A hallmark of meiosis is the rearrangement of parental alleles to ensure genetic diversity in the gametes. These chromosome rearrangements are mediated by the repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) as genetic crossovers between parental homologs. In mice, humans, and many other mammals, meiotic DSBs occur primarily at hotspots, determined by sequence-specific binding of the PRDM9 protein. Without PRDM9, meiotic DSBs occur near gene promoters and other functional sites. Studies in a limited number of mouse strains showed that functional PRDM9 is required to complete meiosis, but despite its apparent importance, Prdm9 has been repeatedly lost across many animal lineages. Both the reason for mouse sterility in the absence of PRDM9 and the mechanism by which Prdm9 can be lost remain unclear. Here, we explore whether mice can tolerate the loss of Prdm9 By generating Prdm9 functional knockouts in an array of genetic backgrounds, we observe a wide range of fertility phenotypes and ultimately demonstrate that PRDM9 is not required for completion of male meiosis. Although DSBs still form at a common subset of functional sites in all mice lacking PRDM9, meiotic outcomes differ substantially. We speculate that DSBs at functional sites are difficult to repair as a crossover and that by increasing the efficiency of crossover formation at these sites, genetic modifiers of recombination rates can allow for meiotic progression. This model implies that species with a sufficiently high recombination rate may lose Prdm9 yet remain fertile.

Center for Genome Dynamics The Jackson Laboratory Bar Harbor Maine 04609 USA

Laboratory of Germ Cell Development Division BIOCEV Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences 14220 Prague Czech Republic

Laboratory of Transgenic Models of Diseases and Czech Centre for Phenogenomics Division BIOCEV Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences 14220 Prague Czech Republic

National Institute of Diabetes Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland 20892 USA

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Anderson LK, Reeves A, Webb LM, Ashley T. 1999. Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics 151: 1569–1579. PubMed PMC

Axelsson E, Webster MT, Ratnakumar A, LUPA Consortium, Ponting CP, Lindblad-Toh K. 2012. Death of PRDM9 coincides with stabilization of the recombination landscape in the dog genome. Genome Res 22: 51–63. 10.1101/gr.124123.111 PubMed DOI PMC

Baker CL, Walker M, Kajita S, Petkov PM, Paigen K. 2014. PRDM9 binding organizes hotspot nucleosomes and limits Holliday junction migration. Genome Res 24: 724–732. 10.1101/gr.170167.113 PubMed DOI PMC

Baker CL, Kajita S, Walker M, Saxl RL, Raghupathy N, Choi K, Petkov PM, Paigen K. 2015a. PRDM9 drives evolutionary erosion of hotspots in Mus musculus through haplotype-specific initiation of meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet 11: e1004916 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004916 PubMed DOI PMC

Baker CL, Petkova P, Walker M, Flachs P, Mihola O, Trachtulec Z, Petkov PM, Paigen K. 2015b. Multimer formation explains allelic suppression of PRDM9 recombination hotspots. PLoS Genet 11: e1005512 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005512 PubMed DOI PMC

Baker Z, Schumer M, Haba Y, Bashkirova L, Holland C, Rosenthal GG, Przeworski M. 2017. Repeated losses of PRDM9-directed recombination despite the conservation of PRDM9 across vertebrates. eLife 6: e24133 10.7554/eLife.24133 PubMed DOI PMC

Balcova M, Faltusova B, Gergelits V, Bhattacharyya T, Mihola O, Trachtulec Z, Knopf C, Fotopulosova V, Chvatalova I, Gregorova S, et al. 2016. Hybrid sterility locus on Chromosome X controls meiotic recombination rate in mouse. PLoS Genet 12: e1005906 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005906 PubMed DOI PMC

Baudat F, Buard J, Grey C, Fledel-Alon A, Ober C, Przeworski M, Coop G, de Massy B. 2010. PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327: 836–840. 10.1126/science.1183439 PubMed DOI PMC

Bhattacharyya T, Gregorova S, Mihola O, Anger M, Sebestova J, Denny P, Simecek P, Forejt J. 2013. Mechanistic basis of infertility of mouse intersubspecific hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110: E468–E477. 10.1073/pnas.1219126110 PubMed DOI PMC

Bhattacharyya T, Reifova R, Gregorova S, Simecek P, Gergelits V, Mistrik M, Martincova I, Pialek J, Forejt J. 2014. X chromosome control of meiotic chromosome synapsis in mouse inter-subspecific hybrids. PLoS Genet 10: e1004088 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004088 PubMed DOI PMC

Bolcun-Filas E, Schimenti JC. 2012. Genetics of meiosis and recombination in mice. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 298: 179–227. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394309-5.00005-5 PubMed DOI

Bolcun-Filas E, Rinaldi VD, White ME, Schimenti JC. 2014. Reversal of female infertility by Chk2 ablation reveals the oocyte DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Science 343: 533–536. 10.1126/science.1247671 PubMed DOI PMC

Brick K, Smagulova F, Khil P, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova GV. 2012. Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice. Nature 485: 642–645. 10.1038/nature11089 PubMed DOI PMC

Brick K, Pratto F, Sun CY, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova G. 2018. Analysis of meiotic double-strand break initiation in mammals. Methods Enzymol 601: 391–418. 10.1016/bs.mie.2017.11.037 PubMed DOI PMC

Burgoyne PS, Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM. 2009. The consequences of asynapsis for mammalian meiosis. Nat Rev Genet 10: 207–216. 10.1038/nrg2505 PubMed DOI

Cloutier JM, Mahadevaiah SK, ElInati E, Nussenzweig A, Tóth A, Turner JM. 2015. Histone H2AFX links meiotic chromosome asynapsis to prophase I oocyte loss in mammals. PLoS Genet 11: e1005462 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005462 PubMed DOI PMC

Davies B, Hatton E, Altemose N, Hussin JG, Pratto F, Zhang G, Hinch AG, Moralli D, Biggs D, Diaz R, et al. 2016. Re-engineering the zinc fingers of PRDM9 reverses hybrid sterility in mice. Nature 530: 171–176. 10.1038/nature16931 PubMed DOI PMC

Di Giacomo M, Barchi M, Baudat F, Edelmann W, Keeney S, Jasin M. 2005. Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102: 737–742. 10.1073/pnas.0406212102 PubMed DOI PMC

Diagouraga B, Clément JAJ, Duret L, Kadlec J, de Massy B, Baudat F. 2018. PRDM9 methyltransferase activity is essential for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation at its binding sites. Mol Cell 69: 853–865.e6. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.033 PubMed DOI

Doetschman T. 2009. Influence of genetic background on genetically engineered mouse phenotypes. Methods Mol Biol 530: 423–433. 10.1007/978-1-59745-471-1_23 PubMed DOI PMC

Fairfield H, Gilbert GJ, Barter M, Corrigan RR, Curtain M, Ding Y, D'Ascenzo M, Gerhardt DJ, He C, Huang W, et al. 2011. Mutation discovery in mice by whole exome sequencing. Genome Biol 12: R86 10.1186/gb-2011-12-9-r86 PubMed DOI PMC

Faisal I, Kauppi L. 2016. Sex chromosome recombination failure, apoptosis, and fertility in male mice. Chromosoma 125: 227–235. 10.1007/s00412-015-0542-9 PubMed DOI

Flachs P, Mihola O, Šimeček P, Gregorová S, Schimenti JC, Matsui Y, Baudat F, de Massy B, Piálek J, Forejt J, et al. 2012. Interallelic and intergenic incompatibilities of the Prdm9 (Hst1) gene in mouse hybrid sterility. PLoS Genet 8: e1003044 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003044 PubMed DOI PMC

Flachs P, Bhattacharyya T, Mihola O, Piálek J, Forejt J, Trachtulec Z. 2014. Prdm9 incompatibility controls oligospermia and delayed fertility but no selfish transmission in mouse intersubspecific hybrids. PLoS One 9: e95806 10.1371/journal.pone.0095806 PubMed DOI PMC

Gregorová S, Forejt J. 2000. PWD/Ph and PWK/Ph inbred mouse strains of Mus m. musculus subspecies—a valuable resource of phenotypic variations and genomic polymorphisms. Folia Biol (Praha) 46: 31–41. PubMed

Gregorová S, Divina P, Storchova R, Trachtulec Z, Fotopulosova V, Svenson KL, Donahue LR, Paigen B, Forejt J. 2008. Mouse consomic strains: exploiting genetic divergence between Mus m. musculus and Mus m. domesticus subspecies. Genome Res 18: 509–515. 10.1101/gr.7160508 PubMed DOI PMC

Grey C, Baudat F, de Massy B. 2018. PRDM9, a driver of the genetic map. PLoS Genet 14: e1007479 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007479 PubMed DOI PMC

Guénet JL, Bonhomme F. 2003. Wild mice: an ever-increasing contribution to a popular mammalian model. Trends Genet 19: 24–31. 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)00007-0 PubMed DOI

Hayashi K, Yoshida K, Matsui Y. 2005. A histone H3 methyltransferase controls epigenetic events required for meiotic prophase. Nature 438: 374–378. 10.1038/nature04112 PubMed DOI

Imai Y, Baudat F, Taillepierre M, Stanzione M, Toth A, de Massy B. 2017. The PRDM9 KRAB domain is required for meiosis and involved in protein interactions. Chromosoma 126: 681–695. 10.1007/s00412-017-0631-z PubMed DOI PMC

Kauppi L, Barchi M, Lange J, Baudat F, Jasin M, Keeney S. 2013. Numerical constraints and feedback control of double-strand breaks in mouse meiosis. Genes Dev 27: 873–886. 10.1101/gad.213652.113 PubMed DOI PMC

Khil PP, Smagulova F, Brick KM, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova GV. 2012. Sensitive mapping of recombination hotspots using sequencing-based detection of ssDNA. Genome Res 22: 957–965. 10.1101/gr.130583.111 PubMed DOI PMC

Kogo H, Tsutsumi M, Ohye T, Inagaki H, Abe T, Kurahashi H. 2012. HORMAD1-dependent checkpoint/surveillance mechanism eliminates asynaptic oocytes. Genes Cells 17: 439–454. 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2012.01600.x PubMed DOI

Li H. 2013. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv:1303.3997v2 [q-bio.GN], pp. 1–3.

Liang K, Keleş S. 2012. Normalization of ChIP-seq data with control. BMC Bioinformatics 13: 199 10.1186/1471-2105-13-199 PubMed DOI PMC

Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM, Baudat F, Rogakou EP, de Boer P, Blanco-Rodríguez J, Jasin M, Keeney S, Bonner WM, Burgoyne PS. 2001. Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis. Nat Genet 27: 271–276. 10.1038/85830 PubMed DOI

Mihola O, Trachtulec Z, Vlcek C, Schimenti JC, Forejt J. 2009. A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science 323: 373–375. 10.1126/science.1163601 PubMed DOI

Muñoz-Fuentes V, Di Rienzo A, Vila C. 2011. Prdm9, a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots, is not functional in dogs and their wild relatives, wolves and coyotes. PLoS One 6: e25498 10.1371/journal.pone.0025498 PubMed DOI PMC

Myers S, Bowden R, Tumian A, Bontrop RE, Freeman C, MacFie TS, McVean G, Donnelly P. 2010. Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9 gene in meiotic recombination. Science 327: 876–879. 10.1126/science.1182363 PubMed DOI PMC

Narasimhan VM, Hunt KA, Mason D, Baker CL, Karczewski KJ, Barnes MR, Barnett AH, Bates C, Bellary S, Bockett NA, et al. 2016. Health and population effects of rare gene knockouts in adult humans with related parents. Science 352: 474–477. 10.1126/science.aac8624 PubMed DOI PMC

Parvanov ED, Petkov PM, Paigen K. 2010. Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science 327: 835 10.1126/science.1181495 PubMed DOI PMC

Qiao H, Rao H, Yun Y, Sandhu S, Fong JH, Sapre M, Nguyen M, Tham A, Van BW, Chng TYH, et al. 2018. Impeding DNA break repair enables oocyte quality control. Mol Cell 72: 211–221.e3. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.031 PubMed DOI PMC

Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26: 841–842. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 PubMed DOI PMC

Rinaldi VD, Hsieh K, Munroe R, Bolcun-Filas E, Schimenti JC. 2017. Pharmacological inhibition of the DNA damage checkpoint prevents radiation-induced oocyte death. Genetics 206: 1823–1828. 10.1534/genetics.117.203455 PubMed DOI PMC

Singhal S, Leffler EM, Sannareddy K, Turner I, Venn O, Hooper DM, Strand AI, Li Q, Raney B, Balakrishnan CN, et al. 2015. Stable recombination hotspots in birds. Science 350: 928–932. 10.1126/science.aad0843 PubMed DOI PMC

Smagulova F, Brick K, Pu Y, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova GV. 2016. The evolutionary turnover of recombination hot spots contributes to speciation in mice. Genes Dev 30: 266–280. 10.1101/gad.270009.115 PubMed DOI PMC

Sun F, Fujiwara Y, Reinholdt LG, Hu J, Saxl RL, Baker CL, Petkov PM, Paigen K, Handel MA. 2015. Nuclear localization of PRDM9 and its role in meiotic chromatin modifications and homologous synapsis. Chromosoma 124: 397–415. 10.1007/s00412-015-0511-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Thibault-Sennett S, Yu Q, Smagulova F, Cloutier J, Brick K, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova GV. 2018. Interrogating the functions of PRDM9 domains in meiosis. Genetics 209: 475–487. 10.1534/genetics.118.300565 PubMed DOI PMC

Turner JM, Mahadevaiah SK, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Nussenzweig A, Xu X, Deng CX, Burgoyne PS. 2005. Silencing of unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes in the mouse. Nat Genet 37: 41–47. 10.1038/ng1484 PubMed DOI

Wang S, Hassold T, Hunt P, White MA, Zickler D, Kleckner N, Zhang L. 2017. Inefficient crossover maturation underlies elevated aneuploidy in human female meiosis. Cell 168: 977–989.e17. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.002 PubMed DOI PMC

Weiss J, Hurley LA, Harris RM, Finlayson C, Tong M, Fisher LA, Moran JL, Beier DR, Mason C, Jameson JL. 2012. ENU mutagenesis in mice identifies candidate genes for hypogonadism. Mamm Genome 23: 346–355. 10.1007/s00335-011-9388-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Wojtasz L, Cloutier JM, Baumann M, Daniel K, Varga J, Fu J, Anastassiadis K, Stewart AF, Remenyi A, Turner JM, et al. 2012. Meiotic DNA double-strand breaks and chromosome asynapsis in mice are monitored by distinct HORMAD2-independent and -dependent mechanisms. Genes Dev 26: 958–973. 10.1101/gad.187559.112 PubMed DOI PMC

Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, Nusbaum C, Myers RM, Brown M, Li W, et al. 2008. Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 9: R137 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 PubMed DOI PMC

A Minimal Hybrid Sterility Genome Assembled by Chromosome Swapping Between Mouse Subspecies (Mus musculus)

Prdm9 deficiency of rat oocytes causes synapsis among non-homologous chromosomes and aneuploidy

Rat PRDM9 shapes recombination landscapes, duration of meiosis, gametogenesis, and age of fertility

Prdm9 Intersubspecific Interactions in Hybrid Male Sterility of House Mouse

Copy-number variation introduced by long transgenes compromises mouse male fertility independently of pachytene checkpoints