Normative values for relative schoolbag weight in primary school children aged 6-14 from Czech Republic: A pilot study
Language English Country United States Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
31765420
PubMed Central
PMC6876794
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0225741
PII: PONE-D-19-19841
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Body Mass Index MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Pilot Projects MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Sex Factors MeSH
- Schools MeSH
- Students MeSH
- Weight-Bearing * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
Little evidence from observational studies has been provided regarding 'optimal' relative schoolbag load during primary education. Also, no study to date has provided reference-based standards for relative schoolbag weight. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to establish normative values of relative schoolbag weight in a sample of children. In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 584 primary school students aged 6-14 (meanage±SD = 9.6±2.4 yrs, meanheight±SD = 1.4±0.2 m, meanweight±SD = 37.5±13.3 kg, meanbody-mass index±SD = 17.6±3.1 kg/m2, 44.4% girls) chosen from five schools in the city of Brno. Schoolbag weight and child's body weight were objectively measured by using digital scale. Relative schoolbag weight was calculated by dividing schoolbag weight with child's body weight and the result was expressed in percentage. Lambda, Mu and Sigma (LMS) method was used to create sex- and age-percentile curves. Boys carried slightly heavier schoolbag, compared with girls (mean difference 0.2 kg, p = 0.020). No significant differences between sexes in relative schoolbag weight were observed (p = 0.240). Median values (P50) for boys and girls were similar and the largest observed between ages 6-9 in boys (15-17%) and 6-8 in girls (16-18%). The percentage of children carrying relative schoolbag weight beyond 10% of their body weight was very high, especially between ages 6-10 in boys (85.1-100%) and 6-11 in girls (86.8-95.4%). This study provides first sex- and age- relative schoolbag weight normative values in primary school children. Future studies should use similar methods for generating comparable data.
See more in PubMed
Al-Saleem SA, Ali A, Ali SI, Alshamrani AA, Almulhem AM, Al-Hashem MH. A study of school bag weight and back pain among primary school children in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale). 2016; 6:222. PubMed PMC
Spiteri K, Busuttil ML, Aquilina S, Gauci D, Camilleri E, Grech V. Schoolbags and back pain in children between 8 and 13 years: a national study. Br J Pain. 2017; 11:81–86. 10.1177/2049463717695144 PubMed DOI PMC
2015. Report of the working group on the weight of schoolbags. Accessed on July 12, 2019.
Van Gent C, Dols JJ, de Rover CM, Hira Sing RA, de Vet HC. The weight of schoolbags and the occurrence of neck, shoulder, and back pain in young adolescents. Spine. 2003; 28: 916–921. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000058721.69053.EC PubMed DOI
Syazwan A, Azhar MM, Anita A, Azizan H, Shaharuddin M, Hanafiah JM, et al. Poor sitting posture and a heavy schoolbag as contributors to musculoskeletal pain in children: an ergonomic school education intervention program. J Pain Res. 2011;4: 287–296. 10.2147/JPR.S22281 PubMed DOI PMC
Kasović M, Zvonar M, Gomaz L, Bolčević F, Anton V. Influence of schoolbag carriage on pattern changes in plantar pressure during walking among first-grade schoolchildren. Kinesiology. 2018; 50: 188–193.
Moore M, White G, Moore D. Association of relative backpack weight with reported pain, pain sites, medical utilization, and lost school time in children and adolescents. J Sch Health. 2007; 77: 232–239. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00198.x PubMed DOI
Hong Y, Li JX, Wong AS, Robinson PD. Effects of load carriage on heart rate, blood pressure and energy expenditure in children. Ergonomics. 2000; 43: 717–727. 10.1080/001401300404698 PubMed DOI
Chow DH, Kwok ML, Au-Yang AC, Holmes AD, Cheng JC, Yao FY, et al. The effect of backpack load on the gait of normal adolescent girls. Ergonomics. 2005; 48: 642–656. 10.1080/00140130500070921 PubMed DOI
Yamato TP, Maher CG, Traeger AC, Wiliams CM, Kamper SJ. Do schoolbags cause back pain in children and adolescents? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2018; 52: 1241–1245. 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098927 PubMed DOI
Jones GT, Macfarlane GJ. Predicting persisteent low back pain in schoolchildren: a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009; 61: 1359–1366. 10.1002/art.24696 PubMed DOI
Dockrell S, Simms C, Blake C. Schoolbag weight limit: can it be defined? J Sch Health. 2013; 83: 368–377. 10.1111/josh.12040 PubMed DOI
Cole TJ. The LMS method for constructing normalized growth standards. Eur J Clin Nutr.1990; 44: 45–60. PubMed
Bryant BP, Bryant JB. Relative weights of the backpacks of elementary-aged children. J Sch Nurs. 2014; 30: 19–23. 10.1177/1059840513495417 PubMed DOI
World Health Organization. Body-mass index (BMI). Geneva: Switzerland, 2015.
Olmedo-Buenrostro BA, Delgado-Enciso I, Sánchez-Ramírez CA, Cruz SA, Vásquez C, Mora-Brambila AB, et al. Current backpack weight status for primary schoolchildren in Colima, Mexico. J Sch Nurs. 2016; 32: 172–176. 10.1177/1059840515606787 PubMed DOI
Tanner JM. Growth at adolescence. 2nd Ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1962.
Malina RM, Bouchard C, and Bar-Or O. Growth, maturation and physical activity 2nd Ed. Human Kinetics, Champaign: IL, 2004