The Quality of DNA Isolated from Processed Food and Feed via Different Extraction Procedures
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
QJ1530107
Ministerstvo Zemědělství
RO0516
Ministerstvo Zemědělství
LO1218
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
PubMed
30917594
PubMed Central
PMC6471455
DOI
10.3390/molecules24061188
PII: molecules24061188
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- DNA degradation, DNA yield, food analysis, food authenticity, meat products, polymerase chain reaction,
- MeSH
- červené maso MeSH
- DNA normy MeSH
- kur domácí MeSH
- masné výrobky analýza MeSH
- polymerázová řetězová reakce metody MeSH
- reagenční diagnostické soupravy MeSH
- skot MeSH
- Sus scrofa MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- skot MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- DNA MeSH
- reagenční diagnostické soupravy MeSH
The extraction of DNA is a critical step for species identification by PCR analysis in processed food and feed products. In this study, eight DNA extraction procedures were compared-DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit, DNeasy mericon Food Kit, chemagic DNA Tissue 10 Kit, Food DNA Isolation Kit, UltraPrep Genomic DNA Food Mini Prep Kit, High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit, phenol-chloroform extraction, and NucleoSpin Food-Using self-prepared samples from both raw and heat-processed and/or mechanically treated muscles and different types of meat products and pet food (pork, beef, and chicken). The yield, purity, and suitability of DNA for PCR amplification was evaluated. Additionally, comparisons between the effectiveness of various extraction methods were made with regard to price, and labor- and time-intensiveness. It was found that the DNeasy mericon Food Kit was the optimal choice for the extraction of DNA from raw muscle, heat-treated muscle, and homemade meat products from multiple and single species.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Lo Y., Shaw P. DNA-based techniques for authentication of processed food and food supplements. Food Chem. 2018;240:767–774. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.08.022. PubMed DOI
Mackie I.M., Pryde S.E., Gonzales-Sotelo C., Medina I., Peréz-Martín R., Quinteiro J., Rey-Mendez M., Rehbein H. Challenges in the identification of species of canned fish. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1999;10:9–14. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00013-8. DOI
Bauer T., Weller P., Hammes W.P., Hertel C. The effect of processing parameters on DNA degradation in food. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2003;217:338–343. doi: 10.1007/s00217-003-0743-y. DOI
Bossier P. Authentication of seafood products by DNA patterns. J. Food Sci. 1999;64:189–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb15862.x. DOI
Lockley A.K., Bardsley R.G. DNA-based methods for food authentication. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2000;11:67–77. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2244(00)00049-2. DOI
Piskata Z., Pospisilova E., Borilova G. Comparative study of DNA extraction methods from fresh and processed yellowfin tuna muscle tissue. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017;20:S430–S443. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2017.1297953. DOI
Partis L., Croan D., Guo Z., Clark R., Coldham T., Murby J. Evaluation of a DNA fingerprinting method for determining the species origin of meats. Meat Sci. 2000;54:369–376. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00112-6. PubMed DOI
Laube I., Zagon J., Broll H. Quantitative determination of commercially relevant species in foods by real-time PCR. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2007;42:336–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01249.x. DOI
Fajardo V., Gonzalez I., Martin I., Rojas M., Hernandez P.E., Garcia T., Martin R. Real-Time PCR for detection and quantification of red deer (Cervus elaphus), fallow deer (Dama dama), and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in meat mixtures. Meat Sci. 2008;79:289–298. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.09.013. PubMed DOI
Mafra I., Ferreira I.M., Oliveira M.B.P. Food authentication by PCR-based methods. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2008;227:649–665. doi: 10.1007/s00217-007-0782-x. DOI
Kesmen Z., Gulluce A., Sahin F., Yetim H. Identification of meat species by TaqMan-based real-time PCR assay. Meat Sci. 2009;82:444–449. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.02.019. PubMed DOI
Kesmen Z., Yetiman A.E., Sahin F., Yetim H. Detection of chicken and turkey meat in meat mixtures by using real-time PCR assays. J. Food Sci. 2012;77:167–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02536.x. PubMed DOI
Yusop M.H.M., Mustafa S., Che Man Y.B., Omar A.R., Mokhtar N.F.K. Detection of raw pork targeting porcine-specific mitochondrial cytochrome B gene by molecular beacon probe real-time polymerase chain reaction. Food Anal. Method. 2012;5:422–429. doi: 10.1007/s12161-011-9260-y. DOI
Izadpanah M., Mohebali N., Elyasi gorji Z., Farzaneh P., Vakhshiteh F., Fazeli A.S. Simple and fast multiplex PCR method for detection of species origin in meat products. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018;55:698–703. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2980-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Murugaiah C., Noor Z.M., Mastakim M., Bilung L.M., Selamat J., Radu S. Meat species identification and halal authentication analysis using mitochondrial DNA. Meat Sci. 2009;8:57–61. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.03.015. PubMed DOI
Pegels N., Gonzalez I., Lopez-Calleja I., Fernandez S., Garcia T., Martin R. Evaluation of a TaqMan real-time PCR assay for detection of chicken, turkey, duck and goose material in highly processed industrial feed samples. Poultry Sci. 2012;91:1709–1719. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01954. PubMed DOI
Pegels N., Gonzalez I., Garcia T., Martin R. Avian-specific real-time PCR assay for authenticity control in farm animal feed and pet foods. Food Chem. 2014;142:39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.031. PubMed DOI
Ren Y., Xiang L., Liu Y., Yang L., Cai Y., Quan S., Pan L., Chen S. A novel quantitative real-time PCR method for identification and quantification of mammalian and poultry species in food. Food Control. 2017;76:42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.01.003. DOI
Buntjer J.B., Lamine A., Haagsma N., Lenstra J.A. Species identification by oligonucleotide hybridisation: The influence of processing of meat products. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999;79:53–57. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199901)79:1<53::AID-JSFA171>3.0.CO;2-E. DOI
Musto M. DNA quality and integrity of nuclear and mitochondrial sequences from beef meat as affected by different cooking methods. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2011;49:523–528.
Camma C., Di Domenico M., Monaco F. Development and validation of fast real-time PCR assays for species identification in raw and cooked meat mixtures. Food Control. 2012;23:400–404. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.08.007. DOI
Sakalar E., Abasiyanik M.F., Bektik E., Tayyrov A. Effect of heat processing on DNA quantification of meat species. J. Food Sci. 2012;77:N40–N43. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02853.x. PubMed DOI
Di Pinto A., Forte V.T., Guastadisegni M.C., Martino C., Schena F.P., Tantillo G.A. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for food analysis. Food Control. 2017;18:76–80. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.08.011. DOI
Stefanova P., Taseva M., Georgieva T., Gotcheva V., Angelov A.A. Modified CTAB method for DNA extraction from soybean and meat products. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2013;27:3803–3810. doi: 10.5504/BBEQ.2013.0026. DOI
Muhammed M.A., Bindu B.S.C., Jini R., Prashanth K.V.H., Bhaskar N. Evaluation of different DNA extraction methods for the detection of adulteration in raw and processed meat through polymerase chain reaction—Restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015;52:514–520. doi: 10.1007/s13197-013-1024-9. DOI
Yalcinkaya B., Yumbul E., Mozioglu E., Akgoz M. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for meat analysis. Food Chem. 2017;221:1253–1257. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.032. PubMed DOI
Aslan O., Hamill R.M., Sweeney T., Reardon W., Mullen A.M. Integrity of nuclear genomic deoxyribonucleic acid in cooked meat: Implications for food traceability. J. Anim. Sci. 2009;87:57–61. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-0995. PubMed DOI
Wilson I.G. Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl. Environ. Microb. 1997;63:3741–3751. PubMed PMC
Cawthorn D., Steinman H.A., Witthuhn R.C. Comparative study of different methods for the extraction of DNA from fish species commercially available in South Africa. Food Control. 2011;22:231–244. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.07.003. DOI
Matsunaga T., Chikuni K., Tanabe R., Muroya S., Shibata K., Yamada J., Shinmura Y.A. Quick and simple method for the identification of meat species and meat products by PCR assay. Meat Sci. 1999;51:143–148. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00112-0. PubMed DOI
Meyer R., Candrian U., Luthy J. Detection of pork in heated meat products by polymerase chain reaction. J. AOAC Int. 1994;77:617–622. PubMed
Hird H., Chisholm J., Sanchez A., Hernandez M., Goodier R., Schneede K., Boltz C., Popping B. Effect of heat and pressure processing on DNA fragmentation and implications for the detection of meat using a real-time polymerase chain reaction. Food Addit. Contam. 2006;23:645–650. doi: 10.1080/02652030600603041. PubMed DOI
Parvalbumin Gene: A Valuable Marker for Pike Authentication and Allergen Risk Assessment
Identification of Selected Tuna Species in Commercial Products