Exploring the role of RRM domains and conserved aromatic residues in RGG motif of eIF4G-binding translation repressor protein Sbp1

. 2018 ; 3 () : 102. [epub] 20210917

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid32175478

Background: RNA binding proteins play crucial role in determining if a given mRNA will be translated, stored, or degraded. Sbp1 is an RGG-motif containing protein that is implicated in affecting mRNA decapping and translation. Sbp1 represses translation by binding eIF4G1 through its RGG-motif and activates decapping when overexpressed. In this report, we have assessed the genetic interaction of Sbp1 with decapping activators such as Dhh1, Pat1, and Scd6. We have further analyzed the importance of different domains and specific conserved residues of Sbp1 in its ability to cause over-expression mediated growth defect. Method: Sequence alignment was performed to identify conserved aromatic residues to be mutated. Using site-directed mutagenesis several point mutations and domain deletions were created in Sbp1 expressed under a galactose-inducible promoter. The mutants were tested for their ability to cause growth defect upon over-expression. The ability of Sbp1 to affect over-expression mediated growth defect of other decapping activators was tested using growth assay. Live cell imaging was done to study localization of Sbp1 and its RRM-deletion mutants to RNA granules upon glucose starvation. Results: Mutation of several aromatic residues in the RGG-motif and that of the phosphorylation sites in the RRM domain of Sbp1 did not affect the growth defect phenotype. Deletion of another eIF4G1-binding RGG-motif protein Scd6 does not affect the ability of Sbp1 to cause growth defect. Moreover, absence of Sbp1 did not affect the growth defect phenotypes observed upon overexpression of decapping activators Dhh1 and Pat1. Strikingly deletion of both the RRM domains (RRM1 and RRM2) and not the RNP motifs within them compromised the growth defect phenotype. Sbp1 mutant lacking both RRM1 and RRM2 was highly defective in localizing to RNA granules. Conclusion: This study identifies an important role of RRM domains independent of the RNP motif in Sbp1 function.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Albuquerque CP, Smolka MB, Payne SH, et al. : A multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008;7(7):1389–1396. 10.1074/mcp.M700468-MCP200 PubMed DOI PMC

Bhatter N, Iyyappan R, Rajyaguru P, et al. : Exploring the role of RRM domains and conserved residues of eIF4G-binding translation repressor protein Sbp1 (supplementary data). figshare.Figure.2020. 10.6084/m9.figshare.11733786.v1 PubMed DOI PMC

Bhatter N, Roy R, Shah S, et al. : Arginine methylation augments Sbp1 function in translation repression and decapping. FEBS J. 2019;286(23):4693–4708. 10.1111/febs.15057 PubMed DOI PMC

Coller J, Parker R: General translational repression by activators of mRNA decapping. Cell. 2005;122(6):875–886. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.012 PubMed DOI PMC

Fay MM, Anderson PJ, Ivanov P: ALS/FTD-Associated C9ORF72 Repeat RNA Promotes Phase Transitions In Vitro and in Cells. Cell Rep. 2017;21(12):3573–3584. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.093 PubMed DOI PMC

Frankel A, Clarke S: RNase treatment of yeast and mammalian cell extracts affects in vitro substrate methylation by type I protein arginine N-methyltransferases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;259(2):391–400. 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0779 PubMed DOI

Holt LJ, Tuch BB, Villen J, et al. : Global analysis of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation sites provides insights into evolution. Science. 2009;325(5948):1682–1686. 10.1126/science.1172867 PubMed DOI PMC

Jong AY, Campbell JL: Isolation of the gene encoding yeast single-stranded nucleic acid binding protein 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83(4):877–881. 10.1073/pnas.83.4.877 PubMed DOI PMC

Maris C, Dominguez C, Allain FH: The RNA recognition motif, a plastic RNA-binding platform to regulate post-transcriptional gene expression. FEBS J. 2005;272(9):2118–2131. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04653.x PubMed DOI

Merrick WC: eIF4F: a retrospective. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(40):24091–24099. 10.1074/jbc.R115.675280 PubMed DOI PMC

Mitchell SF, Jain S, She M, et al. : Global analysis of yeast mRNPs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20(1):127–133. 10.1038/nsmb.2468 PubMed DOI PMC

Moras D, Poterszman A: RNA-protein interactions. Diverse modes of recognition. Curr Biol. 1995;5(3):249–251. 10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00051-0 PubMed DOI

Nissan T, Rajyaguru P, She M, et al. : Decapping activators in Saccharomyces cerevisiae act by multiple mechanisms. Mol Cell. 2010;39(5):773–783. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.025 PubMed DOI PMC

Parbin S, Mohanan G, Gole S, et al. : DEKTV and YVG motifs in the Lsm domain are important for the activity of Scd6, a conserved translation repressor protein. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2020;194474. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2019.194474 PubMed DOI

Pilkington GR, Parker R: Pat1 contains distinct functional domains that promote P-body assembly and activation of decapping. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28(4):1298–1312. 10.1128/MCB.00936-07 PubMed DOI PMC

Rahman MM, Muhseen ZT, Junaid M, et al. : The aromatic stacking interactions between proteins and their macromolecular ligands. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2015;16(6):502–512. 10.2174/138920371606150702131516 PubMed DOI

Rajyaguru PI, Bhatter N, Iyappan R, et al. : Characterizing mutations in and genetic interactions of RGG-motif translation repressor Sbp1. 2018. 10.17605/OSF.IO/FNDY3 DOI

Rajyaguru P, Parker R: RGG motif proteins: modulators of mRNA functional states. Cell Cycle. 2012;11(14):2594–2599. 10.4161/cc.20716 PubMed DOI PMC

Rajyaguru P, She M, Parker R: Scd6 targets eIF4G to repress translation: RGG motif proteins as a class of eIF4G-binding proteins. Mol Cell. 2012;45(2):244–254. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.11.026 PubMed DOI PMC

Roy D, Rajyaguru PI: Suppressor of clathrin deficiency (Scd6)-An emerging RGG-motif translation repressor. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2018;e1479. 10.1002/wrna.1479 PubMed DOI

Segal SP, Dunckley T, Parker R: Sbp1p affects translational repression and decapping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(13):5120–5130. 10.1128/MCB.01913-05 PubMed DOI PMC

Swaney DL, Beltrao P, Starita L, et al. : Global analysis of phosphorylation and ubiquitylation cross-talk in protein degradation. Nat Methods. 2013;10(7):676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2519 PubMed DOI PMC

: Pat1 contains distinct functional domains that promote P-body assembly and activation of decapping. Mol Cell Biol.2008;28(4) : 10.1128/MCB.00936-071298-31210.1128/MCB.00936-07 PubMed DOI PMC

: Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol Cell.2006;21(3) : 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.011319-3010.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.011 PubMed DOI

Zobrazit více v PubMed

figshare
10.6084/m9.figshare.11733786.v1

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...