Development and validation of a multi-locus DNA metabarcoding method to identify endangered species in complex samples
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
29020743
PubMed Central
PMC5632295
DOI
10.1093/gigascience/gix080
PII: 4085313
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- CITES, COI, Customs agencies, DNA metabarcoding, Endangered species, Traditional medicines, cyt b, matK, mini-barcodes, rbcL,
- MeSH
- DNA rostlinná genetika MeSH
- ohrožené druhy * MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- rostliny klasifikace genetika MeSH
- taxonomické DNA čárové kódování * MeSH
- výpočetní biologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- DNA rostlinná MeSH
DNA metabarcoding provides great potential for species identification in complex samples such as food supplements and traditional medicines. Such a method would aid Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) enforcement officers to combat wildlife crime by preventing illegal trade of endangered plant and animal species. The objective of this research was to develop a multi-locus DNA metabarcoding method for forensic wildlife species identification and to evaluate the applicability and reproducibility of this approach across different laboratories. A DNA metabarcoding method was developed that makes use of 12 DNA barcode markers that have demonstrated universal applicability across a wide range of plant and animal taxa and that facilitate the identification of species in samples containing degraded DNA. The DNA metabarcoding method was developed based on Illumina MiSeq amplicon sequencing of well-defined experimental mixtures, for which a bioinformatics pipeline with user-friendly web-interface was developed. The performance of the DNA metabarcoding method was assessed in an international validation trial by 16 laboratories, in which the method was found to be highly reproducible and sensitive enough to identify species present in a mixture at 1% dry weight content. The advanced multi-locus DNA metabarcoding method assessed in this study provides reliable and detailed data on the composition of complex food products, including information on the presence of CITES-listed species. The method can provide improved resolution for species identification, while verifying species with multiple DNA barcodes contributes to an enhanced quality assurance.
Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety Spargelfeldstrasse 191 1220 Vienna Austria
Baseclear B 5 Einsteinweg 5 2333 CC Leiden The Netherlands
Biolytix AG Benkenstrasse 254 4108 Witterswil Switzerland
CREA SCS sede di Tavazzano Laboratorio via Emilia Km 307 26838 Tavazzano Italy
Crop Research Institute Department of Molecular Genetics Drnovská 507 161 06 Prague Czech Republic
Dutch Customs Laboratory Kingsfordweg 1 1043 GN Amsterdam The Netherlands
Eurofins GeneScan GmbH Engesserstrasse 4 79108 Freiburg Germany
Fera Sand Hutton York YO41 1LZ UK
GenoStar Bioinformatics Solutions 60 rue Lavoisier 38330 Montbonnot Saint Martin France
iBET Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica Apartado 12 2780 901 Oeiras Portugal
Laboratory of Customs and Excises Blijde Inkomststraat 20 B 3000 Leuven Belgium
LGC Queens Road Teddington Middlesex TW11 0LY UK
Livsmedelsverket Att Lisa Lundberg Strandbodgatan 4 SE 75323 Uppsala Sweden
Norwegian Veterinary Institute Ullevaalsveien 68 P O Box 750 Sentrum 0106 Oslo Norway
RIKILT Wageningen University and Research P O Box 230 6700 AE Wageningen The Netherlands
U S Customs and Border Protection Laboratory 1100 Raymond Blvd Newark NJ 07102 USA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Chang C, Jang-Liaw N, Lin Y et al. . Authenticating the use of dried seahorses in the traditional Chinese medicine market in Taiwan using molecular forensics. J Food Drug Anal 2013;21:310–6.
Lee SY, Ng WL, Mahat MN et al. . DNA barcoding of the endangered aquilaria (Thymelaeaceae) and its application in species authentication of agarwood products traded in the market. PLoS One 2016;11:e0154631. PubMed PMC
Milner-Gulland EJ, Bukreeva OM, Coulson T et al. . Conservation: reproductive collapse in saiga antelope harems. Nature 2003;422:135. PubMed
CITES www.cites.org. Accessed 12 September 2017.
Cheng X, Su X, Chen X et al. . Biological ingredient analysis of traditional Chinese medicine preparation based on high-throughput sequencing: the story for Liuwei Dihuang Wan. Sci Rep 2015;4:5147. PubMed PMC
Coghlan ML, Haile J, Houston J et al. . Deep sequencing of plant and animal DNA contained within traditional Chinese medicines reveals legality issues and health safety concerns. PLoS Genet 2012;8:e1002657. PubMed PMC
Coghlan ML, Maker G, Crighton E et al. . Combined DNA, toxicological and heavy metal analyses provides an auditing toolkit to improve pharmacovigilance of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Sci Rep 2015;5:17475. PubMed PMC
Ivanova NV, Kuzmina ML, Braukmann TWA et al. . Authentication of herbal supplements using next-generation sequencing. PLoS One 2016;11:e0156426. PubMed PMC
Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F et al. . Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Mol Ecol 2012;21:2045–50. PubMed
Staats M, Arulandhu AJ, Gravendeel B et al. . Advances in DNA metabarcoding for food and wildlife forensic species identification. Anal Bioanal Chem 2016;408:4615–30. PubMed PMC
Fahner NA, Shokralla S, Baird DJ et al. . Large-scale monitoring of plants through environmental DNA metabarcoding of soil: recovery, resolution, and annotation of four DNA markers. PLoS One 2016;11:e0157505. PubMed PMC
Arulandhu AJ, Staats M, Peelen T et al. . DNA metabarcoding of endangered plant and animal species in seized forensic samples. Genome 2015;188–9.
Taylor HR, Harris WE. An emergent science on the brink of irrelevance: a review of the past 8 years of DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour 2012;12:377–88. PubMed
Little DP. A DNA mini-barcode for land plants. Mol Ecol Resour 2014;14:437–46. PubMed
Parveen I, Gafner S, Techen N et al. . DNA barcoding for the identification of botanicals in herbal medicine and dietary supplements: strengths and limitations. Planta Med 2016;82:1225–35. PubMed
RIKILT Wageningen University & Research www.decathlon-project.eu. Accessed 12 September 2017.
RIKILT Wageningen University & Research http://decathlon-fp7.citespipe-wur.surf-hosted.nl:8080/. Accessed 12 September 2017.
Chen R, Dong J, Cui X et al. . DNA based identification of medicinal materials in Chinese patent medicines. Sci Rep 2012;2:958. PubMed PMC
Scholtens I, Laurensse E, Molenaar B et al. . Practical experiences with an extended screening strategy for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in real-life samples. J Agric Food Chem 2013;61:9097–109. PubMed
Murray MG, Thompson WF. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucl Acids Res 1980;8:4321–6. PubMed PMC
Ivanova NV, Zemlak TS, Hanner RH et al. . Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Notes 2007;7:544–8.
Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 2010;26:2460–1. PubMed
Altschul S. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl Acids Res 1997;25:3389–402. PubMed PMC
Arulandhu AJ, Staats M, Hagelaar R. Development and validation of a multi-locus DNA metabarcoding method to identify endangered species in complex samples SOP. protocols.io 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.ixbcfin. PubMed DOI PMC
Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL et al. . Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 2003;270:313–21. PubMed PMC
Hollingsworth PM, Forrest LL, Spouge JL et al. . A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:12794–7. PubMed PMC
Liu S, Li Y, Lu J et al. . SOAP Barcode: revealing arthropod biodiversity through assembly of Illumina shotgun sequences of PCR amplicons. Methods Ecol Evol 2013;4:1142–50.
Gryson N. Effect of food processing on plant DNA degradation and PCR-based GMO analysis: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem 2010;396:2003–22. PubMed
Tang M, Hardman CJ, Ji Y et al. . High-throughput monitoring of wild bee diversity and abundance via mitogenomics. Methods Ecol Evol 2015;6:1034–43. PubMed PMC
CBOL www.barcodeofwildlife.org. Accessed 12 September 2017.
Galimberti A, De Mattia F, Losa A et al. . DNA barcoding as a new tool for food traceability. Food Res Int 2013;50:55–63.
Taberlet P, Coissac E, Hajibabaei M et al. . Environmental DNA. Mol Ecol 2012;21:1789–93. PubMed
Iyengar A. Forensic DNA analysis for animal protection and biodiversity conservation: a review. J Nat Conserv 2014;22:195–205.
16s Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation. Illumina document 15044223. https://support.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-support/documents/documentation/chemistry_documentation/16s/16s-metagenomic-library-prep-guide-15044223-b.pdf.
Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 2011;17:10–12.
Schmieder R, Edwards R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 2011;27:863–4. PubMed PMC
FASTX_Toolkit v. 0.0.14, http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/.
ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/entrezdirect/.
UNEP-WCMC https://speciesplus.net. Accessed 12 September 2017.
Arulandhu AJ, Staats M, Hagelaar R et al. . Supplementary data for “Development and validation of a multi-locus DNA metabarcoding method to identify endangered species in complex samples.” GigaScience Database 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100330. PubMed DOI PMC
Palumbi S, Martin A, Romano S et al. . The simple fool's guide to PCR, version 2.0. Privately published document compiled byPalumbi S. Honolulu, HI: Dept. of Zoology, University of Hawaii; 1991:96822.
Sarri C, Stamatis C, Sarafidou T et al. . A new set of 16S rRNA universal primers for identification of animal species. Food Control 2014;43:35–41.
Leray M, Yang JY, Meyer CP et al. . A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents. Front Zool 2013;10:34. PubMed PMC
Geller J, Meyer C, Parker M et al. . Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all-taxa biotic surveys. Mol Ecol Resour 2013;13:851–61. PubMed
Parson W, Pegoraro K, Niederstätter H et al. . Species identification by means of the cytochrome b gene. Int J Legal Med 2000;114:23–28. PubMed
Fazekas AJ, Kuzmina ML, Newmaster SG et al. . DNA barcoding methods for land 39. Methods Mol Biol 2012;858:223–52. PubMed
Cuenoud P, Savolainen V, Chatrou LW et al. . Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. Am J Botany 2002;89:132–44. PubMed
Levin RA, Wagner WL, Hoch PC et al. . Family-level relationships of Onagraceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF data. Am J Botany 2003;90:107–15. PubMed
Kress WJ, Erickson DL, Shiu S. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS One 2007;2:e508. PubMed PMC
Fazekas AJ, Burgess KS, Kesanakurti PR et al. . Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well. PLoS One 2008;3:e2802. PubMed PMC
Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F et al. . Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding. Nucl Acids Res 2007;35:e14. PubMed PMC
Chen S, Yao H, Han J et al. . Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS One 2010;5:e8613. PubMed PMC
Sang T, Crawford DJ, Stuessy TF. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Am J Botany 1997;84:1120–36. PubMed
Tate JA, Simpson BB. Paraphyly of Tarasa (Malvaceae) and diverse origins of the polyploid species. Syst Botany 2003;28:723–37.
Manning J, Boatwright JS, Daru BH et al. . A molecular phylogeny and generic classification of Asphodelaceae subfamily Alooideae: a final resolution of the prickly issue of polyphyly in the alooids? Syst Botany 2014;39:55–74.