Advanced Confocal Microscopy Techniques to Study Protein-protein Interactions and Kinetics at DNA Lesions
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, audiovizuální média
PubMed
29155761
PubMed Central
PMC5755375
DOI
10.3791/55999
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- geny p53 * MeSH
- interakční proteinové domény a motivy * MeSH
- kinetika MeSH
- konfokální mikroskopie metody MeSH
- poškození DNA * MeSH
- Publikační typ
- audiovizuální média MeSH
- časopisecké články MeSH
Local microirradiation with lasers represents a useful tool for studies of DNA-repair-related processes in live cells. Here, we describe a methodological approach to analyzing protein kinetics at DNA lesions over time or protein-protein interactions on locally microirradiated chromatin. We also show how to recognize individual phases of the cell cycle using the Fucci cellular system to study cell-cycle-dependent protein kinetics at DNA lesions. A methodological description of the use of two UV lasers (355 nm and 405 nm) to induce different types of DNA damage is also presented. Only the cells microirradiated by the 405-nm diode laser proceeded through mitosis normally and were devoid of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs). We also show how microirradiated cells can be fixed at a given time point to perform immunodetection of the endogenous proteins of interest. For the DNA repair studies, we additionally describe the use of biophysical methods including FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) and FLIM (Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy) in cells with spontaneously occurring DNA damage foci. We also show an application of FLIM-FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer) in experimental studies of protein-protein interactions.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Cadet J, Mouret S, Ravanat JL, Douki T. Photoinduced damage to cellular DNA: direct and photosensitized reactions. Photochem Photobiol. 2012;88(5):1048–1065. PubMed
Cooke MS, et al. Immunochemical detection of UV-induced DNA damage and repair. J Immunol Methods. 2003;280(1-2):125–133. PubMed
Lahtz C, et al. Gamma irradiation does not induce detectable changes in DNA methylation directly following exposure of human cells. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44858. PubMed PMC
Cremer T, et al. Detection of chromosome aberrations in the human interphase nucleus by visualization of specific target DNAs with radioactive and non-radioactive in situ hybridization techniques: diagnosis of trisomy 18 with probe L1.84. Hum Genet. 1986;74(4):346–352. PubMed
Zorn C, Cremer T, Cremer C, Zimmer J. Laser UV microirradiation of interphase nuclei and post-treatment with caffeine. A new approach to establish the arrangement of interphase chromosomes. Hum Genet. 1976;35(1):83–89. PubMed
Bartova E, et al. Recruitment of Oct4 protein to UV-damaged chromatin in embryonic stem cells. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e27281. PubMed PMC
Stixova L, et al. HP1beta-dependent recruitment of UBF1 to irradiated chromatin occurs simultaneously with CPDs. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2014;7(1):39. PubMed PMC
Stixova L, et al. Advanced microscopy techniques used for comparison of UVA- and gamma-irradiation-induced DNA damage in the cell nucleus and nucleolus. Folia Biol (Praha) 2014;60(Suppl 1):76–84. PubMed
Luijsterburg MS, et al. Heterochromatin protein 1 is recruited to various types of DNA damage. J Cell Biol. 2009;185(4):577–586. PubMed PMC
Bartova E, et al. Coilin is rapidly recruited to UVA-induced DNA lesions and gamma-radiation affects localized movement of Cajal bodies. Nucleus. 2014;5(3):460–468. PubMed PMC
Franek M, et al. Advanced Image Acquisition and Analytical Techniques for Studies of Living Cells and Tissue Sections. Microsc Microanal. 2016;22(2):326–341. PubMed
Lemmer P, et al. Using conventional fluorescent markers for far-field fluorescence localization nanoscopy allows resolution in the 10-nm range. J Microsc. 2009;235(2):163–171. PubMed
Reits EA, Neefjes JJ. From fixed to FRAP: measuring protein mobility and activity in living cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(6):E145–E147. PubMed
Lakowitz JR. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. 3rd ed. New York, USA: Springers Science+Business Media, LLC; 2006.
Piston DW, Kremers GJ. Fluorescent protein FRET: the good, the bad and the ugly. Trends Biochem Sci. 2007;32(9):407–414. PubMed
Levitt JA, Matthews DR, Ameer-Beg SM, Suhling K. Fluorescence lifetime and polarization-resolved imaging in cell biology. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20(1):28–36. PubMed
Shimomura O, Johnson FH, Saiga Y. Extraction, purification and properties of aequorin, a bioluminescent protein from the luminous hydromedusan, Aequorea. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1962;59:223–239. PubMed
Iwabuchi K, Bartel PL, Li B, Marraccino R, Fields S. Two cellular proteins that bind to wild-type but not mutant p53. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(13):6098–6102. PubMed PMC
Ward IM, Minn K, van Deursen J, Chen J. p53 Binding protein 53BP1 is required for DNA damage responses and tumor suppression in mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(7):2556–2563. PubMed PMC
Kanda T, Sullivan KF, Wahl GM. Histone-GFP fusion protein enables sensitive analysis of chromosome dynamics in living mammalian cells. Curr Biol. 1998;8(7):377–385. PubMed
Walter J, Schermelleh L, Cremer M, Tashiro S, Cremer T. Chromosome order in HeLa cells changes during mitosis and early G1, but is stably maintained during subsequent interphase stages. J Cell Biol. 2003;160(5):685–697. PubMed PMC
Sakaue-Sawano A, et al. Tracing the silhouette of individual cells in S/G2/M phases with fluorescence. Chem Biol. 2008;15(12):1243–1248. PubMed
Sorokin DV, et al. Localized movement and morphology of UBF1-positive nucleolar regions are changed by gamma-irradiation in G2 phase of the cell cycle. Nucleus. 2015;6(4):301–313. PubMed PMC
Vogel SS, Nguyen TA, van der Meer BW, Blank PS. The impact of heterogeneity and dark acceptor states on FRET: implications for using fluorescent protein donors and acceptors. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49593. PubMed PMC
Foltankova V, Matula P, Sorokin D, Kozubek S, Bartova E. Hybrid detectors improved time-lapse confocal microscopy of PML and 53BP1 nuclear body colocalization in DNA lesions. Microsc Microanal. 2013;19(2):360–369. PubMed
Suchankova J, et al. Distinct kinetics of DNA repair protein accumulation at DNA lesions and cell cycle-dependent formation of gammaH2AX- and NBS1-positive repair foci. Biol Cell. 2015;107(12):440–454. PubMed
Bártová E, et al. PCNA is recruited to irradiated chromatin in late S phase and is most pronounced in G2 phase of the cell cycle. Protoplasma. 2017. PubMed
Krejci J, et al. Post-Translational Modifications of Histones in Human Sperm. J Cell Biochem. 2015;116(10):2195–2209. PubMed
Chou DM, et al. A chromatin localization screen reveals poly (ADP ribose)-regulated recruitment of the repressive polycomb and NuRD complexes to sites of DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(43):18475–18480. PubMed PMC
Sustackova G, et al. Acetylation-dependent nuclear arrangement and recruitment of BMI1 protein to UV-damaged chromatin. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227(5):1838–1850. PubMed
Smirnov E, et al. Separation of replication and transcription domains in nucleoli. J Struct Biol. 2014;188(3):259–266. PubMed
Bastiaens PI, Squire A. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy: spatial resolution of biochemical processes in the cell. Trends Cell Biol. 1999;9(2):48–52. PubMed
Day RN. Measuring protein interactions using Forster resonance energy transfer and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. Methods. 2014;66(2):200–207. PubMed PMC
Konig K, Uchugonova A, Breunig HG. High-resolution multiphoton cryomicroscopy. Methods. 2014;66(2):230–236. PubMed