Difficulties in identifying the bacterial species from the genus Clostridium in a case of injury-related osteitis
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu kazuistiky, časopisecké články
PubMed
29524152
DOI
10.1007/s12223-018-0597-0
PII: 10.1007/s12223-018-0597-0
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antibakteriální látky farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- Clostridium klasifikace účinky léků genetika izolace a purifikace MeSH
- DNA bakterií genetika MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- klindamycin farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metronidazol farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- mikrobiální testy citlivosti MeSH
- osteitida farmakoterapie mikrobiologie MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- RNA ribozomální 16S genetika MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- shluková analýza MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- kazuistiky MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Polsko MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antibakteriální látky MeSH
- DNA bakterií MeSH
- klindamycin MeSH
- metronidazol MeSH
- RNA ribozomální 16S MeSH
Most Clostridium species are part of saprophytic microflora in humans and animals; however, some are well-known human pathogens. We presented the challenges in identifying the Clostridium species isolated from a patient with an infected open dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the fourth digit of the right hand. The clinical materials were intraoperative samples collected from a patient diagnosed with an injury-related infection, with soft tissue loss and tendon sheath involvement. The available biochemical, molecular, and genetic techniques were used in identifying the isolated bacteria. The isolated bacterium was shown to have low biochemical activity; hence, it was not definitively identified via biochemical tests Api 20A or Rapid 32A. Vitek 2 and mass spectrometry methods were equally inconclusive. Clostridium tetani infection was strongly suspected based on the bacterium's morphology and the appearance of its colonies on solid media. It was only via the 16S rRNA sequencing method, which is non-routine and unavailable in most clinical laboratories, that this pathogen was excluded. Despite appropriate pre-laboratory procedures, which are critical for obtaining reliable test results, the routine methods of anaerobic bacterium identification are not always useful in diagnostics. Diagnostic difficulties occur in the case of environment-derived bacteria of low or not fully understood biological activity, which are absent from databases of automatic bacterial identification systems.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Microbiol Methods. 2013 Feb 15;92(2):209-12 PubMed
BMC Genomics. 2011 Jan 11;12:18 PubMed
Antibiotics (Basel). 2017 Nov 07;6(4):null PubMed
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009 May;80(5):827-31 PubMed
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Sep;20(9):1571-3 PubMed
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Jul;17(7):1043-7 PubMed
Braz J Microbiol. 2016 Apr-Jun;47(2):410-3 PubMed
J Microbiol Methods. 2017 Jul;138:20-29 PubMed
Lancet. 2014 Dec 20;384(9961):2266 PubMed
J Microbiol Methods. 2016 Aug;127:141-145 PubMed
Genome Biol Evol. 2017 Oct 1;9(10):2707-2714 PubMed
Anaerobe. 2016 Aug;40:73-5 PubMed
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Jan;3(1):66-98 PubMed
Future Microbiol. 2014;9(2):217-33 PubMed
J Trauma. 2005 May;58(5):1082-8 PubMed
Vaccine. 2014 Feb 3;32(6):639-44 PubMed