Mate value is a construct that can be measured in various ways, ranging from complex but difficult-to-obtain ratings all the way to single-item self-report measures. Due to low sample sizes in previous studies, little is known about the relationship between mate value and demographic variables. In this article, we tested the Mate Value Scale, a relatively new, short, 4-item self-report measure in two large samples. In the first sample of over 1,000, mostly college-age participants, the scale was found to be reliable and correlated with criterion variables in expected ways. In the second, larger sample, which included over 21,000 participants, we have tested for differences across demographics. Contrary to theoretical expectations and previous findings with smaller samples, the differences were either very small (sexual orientation, age, education) or small (sex, socioeconomic status, relationship status) in terms of their effect size. This suggests that the scale is not measuring "objective" mate value (as understood either in terms of fitness or actual mating decisions by potential partners on the "market"), but a self-perception of it, open to social comparison, relative standards, possibly even biases, raising questions about measuring self-perceived versus objective mate value.

Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Institute of Psychology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary

National Institute of Mental Health Klecany Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Arnocky S. (2018). Self-perceived mate value, facial attractiveness, and mate preferences: Do desirable men want it all? Evolutionary Psychology, 16. PubMed PMC

Blake K. R., Bastian B., O’Dean S. M., Denson T. F. (2017). High estradiol and low progesterone are associated with high assertiveness in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 75, 91–99. PubMed

Bőthe B., Tóth-Király I., Zsila Á., Griffiths M. D., Demetrovics Z., Orosz G. (2018). The development of the problematic pornography consumption scale (PPCS). The Journal of Sex Research, 55, 395–406. PubMed

Brase G. L., Guy E. C. (2004). The demographics of mate value and self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 471–484.

Brindley S., McDonald M. M., Welling L. L., Zeigler-Hill V. (2018). An evolutionary perspective on intergroup dating bias. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 3, 1–28.

Brown T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Buss D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14.

Buss D. M., Schmitt D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. PubMed

Buss D. M., Shackelford T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–361. PubMed

Campbell L., Wilbur C. J. (2009). Are the traits we prefer in potential mates the traits they value in themselves? An analysis of sex differences in the self-concept. Self and Identity, 8, 418–446.

Chen F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.

Csajbók Z., Berkics M. (2017). Factor, factor, on the whole, who’s the best fitting of all? Factors of mate preferences in a large sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 114, 92–102.

Diener E., Emmons R. A., Larsen R. J., Griffin S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. PubMed

Edlund J. E., Sagarin B. J. (2010). Mate value and mate preferences: An investigation into decisions made with and without constraints. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 835–839.

Edlund J. E., Sagarin B. J. (2014). The mate value scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 72–77.

Erik E., Bhogal M. S. (2016). Do the dark triad and self-perceived mate value predict intention to mate poach? Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 7, 1–4.

Festinger L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

Fisher M., Cox A., Bennett S., Gavric D. (2008). Components of self-perceived mate value. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2, 156.

Fletcher G. J., Simpson J. A., Thomas G., Giles L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 72–89. PubMed

Gillen M. M., Collisson B., Murtagh M., Browne B. L., McCutcheon L. E. (2016). Additional psychometric data for the mate value scale. Journal of Relationships Research, 7, 1–7.

Goodwin R., Marshall T., Fülöp M., Adonu J., Spiewak S., Neto F., Hernandez Plaza S. (2012). Mate value and self-esteem: Evidence from eight cultural groups. PLoS One, 7, e36106. PubMed PMC

Jonason P. K., Garcia J. R., Webster G. D., Li N. P., Fisher H. E. (2015). Relationship dealbreakers: Traits people avoid in potential mates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1697–1711. PubMed

Kasumovic M. M., Blake K., Dixson B. J., Denson T. F. (2015). Why do people play violent video games? Demographic, status-related, and mating-related correlates in men and women. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 204–211.

Kenny D. A., Kaniskan B., McCoach D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44, 486–507.

Kirkpatrick L. A., Waugh C. E., Valencia A., Webster G. D. (2002). The functional domain specificity of self-esteem and the differential prediction of aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 756. PubMed

Kirsner B. R., Figueredo A. J., Jacobs W. J. (2003). Self, friends, and lovers: Structural relations among Beck Depression Inventory scores and perceived mate values. Journal of Affective Disorders, 75, 131–148. PubMed

Leary M. R., Baumeister R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.

Lemay E. P. Jr & Wolf N. R. (2016). Projection of romantic and sexual desire in opposite-sex friendships: How wishful thinking creates a self-fulfilling prophecy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 864–878. PubMed

Luo S. (2017). Assortative mating and couple similarity: Patterns, mechanisms, and consequences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11, e12337.

Mafra A. L., Lopes F. A. (2014). “Am I good enough for you?” Features related to self-perception and self-esteem of Brazilians from different socioeconomic status. Psychology, 5, 653–663.

March E., Wagstaff D. L. (2017). Sending nudes: Sex, self-rated mate value, and trait Machiavellianism predict sending unsolicited explicit images. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2210. PubMed PMC

Martos T., Sallay V., Désfalvi J., Szabó T., Ittzés A. (2014). Az Élettel való Elégedettség Skála magyar változatának (SWLS-H) pszichometriai jellemzői [Psychometric characteristics of the Hungarian version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS-H)]. Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, 15, 289–303.

McDonald M. M., Coleman B., Brindley S. (2019). Calibrating fear of rape: Threat likelihood and victimization costs. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 326–330.

Meskó N., Láng A., Kocsor F., Rózsa K. (2012). Measuring sexual commitment. Hungarian version of the sociosexual orientation inventory revised (SOI-R). Magyar Pszichologiai Szemle, 67, 733–755.

Pass J. A., Lindenberg S. M., Park J. H. (2010). All you need is love: Is the sociometer especially sensitive to one’s mating capacity? European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 221–234.

Penke L., Asendorpf J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135. PubMed

Penke L., Denissen J. J. (2008). Sex differences and lifestyle-dependent shifts in the attunement of self-esteem to self-perceived mate value: Hints to an adaptive mechanism? Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1123–1129.

Peplau L. A., Cutrona C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480. PubMed

Regan P. C. (1998). What if you can’t get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1294–1303.

Roberts B. W., Donahue E. M. (1994). One personality, multiple selves: Integrating personality and social roles. Journal of Personality, 62, 199–218. PubMed

Rosenberg M. (1965). Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Measures Package, 61, 52.

Sallay V., Martos T., Földvári M., Szabó T., Ittzés A. (2014). Hungarian version of the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSES-H): An alternative translation, structural invariance, and validity. Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, 15, 259–275.

Shackelford T. K. (2001). Self-esteem in marriage. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 371–390.

Singh D. (2002). Female mate value at a glance: Relationship of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23, 81–91. PubMed

Symons D. (1985). Darwinism and contemporary marriage. In Davis K., Grossbard-Shechtman A. (Eds.), Contemporary Marriage (pp. 133–155). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Trivers R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection (Vol. 136). Cambridge, MA: Biological Laboratories, Harvard University.

Urbán R., Szigeti R., Kökönyei G., Demetrovics Z. (2014). Global self-esteem and method effects: Competing factor structures, longitudinal invariance and response styles in adolescents. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 488. PubMed PMC

Wenzel A., Emerson T. (2009). Mate selection in socially anxious and nonanxious individuals. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 341–363.

Zhang L., Liu S., Li Y., Ruan L. J. (2015). Heterosexual rejection and mate choice: A sociometer perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1846. PubMed PMC

Observed Aspects of Mate Value and Sociosexuality Account for Mate Preferences: Data from a Large, Representative Study from Czechia

Individual Differences in How Desirable People Think They Are as a Mate