Low-level fat fraction quantification at 3 T: comparative study of different tools for water-fat reconstruction and MR spectroscopy
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
Grant support
CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0017
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
LO1212
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
7AMB18AT023
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
8J18AT023
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
AKTION AUT-CZE # 74p6
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
MSM100651801
Akademie Věd České Republiky
PubMed
31980962
DOI
10.1007/s10334-020-00825-9
PII: 10.1007/s10334-020-00825-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Low-level fat fraction, MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, Proton density fat fraction, Quantification,
- MeSH
- Algorithms MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Emulsions MeSH
- Phantoms, Imaging MeSH
- Liver diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy methods MeSH
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted methods MeSH
- Software MeSH
- Adipose Tissue diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Water MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Emulsions MeSH
- Water MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Chemical Shift Encoded Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CSE-MRI)-based quantification of low-level (< 5% of proton density fat fraction-PDFF) fat infiltration requires highly accurate data reconstruction for the assessment of hepatic or pancreatic fat accumulation in diagnostics and biomedical research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compare three software tools available for water/fat image reconstruction and PDFF quantification with MRS as the reference method. Based on the algorithm exploited in the tested software, the accuracy of fat fraction quantification varies. We evaluate them in phantom and in vivo MRS and MRI measurements. RESULTS: The signal model of Intralipid 20% emulsion used for phantoms was established for 3 T and 9.4 T fields. In all cases, we noticed a high coefficient of determination (R-squared) between MRS and MRI-PDFF measurements: in phantoms <0.9924-0.9990>; and in vivo <0.8069-0.9552>. Bland-Altman analysis was applied to phantom and in vivo measurements. DISCUSSION: Multi-echo MRI in combination with an advanced algorithm including multi-peak spectrum modeling appears as a valuable and accurate method for low-level PDFF quantification over large FOV in high resolution, and is much faster than MRS methods. The graph-cut algorithm (GC) showed the fewest water/fat swaps in the PDFF maps, and hence stands out as the most robust method of those tested.
References provided by Crossref.org