PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography colonography (CTC) in the detection of internal hemorrhoids. METHODS: Three gastroenterologists systematically reported on the presence of internal hemorrhoids in patients with incomplete colonoscopy, for whom they considered a subsequent CTC. For 44 patients with internal hemorrhoids revealed by optical colonoscopy, an age- and gender-matched cohort of 66 patients with normal findings in the rectum was selected. Endoluminal and transaxial CTC views of the rectum were evaluated for the presence of internal hemorrhoids, the anal verge prominence, asymmetry, and cushion-like appearance on a Likert scale by two experienced radiologists and two gastroenterologists. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for identification of internal hemorrhoids were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.53-0.68), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.75) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.62-0.70), respectively. The radiologists showed a better specificity, the gastroenterologists a slightly better sensitivity. When only the rating "very likely" was considered as positive, the specificity rose to 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81-0.94) with a sensitivity of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.38-0.62). The interobserver agreement was fair. The best predictor of the presence of hemorrhoids was a prominent anal verge in the supine position (OR=1.789, 95% CI, 1.267-2.525). The difference between supine and prone positions in the evaluated features in patients with internal hemorrhoids was not significant. CONCLUSION: CTC has low sensitivity but high specificity in the detection of internal hemorrhoids, if the rater is confident in detecting them. Internal hemorrhoids do not substantially change their shape between prone and supine positions.

4th Department of Medicine 1st School of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital Prague Prague Czech Republic

Department of Radiology 1st School of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital Prague Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, Marmo R. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection - systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2011;259:393–405. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101887. PubMed DOI PMC

Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH. CT colonography: pitfalls in interpretation. Radiol Clin North Am. 2013;51:69–88. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.09.005. PubMed DOI PMC

Silva AC, Vens EA, Hara AK, Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Johnson CD. Evaluation of benign and malignant rectal lesions with CT colonography and endoscopic correlation. Radiographics. 2006;26:1085–1099. doi: 10.1148/rg.264055166. PubMed DOI

Trilisky I, Dachman AH, Wroblewski K, Vannier MW, Horne JM. CT colonography with computer-aided detection: recognizing the causes of false-positive reader results. Radiographics. 2014;34:1885–1905. doi: 10.1148/rg.347130053. PubMed DOI PMC

Raman SP, Horton KM, Fishman EK. MDCT and CT angiography evaluation of rectal bleeding: the role of volume visualization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:589–597. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10357. PubMed DOI

Riss S, Weiser FA, Schwameis K, et al. The prevalence of hemorrhoids in adults. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:215–220. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1316-3. PubMed DOI

Schubert MC, Sridhar S, Schade RR, Wexner SD. What every gastroenterologist needs to know about common anorectal disorders. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3201–3209. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3201. PubMed DOI PMC

Hock D, Materne R, Ouhadi R, Mancini I, Aouachria SA, Nchimi A. Test-positive rate at CT colonography is increased by rectal bleeding and/or unexplained weight loss, unlike other common gastrointestinal symptoms. Eur J Radiol Open. 2015;2:32–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2014.12.002. PubMed DOI PMC

Lambert L, Danes J, Jahoda J, Masek M, Lisy J, Ourednicek P. Submilisievert ultralow-dose CT colonography using iterative reconstruction technique: a feasibility study. Acta Radiol 1987. 2015;56:517–525. doi: 10.1177/0284185114533683. PubMed DOI

Lambert L, Ourednicek P, Jahoda J, Lambertova A, Danes J. Model-based vs hybrid iterative reconstruction technique in ultralow-dose submillisievert CT colonography. Br J Radiol. 2015;88:20140667. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140667. PubMed DOI PMC

Levine MS, Kam LW, Rubesin SE, Ekberg O. Internal hemorrhoids: diagnosis with double-contrast barium enema examinations. Radiology. 1990;177:141–144. doi: 10.1148/radiology.177.1.2399313. PubMed DOI

Kim SY, Park SH, Choi EK, et al. Automated carbon dioxide insufflation for CT colonography: effectiveness of colonic distention in cancer patients with severe luminal narrowing. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:698–706. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2156. PubMed DOI

Sosna J, Bar-Ziv J, Libson E, Eligulashvili M, Blachar A. CT colonography: positioning order and intracolonic pressure. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:W175–180. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3303. PubMed DOI

Gupta PJ. Hypertrophied anal papillae and fibrous anal polyps, should they be removed during anal fissure surgery? World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:2412–2414. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i16.2412. PubMed DOI PMC

Bortz J. Potential pitfalls in the anorectal region during CT colonography: A discussion and pictorial overview of common pitfalls. South Afr J Radiol. 2017;21:11. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v21i1.1108. DOI

Miyamoto H, Asanoma M, Miyamoto H, Takasu C, Masamune K, Shimada M. Visualization and hypervascularization of the haemorrhoidal plexus in vivo using power Doppler imaging transanal ultrasonography and three-dimensional power Doppler angiography. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:e686–e691. doi: 10.1111/codi.12406. PubMed DOI

Neri E, Halligan S, Hellström M, et al. The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:720–729. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2632-x. PubMed DOI PMC