Fraud and Understanding the Moral Mind: Need for Implementation of Organizational Characteristics into Behavioral Ethics
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
18-13766S
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
PubMed
31197626
DOI
10.1007/s11948-019-00117-z
PII: 10.1007/s11948-019-00117-z
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Behavioral ethics, Dishonesty, Fraud, Organizational culture, Organizational trade-offs, Selection,
- MeSH
- etika MeSH
- kreativita MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mravy * MeSH
- podvádění MeSH
- podvod * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The development of behavioral ethics has brought forth a detailed understanding of the processes of moral perception, decision-making and behavior within and beyond organizations and communities. However, prescriptive recommendations of behavioral research regarding how to support an ethical environment often underestimate the specifics of organizational characteristics that may encourage the occurrence and persistence of dishonesty, especially regarding deception as a desired action in some instances by some employees and managers. Furthermore, behavioral research does not adequately recognize the notion that dishonesty can be sometimes viewed as an acceptable cost for some expected traits or skills of an employee such as intelligence or creativity. Under some conditions, deception can be even considered a moral, prosocial activity. Finally, formal ethics systems and situational measures to promote honesty may be inefficient or directly harmful. This article highlights questions of how to assess such factors in research on (un)ethical behavior within organizations.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135 PubMed
Sci Eng Ethics. 2004 Apr;10(2):311-24 PubMed
Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1264-70 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 25;112(34):10651-6 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 7;281(1790): PubMed
Psychol Sci. 2009 Sep;20(9):1153-60 PubMed
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Aug;101(2):366-85 PubMed
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Oct;105(4):531-48 PubMed
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Oct;22(5):1513-1534 PubMed
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000 Nov;83(2):235-259 PubMed
Nature. 2008 Mar 20;452(7185):348-51 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 13;108 Suppl 3:15655-9 PubMed
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):326-34 PubMed
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 26;9(3):e92336 PubMed
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar;102(3):445-59 PubMed
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 12;8:1566 PubMed
Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;20(3):378-84 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 18;109(38):15197-200 PubMed
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov;10(6):738-41 PubMed
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Sep;32(17):2668-2690 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 23;115(4):E592-E600 PubMed
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):670-88 PubMed
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Apr 17;40(7):898-909 PubMed
