• This record comes from PubMed

ALPPS for Locally Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Did Aggressive Surgery Lead to the Oncological Benefit? An International Multi-center Study

. 2020 May ; 27 (5) : 1372-1384. [epub] 20200130

Language English Country United States Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study

Links

PubMed 32002719
PubMed Central PMC7138775
DOI 10.1245/s10434-019-08192-z
PII: 10.1245/s10434-019-08192-z
Knihovny.cz E-resources

BACKGROUND: ALPPS is found to increase the resectability of primary and secondary liver malignancy at the advanced stage. The aim of the study was to verify the surgical and oncological outcome of ALPPS for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: The study cohort was based on the ALPPS registry with patients from 31 international centers between August 2009 and January 2018. Propensity score matched patients receiving chemotherapy only were selected from the SEER database as controls for the survival analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients undergoing ALPPS were recruited, 99 completed the second stage with median inter-stage duration of 11 days. The median kinetic growth rate was 23 ml/day. R0 resection was achieved in 87 (85%). Initially high rates of morbidity and mortality decreased steadily to a 29% severe complication rate and 7% 90-day morbidity in the last 2 years. Post-hepatectomy liver failure remained the main cause of 90-day mortality. Multivariate analysis revealed insufficient future liver remnant at the stage-2 operation (FLR2) to be the only risk factor for severe complications (OR 2.91, p = 0.02). The propensity score matching analysis showed a superior overall survival in the ALPPS group compared to palliative chemotherapy (median overall survival: 26.4 months vs 14 months; 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates: 82.4%, 70.5% and 39.6% vs 51.2%, 21.4% and 11.3%, respectively, p < 0.01). The survival benefit, however, was not confirmed in the subgroup analysis for patients with insufficient FLR2 or multifocal ICC. CONCLUSION: ALPPS showed high efficacy in achieving R0 resections in locally advanced ICC. To get the most oncological benefit from this aggressive surgery, ALPPS would be restricted to patients with single lesions and sufficient FLR2.

1st Department of Surgery Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

Center for Surgery and Transplantology A 1 Burnazyan Russian State Scientific Center FMBC of FMBA Moscow Russia

Centre Hépato Biliaire AP HP Hôpital Paul Brousse Inserm U 935 Univ Paris Saclay Villejuif France

Clara Campal Oncological Center Sanchinarro University Hospital San Pablo University CEU Madrid Spain

Department of Anatomy 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery Federico 2 University Naples Italy

Department of General Surgery Nicosia Teaching Hospital Strovolos Cyprus

Department of General Visceral and endocrine Surgery München Klinik Neuperlach Munich Germany

Department of General Visceral and Pediatric Surgery University Hospital Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany

Department of General Visceral and Thoracic Surgery University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery University Hospital Frankfurt Frankfurt Germany

Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery University Hospital Mainz Mainz Germany

Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery University Hospital Tuebingen Tübingen Germany

Department of General Visceral and Vascular Surgery University Hospital Jena Jena Germany

Department of General Visceral Cancer and Transplantation Surgery University Hospital of Cologne Cologne Germany

Department of Hepato Pancreato Biliary Surgery Sun Yat Sen Memorial Hospital Sun Yat Sen University Guangzhou China

Department of Human Structure and Repair Faculty of Medicine Ghent University Ghent Belgium

Department of Public Health Federico 2 University Hospital Naples Italy

Department of Surgery and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Linköping University Linköping Sweden

Department of Surgery and Transplantation São Lucas Hospital Copacabana Rio de Janeiro Brazil

Department of Surgery and Transplantation University Hospital RWTH Aachen Aachen Germany

Department of Surgery Ankara University Ankara Turkey

Department of Surgery Division of HPB Surgery Asklepios Hospital Barmbek Semmelweis University Budapest Campus Hamburg Hamburg Germany

Department of Surgery Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

Department of Surgery Shinshu University School of Medicine Matsumoto Japan

Department of Surgery University College London London UK

Department of Surgery University Medical Center Regensburg Regensburg Germany

Department of Surgery Virgen de la Arrixaca Hospital IMIB Arrixaca Murcia Spain

Department of Transplant Surgery Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic

Division of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery University of Rochester Rochester NY USA

Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Polytechnic University of Marche Ancona Italy

Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit University of Padua Padua Italy

Hepatobiliary Surgery Division San Raffaele Hospital Milan Italy

HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit Italian Hospital Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina

Klinikum Karlsruhe Karlsruhe Germany

Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center Department of Surgery and Transplantation University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Comment In

PubMed

See more in PubMed

Banales JM, Cardinale V, Carpino G, et al. Expert consensus document: cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA) Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(5):261–280. PubMed

Cardinale V, Semeraro R, Torrice A, et al. Intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma: new insight into epidemiology and risk factors. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2010;2(11):407–416. PubMed PMC

Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, et al. The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(4):505–527. PubMed PMC

Benson AB, 3rd, D’Angelica MI, Abbott DE, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: hepatobiliary cancers, version 1.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(5):563–573. PubMed PMC

Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2014;60(6):1268–1289. PubMed

Mavros MN, Economopoulos KP, Alexiou VG, Pawlik TM. Treatment and prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(6):565–574. PubMed

Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(14):1273–1281. PubMed

Weber SM, Ribero D, O’Reilly EM, Kokudo N, Miyazaki M, Pawlik TM. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(8):669–680. PubMed PMC

Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin RD, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Gut. 2012;61(12):1657–1669. PubMed

Zhang XF, Beal EW, Bagante F, et al. Early versus late recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection with curative intent. Br J Surg. 2018;105(7):848–856. PubMed

Farges O, Fuks D, Boleslawski E, et al. Influence of surgical margins on outcome in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter study by the AFC-IHCC-2009 study group. Ann Surg. 2011;254(5):824–829. PubMed

Ribero D, Pinna AD, Guglielmi A, et al. Surgical approach for long-term survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 434 patients. Arch Surg. 2012;147(12):1107–1113. PubMed

Tamandl D, Herberger B, Gruenberger B, Puhalla H, Klinger M, Gruenberger T. Influence of hepatic resection margin on recurrence and survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(10):2787–2794. PubMed

de Santibanes E, Clavien PA. Playing Play-Doh to prevent postoperative liver failure: the “ALPPS” approach. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):415–417. PubMed

Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H, et al. Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):405–414. PubMed

Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, de Santibanes M, Pekolj J, de Santibanes E. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy offers high oncological feasibility with adequate patient safety: a prospective study at a single center. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):723–732. PubMed

Li J, Ewald F, Gulati A, Nashan B. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy: from technical evolution to oncological benefit. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8(2):124–133. PubMed PMC

Schadde E, Ardiles V, Robles-Campos R, et al. Early survival and safety of ALPPS: first report of the International ALPPS Registry. Ann Surg. 2014;260(5):829–836. PubMed

Schadde E, Malago M, Hernandez-Alejandro R, et al. Monosegment ALPPS hepatectomy: extending resectability by rapid hypertrophy. Surgery. 2015;157(4):676–689. PubMed

D’Haese JG, Neumann J, Weniger M, et al. Should ALPPS be used for liver resection in intermediate-stage HCC? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1335–1343. PubMed

Hernandez-Alejandro R, Bertens KA, Pineda-Solis K, Croome KP. Can we improve the morbidity and mortality associated with the associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure in the management of colorectal liver metastases? Surgery. 2015;157(2):194–201. PubMed

Li J, Girotti P, Konigsrainer I, Ladurner R, Konigsrainer A, Nadalin S. ALPPS in right trisectionectomy: a safe procedure to avoid postoperative liver failure? J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(5):956–961. PubMed

Olthof PB, Coelen RJS, Wiggers JK, et al. High mortality after ALPPS for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: case-control analysis including the first series from the international ALPPS registry. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(5):381–387. PubMed PMC

Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Doherty DA, et al. Body surface area and body weight predict total liver volume in Western adults. Liver Transpl. 2002;8(3):233–240. PubMed

Kambakamba P, Stocker D, Reiner CS, et al. Liver kinetic growth rate predicts postoperative liver failure after ALPPS. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18(10):800–805. PubMed PMC

van den Broek MA, van Dam RM, van Breukelen GJ, et al. Development of a composite endpoint for randomized controlled trials in liver surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98(8):1138–1145. PubMed

Li J, Moustafa M, Freiwald-Bibiza E, Alzudjali A, Fischer L, Nashan B. Is it feasible to standardize a composite postoperative complication reporting system for liver resection? J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04457-w. PubMed DOI

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213. PubMed PMC

Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 2011;149(5):680–688. PubMed

Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) Surgery. 2011;149(5):713–724. PubMed

Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(8):528–535. PubMed PMC

Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML, Graf R. Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1545–1559. PubMed

Li J, Kantas A, Ittrich H, et al. Avoid “all-touch” by hybrid ALPPS to achieve oncological efficacy. Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):e6–e7. PubMed

Schadde E, Ardiles V, Slankamenac K, et al. ALPPS offers a better chance of complete resection in patients with primarily unresectable liver tumors compared with conventional-staged hepatectomies: results of a multicenter analysis. World J Surg. 2014;38(6):1510–1519. PubMed

Lang H, de Santibanes E, Schlitt HJ, et al. 10th Anniversary of ALPPS—lessons learned and quo vadis. Ann Surg. 2019;269(1):114–119. PubMed

Sandstrom P, Rosok BI, Sparrelid E, et al. ALPPS improves resectability compared with conventional two-stage hepatectomy in patients with advanced colorectal liver metastasis: results from a Scandinavian multicenter randomized controlled trial (LIGRO trial) Ann Surg. 2018;267(5):833–840. PubMed PMC

Truant S, Oberlin O, Sergent G, et al. Remnant liver volume to body weight ratio > or = 0.5%: A new cut-off to estimate postoperative risks after extended resection in noncirrhotic liver. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(1):22–33. PubMed

Tanaka K, Matsuo K, Murakami T, et al. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): short-term outcome, functional changes in the future liver remnant, and tumor growth activity. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(4):506–512. PubMed

de Graaf W, van Lienden KP, Dinant S, et al. Assessment of future remnant liver function using hepatobiliary scintigraphy in patients undergoing major liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(2):369–378. PubMed PMC

de Graaf W, van Lienden KP, van Gulik TM, Bennink RJ. (99 m)Tc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy with SPECT for the assessment of hepatic function and liver functional volume before partial hepatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(2):229–236. PubMed

Serenari M, Collaud C, Alvarez FA, et al. Interstage assessment of remnant liver function in ALPPS using hepatobiliary scintigraphy: prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure and introduction of the HIBA index. Ann Surg. 2018;267(6):1141–1147. PubMed

Linecker M, Bjornsson B, Stavrou GA, et al. Risk adjustment in ALPPS is associated with a dramatic decrease in early mortality and morbidity. Ann Surg. 2017;266(5):779–786. PubMed

Edmondson MJ, Sodergren MH, Pucher PH, et al. Variations and adaptations of associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): many routes to the summit. Surgery. 2016;159(4):1058–1072. PubMed

de Santibanes E, Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, Pekolj J, de Santibanes M. Inverting the ALPPS paradigm by minimizing first stage impact: the mini-ALPPS technique. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016;401(4):557–563. PubMed

Sakamoto Y, Matsumura M, Yamashita S, Ohkura N, Hasegawa K, Kokudo N. Partial TIPE ALPPS for perihilar cancer. Ann Surg. 2018;267(2):e18–e20. PubMed

Hoffmann RT, Paprottka PM, Schon A, et al. Transarterial hepatic yttrium-90 radioembolization in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: factors associated with prolonged survival. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35(1):105–116. PubMed

Hyder O, Marsh JW, Salem R, et al. Intra-arterial therapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(12):3779–3786. PubMed

Hyder O, Hatzaras I, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Recurrence after operative management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery. 2013;153(6):811–818. PubMed PMC

Spolverato G, Bagante F, Weiss M, et al. Comparative performances of the 7th and the 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115(6):696–703. PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...