AIMS: Increased spatial angle between QRS complex and T wave loop orientations has repeatedly been shown to predict cardiac risk. However, there is no consensus on the methods for the calculation of the angle. This study compared the reproducibility and predictive power of three most common ways of QRS-T angle assessment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrocardiograms of 352 healthy subjects, 941 survivors of acute myocardial infarction (MI), and 605 patients recorded prior to the implantation of automatic defibrillator [implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)] were used to obtain QRS-T angle measurements by the maximum R to T (MRT), area R to T (ART), and total cosine R to T (TCRT) methods. The results were compared in terms of physiologic reproducibility and power to predict mortality in the cardiac patients during 5-year follow-up. Maximum R to T results were significantly less reproducible compared to the other two methods. Among both survivors of acute MI and ICD recipients, TCRT method was statistically significantly more powerful in predicting mortality during follow-up. Among the acute MI survivors, increased spatial QRS-T angle (TCRT assessment) was particularly powerful in predicting sudden cardiac death with the area under the receiver operator characteristic of 78% (90% confidence interval 63-90%). Among the ICD recipients, TCRT also predicted mortality significantly among patients with prolonged QRS complex duration when the spatial orientation of the QRS complex is poorly defined. CONCLUSION: The TCRT method for the assessment of spatial QRS-T angle appears to offer important advantages in comparison to other methods of measurement. This approach should be included in future clinical studies of the QRS-T angle. The TCRT method might also be a reasonable candidate for the standardization of the QRS-T angle assessment.

Department of Cardiology and Pneumology Heart Center University Medical Center Göttingen Robert Koch Str 40 Göttingen Germany

Department of internal medicine and cardiology Faculty of Medicine University Hospital Brno Masaryk University Jihlavska 20 Brno Czech Republic

Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine 2 University Hospital Regensburg Franz Josef Strauß Allee 11 Regensburg Germany

DZHK partner site Munich Heart Alliance Munich Germany

Innere Medizin 1 Klinikum rechts der Isar Technische Universität München Ismaninger Str 22 Munich Germany

Medizinische Abteilung mit Kardiologie Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien Montleartstraße 37 Vienna Austria

National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College Dovehouse Street London UK

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Zabel M, Acar B, Klingenheben T, Franz MR, Hohnloser SH, Malik M.. Analysis of 12-lead T-wave morphology for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Circulation 2000;102:1252–7. PubMed

Huang H-C, Lin L-Y, Yu H-Y, Ho Y-L.. Risk stratification by T-wave morphology for cardiovascular mortality in patients with systolic heart failure. Europace 2009;11:1522–8. PubMed

Kardys I, Kors JA, van der Meer IM, Hofman A, van der Kuip DA, Witteman JC.. Spatial QRS-T angle predicts cardiac death in a general population. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1357–64. PubMed

Aro AL, Huikuri HV, Tikkanen JT, Junttila MJ, Rissanen HA. et al. QRS-T angle as a predictor of sudden cardiac death in a middle-aged general population. Europace 2012;14:872–6. PubMed

Tereshchenko LG, Kim ED, Oehler A, Meoni LA, Ghafoori E, Rami T. et al. Electrophysiologic substrate and risk of mortality in incident hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2016;27:3413–20. PubMed PMC

de Bie MK, Koopman MG, Gaasbeek A, Dekker FW, Maan AC, Swenne CA. et al. Incremental prognostic value of an abnormal baseline spatial QRS-T angle in chronic dialysis patients. Europace 2013;15:290–6. PubMed

Malik M. Ventricular gradient and cardiac risk. Europace 2011;13:605–7. PubMed

Malik M, Hnatkova K, Kowalski D, Keirns JJ, van Gelderen EM.. QT/RR curvatures in healthy subjects: sex differences and covariates. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2013;305:H1798–806. PubMed PMC

Barthel P, Wensel R, Bauer A, Müller A, Wolf P, Ulm K. et al. Respiratory rate predicts outcome after acute myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J 2013;34:1644–50. PubMed

Sinnecker D, Dirschinger RJ, Barthel P, Müller A, Morley-Davies A, Hapfelmeier A. et al. Postextrasystolic blood pressure potentiation predicts poor outcome of cardiac patients. J Am Heart Assoc 2014;3:e000857.. PubMed PMC

Tracy CM, Epstein AE, Darbar D, Dimarco JP, Dunbar SB, Estes NAM 3rd. et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update of the 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines . J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1297–313. PubMed

Seegers J, Hnatkova K, Friede T, Malik M, Zabel M.. T-wave loop area from a pre-implant 12-lead ECG is associated with appropriate ICD shocks. PLoS One 2017;12:e0173868. PubMed PMC

van Oosterom A. The case of the QRS-T angles versus QRST integral maps. J Electrocardiol 2014;47:144–50. PubMed

Acar B, Yi G, Hnatkova K, Malik M.. Spatial, temporal and wavefront direction characteristics of 12–lead T wave morphology. Med Biol Eng Comput 1999;37:574–84. PubMed

Malik M, van Gelderen EM, Lee JH, Kowalski DL, Yen M, Goldwater R. et al. Proarrhythmic safety of repeat doses of mirabegron in healthy subjects: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-, and active-controlled thorough QT study. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012;92:696–706. PubMed

Guldenring D, Finlay DD, Strauss DG, Galeotti L, Nugent CD, Donnelly MP. et al. Transformation of the Mason-Likar 12-lead electrocardiogram to the Frank vectorcardiogram. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012;2012:677–80. PubMed

Edenbrandt L, Pahlm O.. Vectorcardiogram synthesized from a 12-lead ECG: superiority of the inverse Dower matrix. J Electrocardiol 1988;21:361–7. PubMed

Smetana P, Batchvarov VN, Hnatkova K, Camm AJ, Malik M.. Ventricular gradient and nondipolar repolarization components increase at higher heart rate. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2004;286:H131–6. PubMed

Steinbeck G, Andresen D, Seidl K, Brachmann J, Hoffmann E, Wojciechowski D. et al. Defibrillator implantation early after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1427–36. PubMed

Salvi V, Clark E, Karnad DR, Macfarlane PW, Panicker GK, Hingorani P. et al. Comparison of the spatial QRS-T angle derived from digital ECGs recorded using conventional electrode placement with that derived from Mason-Likar electrode position. J Electrocardiol 2016;49:714–9. PubMed

Rautaharju PM, Prineas RJ, Zhang ZM.. A simple procedure for estimation of the spatial QRS/T angle from the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram. J Electrocardiol 2007;40:300–4. PubMed

Schreurs CA, Algra AM, Man SC, Cannegieter SC, van der Wall EE, Schalij MJ. et al. The spatial QRS-T angle in the Frank vectorcardiogram: accuracy of estimates derived from the 12-lead electrocardiogram. J Electrocardiol 2010;43:294–301. PubMed

Kors JA, van Herpen G, Sittig AC, van Bemmel JH.. Reconstruction of the Frank vectorcardiogram from standard electrocardiographic leads: diagnostic comparison of different methods. Eur Heart J 1990;11:1083–92. PubMed

Cortez DL, Schlegel TT.. When deriving the spatial QRS-T angle from the 12-lead electrocardiogram, which transform is more Frank: regression or inverse Dower? J Electrocardiol 2010;43:302–9. PubMed

Kenttä T, Viik J, Karsikas M, Seppänen T, Nieminen T, Lehtimäki T. et al. Postexercise recovery of the spatial QRS/T angle as a predictor of sudden cardiac death. Heart Rhythm 2012;9:1083–9. PubMed

QRS micro-fragmentation as a mortality predictor

Intra-subject stability of different expressions of spatial QRS-T angle and their relationship to heart rate

Sex and race differences in J-Tend, J-Tpeak, and Tpeak-Tend intervals

Rationale and design of the EU-CERT-ICD prospective study: comparative effectiveness of prophylactic ICD implantation