Randomised phase II study of second-line olaratumab with mitoxantrone/prednisone versus mitoxantrone/prednisone alone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Clinical Trial, Phase II, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
30573277
DOI
10.1016/j.ejca.2018.10.005
PII: S0959-8049(18)31433-3
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Antineoplastics, Metastatic, Mitoxantrone, Monoclonal antibodies, Olaratumab, Platelet-derived growth factor alpha, Prostate cancer, Receptor,
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Metastasis MeSH
- Survival Rate MeSH
- Mitoxantrone administration & dosage MeSH
- Antibodies, Monoclonal administration & dosage MeSH
- Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant drug therapy pathology MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Prednisone administration & dosage MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase II MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Mitoxantrone MeSH
- Antibodies, Monoclonal MeSH
- olaratumab MeSH Browser
- Prednisone MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRα) is expressed in primary prostate adenocarcinoma and in associated skeletal metastases. Olaratumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds PDGFRα and blocks downstream signalling. This phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of olaratumab in combination with mitoxantrone and prednisone (M/P) versus M/P alone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who progressed after docetaxel. METHODS: Patients were randomised to receive 21-d cycles of olaratumab (15 mg/kg, Days 1 and 8) plus mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2, Day 1) and prednisone (5 mg, twice daily) or M/P alone. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end-point. Secondary end-points included overall survival (OS), safety, and circulating tumour cell (CTC) counts. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were randomised, 63 to olaratumab + M/P and 60 to M/P. Median PFS was 2.3 months for olaratumab + M/P and 2.4 months for M/P (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87-1.90). Median OS was 14.2 months for olaratumab + M/P and 12.8 months for M/P (HR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.72-1.61). Both treatment arms had similar toxicity profiles; neutropenia (24% versus 15%), anaemia (13% versus 14%) and fatigue (11% versus 9%) (olaratumab + M/P versus M/P, respectively) were the most common grade ≥3 events. High CTC count was associated with poorer OS in both arms. Patients with very high cell counts (>37 cells/7.5 ml) exhibited improved OS with olaratumab + M/P (interaction P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Olaratumab + M/P had an acceptable safety profile but did not improve the efficacy of M/P chemotherapy. Further study with selected patient populations and earlier in the disease course might be considered.
Centrum Onkologii Instytut im Marii Sklodowskiej Curie Warsaw Poland
CHU Sart Tilman University of Liège Liège Belgium
Clinica Universidad De Navarra Pamplona Spain
Department of Urologie Universitätsmedizin Rostock Rostock Germany
Department of Urology and Uro Oncology University Hospital Cologne Cologne Germany
Department of Urology Josa Andras Teaching Hospital Nyiregyhaza Hungary
Department of Urology University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
Eli Lilly and Company Basingstoke United Kingdom
Eli Lilly and Company Bridgewater NJ USA
Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis IN USA
Medical Oncology Department Hospital 12 De Octubre Madrid Spain
Medical Oncology Department Santa Chiara Hospital Trento Italy
References provided by Crossref.org