IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
LO 1304
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
LM 2015089
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
NT 13581
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
NV 16-32198A
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
PubMed
29556922
PubMed Central
PMC6614140
DOI
10.1007/s12253-018-0413-9
PII: 10.1007/s12253-018-0413-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- CADMA, Glioma, IDH1, IDH2, Mutation testing,
- MeSH
- glioblastom genetika MeSH
- gliom genetika MeSH
- imunohistochemie metody MeSH
- isocitrátdehydrogenasa genetika MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mutace genetika MeSH
- mutační analýza DNA metody MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery genetika MeSH
- nádory mozku genetika MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- isocitrátdehydrogenasa MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery MeSH
Mutations in IDH1/2 genes are a marker of good prognosis for glioma patients, associated with low grade gliomas and secondary glioblastomas. Immunohistochemistry and Sanger sequencing are current standards for IDH1/2 genotyping while many other methods exist. The aim of this study was to validate Competitive amplification of differentially melting amplicons (CADMA) PCR for IDH genotyping by comparison with SNaPshot assay and two immunohistochemical methods. In our study, 87 glioma patients (46 from Olomouc and 41 from Ostrava) were analyzed. IDH1/2 mutations in native bioptical samples were analyzed at DNA level by CADMA and SNaPshot while IDH1 mutations in FFPE samples were analyzed at protein level by two IHC methods. CADMA PCR sensitivity for IDH1 was 96.4% and specificity 100% for 86 concluded samples. SNaPshot assay sensitivity was 92.9% and specificity of 100% for 85 concluded samples. IHC in the laboratory no. 2 reached sensitivity 85.7% and specificity 100% for 86 concluded samples. IHC in the laboratory no. 4 reached sensitivity of 96.4% and specificity of 79.7% in 74 concluded samples. Only one IDH2 mutation was found by SNaPshot while CADMA yielded false negative result. In conclusion, CADMA is a valid method for IDH1 p.(R132H) testing with higher sensitivity than SNaPshot assay. Also, molecular genetic methods of IDH1 testing from native samples were more robust than IHC from FFPE.
CGB Laboratory Inc Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Biomedical Sciences Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Neurosurgery University Hospital Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
Department of Pathology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA
Neurosurgery Clinic University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P, Mankoo P, Carter H, Siu IM, Gallia GL, Olivi A, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, Keir S, Nikolskaya T, Nikolsky Y, Busam DA, Tekleab H, Diaz LA, Jr, Hartigan J, Smith DR, Strausberg RL, Marie SK, Shinjo SM, Yan H, Riggins GJ, Bigner DD, Karchin R, Papadopoulos N, Parmigiani G, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321:1807–1812. doi: 10.1126/science.1164382. PubMed DOI PMC
Hempel JM, Bidsas S, Schittenhelm J, Brendle C, Bender B, Wassmann H, Skardelly M, Tabatabai G, Vega SC, Ernemann U, Klose U. In vivo molecular profiling of human glioma using diffusion kurtosis imaging. J Neuro-Oncol. 2016;131:93–101. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2272-0. PubMed DOI
Nesvick CL, Zhang C, Edwards NA, Montgomery BK, Lee M, Yang C, Wang H, Zhu D, Heiss JD, Merrill MJ, Ray-Chaudhury A, Zhuang Z. ZEB1 expression is increased in IDH1-mutant lower-grade gliomas. J Neuro-Oncol. 2016;130:111–122. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2240-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Yang Y, Mao Q, Wang X, Liu Y, Mao Y, Zhou Q, Luo J. An analysis of 170 glioma patients and systematic review to investigate the association between IDH-1 mutations and preoperative glioma-related epilepsy. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;31:56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.11.030. PubMed DOI
Rodriguez FJ, Vizcaino MA, Lin MT. Recent advances on the molecular pathology of glial neoplasms in children and adults. J Mol Diagn. 2016;18:620–634. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.05.005. PubMed DOI PMC
Turkalp Z, Karamchandani J, Das S. IDH mutation in glioma: new insights and promises for the future. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:1319–1325. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1205. PubMed DOI
Kingsbury JM, Shamaprasad N, Billmyre RB, Heitman J, Cardenas ME. Cancer-associated isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations induce mitochondrial DNA instability. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:3524–3538. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw195. PubMed DOI PMC
Masui K, Cavenee WK, Mischel PS. Cancer metabolism as a central driving force of glioma pathogenesis. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2016;33:161–168. doi: 10.1007/s10014-016-0265-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Cairns RA, Mak TW. Oncogenic isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations: mechanisms, models, and clinical opportunities. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:730–741. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0083. PubMed DOI
Lu C, Ward PS, Kapoor GS, Rohle D, Turcan S, Abdel-Wahab O, Edwards CR, Khanin R, Figueroa ME, Melnick A, Wellen KE, O'Rourke DM, Berger SL, Chan TA, Levine RL, Mellinghoff IK, Thompson CB. IDH mutation impairs histone demethylation and results in a block to cell differentiation. Nature. 2012;483:474–478. doi: 10.1038/nature10860. PubMed DOI PMC
Johannessen TA, Mukherjee J, Viswanath P, Ohba S, Ronen SM, Bjerkvig R, Pieper RO. Rapid conversion of mutant IDH1 from driver to passenger in a model of human gliomagenesis. Mol Cancer Res. 2016;14:976–983. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-16-0141. PubMed DOI PMC
Capper D, Weissert S, Balss J, Habel A, Meyer J, Jager D, Ackermann U, Tessmer C, Korshunov A, Zentgraf H, Hartmann C, von Deimling A. Characterization of R132H mutation-specific IDH1 antibody binding in brain tumors. Brain Pathol. 2010;20:245–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2009.00352.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Balss J, Meyer J, Mueller W, Korshunov A, Hartmann C, von Deimling A. Analysis of the IDH1 codon 132 mutation in brain tumors. Acta Neuropathol. 2008;116:597–602. doi: 10.1007/s00401-008-0455-2. PubMed DOI
Felsberg J, Wolter M, Seul H, Friedensdorf B, Goppert M, Sabel MC, Reifenberger G. Rapid and sensitive assessment of the IDH1 and IDH2 mutation status in cerebral gliomas based on DNA pyrosequencing. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119:501–507. doi: 10.1007/s00401-010-0647-4. PubMed DOI
Setty P, Hammes J, Rothamel T, Vladimirova V, Kramm CM, Pietsch T, Waha A. A pyrosequencing-based assay for the rapid detection of IDH1 mutations in clinical samples. J Mol Diagn. 2010;12:750–756. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090237. PubMed DOI PMC
Horbinski C, Kelly L, Nikiforov YE, Durso MB, Nikiforova MN. Detection of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations by fluorescence melting curve analysis as a diagnostic tool for brain biopsies. J Mol Diagn. 2010;12:487–492. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090228. PubMed DOI PMC
Aibaidula A, Zhao W, Wu JS, Chen H, Shi ZF, Zheng LL, Mao Y, Zhou LF, Sui GD. Microfluidics for rapid detection of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation for intraoperative application. J Neurosurg. 2016;124:1611–1618. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS141833. PubMed DOI
Meyer J, Pusch S, Balss J, Capper D, Mueller W, Christians A, Hartmann C, von Deimling A. PCR- and restriction endonuclease-based detection of IDH1 mutations. Brain Pathol. 2010;20:298–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2009.00327.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Perizzolo M, Winkfein B, Hui S, Krulicki W, Chan JA, Demetrick DJ. IDH mutation detection in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded gliomas using multiplex PCR and single-base extension. Brain Pathol. 2012;22:619–624. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2012.00579.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Boisselier B, Marie Y, Labussiere M, Ciccarino P, Desestret V, Wang X, Capelle L, Delattre JY, Sanson M. COLD PCR HRM: a highly sensitive detection method for IDH1 mutations. Hum Mut. 2010;31:1360–1365. doi: 10.1002/humu.21365. PubMed DOI
Zacher A, Kaulich K, Stepanow S, Wolter M, Kohrer K, Felsberg J, Malzkorn B, Reifenberger G. Molecular diagnostics of gliomas using next generation sequencing of a glioma-tailored gene panel. Brain Pathol. 2016;27:146–159. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12367. PubMed DOI PMC
Polivka J, Polivka J, Jr, Rohan V, Pesta M, Repik T, Pitule P, Topolcan O. Isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 mutations as prognostic biomarker in glioblastoma multiforme patients in West Bohemia. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:735659. doi: 10.1155/2014/735659. PubMed DOI PMC
van den Bent MJ, Hartmann C, Preusser M, Strobel T, Dubbink HJ, Kros JM, von Deimling A, Boisselier B, Sanson M, Halling KC, Diefes KL, Aldape K, Giannini C. Interlaboratory comparison of IDH mutation detection. J Neuro-Oncol. 2013;112:173–178. doi: 10.1007/s11060-013-1056-z. PubMed DOI
Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114:97–109. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–820. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. PubMed DOI
Houdova Megova M, Drabek J, Dwight Z, Trojanec R, Koudelakova V, Vrbkova J, Kalita O, Mlcochova S, Rabcanova M, Hajduch M. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations are better prognostic marker than O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation in glioblastomas - a retrospective, single-Centre molecular genetics study of gliomas. Klinicka onkologie. 2017;30:361–371. doi: 10.14735/amko2017361. PubMed DOI
Agarwal S, Sharma MC, Jha P, Pathak P, Suri V, Sarkar C, Chosdol K, Suri A, Kale SS, Mahapatra AK, Jha P. Comparative study of IDH1 mutations in gliomas by immunohistochemistry and DNA sequencing. Neuro-Oncology. 2013;15:718–726. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not015. PubMed DOI PMC
Ramos-Vara JA, Miller MA. When tissue antigens and antibodies get along: revisiting the technical aspects of immunohistochemistry--the red, brown, and blue technique. Vet Pathol. 2014;51:42–87. doi: 10.1177/0300985813505879. PubMed DOI
Preusser M, Wohrer A, Stary S, Hoftberger R, Streubel B, Hainfellner JA. Value and limitations of immunohistochemistry and gene sequencing for detection of the IDH1-R132H mutation in diffuse glioma biopsy specimens. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011;70:715–723. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31822713f0. PubMed DOI
Loussouarn D, Le Loupp AG, Frenel JS, Leclair F, von Deimling A, Aumont M, Martin S, Campone M, Denis MG. Comparison of immunohistochemistry, DNA sequencing and allele-specific PCR for the detection of IDH1 mutations in gliomas. Int J Oncol. 2012;40:2058–2062. PubMed
Gilbert MT, Haselkorn T, Bunce M, Sanchez JJ, Lucas SB, Jewell LD, Van Marck E, Worobey M. The isolation of nucleic acids from fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues-which methods are useful when? P ONE. 2007;2:e537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000537. PubMed DOI PMC
Huijsmans CJ, Damen J, van der Linden JC, Savelkoul PH, Hermans MH. Comparative analysis of four methods to extract DNA from paraffin-embedded tissues: effect on downstream molecular applications. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3:239. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-239. PubMed DOI PMC
Takano S, Tian W, Matsuda M, Yamamoto T, Ishikawa E, Kaneko MK, Yamazaki K, Kato Y, Matsumura A. Detection of IDH1 mutation in human gliomas: comparison of immunohistochemistry and sequencing. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2011;28:115–123. doi: 10.1007/s10014-011-0023-7. PubMed DOI
Kaneko MK, Tsujimoto Y, Hozumi Y, Goto K, Kato Y. Novel monoclonal antibodies GMab-r1 and LMab-1 specifically recognize IDH1-R132G and IDH1-R132L mutations. Monoclon Antib Immunodiagn Immunother. 2013;32:224–228. doi: 10.1089/mab.2013.0006. PubMed DOI