Prognostic value of c-MET in head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review, Systematic Review
PubMed
29103754
DOI
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.09.009
PII: S1368-8375(17)30263-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Head and neck cancer, Immunohistochemistry, Overexpression, Predictive factor, Prognostic factor, c-MET receptor,
- MeSH
- Survival Analysis MeSH
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck MeSH
- Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition MeSH
- Immunohistochemistry MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Head and Neck Neoplasms genetics pathology physiopathology MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met genetics physiology MeSH
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell genetics pathology physiopathology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Meta-Analysis MeSH
- Review MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-MET) ligand/receptor axis has been implicated in pathogenesis of malignant diseases including squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Overexpression of c-MET has been reported as a common molecular abnormality in SCCHN, although its prognostic and predictive value remains to be validated. METHODS: We systematically searched literature for studies evaluating c-MET expression on immunohistochemistry in newly diagnosed, non-metastatic SCCHN. The c-MET expressing cases were classified into three categories according to predefined cut-off values for positivity. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of c-MET expression and its relationship with selected clinicopathological variables. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies with 2019 cases were included. Relative frequencies of c-MET expression above cut-off levels I, II, and III were 81.8%, 63.8%, and 46.2%, respectively. Differences between these three values were statistically significant (p<1.0×10-6). Above cut-off level II, c-MET positivity was associated with worse overall survival (p=4.0×10-6), positive nodal status (p=1.0×10-4), higher disease stage (p=7.0×10-4), older age (p=2.1×10-3), disease recurrence (p=2.0×10-2), and primary tumour localization in the oral cavity (p=2.3×10-2). Above cut-off level III, c-MET positivity was associated with worse disease-free or progression-free survival (p=9.0×10-6), p16 negativity (p=2.4×10-4), worse overall survival (p=4.0×10-4), positive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status (p=7.2×10-4), and larger primary tumours (p=4.6×10-3). CONCLUSION: In SCCHN, immunohistochemical overexpression of c-MET above cut-off levels III and particularly II was associated with inferior survival outcomes and advanced disease. Moreover, it represents a promising predictive biomarker for c-MET targeting, yet the optimal scoring method remains to be defined.
AFR Oncology Boulogne Billancourt France
Department of Mathematics and Statistics Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Oncology Bichat Beaujon University Hospital Paris France
Department of Oncology Hospital Paris Saint Joseph Paris France
References provided by Crossref.org