• This record comes from PubMed

Feasibility of directional percutaneous epicardial ablation with a partially insulated catheter

. 2018 Oct ; 53 (1) : 105-113. [epub] 20180714

Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
HL007111 National Institutes of Health
LQ1605 National Program of Sustainability
CZ.1.05/1.100/02.0123 FNUSA-ICRC

Links

PubMed 30008046
DOI 10.1007/s10840-018-0404-5
PII: 10.1007/s10840-018-0404-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of directional percutaneous epicardial ablation using a partially insulated catheter. METHODS: Partially insulated catheter prototypes were tested in 12 (6 canine, 6 porcine) animal studies in two centers. Prototypes had interspersed windows to enable visualization of epicardial structures with ultrasound. Epicardial unipolar ablation and ablation between two electrodes was performed according to protocol (5-60 W power, 0-60 mls/min irrigation, 78 s mean duration). RESULTS: Of 96 epicardial ablation attempts, unipolar ablation was delivered in 53.1%. Electrogram evidence of ablation, when analyzable, occurred in 75 of 79 (94.9%) therapies. Paired pre/post-ablation pacing threshold (N = 74) showed significant increase in pacing threshold post-ablation (0.9 to 2.6 mA, P < .0001). Arrhythmias occurred in 18 (18.8%) therapies (11 ventricular fibrillation, 7 ventricular tachycardia), mainly in pigs (72.2%). Coronary artery visualization was variably successful. No phrenic nerve injury was noted during or after ablation. Furthermore, there were minimal pericardial changes with ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Epicardial ablation using a partially insulated catheter to confer epicardial directionality and protect the phrenic nerve seems feasible. Iterations with ultrasound windows may enable real-time epicardial surface visualization thus identifying coronary arteries at ablation sites. Further improvements, however, are necessary.

See more in PubMed

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct;7(5):913-9 PubMed

J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:195483 PubMed

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul;32(7):1011-9 PubMed

Heart Rhythm. 2015 Mar;12(3):623-630 PubMed

Circulation. 2004 May 18;109(19):2363-9 PubMed

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996 Jun;7(6):531-6 PubMed

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Jul;27(7):933-7 PubMed

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 25;54(9):799-808 PubMed

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Aug;8(4):896-904 PubMed

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 May 25;55(21):2366-72 PubMed

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2001 Sep;5(3):253-66 PubMed

Europace. 2009 May;11(5):565-70 PubMed

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Sep;12(9):1502-13 PubMed

Heart Rhythm. 2007 Jan;4(1):95-8 PubMed

Heart Rhythm. 2013 Nov;10(11):1613-21 PubMed

Heart Rhythm. 2015 Aug;12(8):1838-44 PubMed

Heart Rhythm. 2008 May;5(5):766-7 PubMed

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Jul;28(1):76-80; discussion 80-2 PubMed

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995 Sep;42(9):879-90 PubMed

Circulation. 2009 Aug 4;120(5):366-75 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...