Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutations are Better Prognostic Marker than O6-methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Promoter Methylation in Glioblastomas - a Retrospective, Single-centre Molecular Genetics Study of Gliomas
Language English Country Czech Republic Media print
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
29031038
DOI
10.14735/amko2017361
PII: 61978
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Glioma genetics mortality pathology MeSH
- Isocitrate Dehydrogenase genetics MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- DNA Methylation MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Mutation MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor genetics MeSH
- Brain Neoplasms genetics mortality pathology MeSH
- O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase genetics MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Promoter Regions, Genetic MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Isocitrate Dehydrogenase MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor MeSH
- O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase MeSH
BACKGROUND: Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) are a promising prognostic biomarker of gliomas. The purpose of our study was to examine the clinical prognostic properties of IDH1/2 mutations in a glioma patient cohort from the Czech Republic using an improved platform for simple and reliable IDH genotyping. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a group of 145 glioma patients by testing for the three most frequent IDH mutations, IDH1 R132H, IDH1 R132C, and IDH2 R172K, through the competitive amplification of differentially melting amplicons (CADMA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR). O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, copy number of EGFR, p53, RB1, MDM2, CDKN2A genes, and deletions in 1p, 19q and 10p chromosomal regions were also analyzed and correlated with clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Of 145 gliomas, 36 harbored IDH1 R132H mutation and 1 IDH1 R132C mutation. We did not detect any IDH2 R172K mutation. IDH1 mutations were positively associated with MGMT methylation (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.387-7.282; p = 0.007), 1p/19q co-loss (OR 8.85, 95% CI 2.367-42.786; p = 0.002) and negatively associated with epidermal growth factor receptor amplification (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.019-0.437; p = 0.006) and 10p loss (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.005-0.436; p = 0.019). The overall survival of IDH-mutant was 25 months, but only 9 months in IDH-wild type gliomas (p = 0.035); at the same time, survival associated with methylated vs. unmethylated MGMT promoter did not significantly differ (p = 0.166). CONCLUSION: Despite IDH1 mutations being closely associated with MGMT methylation in glioma patients, IDH1 mutations in glioblastoma patients are stronger marker of overall survival than MGMT methylation and should be the marker of choice, especially when using genotyping by CADMA PCR.Key words: isocitrate dehydrogenase - polymerase chain reaction - glioma - glioblastoma.
References provided by Crossref.org