Toward Modern Classification of Eustigmatophytes, Including the Description of Neomonodaceae Fam. Nov. and Three New Genera1

. 2020 Jun ; 56 (3) : 630-648. [epub] 20200427

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, práce podpořená grantem, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid32068883

Grantová podpora
P20 GM103429 NIGMS NIH HHS - United States
P20 RR016460 NCRR NIH HHS - United States
8P20GM103429-11 National Institute of General Medical Sciences U.S.A. - International
5P20RR016460-11 National Center for Research Resources U.S.A. - International

The class Eustigmatophyceae includes mostly coccoid, freshwater algae, although some genera are common in terrestrial habitats and two are primarily marine. The formal classification of the class, developed decades ago, does not fit the diversity and phylogeny of the group as presently known and is in urgent need of revision. This study concerns a clade informally known as the Pseudellipsoidion group of the order Eustigmatales, which was initially known to comprise seven strains with oval to ellipsoidal cells, some bearing a stipe. We examined those strains as well as 10 new ones and obtained 18S rDNA and rbcL gene sequences. The results from phylogenetic analyses of the sequence data were integrated with morphological data of vegetative and motile cells. Monophyly of the Pseudellipsoidion group is supported in both 18S rDNA and rbcL trees. The group is formalized as the new family Neomonodaceae comprising, in addition to Pseudellipsoidion, three newly erected genera. By establishing Neomonodus gen. nov. (with type species Neomonodus ovalis comb. nov.), we finally resolve the intricate taxonomic history of a species originally described as Monodus ovalis and later moved to the genera Characiopsis and Pseudocharaciopsis. Characiopsiella gen. nov. (with the type species Characiopsiella minima comb. nov.) and Munda gen. nov. (with the type species Munda aquilonaris) are established to accommodate additional representatives of the polyphyletic genus Characiopsis. A morphological feature common to all examined Neomonodaceae is the absence of a pyrenoid in the chloroplasts, which discriminates them from other morphologically similar yet unrelated eustigmatophytes (including other Characiopsis-like species).

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Alverson AJ & Kolnick L. 2005. Intragenomic nucleotide polymorphism among small subunit (18S) rDNA paralogs in the diatom genus Skeletonema (Bacillariophyta). J. Phycol 41:1248–57.

Alves-de-Souza C, Benevides TS, Santos JOB, Von Dassow P, Guillou L & Menezes M. 2017. Does environmental heterogeneity explain temporal β diversity of small eukaryotic phytoplankton? Example from a tropical eutrophic coastal lagoon. J. Plankton Res 39:698–714.

Amaral R, Elias M, Santos L & Santos MF 2011. Molecular and microscopic evidence place microalgal species of Characiopsis into the Eustigmatophyceae. Eur. J. Phycol 46:136.

Antia NJ, Bisalputra T, Cheng JY & Kalley JP 1975. Pigment and cytological evidence for reclassification of Nannochloris oculata and Monallantus salina in the Eustigmatophyceae. J. Phycol 11:339–43.

Assunção MFG, Amaral R, Martins CB, Ferreira JD, Ressurreição S, Santos SD, Varejão JMTB & Santos LMA 2016. Screening microalgae as potential sources of antioxidants. J. Appl. Phycol 29:865–77.

Bischoff HW & Bold HC 1963. Some soil algae from Enchanted Rock and related algal species. In Phycological Studies, vol. IV, University of Texas, USA, 6318, pp. 1–95.

Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM & Gabaldón T. 2009. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25:1972–3. PubMed PMC

Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol 17: 540–52. PubMed

Chodat RH 1913. Monographies d’algues en culture pure. In Materiaux pour la Flore Cryptogamique Suisse, 4, Fasc. 2 Bern: K. J. Wyss.

Dashiell C & Bailey J. 2009. New observations on the biology of eustigmatophytes, with a description of Microtalis gen. nov. J. Phycol 45:8. PubMed

Eliáš M, Amaral R, Fawley KP, Fawley MW, Němcová Y, Neustupa J, Přibyl P, Santos LMA & Ševčíková T. 2017. Eustigmatophyceae. In Archibald JM, Simpson AGB, Slamovits CH [Eds.] Handbook of the Protists, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp. 367–406.

Ettl H. 1978. Xanthophyceae. In Ettl H, Gerloff HJ & Heynig H [Eds.]. Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bd. 3. 1. Teil, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 530 pp.

Fawley MW, Fawley KP & Hegewald E. 2013. Desmodesmus baconii (Chlorophyta), a new species with double rows of arcuate spines. Phycologia 52:565–72.

Fawley KP, Eliáš M & Fawley MW 2014. The diversity and phylogeny of the commercially important algal class Eustigmatophyceae, including the new clade Goniochloridales. J. Appl. Phycol 26:1773–82.

Fawley MW, Jameson I & Fawley KP 2015. The phylogeny of the genus Nannochloropsis (Monodopsidaceae, Eustigmatophyceae), with descriptions of N. australis sp. nov. and Microchloropsis gen. nov. Phycologia 54:545–52.

Fawley KP & Fawley MW 2017. Rediscovery of Tetraedriella subglobosa Pascher, a member of the Eustigmatophyceae. Fottea 17:96–102.

Fawley MW, Němcová Y & Fawley KP 2019. Phylogeny and characterization of Paraeustigmatos columelliferus, gen. et sp. nov., a member of the Eustigmatophyceae that may represent a basal group within the Eustigmatales. Fottea 19:107–14.

Gao B, Yang J, Lei X, Xia S, Li A & Zhang C. 2016. Characterization of cell structural change, growth, lipid accumulation, and pigment profile of a novel oleaginous microalga, Vischeria stellata (Eustigmatophyceae), cultured with different initial nitrate supplies. J. Appl. Phycol 28:821–30.

Gao B, Xia S, Lei X & Zhang Z. 2018. Combined effects of different nitrogen sources and levels and light intensities on growth and fatty acid and lipid production of oleaginous eustigmatophycean microalga Eustigmatos cf. polyphem. J. Appl. Phycol 30:215–29.

Guiry MD & Guiry GM 2019. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway http://www.algaebase.org; searched on September 26, 2019.

Hall TA 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids. Symp. Ser 41:95–8.

Hegewald E, Padisák J & Friedl T. 2007. Pseudotetraëdriella kamillae: taxonomy and ecology of a new member of the algal class Eustigmatophyceae (Stramenopiles). Hydrobiologia 586:107–16.

Hibberd DJ & Leedale GF 1970. Eustigmatophyceae - a new algal class with unique organization of the motile cell. Nature 225:758–60. PubMed

Hibberd DJ & Leedale GF 1971. A new algal class - The Eustigmatophyceae. Taxon 20:523–5. PubMed

Hibberd DJ & Leedale GF 1972. Observations on the cytology and ultrastructure of the new algal class, Eustigmatophyceae. Ann. Bot 36:49–71.

Hibberd DJ 1980. Eustigmatophyceae. In Cox ER [Ed.] Phytoflagellates: Form and Function. Elsevier, New York, Amsterdam, Oxford, pp. 319–34.

Hibberd DJ 1981. Notes on the taxonomy and nomenclature of the algal classes Eustigmatophyceae and Tribophyceae (synonym Xanthophyceae). Bot. J. Linnean Soc 82:93–119.

Jones HM, Simpson GE, Stickle AJ & Mann DG 2005. Life history and systematics of Petroneis (Bacillariophyta) with special reference to British waters. Eur. J. Phycol 40:61–87.

Katana A, Kwiatowski J, Spalik K, Bożena Zakryš., Szalacha E & Szymańdka H. 2001. Phylogenetic position of Koliella (chlorophyte) as inferred from nuclear and chloroplast small subunit rDNA. J. Phycol 37:443–51.

Katoh K & Frith MC 2012. Adding unaligned sequences into an existing alignment using MAFFT and LAST. Bioinformatics 28:3144–6. PubMed PMC

Katoh K & Standley DM 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol 30:772–80. PubMed PMC

Kryvenda A, Rybalka N, Wolf M & Friedl T. 2018. Species distinctions among closely related strains of Eustigmatophyceae (Stramenopiles) emphasizing ITS2 sequence-structure data: Eustigmatos and Vischeria. Eur. J. Phycol 53:471–91.

Lara E, Mitchell EAD, Moreira D & García PL 2011. Highly diverse and seasonally dynamic protist community in a pristine peat bog. Protist 162:14–32. PubMed

Lee KWL & Bold HC 1973. Pseudocharaciopsis texensis gen. et. sp. nov., a new member of the Eustigmatophyceae. Br. Phycol. J 8:31–7.

Letunic I & Bork P. 2016. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3:an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 44:W242–5. PubMed PMC

Li Z, Sun M, Li Q, Li A & Zhang C. 2012. Profiling of carotenoids in six microalgae (Eustigmatophyceae) and assessment of their ß-carotene productions in bubble column photobioreactor. Biotechnol. Lett 34:2049–53. PubMed

Lubián LM 1982. Nannochloropsis gaditana sp. nov., una nueva Eustigmatophyceae marina. Lazaroa 4:287–93.

Lubián LM, Montero O, Moreno-Garrido I, Huertas IE, Sobrino C, González-del Valle M & Parés G. 2000. Nannochloropsis (Eustigmatophyceae) as source of commercially valuable pigments. J. Appl. Phycol 12:249–55.

Ma XN, Chen TP, Yang B, Liu J & Chen F. 2016. Lipid production from Nannochloropsis. Mar. Drugs 14: E61. PubMed PMC

Maruyama I, Nakamura T, Ando Y & Maeda T. 1986. Identification of the alga known as “marine Chlorella” as a member of the Eustigmatophyceae. Jap. J. Phycol 34:319–25.

Miller MA, Pfeiffer WT & Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for Inference of Large Phylogenetic Trees. Conference paper. Proceedings of Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

Nakayama T, Nakamura A, Yokoyama A, Shiratori T, Inouye I & Ishida K. 2015. Taxonomic study of a new eustigmatophycean alga, Vacuoliviride crystalliferum gen. et sp. nov. J. Plant Res 128:249–57. PubMed

Neustupa J and Němcová Y. 2001. Morphological and taxonomic study for three terrestrial eustigmatophycean species. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 123:373–86.

Nicholas KB & Nicholas HB Jr. 1997. GeneDoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments. Distributed by the authors.

Nikouli E, Kormas KA, Berillis P, Karayanni H & Moustaka-Gouni M. 2013. Harmful and parasitic unicellular eukaryotes persist in a shallow lake under reconstruction (L. Karla, Greece). Hydrobiologia 718:73–83.

Pal D, Khozin-Goldberg I, Didi-Cohen S, Solovchenko A, Batushansky A, Kaye Y, Sikron N, Samani T, Fait A & Boussiba S. 2013. Growth, lipid production and metabolic adjustments in the euryhaline eustigmatophyte Nannochloropsis oceanica CCALA 804 in response to osmotic downshift. Appl. Microbiol. Biot 97:8291–306. PubMed

Pascher A. 1938. Characiopsis. In Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutchland, Ӧsterreich und der Schweiz. Rabenhorst L [Eds.] Vol. 11, Teil 5, pp. 641–832.

Patwardhan A, Ray S & Roy A. 2014. Molecular markers in phylogenetic studies – A review. J. Phylogen. Evol. Biol 2:131.

Poulton EM 1925. Études sur les Heterokontes. These no. 777, Uniuersité de Genève. Geneva: Imprimerie Jent Societe Anonyme. [Bulletin de la Société Botanique de Genève, Ser. 2, 17:33–121, 1926].

Preisig HR and Wilhelm C. 1989. Ultrastructure, pigments and taxonomy of Botryococcus similis gen. et sp. nov. (Eustigmatophyceae). Phycologia 28:61–9.

Prior SE, Fawley MW & Fawley KP 2009. DNA Analysis of Freshwater Eustigmatophyceae, a Potential Source of Essential Fatty Acids. J. Ark. Acad. Sci 63:139–44.

Přibyl P, Eliáš M, Cepák V, Lukavský J & Kaštánek P. 2012. Zoosporogenesis, morphology, ultrastructure, pigment composition, and phylogenetic position of Trachidiscus minutus (Eustigmatophyceae, Heterokontophyta). J. Phycol 48:231–42. PubMed

Preisig HR & Wilhelm C. 1989. Ultrastructure, pigments and taxonomy of Botryochloropsis similis gen. et sp. nov. (Eustigmatophyceae). Phycologia 28:61–9.

Santos LMA 1990. Cytology and ultrastructure of Eustigmatophyceae. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leeds, England, 93 pp.

Santos LMA 1996. The Eustigmatophyceae: actual knowledge and research perspectives. Nova Hedwigia 112:391–405.

Santos LMA & Leedale GF 1991. Vischeria stellata (Eustigmatophyceae): ultrastructure of the zoospores, with special reference to the flagellar apparatus. Protoplasma 164:160–7.

Santos LMA & Leedale GF 1995. Some notes on the ultrastructure of small azoosporic members of the algal class Eustigmatophyceae. Nova Hedwigia 60:219–25.

Santos LMA & Santos MF 2004. The Coimbra Culture Collection of Algae (ACOI). Nova Hedwigia 79:39–47.

Ševčíková T, Horák A, Klimeš V, Zbránková V, Demir-Hilton E, Sudek S, Jenkins J, Schmutz J, Přibyl P, Fousek J, Vlček Č, Lang BF, Oborník M, Worden AZ & Eliáš M. 2015. Updating algal evolutionary relationships through plastid genome sequencing: did alveolate plastids emerge through endosymbiosis of an ochrophyte? Sci. Rep 5:10134. PubMed PMC

Ševčíková T, Yurchenko T, Fawley KP, Amaral R, Strnad H, Santos LMA, Fawley MW & Eliáš M. 2019. Plastid genomes and proteins illuminate the evolution of Eustigmatophyte algae and their bacterial endosymbionts. Genome Biol. Evol 11:362–79. PubMed PMC

Silva PC 1980. Remarks on Algal Nomenclature VI. Taxon 29:121–45.

Silva PC 1994. Report of the Committee for Algae: 2. Taxon 43:257–64.

Schlösser UG 1994. SAG- Sammlung von Algenkulturenat the University of Göttingen. Catalogue of strains. Botanica Acta 107:175–6.

Schnepf E, Niemann A & Wilhelm C. 1996. Pseudostaurastrum limneticum, a Eustigmatophycean alga with astigmatic zoospores: Morphogenesis, fine structure, pigment composition and taxonomy. Arch. Protistenkd 146:237–49.

Stamatakis A, Hoover P & Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst. Biol 57:758–71. PubMed

Villanueva L, Besseling M, Rodrigo-Gámiza M, Rampen SW, Verschuren D & Sinningh Damsté JS 2014. Potential biological sources of long chain alkyl diols in a lacustrine system. Org. Geochem 68:27–30.

Wujek DE 2012. Biomineralization on the stalk of the eustigmatophyte Pseudocharaciopsis (Eustigmatophyceae). Algae 27:135–7.

Yang EC, Boo GH, Kim HJ, Cho SM, Boo SM, Andersen RA & Yoon HS 2012. Supermatrix data highlight the phylogenetic relationships of photosynthetic stramenopiles. Protist 163:217–31. PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

GENBANK
KF848932, MN401200, KF848933, MK281457, MN389511, MN401194, MN389513, MN401191

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...