Sludge treatment beds (STBs) have been used widely in many countries due to low energy consumption, low operating and maintenance costs, and better environmental compatibility. Penetration, evaporation, and transpiration are the main processes for sludge dewatering in STBs. However, the leachate quality from STBs usually cannot meet discharge limits. Moreover, such leachate has very low COD/N ratio, which makes it difficult to treat. In the present study, two subsurface flow (SSF) constructed wetlands (CWs) were investigated for the treatment of leachate from STBs under three different hydraulic retention time (HRT) (3 days, 4 days, 6 days), aiming for evaluating the effects of plants and HRT on treatment performance, as well as the potential of SSF CWs to treat sludge leachate with low COD/N ration. The results showed that plants play an important role in leachate treatment. The best treatment performance was achieved with HRT of 4 days. In this condition, the mean removal efficiencies of COD (chemical oxygen demand), NH4+-N, TN (total nitrogen), and TP (total phosphorus) in the planted and the unplanted CWs were 61.6% (unplanted - 3.7%), 76.6% (unplanted 43.5%), 70% (unplanted 41%), and 65.6% (unplanted 6%), respectively. Heavy metal concentrations were below the Chinese integrated wastewater discharge standard during the experimental period in the planted CW, and the removal efficiencies in the planted CW system were higher than in the unplanted CW system. In all, planted SSF CWs can be an effective approach in removing leachate from sludge treatment beds. Furthermore, considering to temperature and seasonal variation, the leachate from STBs needs to be further studied in pilot- and full-scale condition.

College of Environmental Science and Engineering Guilin University of Technology Jian'gan Road 12 Guilin 541004 China

College of Resources and Environment Huazhong Agricultural University Wuhan China

College of Resources and Environmental Science South Central University for Nationalities Wuhan China

Department of Applied Ecology Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 16521 Prague Czech Republic

Key Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco Environment Ministry of Education Chongqing University Chongqing 400045 People's Republic of China

The Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Medicinal Plants of Jiangsu Province Jiangsu Normal University Shanghai Road 101 Xuzhou 221116 China

Zobrazit více v PubMed

J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2005;40(6-7):1369-79 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2007 Jul 15;380(1-3):48-65 PubMed

Environ Pollut. 2009 Apr;157(4):1186-94 PubMed

Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jan;101(1):51-7 PubMed

Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Jan 1;45(1):61-9 PubMed

J Hazard Mater. 2012 Apr 30;213-214:393-405 PubMed

J Environ Manage. 2012 Dec 15;112:429-48 PubMed

Water Sci Technol. 2013;68(6):1223-32 PubMed

Water Environ Res. 2013 Sep;85(9):855-62 PubMed

Water Res. 2015 Jun 1;76:160-70 PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jan;23(1):180-97 PubMed

Water Environ Res. 2015 Nov;87(11):1999-2007 PubMed

J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2016 Jan 28;51(2):105-113 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2016 Feb 15;544:495-8 PubMed

J Environ Manage. 2016 Apr 1;170:15-20 PubMed

J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2016;51(5):380-8 PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jun;23(12):11957-63 PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jun;23(12):12384-91 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jul 15;559:212-217 PubMed

Chem Biodivers. 2016 May;13(5):582-90 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2017 Apr 15;584-585:742-750 PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Feb;25(5):4149-4164 PubMed

Water Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;77(1-2):279-285 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jan 10;647:149-157 PubMed