ALPPS for Locally Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Did Aggressive Surgery Lead to the Oncological Benefit? An International Multi-center Study
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study
PubMed
32002719
PubMed Central
PMC7138775
DOI
10.1245/s10434-019-08192-z
PII: 10.1245/s10434-019-08192-z
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Ascites epidemiology MeSH
- Cholangiocarcinoma surgery MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Hepatectomy methods MeSH
- Surgical Wound Infection epidemiology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Ligation MeSH
- International Cooperation MeSH
- Survival Rate MeSH
- Bile Duct Neoplasms surgery MeSH
- Palliative Care MeSH
- Postoperative Complications epidemiology prevention & control MeSH
- Postoperative Hemorrhage epidemiology MeSH
- SEER Program MeSH
- Proportional Hazards Models MeSH
- Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use MeSH
- Registries MeSH
- Liver Failure prevention & control MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Propensity Score MeSH
- Portal Vein surgery MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Antineoplastic Agents MeSH
BACKGROUND: ALPPS is found to increase the resectability of primary and secondary liver malignancy at the advanced stage. The aim of the study was to verify the surgical and oncological outcome of ALPPS for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: The study cohort was based on the ALPPS registry with patients from 31 international centers between August 2009 and January 2018. Propensity score matched patients receiving chemotherapy only were selected from the SEER database as controls for the survival analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients undergoing ALPPS were recruited, 99 completed the second stage with median inter-stage duration of 11 days. The median kinetic growth rate was 23 ml/day. R0 resection was achieved in 87 (85%). Initially high rates of morbidity and mortality decreased steadily to a 29% severe complication rate and 7% 90-day morbidity in the last 2 years. Post-hepatectomy liver failure remained the main cause of 90-day mortality. Multivariate analysis revealed insufficient future liver remnant at the stage-2 operation (FLR2) to be the only risk factor for severe complications (OR 2.91, p = 0.02). The propensity score matching analysis showed a superior overall survival in the ALPPS group compared to palliative chemotherapy (median overall survival: 26.4 months vs 14 months; 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates: 82.4%, 70.5% and 39.6% vs 51.2%, 21.4% and 11.3%, respectively, p < 0.01). The survival benefit, however, was not confirmed in the subgroup analysis for patients with insufficient FLR2 or multifocal ICC. CONCLUSION: ALPPS showed high efficacy in achieving R0 resections in locally advanced ICC. To get the most oncological benefit from this aggressive surgery, ALPPS would be restricted to patients with single lesions and sufficient FLR2.
1st Department of Surgery Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Centre Hépato Biliaire AP HP Hôpital Paul Brousse Inserm U 935 Univ Paris Saclay Villejuif France
Department of Anatomy 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery Federico 2 University Naples Italy
Department of General Surgery Nicosia Teaching Hospital Strovolos Cyprus
Department of General Visceral and endocrine Surgery München Klinik Neuperlach Munich Germany
Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery University Hospital Mainz Mainz Germany
Department of General Visceral and Vascular Surgery University Hospital Jena Jena Germany
Department of Human Structure and Repair Faculty of Medicine Ghent University Ghent Belgium
Department of Public Health Federico 2 University Hospital Naples Italy
Department of Surgery and Transplantation São Lucas Hospital Copacabana Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Department of Surgery and Transplantation University Hospital RWTH Aachen Aachen Germany
Department of Surgery Ankara University Ankara Turkey
Department of Surgery Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Department of Surgery Shinshu University School of Medicine Matsumoto Japan
Department of Surgery University College London London UK
Department of Surgery University Medical Center Regensburg Regensburg Germany
Department of Surgery Virgen de la Arrixaca Hospital IMIB Arrixaca Murcia Spain
Division of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery University of Rochester Rochester NY USA
Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit University of Padua Padua Italy
Hepatobiliary Surgery Division San Raffaele Hospital Milan Italy
HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit Italian Hospital Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina
See more in PubMed
Banales JM, Cardinale V, Carpino G, et al. Expert consensus document: cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA) Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(5):261–280. PubMed
Cardinale V, Semeraro R, Torrice A, et al. Intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma: new insight into epidemiology and risk factors. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2010;2(11):407–416. PubMed PMC
Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, et al. The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(4):505–527. PubMed PMC
Benson AB, 3rd, D’Angelica MI, Abbott DE, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: hepatobiliary cancers, version 1.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(5):563–573. PubMed PMC
Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2014;60(6):1268–1289. PubMed
Mavros MN, Economopoulos KP, Alexiou VG, Pawlik TM. Treatment and prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(6):565–574. PubMed
Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(14):1273–1281. PubMed
Weber SM, Ribero D, O’Reilly EM, Kokudo N, Miyazaki M, Pawlik TM. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(8):669–680. PubMed PMC
Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin RD, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Gut. 2012;61(12):1657–1669. PubMed
Zhang XF, Beal EW, Bagante F, et al. Early versus late recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection with curative intent. Br J Surg. 2018;105(7):848–856. PubMed
Farges O, Fuks D, Boleslawski E, et al. Influence of surgical margins on outcome in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter study by the AFC-IHCC-2009 study group. Ann Surg. 2011;254(5):824–829. PubMed
Ribero D, Pinna AD, Guglielmi A, et al. Surgical approach for long-term survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 434 patients. Arch Surg. 2012;147(12):1107–1113. PubMed
Tamandl D, Herberger B, Gruenberger B, Puhalla H, Klinger M, Gruenberger T. Influence of hepatic resection margin on recurrence and survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(10):2787–2794. PubMed
de Santibanes E, Clavien PA. Playing Play-Doh to prevent postoperative liver failure: the “ALPPS” approach. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):415–417. PubMed
Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H, et al. Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):405–414. PubMed
Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, de Santibanes M, Pekolj J, de Santibanes E. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy offers high oncological feasibility with adequate patient safety: a prospective study at a single center. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):723–732. PubMed
Li J, Ewald F, Gulati A, Nashan B. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy: from technical evolution to oncological benefit. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8(2):124–133. PubMed PMC
Schadde E, Ardiles V, Robles-Campos R, et al. Early survival and safety of ALPPS: first report of the International ALPPS Registry. Ann Surg. 2014;260(5):829–836. PubMed
Schadde E, Malago M, Hernandez-Alejandro R, et al. Monosegment ALPPS hepatectomy: extending resectability by rapid hypertrophy. Surgery. 2015;157(4):676–689. PubMed
D’Haese JG, Neumann J, Weniger M, et al. Should ALPPS be used for liver resection in intermediate-stage HCC? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1335–1343. PubMed
Hernandez-Alejandro R, Bertens KA, Pineda-Solis K, Croome KP. Can we improve the morbidity and mortality associated with the associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure in the management of colorectal liver metastases? Surgery. 2015;157(2):194–201. PubMed
Li J, Girotti P, Konigsrainer I, Ladurner R, Konigsrainer A, Nadalin S. ALPPS in right trisectionectomy: a safe procedure to avoid postoperative liver failure? J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(5):956–961. PubMed
Olthof PB, Coelen RJS, Wiggers JK, et al. High mortality after ALPPS for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: case-control analysis including the first series from the international ALPPS registry. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(5):381–387. PubMed PMC
Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Doherty DA, et al. Body surface area and body weight predict total liver volume in Western adults. Liver Transpl. 2002;8(3):233–240. PubMed
Kambakamba P, Stocker D, Reiner CS, et al. Liver kinetic growth rate predicts postoperative liver failure after ALPPS. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18(10):800–805. PubMed PMC
van den Broek MA, van Dam RM, van Breukelen GJ, et al. Development of a composite endpoint for randomized controlled trials in liver surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98(8):1138–1145. PubMed
Li J, Moustafa M, Freiwald-Bibiza E, Alzudjali A, Fischer L, Nashan B. Is it feasible to standardize a composite postoperative complication reporting system for liver resection? J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04457-w. PubMed DOI
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213. PubMed PMC
Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 2011;149(5):680–688. PubMed
Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) Surgery. 2011;149(5):713–724. PubMed
Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(8):528–535. PubMed PMC
Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML, Graf R. Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1545–1559. PubMed
Li J, Kantas A, Ittrich H, et al. Avoid “all-touch” by hybrid ALPPS to achieve oncological efficacy. Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):e6–e7. PubMed
Schadde E, Ardiles V, Slankamenac K, et al. ALPPS offers a better chance of complete resection in patients with primarily unresectable liver tumors compared with conventional-staged hepatectomies: results of a multicenter analysis. World J Surg. 2014;38(6):1510–1519. PubMed
Lang H, de Santibanes E, Schlitt HJ, et al. 10th Anniversary of ALPPS—lessons learned and quo vadis. Ann Surg. 2019;269(1):114–119. PubMed
Sandstrom P, Rosok BI, Sparrelid E, et al. ALPPS improves resectability compared with conventional two-stage hepatectomy in patients with advanced colorectal liver metastasis: results from a Scandinavian multicenter randomized controlled trial (LIGRO trial) Ann Surg. 2018;267(5):833–840. PubMed PMC
Truant S, Oberlin O, Sergent G, et al. Remnant liver volume to body weight ratio > or = 0.5%: A new cut-off to estimate postoperative risks after extended resection in noncirrhotic liver. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(1):22–33. PubMed
Tanaka K, Matsuo K, Murakami T, et al. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): short-term outcome, functional changes in the future liver remnant, and tumor growth activity. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(4):506–512. PubMed
de Graaf W, van Lienden KP, Dinant S, et al. Assessment of future remnant liver function using hepatobiliary scintigraphy in patients undergoing major liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(2):369–378. PubMed PMC
de Graaf W, van Lienden KP, van Gulik TM, Bennink RJ. (99 m)Tc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy with SPECT for the assessment of hepatic function and liver functional volume before partial hepatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(2):229–236. PubMed
Serenari M, Collaud C, Alvarez FA, et al. Interstage assessment of remnant liver function in ALPPS using hepatobiliary scintigraphy: prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure and introduction of the HIBA index. Ann Surg. 2018;267(6):1141–1147. PubMed
Linecker M, Bjornsson B, Stavrou GA, et al. Risk adjustment in ALPPS is associated with a dramatic decrease in early mortality and morbidity. Ann Surg. 2017;266(5):779–786. PubMed
Edmondson MJ, Sodergren MH, Pucher PH, et al. Variations and adaptations of associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): many routes to the summit. Surgery. 2016;159(4):1058–1072. PubMed
de Santibanes E, Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, Pekolj J, de Santibanes M. Inverting the ALPPS paradigm by minimizing first stage impact: the mini-ALPPS technique. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016;401(4):557–563. PubMed
Sakamoto Y, Matsumura M, Yamashita S, Ohkura N, Hasegawa K, Kokudo N. Partial TIPE ALPPS for perihilar cancer. Ann Surg. 2018;267(2):e18–e20. PubMed
Hoffmann RT, Paprottka PM, Schon A, et al. Transarterial hepatic yttrium-90 radioembolization in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: factors associated with prolonged survival. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35(1):105–116. PubMed
Hyder O, Marsh JW, Salem R, et al. Intra-arterial therapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(12):3779–3786. PubMed
Hyder O, Hatzaras I, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Recurrence after operative management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery. 2013;153(6):811–818. PubMed PMC
Spolverato G, Bagante F, Weiss M, et al. Comparative performances of the 7th and the 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115(6):696–703. PubMed