Uninterrupted administration of edoxaban vs vitamin K antagonists in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: Rationale and design of the ELIMINATE-AF study

. 2018 Apr ; 41 (4) : 440-449. [epub] 20180417

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid29663464

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at an approximately 0.5% to 3% increased risk of thromboembolism during and immediately after catheter ablation. Treatment guidelines recommend periprocedural oral anticoagulation plus unfractionated heparin during ablation. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran are the only non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants for which there are randomized controlled trials assessing uninterrupted anticoagulation in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. Edoxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is noninferior vs warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism with less major bleeding in patients with nonvalvular AF. The ELIMINATE-AF (Evaluation of Edoxaban Compared With VKA in Subjects Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation) trial is a multinational, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, blinded-endpoint evaluation (PROBE) study to assess the safety and efficacy of once-daily edoxaban 60 mg (30 mg in patients indicated for a dose reduction) vs vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with nonvalvular AF undergoing catheter ablation (http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02942576). A total of 560 patients are planned for randomization to edoxaban or VKA (2:1 ratio) to obtain 450 patients fully compliant with the protocol. Patients will complete 21 to 28 days of anticoagulation prior to the ablation and a 90-day post-ablation period. The primary efficacy endpoint is the composite of all-cause death, stroke, and major bleeding. The primary safety endpoint is major bleeding. A magnetic resonance imaging substudy will assess the incidence of silent cerebral lesions post-ablation. ELIMINATE-AF will define the efficacy and safety of edoxaban for uninterrupted oral anticoagulation during catheter ablation of AF.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Calkins H, Reynolds MR, Spector P, et al. Treatment of atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs or radiofrequency ablation: two systematic literature reviews and meta‐analyses. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2:349–361. PubMed

Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3:32–38. PubMed

January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society [published correction appears in J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2305–2307]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:e1–e76. PubMed

Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow‐up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Europace. 2012;14:528–606. PubMed

Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation Developed in Collaboration With EACTS [article in English, Spanish; published correction appears in Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017;70:1031]. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017;70:50.e1–50.e84. PubMed

Oral H, Chugh A, Ozaydin M, et al. Risk of thromboembolic events after percutaneous left atrial radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2006;114:759–765. PubMed

Vazquez SR, Johnson SA, Rondina MT. Peri‐procedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation. Thromb Res. 2010;126:e69–e77. PubMed PMC

Di Biase L, Burkhardt JD, Santangeli P, et al. Periprocedural stroke and bleeding complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with different anticoagulation management: results from the Role of Coumadin in Preventing Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation (COMPARE) randomized trial. Circulation. 2014;129:2638–2644. PubMed

Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta‐analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;383:955–962. PubMed

Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e275–e444. PubMed PMC

Calkins H, Willems S, Gerstenfeld EP, et al; RE‐CIRCUIT Investigators . Uninterrupted dabigatran versus warfarin for ablation in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1627–1636. PubMed

Cappato R, Marchlinski FE, Hohnloser SH, et al; VENTURE‐AF Investigators . Uninterrupted rivaroxaban vs. uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists for catheter ablation in non‐valvular atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1805–1811. PubMed PMC

Parasrampuria DA, Truitt KE. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of edoxaban, a non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant that inhibits clotting factor Xa. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55:641–655. PubMed PMC

Savaysa (edoxaban) tablets [full prescribing information] . Parsippany, NJ: Daiichi‐Sankyo Inc., 2015.

Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, et al; ENGAGE‐AF TIMI 48 Investigators . Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2093–2104. PubMed

Steffel J, Ruff CT, Hamershock RA, et al. First experience with edoxaban and atrial fibrillation ablation: insights from the ENGAGE AF‐TIMI 48 trial. Int J Cardiol. 2017;244:192–195. PubMed

Lip GY, Agnelli G. Edoxaban: a focused review of its clinical pharmacology. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:1844–1855. PubMed

Weitz JI, Connolly SJ, Patel I, et al. Randomised, parallel‐group, multicentre, multinational phase 2 study comparing edoxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost. 2010;104:633–641. PubMed

Rodeghiero F, Tosetto A, Abshire T, et al; ISTH/SSC Joint VWF and Perinatal/Pediatric Hemostasis Subcommittee Working Group . ISTH/SSC bleeding assessment tool: a standardized questionnaire and a proposal for a new bleeding score for inherited bleeding disorders. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:2063–2065. PubMed

Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123:2736–2747. PubMed

Chesebro JH, Knatterud G, Roberts R, et al. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, Phase I: a comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Clinical findings through hospital discharge. Circulation. 1987;76:142–154. PubMed

Herrera Siklódy C, Deneke T, Hocini M, et al. Incidence of asymptomatic intracranial embolic events after pulmonary vein isolation: comparison of different atrial fibrillation ablation technologies in a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:681–688. PubMed

Deneke T, Shin DI, Balta O, et al. Postablation asymptomatic cerebral lesions: long‐term follow‐up using magnetic resonance imaging. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1705–1711. PubMed

Haeusler KG, Koch L, Herm J, et al. 3 Tesla MRI‐detected brain lesions after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: results of the MACPAF study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:142017. PubMed

Zhao Y, Yang Y, Tang X, et al. New oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin for perioperative anticoagulation in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a meta‐analysis of continuous or interrupted new oral anticoagulants during ablation compared to interrupted or continuous warfarin. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017;48:267–282. PubMed

Aryal MR, Ukaigwe A, Pandit A, et al. Meta‐analysis of efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin or dabigatran in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114:577–582. PubMed

Phan K, Wang N, Pison L, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin or dabigatran in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a meta‐analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2015;185:209–213. PubMed

Hohnloser SH, Camm AJ. Safety and efficacy of dabigatran etexilate during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a meta‐analysis of the literature. Europace. 2013;15:1407–1411. PubMed

Nogami A, Machino T, Harada T, et al; ABRIDGE‐J Study Group . Clinical benefit of minimally interrupted dabigatran versus uninterrupted warfarin for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Circulation. 2017;136:e448–e467. PubMed

Di Biase L, Callans D, Haeusler KG, et al. Rationale and design of AXAFA‐AFNET 5: an investigator‐initiated, randomized, open, blinded outcome assessment, multi‐centre trial comparing continuous apixaban to vitamin K antagonists in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Europace. 2017;19:132–138. PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02942576

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...