Neurol. 2005 Aug;12(8):602-8 PubMed

Science. 2002 Feb 8;295(5557):1070-3 PubMed

Neurology. 2008 Mar 18;70(12):956-63 PubMed

Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 May;91(3):e237-8 PubMed

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;247(7):947-53 PubMed

Science. 2002 Dec 13;298(5601):2213-6 PubMed

Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1992 Oct;3(5):565-70 PubMed

Brain. 2002 Oct;125(Pt 10):2296-307 PubMed

Nat Neurosci. 2001 Dec;4(12):1165 PubMed

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd Augenarztl Fortbild. 1951;118(2):133-47 PubMed

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1978 May;172(5):731-5 PubMed

Arch Ophthalmol. 1975 Dec;93(12):1322-7 PubMed

Brain. 2012 Feb;135(Pt 2):534-41 PubMed

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jan 21;52(1):382-8 PubMed