Geographic and socioeconomic diversity of food and nutrient intakes: a comparison of four European countries
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
633692
Horizon 2020
SD004
Top Consortia for Knowlegde and Innovation of the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
PubMed
29594476
PubMed Central
PMC6561990
DOI
10.1007/s00394-018-1673-6
PII: 10.1007/s00394-018-1673-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Diet, Dietary guidelines, Europe, Foods, Nutrients, SUSFANS,
- MeSH
- dieta metody MeSH
- dietní záznamy MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- socioekonomické faktory * MeSH
- výživa - přehledy statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- živiny aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Dánsko MeSH
- Francie MeSH
- Itálie MeSH
PURPOSE: Public health policies and actions increasingly acknowledge the climate burden of food consumption. The aim of this study is to describe dietary intakes across four European countries, as baseline for further research towards healthier and environmentally-friendlier diets for Europe. METHODS: Individual-level dietary intake data in adults were obtained from nationally-representative surveys from Denmark and France using a 7-day diet record, Italy using a 3-day diet record, and Czech Republic using two replicates of a 24-h recall. Energy-standardised food and nutrient intakes were calculated for each subject from the mean of two randomly selected days. RESULTS: There was clear geographical variability, with a between-country range for mean fruit intake from 118 to 199 g/day, for vegetables from 95 to 239 g/day, for fish from 12 to 45 g/day, for dairy from 129 to 302 g/day, for sweet beverages from 48 to 224 ml/day, and for alcohol from 8 to 15 g/day, with higher intakes in Italy for fruit, vegetables and fish, and in Denmark for dairy, sweet beverages and alcohol. In all countries, intakes were low for legumes (< 20 g/day), and nuts and seeds (< 5 g/day), but high for red and processed meat (> 80 g/day). Within countries, food intakes also varied by socio-economic factors such as age, gender, and educational level, but less pronounced by anthropometric factors such as overweight status. For nutrients, intakes were low for dietary fibre (15.8-19.4 g/day) and vitamin D (2.4-3.0 µg/day) in all countries, for potassium (2288-2938 mg/day) and magnesium (268-285 mg/day) except in Denmark, for vitamin E in Denmark (6.7 mg/day), and for folate in Czech Republic (212 µg/day). CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variation in food and nutrient intakes across Europe, not only between, but also within countries. Individual-level dietary data provide insight into the heterogeneity of dietary habits beyond per capita food supply data, and this is crucial to balancing healthy and environmentally-friendly diets for European citizens.
Center for Health Nutrition and Food National Institute of Public Health Brno Czech Republic
Division of Human Nutrition Wageningen University PO Box 8129 6700 EV Wageningen The Netherlands
Zobrazit více v PubMed
GBD. 2016 Risk Factors Collaborators Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1345–1422. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32366-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Traill WB, Mazzocchi M, Shankar B, Hallam D. Importance of government policies and other influences in transforming global diets. Nutr Rev. 2014;72:591–604. doi: 10.1111/nure.12134. PubMed DOI
Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition . Food systems and diets: Facing the challenges of the 21st century. London: Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition; 2016.
Schmidhuber J, Traill WB. The changing structure of diets in the European Union in relation to healthy eating guidelines. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9:584–595. doi: 10.1079/PHN2005844. PubMed DOI
Balanza R, García-Lorda P, Pérez-Rodrigo C, Aranceta J, Bonet MB, Salas-Salvadó J. Trends in food availability determined by the Food and Agriculture Organization’s food balance sheets in Mediterranean Europe in comparison with other European areas. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10:168–176. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007246592. PubMed DOI
Gerbens-Leenes P, Nonhebel S, Krol M. Food consumption patterns and economic growth. Increasing affluence and the use of natural resources. Appetite. 2010;55:597–608. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.09.013. PubMed DOI
Mozaffarian D, Ludwig DS. Dietary guidelines in the 21st century—a time for food. JAMA. 2010;304:681–682. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1116. PubMed DOI
Kromhout D, Spaaij C, de Goede J, Weggemans R. The 2015 Dutch food-based dietary guidelines. Eur J C Nutr. 2016;70(8):869–878. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.52. PubMed DOI PMC
World Health Organisation (WHO) Food based dietary guidelines in the WHO European region. Copenhagen: WHO; 2003.
Rutten M, Achterbosch TJ, de Boer IJ, et al. Metrics, models and foresight for European sustainable food and nutrition security: the vision of the SUSFANS project. Agric Syst. 2016
Pedersen A, Fagt S, Groth MV, Christensen T, Biltoft-Jensen A, Matthiessen J, Andersen NL, Kørup K, Hartkopp H, Ygil K, Hinsch HJ, Saxholt E, Trolle E (2009) Danskernes kostvaner 2003–2008. In: DTU Fødevareinstituttet
Ruprich JDM, Rehurkova I, Slamenikova E, Resova D. Individual food consumption—the national study SISP04. Prague: CHFCH National Institute of Public Health; 2006.
Leclercq CAD, Piccinelli R, Sette S, Le Donne C, Turrini A. The Italian national food consumption survey INRAN-SCAI 2005-06: main results in terms of food consumption. Publ Health Nutr. 2009;12(12):2504–2532. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009005035. PubMed DOI
Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments (AFSSA) (2009) Report of the 2006/2007 Individual and National Study on Food Consumption 2 (INCA 2). In: Synthèse de l’étude individuelle nationale des consommations alimentaires 2 (INCA 2), 2006–2007, pp 1–44
Matthiessen J, Stockmarr A, Biltoft-Jensen A, Fagt S, Zhang H, Groth MV. Trends in overweight and obesity in Danish children and adolescents: 2000–2008-exploring changes according to parental education. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42:385–392. doi: 10.1177/1403494813520356. PubMed DOI
European Food Safety Authority The food classification and description system FoodEx2 (revision 2) EFSA Supp Publ. 2015;804:90.
EFSA. ( Eurepean. Food Safety Authority) Use of the EFSA comprehensive european food consumption database in exposure assessment. EFSA J. 2011;9:2097. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2097. DOI
Møller ASE, Christensen AT, Hartkopp H. Fødevaredatabanken version 6.0. Denmark: Fødevareinformatik, Afdeling for Ernæring; 2005.
Saxholt E, Christensen AT, Møller A, Hartkopp HB, Hess Ygil H, Hels OH (2008) Fødevaredatabanken, version 7. In: Fødevareinformatik, Afdeling for Ernæring, Fødevareinstituttet, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Czech Centre for Food Composition Database . Czech food composition database version 6.16. Prague: Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information; 2016.
Food Research Institute . Slovak food composition data bank. Bratislava: Department of Risk Assessment Food Composition Data Bank and Consumer’s Survey VUP Food Research Institute; 2016.
Istituto. Nazionale. di. Ricerca. per. gli. Alimenti. e la. Nutrizione. ( INRAN. ) Banca Dati di Composizione degli Alimenti. Roma: Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione; 2016.
Feinberg M, FJ-CLC . Institut national de la recherche agronomique. Paris: Technique & Documentation—Lavoisier; 1995. Répertoire général des aliments (General Inventory of Foods)
Ireland J, dCL, Oseredczuk M et al (2008) French food composition table, version 2008. In: French Food Safety Agency (AFSSA)
Goldberg G, Black A, Jebb S, Cole T, Murgatroyd P, Coward W, Prentice A. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991;45:569–581. PubMed
Black AE. Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake: basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24:1119. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801376. PubMed DOI
Ministry of Food Agriculture and Fisheries . The official dietary guidelines (Danish: De officielle kostråd) Denmark: Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Glostrup; 2013.
Czech Society for Nutrition . Nutrition recommendations for Czech Republic (Czech: Výživová doporučení pro obyvatelstvo České republiky) Prague: Czech Society for Nutrition; 2012.
Italian National Research Institute on Food and Nutrition ( INRAN ; CRA -NUT) Guidelines for healthy Italian food habits, 2003 (Italian: Linee guida per una sana alimentazione italiana. Revisione 2003) Rome: Italian National Research Institute on Food and Nutrition (INRAN; CRA-NUT); 2003.
Programme National Nutrition Santé (PNNS) (2016) La Santé vient en mangeant Le guide alimentaire pour tous. ANSES Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail, Maisons-Alfort Cedex
Van Kernebeek HRJ, Oosting SJ, Feskens EJM, Gerber PJ, De Boer IJM. The effect of nutritional quality on comparing environmental impacts of human diets. J Clean Prod. 2014;73:88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.028. DOI
Roos E, Karlsson H, Witthoft C, Sundberg C. Evaluating the sustainability of diets-combining environmental and nutritional aspects. Environ Sci Policy. 2015;47:157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.001. DOI
Drewnowski A. Defining nutrient density: development and validation of the nutrient rich foods index. J Am Coll Nutr. 2009;28:421 s-426. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2009.10719757. PubMed DOI
Fulgoni VL, 3rd, Keast DR, Drewnowski A. Development and validation of the nutrient-rich foods index: a tool to measure nutritional quality of foods. J Nutr. 2009;139:1549–1554. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.101360. PubMed DOI
EFSA. (European Food Safety Authority) Panel (EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies), 2010. Scientific opinion on principles for deriving and applying dietary reference values. EFSA J. 2010;8:1458.
World Health Organisation (WHO) Guideline: sodium intake for adults and children. Geneva: WHO; 2012. PubMed
World Health Organisation (WHO) Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children. Geneva: WHO; 2015. PubMed
Food and Agriculture Organisation ( FAO. ) Fats and fatty acids in human nutrition. Report of an expert consultation. FAO Food Nutr Pap. 2010;91:1–166. PubMed
Institute of Medicine (IOM) Dietary reference intakes: applications in dietary assesment. Washington DC: National Academy; 2000.
De Irala-Estevez J, Groth M, Johansson L, Oltersdorf U. A systematic review of socio-economic differences in food habits in Europe: consumption of fruit and vegetables. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54:706. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601080. PubMed DOI
Prättälä R, Hakala S, Roskam A-JR, Roos E, Helmert U, Klumbiene J, Van Oyen H, Regidor E, Kunst AE. Association between educational level and vegetable use in nine European countries. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:2174–2182. doi: 10.1017/S136898000900559X. PubMed DOI
Roos E, Talala K, Laaksonen M, Helakorpi S, Rahkonen O, Uutela A, Prättälä R. Trends of socioeconomic differences in daily vegetable consumption, 1979–2002. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008;62:823–833. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602798. PubMed DOI
de Boer J, Schosler H, Aiking H. “Meatless days” or “less but better”? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges. Appetite. 2014;76:120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.002. PubMed DOI
McLean RM. Measuring population sodium intake: a review of methods. Nutrients. 2014;6:4651–4662. doi: 10.3390/nu6114651. PubMed DOI PMC
Tukker AHG, Guinée J, Heijungs R, de Koning A, van Oers L et al (2006) Environmental Impact of Products (EIPRO) Analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the final consumption of the EU25. In: European Commission Technical Report EUR 22284 EN. IPTS/ESTO, European Commission Joint Research Centre Brussels
German Nutrition Society . Ten guidelines for wholesome eating and drinking from the German Nutrition Society (German: Vollwertig essen und trinken nach den 10 Regeln der DGE) Bonn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährungs e.V.; 2013.
The Swedish National Food Agency ( Livsmedelsverket. ) Find your way to eat greener, not too much and to be active! (Hitta ditt sätt att äta grönare, lagom mycket och röra på dig!) Uppsala: Livesmedelsverket; 2017.
Health Council of the Netherlands . Guidelines for a healthy diet: the ecological perspective. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands; 2011.
Macdiarmid J, Kyle J, Horgan G, Loe J, Fyfe C, Johnstone A, McNeill G (2011) Livewell: a balance of healthy and sustainable food choices. In: WWF-UK
Linseisen J, Kesse E, Slimani N, Bueno-De-Mesquita H, Ocké M, Skeie G, Kumle M, Iraeta MD, Gómez PM, Janzon L. Meat consumption in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohorts: results from 24-hour dietary recalls. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5:1243–1258. doi: 10.1079/PHN2002402. PubMed DOI
Kushi LH, Lenart EB, Willett WC. Health implications of Mediterranean diets in light of contemporary knowledge. 2. Meat, wine, fats, and oils. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995;61:1416S1427S. PubMed
Halkjaer J, Olsen A, Bjerregaard L, Deharveng G, Tjønneland A, Welch A, Crowe F, Wirfält E, Hellstrom V, Niravong M. Intake of total, animal and plant proteins, and their food sources in 10 countries in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63:S16-S36. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.73. PubMed DOI
Bingham S, Gill C, Welch A, Day K, Cassidy A, Khaw K, Sneyd M, Key T, Roe L, Day N. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. Br J Nutr. 1994;72:619–643. doi: 10.1079/BJN19940064. PubMed DOI
Holmes B, Dick K, Nelson M. A comparison of four dietary assessment methods in materially deprived households in England. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11:444–456. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007000559. PubMed DOI
De Keyzer W, Huybrechts I, De Vriendt V, Vandevijvere S, Slimani N, Van Oyen H, De Henauw S. Repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption survey. Food Nutr Res. 2011;55:7307. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.7307. PubMed DOI PMC
Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:1220S1228S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/65.4.1220S. PubMed DOI
Crispim SP, Geelen A, De Vries JH, Freisling H, Souverein OW, Hulshof PJ, Ocke MC, Boshuizen H, Andersen LF, Ruprich J. Bias in protein and potassium intake collected with 24-h recalls (EPIC-Soft) is rather comparable across European populations. Eur J Nutr. 2012;51:997–1010. doi: 10.1007/s00394-011-0279-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Dodd KW, Guenther PM, Freedman LS, Subar AF, Kipnis V, Midthune D, Tooze JA, Krebs-Smith SM. Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: a review of the theory. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:1640–1650. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.07.011. PubMed DOI
Larkin FA, Metzner HL, Guire KE. Comparison of 3 consecutive-day and 3 random-day records of dietary-intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 1991;91:1538–1542. PubMed
Tarasuk V, Beaton GH. The nature and individuality of within-subject variation in energy-intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;54:464–470. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/54.3.464. PubMed DOI
Ellozy M. Dietary variability and its impact on nutritional epidemiology. J Chron Dis. 1983;36:237–249. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(83)90058-9. PubMed DOI
Skeie G, Braaten T, Hjartåker A, Lentjes M, Amiano P, Jakszyn P, Pala V, Palanca A, Niekerk E, Verhagen H. Use of dietary supplements in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition calibration study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63:S226S238. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.83. PubMed DOI