Sublingual allergen immunotherapy with a liquid birch pollen product in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
30508538
DOI
10.1016/j.jaci.2018.11.018
PII: S0091-6749(18)31720-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Birch pollen allergy, allergen immunotherapy, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, combined symptom and medication score, efficacy, pivotal phase III trial, quality of life, safety, sublingual immunotherapy,
- MeSH
- Allergens immunology MeSH
- Conjunctivitis, Allergic therapy MeSH
- Antigens, Plant immunology MeSH
- Betula immunology MeSH
- Asthma therapy MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Double-Blind Method MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Pollen immunology MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal therapy MeSH
- Sublingual Immunotherapy * adverse effects MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Allergens MeSH
- Antigens, Plant MeSH
BACKGROUND: Sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SLIT) has been demonstrated to be both clinically efficacious and safe. However, in line with the current regulatory guidance from the European Medicines Agency, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) products must demonstrate their efficacy and safety in pivotal phase III trials for registration. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of sublingual high-dose liquid birch pollen extract (40,000 allergy units native [AUN]/mL) in adults with birch pollen allergy. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group multicenter trial was conducted in 406 adult patients with moderate-to-severe birch pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with or without mild-to-moderate controlled asthma. Treatment was started 3 to 6 months before the birch pollen season and continued during the season in 40 clinical study centers in 5 European countries. For primary end point assessment, the recommended combined symptom and medication score of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology was used. Secondary end points included quality-of-life assessments, immunologic parameters, and safety. RESULTS: Primary efficacy results demonstrated a significant (P < .0001) and clinically relevant (32%) reduction in the combined symptom and medication score compared with placebo after 3 to 6 months of SLIT. Significantly better rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life scores (P < .0001) and the patient's own overall assessment of his or her health status, including the visual analog scale score (Euro Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale; P = .0025), were also demonstrated. In total, a good safety profile of SLIT was observed. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed both the clinical efficacy and safety of a sublingual liquid birch pollen extract in adults with birch pollen allergy in a pivotal phase III trial (EudraCT: 2013-005550-30; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02231307).
ALIAN s r o Ambulancia alergológie a klinickej imunológie Bardejov Slovakia
Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden Germany
Division of Internal Medicine Asthma and Allergy Medical University of Lodz Lodz Poland
HAL Allergy BV Leiden The Netherlands
Upper Airways Research Laboratory University of Ghent Ghent Belgium
References provided by Crossref.org