Venetoclax plus LDAC for newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
32219442
PubMed Central
PMC7290090
DOI
10.1182/blood.2020004856
PII: S0006-4971(20)61957-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- akutní myeloidní leukemie farmakoterapie genetika mortalita MeSH
- bicyklické sloučeniny heterocyklické aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- cytarabin aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- indukce remise MeSH
- Kaplanův-Meierův odhad MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mutace MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- sulfonamidy aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- bicyklické sloučeniny heterocyklické MeSH
- cytarabin MeSH
- sulfonamidy MeSH
- venetoclax MeSH Prohlížeč
Effective treatment options are limited for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy. Adults age ≥18 years with newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were enrolled in this international phase 3 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Patients (N = 211) were randomized 2:1 to venetoclax (n = 143) or placebo (n = 68) in 28-day cycles, plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) on days 1 to 10. Primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included response rate, transfusion independence, and event-free survival. Median age was 76 years (range, 36-93 years), 38% had secondary AML, and 20% had received prior hypomethylating agent treatment. Planned primary analysis showed a 25% reduction in risk of death with venetoclax plus LDAC vs LDAC alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-1.07; P = .11), although not statistically significant; median OS was 7.2 vs 4.1 months, respectively. Unplanned analysis with additional 6-month follow-up demonstrated median OS of 8.4 months for the venetoclax arm (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.98; P = .04). Complete remission (CR) plus CR with incomplete blood count recovery rates were 48% and 13% for venetoclax plus LDAC and LDAC alone, respectively. Key grade ≥3 adverse events (venetoclax vs LDAC alone) were febrile neutropenia (32% vs 29%), neutropenia (47% vs 16%), and thrombocytopenia (45% vs 37%). Venetoclax plus LDAC demonstrates clinically meaningful improvement in remission rate and OS vs LDAC alone, with a manageable safety profile. Results confirm venetoclax plus LDAC as an important frontline treatment for AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03069352.
3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
AbbVie Inc North Chicago IL; and
Almazov National Medical Research Center Saint Petersburg Russia
Centre Hospitalier Le Mans Le Mans France
Centro de Investigación Biomedica en Red en Cancer Instituto Carlos 3 Madrid Spain
Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX
Evaggelismos General Hospital Athens Greece
George Papanicolaou General Hospital Thessaloniki Greece
Heartlands Hospital Birmingham United Kingdom
Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe Valencia Spain
Hubertus Wald University Cancer Center University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Laiko General Hospital National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School Athens Greece
Leukaemia Translational Research Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
Netcare Pretoria East Hospital Pretoria South Africa
Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital Nizhny Novgorod Russia
Norton Cancer Institute Louisville KY
Seoul National University Hospital Seoul South Korea
The Alfred Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia
Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
University of Fukui Hospital Fukui Japan
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Cancer Center Pittsburgh PA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Juliusson G, Antunovic P, Derolf A, et al. . Age and acute myeloid leukemia: real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry. Blood. 2009;113(18):4179-4187. PubMed
National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program: Cancer stat facts: leukemia—acute myeloid leukemia. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/amyl.html. Accessed 3 September 2019.
Amadori S, Suciu S, Selleslag D, et al. . Gemtuzumab ozogamicin versus best supportive care in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy: results of the randomized phase III EORTC-GIMEMA AML-19 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(9):972-979. PubMed
Dombret H, Seymour JF, Butrym A, et al. . International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs conventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with >30% blasts. Blood. 2015;126(3):291-299. PubMed PMC
Kantarjian HM, Thomas XG, Dmoszynska A, et al. . Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial of decitabine versus patient choice, with physician advice, of either supportive care or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(21):2670-2677. PubMed PMC
Burnett AK, Milligan D, Prentice AG, et al. . A comparison of low-dose cytarabine and hydroxyurea with or without all-trans retinoic acid for acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome in patients not considered fit for intensive treatment. Cancer. 2007;109(6):1114-1124. PubMed
Dennis M, Hills RK, Russell NH, et al. . An evaluation of 17 years of low dose cytarabine as therapy for AML patients not fit for intensive treatment, including patients with adverse cytogenetics, shows improving survival, potential underutilisation and highlights the need for new therapy [abstract]. Blood. 2017;130(1). Abstract 3874.
Del Poeta G, Venditti A, Del Principe MI, et al. . Amount of spontaneous apoptosis detected by Bax/Bcl-2 ratio predicts outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Blood. 2003;101(6):2125-2131. PubMed
Lagadinou ED, Sach A, Callahan K, et al. . BCL-2 inhibition targets oxidative phosphorylation and selectively eradicates quiescent human leukemia stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12(3):329-341. PubMed PMC
Fischer K, Al-Sawaf O, Fink AM, et al. . Venetoclax and obinutuzumab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia [published correction appears in Blood. 2017;130(2):232]. Blood. 2017;129(19):2702-2705. PubMed PMC
Kumar S, Kaufman JL, Gasparetto C, et al. . Efficacy of venetoclax as targeted therapy for relapsed/refractory t(11;14) multiple myeloma. Blood. 2017;130(22):2401-2409. PubMed
Moreau P, Chanan-Khan A, Roberts AW, et al. . Promising efficacy and acceptable safety of venetoclax plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory MM. Blood. 2017;130(22):2392-2400. PubMed
Roberts AW, Davids MS, Pagel JM, et al. . Targeting BCL2 with venetoclax in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(4):311-322. PubMed PMC
Seymour JF, Kipps TJ, Eichhorst B, et al. . Venetoclax-rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(12):1107-1120. PubMed
Stilgenbauer S, Eichhorst B, Schetelig J, et al. . Venetoclax in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with 17p deletion: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(6):768-778. PubMed
Wei AH, Strickland SA Jr., Hou JZ, et al. . Venetoclax combined with low-dose cytarabine for previously untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results from a phase Ib/II study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15):1277-1284. PubMed PMC
Bogenberger JM, Delman D, Hansen N, et al. . Ex vivo activity of BCL-2 family inhibitors ABT-199 and ABT-737 combined with 5-azacytidine in myeloid malignancies. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56(1):226-229. PubMed PMC
Niu X, Zhao J, Ma J, et al. . Binding of released Bim to Mcl-1 is a mechanism of intrinsic resistance to ABT-199 which can be overcome by combination with daunorubicin or cytarabine in AML cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(17):4440-4451. PubMed PMC
Teh TC, Nguyen NY, Moujalled DM, et al. . Enhancing venetoclax activity in acute myeloid leukemia by co-targeting MCL1. Leukemia. 2018;32(2):303-312. PubMed
Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. . The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391-2405. PubMed
Agarwal SK, DiNardo CD, Potluri J, et al. . Management of venetoclax-posaconazole interaction in acute myeloid leukemia patients: evaluation of dose adjustments. Clin Ther. 2017;39(2):359-367. PubMed
National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03. Available at: https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm. Accessed 27 August 2019.
Howard SC, Jones DP, Pui CH. The tumor lysis syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1844-1854. PubMed PMC
Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, et al. ; International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia . Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for diagnosis, standardization of response criteria, treatment outcomes, and reporting standards for therapeutic trials in acute myeloid leukemia [published correction appears in J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(3):576]. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(24):4642-4649. PubMed
Döhner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, et al. . Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017;129(4):424-447. PubMed PMC
Wei AH, Strickland SA, Hou JZ, Fiedler W, Lin H, Walter RB. Venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine induces rapid, deep, and durable responses in previously untreated older adults with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy Paper presented at the 60th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology; 2 December 2018; San Diego, CA; 2018.
Cortes JE, Douglas Smith B, Wang ES, et al. . Glasdegib in combination with cytarabine and daunorubicin in patients with AML or high-risk MDS: phase 2 study results. Am J Hematol. 2018;93(11):1301-1310. PubMed PMC
DiNardo CD, Stein EM, de Botton S, et al. . Durable remissions with ivosidenib in IDH1-mutated relapsed or refractory AML. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(25):2386-2398. PubMed
DiNardo CD, Pratz K, Pullarkat V, et al. . Venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2019;133(1):7-17. PubMed PMC
Cashen AF, Schiller GJ, O’Donnell MR, DiPersio JF. Multicenter, phase II study of decitabine for the first-line treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(4):556-561. PubMed
Döhner H, Lübbert M, Fiedler W, et al. . Randomized, phase 2 trial of low-dose cytarabine with or without volasertib in AML patients not suitable for induction therapy. Blood. 2014;124(9):1426-1433. PubMed PMC
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03069352