Safety and efficacy of self-administered romiplostim in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: Results of an integrated database of five clinical trials
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
32129511
PubMed Central
PMC7318268
DOI
10.1002/ajh.25776
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Self Administration MeSH
- Databases, Factual * MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic blood drug therapy MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Platelet Count MeSH
- Receptors, Fc administration & dosage MeSH
- Recombinant Fusion Proteins administration & dosage adverse effects MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Thrombopoietin administration & dosage adverse effects MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Receptors, Fc MeSH
- Recombinant Fusion Proteins MeSH
- romiplostim MeSH Browser
- Thrombopoietin MeSH
Romiplostim self-administration by patients or caregivers may offer time/cost savings to healthcare professionals (HCPs) and convenience for patients who avoid weekly clinic visits. We performed an integrated analysis of five clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of romiplostim self-administration. Data were analyzed from adults with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who received weekly romiplostim via self-administration or from an HCP. Patients who achieved a stable romiplostim dose for ≥3 weeks (HCP group ≥5 weeks to provide an appropriate index date to enable comparisons with the self-administration group) with platelet counts ≥50 × 109 /L were eligible. In the self-administration (n = 621) vs HCP (n = 133) groups, respectively, median age was 53 vs 58 years, median time since primary ITP diagnosis was 3.7 vs 2.5 years, and median baseline platelet count at ITP diagnosis was 19.0 vs 20.0 × 109 /L. In the self-administration and HCP-dosed groups, median romiplostim treatment duration was 89 vs 52 weeks and median total number of doses was 81 vs 50, respectively. In the self-administration and HCP groups, respectively: 95.0% and 100.0% of patients achieved ≥1 platelet response (defined as weekly platelet count ≥50 × 109 /L without rescue medication in previous 4 weeks); the median percentage of weeks with a response was 94.5% and 95.9%; and rescue medication was used in 36.7% and 39.8% of patients. Self-administration did not adversely affect safety; duration-adjusted rates for all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and bleeding TEAEs were numerically lower with self-administration. Romiplostim self-administration appears effective and well tolerated in eligible patients with ITP.
Amgen GmbH Rotkreuz Switzerland
Amgen Inc Thousand Oaks California USA
Department of Hematology AZ Sint Jan Brugge Bruges Belgium
Department of Hematology University Hospitals Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg Leuven Belgium
Division of Cancer Services Princess Alexandra Hospital Brisbane Australia
Hematology Division Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA
The Pathology Clinical Academic Group The Royal London Hospital London UK
See more in PubMed
Cooper N, Bussel J. The pathogenesis of immune thrombocytopaenic purpura. Br J Haematol. 2006;133(4):364‐374. PubMed
Neunert C, Noroozi N, Norman G, et al. Severe bleeding events in adults and children with primary immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review. J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13(3):457‐464. PubMed PMC
Tarantino MD, Mathias SD, Snyder CF, Isitt JJ, Gernsheimer T, Young J. Impact of ITP on physician visits and workplace productivity. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26(2):319‐328. PubMed
Hill QA, Newland AC. Fatigue in immune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol. 2015;170(2):141‐149. PubMed
Molineux G, Newland A. Development of romiplostim for the treatment of patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia: from bench to bedside. Br J Haematol. 2010;150(1):9‐20. PubMed
Highlights of prescribing information . NPLATE® (romiplostim) for injection, for subcutaneous use. Initial US Approval: 2008. 2018. https://www.pi.amgen.com/~/media/amgen/repositorysites/pi‐amgen‐com/nplate/nplate_pi_hcp_english.pdf. Revised October, 2019. Accessed March 16, 2020.
Nplate summary of product characteristics (SmPC) ‐ (eMC). 2013. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product‐information/nplate‐epar‐product‐information_en.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2020.
PR Newswire Association. Amgen submits supplemental biologics license application for Nplate® (romiplostim). 2018. https://www.prnewswire.com/news‐releases/amgen‐submits‐supplemental‐biologics‐license‐application‐for‐nplate‐romiplostim‐300769133.html. Accessed March 16, 2020.
Selleslag D, Bird R, Altomare I, et al. Impact of self‐administration of romiplostim by patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia compared with administration by a healthcare provider. Eur J Haematol. 2014;94(2):169‐176. PubMed
Amgen. Selecting and training adult patients for home administration of NPLATE® (Romiplostim). 2018. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/rmm/272/Document. Accessed March 16, 2020.
Bussel JB, Kuter DJ, Pullarkat V, Lyons RM, Guo M, Nichol JL. Safety and efficacy of long‐term treatment with romiplostim in thrombocytopenic patients with chronic ITP. Blood. 2009;113(10):2161‐2171. PubMed
Kuter DJ, Bussel JB, Newland A, et al. Long‐term treatment with romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia: safety and efficacy. Br J Haematol. 2013;161(3):411‐423. PubMed
Kuter DJ, Rummel M, Boccia R, et al. Romiplostim or standard of care in patients with immune thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(20):1889‐1899. PubMed
Janssens A, Tarantino M, Bird RJ, et al. Romiplostim treatment in adults with immune thrombocytopenia of varying duration and severity. Acta Haematol. 2015;134(4):215‐228. PubMed
Lyons RM, Boccia RV, Macik G, et al. Home administration of romiplostim by patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Blood. 2009;114(22):3510.
Terrell DR, George JN, Bussel JB, et al. Self‐administration of romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Community Oncol. 2013;10:285‐292.
Janssens A, Rodeghiero F, Anderson D, et al. Changes in bone marrow morphology in adults receiving romiplostim for the treatment of thrombocytopenia associated with primary immune thrombocytopenia. Ann Hematol. 2016;95(7):1077‐1087. PubMed PMC
Newland A, Godeau B, Priego V, et al. Remission and platelet responses with romiplostim in primary immune thrombocytopenia: final results from a phase 2 study. Br J Haematol. 2016;172(2):262‐273. PubMed
Schipperus M, Kaiafa G, Taylor L, et al. Assessment of self‐administration of romiplostim in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura after receipt of home administration training materials: a cross‐sectional study. Drug Saf. 2019;42(1):77‐83. PubMed PMC
Steurer M, Quittet P, Papadaki HA, et al. A large observational study of patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia receiving romiplostim in European clinical practice. Eur J Haematol. 2017;98(2):112‐120. PubMed