Validation of the mIBG skeletal SIOPEN scoring method in two independent high-risk neuroblastoma populations: the SIOPEN/HR-NBL1 and COG-A3973 trials
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články, validační studie
Grantová podpora
8177
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
U10 CA180899
NCI NIH HHS - United States
QLRI-CT_2002-01768
EC Grant
PubMed
28940046
PubMed Central
PMC5747549
DOI
10.1007/s00259-017-3829-7
PII: 10.1007/s00259-017-3829-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- High-risk neuroblastoma, MIBG, SIOPEN score,
- MeSH
- 3-jodobenzylguanidin metabolismus MeSH
- biologický transport MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- neuroblastom diagnóza metabolismus MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- riziko MeSH
- společnosti lékařské * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- 3-jodobenzylguanidin MeSH
BACKGROUND: Validation of the prognostic value of the SIOPEN mIBG skeletal scoring system in two independent stage 4, mIBG avid, high-risk neuroblastoma populations. RESULTS: The semi-quantitative SIOPEN score evaluates skeletal meta-iodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) uptake on a 0-6 scale in 12 anatomical regions. Evaluable mIBG scans from 216 COG-A3973 and 341 SIOPEN/HR-NBL1 trial patients were reviewed pre- and post-induction chemotherapy. The prognostic value of skeletal scores for 5-year event free survival (5 yr.-EFS) was tested in the source and validation cohorts. At diagnosis, both cohorts showed a gradual non-linear increase in risk with cumulative scores. Several approaches were explored to test the relationship between score and EFS. Ultimately, a cutoff score of ≤3 was the most useful predictor across trials. A SIOPEN score ≤ 3 pre-induction was found in 15% SIOPEN patients and in 22% of COG patients and increased post-induction to 60% in SIOPEN patients and to 73% in COG patients. Baseline 5 yr.-EFS rates in the SIOPEN/HR-NBL1 cohort for scores ≤3 were 47% ± 7% versus 26% ± 3% for higher scores at diagnosis (p < 0.007) and 36% ± 4% versus 14% ± 4% (p < 0.001) for scores obtained post-induction. The COG-A3973 showed 5 yr.-EFS rates for scores ≤3 of 51% ± 7% versus 34% ± 4% for higher scores (p < 0.001) at diagnosis and 43% ± 5% versus 16% ± 6% (p = 0.004) for post-induction scores. Hazard ratios (HR) significantly favoured patients with scores ≤3 after adjustment for age and MYCN-amplification. Optimal outcomes were recorded in patients who achieved complete skeletal response. CONCLUSIONS: Validation in two independent cohorts confirms the prognostic value of the SIOPEN skeletal score. In particular, patients with an absolute SIOPEN score > 3 after induction have very poor outcomes and should be considered for alternative therapeutic strategies.
Children's Cancer Research Institute Zimmermannplatz 10 1090 Vienna Austria
Children's Memorial Health Institute Warsaw Poland
Children's Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center University of Florida Gainesville FL USA
Department of Diagnostic Imaging St Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis TN USA
Department of Nuclear Medicine Lille Oscar Lambret Center Lille France
Department of Pediatrics Duke University Medical Center Durham NC USA
Department of Radiology BC Children's Hospital Vancouver BC Canada
Department of Radiology Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati OH USA
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Institute of Radiology Clinique de La Source Lausanne Switzerland
Medical University Department of Paediatrics Vienna Austria
Motol University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Nuclear Medicine Division Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy
Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology Gustave Roussy Institute Université Paris Sud Villejuif France
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Ghent University Ghent Belgium
Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel Petah Tikva Israel
Zobrazit více v PubMed
London WB, Castleberry RP, Matthay KK, Look AT, Seeger RC, Shimada H, et al. Evidence for an age cutoff greater than 365 days for neuroblastoma risk group stratification in the Children's oncology group. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6459–65. PubMed
Moroz V, Machin D, Faldum A, Hero B, Iehara T, Mosseri V, et al. Changes over three decades in outcome and the prognostic influence of age-at-diagnosis in young patients with neuroblastoma: a report from the international neuroblastoma risk group project. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:561–71. PubMed
Seeger RC, Brodeur GM, Sather H, Dalton A, Siegel SE, Wong KY, et al. Association of multiple copies of the N-myc oncogene with rapid progression of neuroblastomas. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:1111–6. PubMed
Shimada H, Stram DO, Chatten J, Joshi VV, Hachitanda Y, Brodeur GM, et al. Identification of subsets of neuroblastomas by combined histopathologic and N-myc analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:1470–6. PubMed
Simon T, Hero B, Faldum A, Handgretinger R, Schrappe M, Klingebiel T, et al. Long term outcome of high-risk neuroblastoma patients after immunotherapy with antibody ch14.18 Or oral metronomic chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:21. PubMed PMC
Valteau-Couanet D, Le Deley MC, Bergeron C, Ducassou S, Michon J, Rubie H, et al. Long-term results of the combination of the N7 induction chemotherapy and the busulfan-melphalan high dose chemotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61:977–81. PubMed
Matthay KK, Reynolds CP, Seeger RC, Shimada H, Adkins ES, Haas-Kogan D, et al. Long-term results for children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated on a randomized trial of myeloablative therapy followed by 13-cis-retinoic acid: a children's oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1007–13. PubMed PMC
Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, Carlsen NL, Castel V, Castelberry RP, et al. Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(8):1466–77. PubMed
Monclair T, Brodeur GM, Ambros PF, Brisse HJ, Cecchetto G, Holmes K, et al. The international neuroblastoma risk group (INRG) staging system: an INRG task force report. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:298–303. PubMed PMC
Matthay KK, Shulkin B, Ladenstein R, Michon J, Giammarile F, Lewington V, et al. Criteria for evaluation of disease extent by (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scans in neuroblastoma: a report for the international neuroblastoma risk group (INRG) task force. Br J Cancer. 2010;102:1319–26. PubMed PMC
Ladenstein R, Valteau-Couanet D, Brock P, Yaniv I, Castel V, Laureys G, et al. Randomized trial of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during rapid COJEC induction in pediatric patients with high-risk neuroblastoma: the European HR-NBL1/ SIOPEN study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3516–24. PubMed
Ladenstein R, Pötschger U, Pearson ADJ, Brock P, Luksch R, Castel V, et al. Busulfan and melphalan versus carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan as high-dose chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN): an international, randomised, multi-arm, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:500–14. PubMed
Lewington V, Lambert B, Poetschger U, Sever ZB, Giammarile F, McEwan AJB, et al. 123I-mIBG scintigraphy in neuroblastoma: development of a SIOPEN semi-quantitative reporting, method by an international panel. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:234–41. PubMed PMC
Kreissman SG, Seeger RC, Matthay KK, London WB, Sposto R, Grupp SA, et al. Purged versus non-purged peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation for high-risk neuroblastoma (COG A3973): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:999–1008. PubMed PMC
Garaventa A, Luksch R, Biasotti S, Severi G, Pizzitola MR, Viscardi E, et al. A phase II study of topotecan with vincristine and doxorubicin in children with recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma. Cancer. 2003;98:2488–94. PubMed
Ladenstein R, Weixler S, Baykan B, Bleeke M, Kunert R, Katinger D, et al. Ch14.18 Antibody produced in CHO cells in relapsed or refractory stage 4 neuroblastoma patients: a SIOPEN phase 1 study. MAbs. 2013;5:801–9. PubMed PMC
Yu AL, Gilman AL, Ozkaynak MF, London WB, Kreissman SG, Chen HX, et al. Anti-GD2 antibody with GM-CSF, interleukin-2, and isotretinoin for neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1324–34. PubMed PMC
Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53(282):457–81.
Marubini E, Valsecchi MG. Analysing survival data from clinical trials and observational studies. New York: Wiley; 2004.
Heinzl H, Kaider A. Gaining more flexibility in cox proportional hazards regression models with cubic spline functions. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 1997;54:201–8. PubMed
Heagerty PJ, Zheng Y. Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves. Biometrics. 2005;61:92–105. PubMed
Heagerty PJ, Lumley T, Pepe MS. Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. Biometrics. 2000;56:337–44. PubMed
YOUDEN WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950:32–5. PubMed
Yanik GA, Parisi MT, Shulkin BL, Naranjo A, Kreissman SG, London WB, et al. Semiquantitative mIBG scoring as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma: a report from the Children's oncology group. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:541–8. PubMed PMC
Heagerty PJ. and packaging by PS-C. survivalROC: Time-dependent ROC curve estimation from censored survival data. 2013. R package version 1.0.3. 2013
Decarolis B, Schneider C, Hero B, Simon T, Volland R, Roels F, et al. Iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy scoring allows prediction of outcome in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma: results of the cologne interscore comparison study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:944–51. PubMed
Yanik GA, Parisi MT, Naranjo A, Nadel H, Gelfand MJ, Park JR, et al. Validation of post-induction Curie scores in high risk neuroblas-toma. A Children's Oncology Group (COG) and SIOPEN group report on SIOPEN/HR-NBL1. J Nucl Med. 2017 https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.195883. PubMed DOI PMC
Hartmann O, Valteau-Couanet D, Vassal G, Lapierre V, Brugières L, Delgado R, et al. Prognostic factors in metastatic neuroblastoma in patients over 1 year of age treated with high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation: a multivariate analysis in 218 patients treated in a single institution. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999;23:789–95. PubMed
Kushner BH, Kramer K, LaQuaglia MP, Modak S, Yataghene K, Cheung NKV. Reduction from seven to five cycles of intensive induction chemotherapy in children with high-risk neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4888–92. PubMed
Park JR, Kreissman SG, London WB, Naranjo A, Cohn SL, Hogarty MD, et al. A phase III randomized clinical trial (RCT) of tandem myeloablative autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) using peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) as consolidation therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB): A Children's Oncology Group (COG) study. J Clin Oncol Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2016;34(suppl; abstr LBA3):LBA3–LBA3.
Ladenstein R, Philip T, Lasset C, Hartmann O, Garaventa A, Pinkerton R, et al. Multivariate analysis of risk factors in stage 4 neuroblastoma patients over the age of one year treated with megatherapy and stem-cell transplantation: a report from the European bone marrow transplantation solid tumor registry. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:953–65. PubMed