Environmental Impact on Differential Composition of Gut Microbiota in Indoor Chickens in Commercial Production and Outdoor, Backyard Chickens
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
RVO0518
Ministerstvo Zemědělství
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_025/0007404
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
PubMed
32443788
PubMed Central
PMC7285315
DOI
10.3390/microorganisms8050767
PII: microorganisms8050767
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- backyard chicken, caecum, chicken microbiota, environment, microbiome,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
In this study, we compared the caecal microbiota composition of egg-laying hens from commercial production that are kept indoors throughout their whole life with microbiota of hens kept outdoors. The microbiota of outdoor hens consisted of lower numbers of bacterial species than the microbiota of indoor hens. At the phylum level, microbiota of outdoor hens was enriched for Bacteroidetes (62.41 ± 4.47% of total microbiota in outdoor hens and 52.01 ± 6.27% in indoor hens) and Proteobacteria (9.33 ± 4.99% in outdoor and 5.47 ± 2.24% in indoor hens). On the other hand, Firmicutes were more abundant in the microbiota of indoor hens (33.28 ± 5.11% in indoor and 20.66 ± 4.41% in outdoor hens). Horizontally transferrable antibiotic resistance genes tetO, tet(32), tet(44), and tetW were also less abundant in the microbiota of outdoor hens than indoor hens. A comparison of the microbiota composition at the genus and species levels pointed toward isolates specifically adapted to the two extreme environments. However, genera and species recorded as being similarly abundant in the microbiota of indoor and outdoor hens are equally as noteworthy because these represent microbiota members that are highly adapted to chickens, irrespective of their genetics, feed composition, and living environment.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Kubasova T., Kollarcikova M., Crhanova M., Karasova D., Cejkova D., Sebkova A., Matiasovicova J., Faldynova M., Pokorna A., Cizek A., et al. Contact with adult hen affects development of caecal microbiota in newly hatched chicks. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0212446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212446. PubMed DOI PMC
Rantala M., Nurmi E. Prevention of the growth of Salmonella infantis in chicks by the flora of the alimentary tract of chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 1973;14:627–630. doi: 10.1080/00071667308416073. PubMed DOI
Hofacre C.L., Froyman R., Gautrias B., George B., Goodwin M.A., Brown J. Use of Aviguard and other intestinal bioproducts in experimental Clostridium perfringens-associated necrotizing enteritis in broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 1998;42:579–584. doi: 10.2307/1592685. PubMed DOI
Craven S.E., Stern N.J., Cox N.A., Bailey J.S., Berrang M. Cecal carriage of Clostridium perfringens in broiler chickens given Mucosal Starter Culture. Avian Dis. 1999;43:484–490. doi: 10.2307/1592646. PubMed DOI
Varmuzova K., Kubasova T., Davidova-Gerzova L., Sisak F., Havlickova H., Sebkova A., Faldynova M., Rychlik I. Composition of gut microbiota influences resistance of newly hatched chickens to Salmonella Enteritidis Infection. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:957. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00957. PubMed DOI PMC
Caly D.L., D′Inca R., Auclair E., Drider D. Alternatives to antibiotics to prevent necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens: A microbiologist′s perspective. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:1336. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01336. PubMed DOI PMC
Rychlik I. Composition and function of chicken gut microbiota. Animals. 2020;10:103. doi: 10.3390/ani10010103. PubMed DOI PMC
Bolger A.M., Lohse M., Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. PubMed DOI PMC
Caporaso J.G., Kuczynski J., Stombaugh J., Bittinger K., Bushman F.D., Costello E.K., Fierer N., Pena A.G., Goodrich J.K., Gordon J.I., et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. PubMed DOI PMC
Videnska P., Sedlar K., Lukac M., Faldynova M., Gerzova L., Cejkova D., Sisak F., Rychlik I. Succession and replacement of bacterial populations in the caecum of egg laying hens over their whole life. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e115142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115142. PubMed DOI PMC
Qi Z., Shi S., Tu J., Li S. Comparative metagenomic sequencing analysis of cecum microbiotal diversity and function in broilers and layers. 3 Biotech. 2019;9:316. doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-1834-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Ocejo M., Oporto B., Hurtado A. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing characterization of caecal microbiome composition of broilers and free-range slow-growing chickens throughout their productive lifespan. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:2506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39323-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Sergeant M.J., Constantinidou C., Cogan T.A., Bedford M.R., Penn C.W., Pallen M.J. Extensive microbial and functional diversity within the chicken cecal microbiome. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e91941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091941. PubMed DOI PMC
Xu Y., Yang H., Zhang L., Su Y., Shi D., Xiao H., Tian Y. High-throughput sequencing technology to reveal the composition and function of cecal microbiota in Dagu chicken. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16:259. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0877-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Rothrock M.J., Jr., Locatelli A., Feye K.M., Caudill A.J., Guard J., Hiett K., Ricke S.C. A Microbiomic Analysis of a pasture-raised broiler flock elucidates foodborne pathogen ecology along the farm-to-fork continuum. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019;6:260. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00260. PubMed DOI PMC
Ferrario C., Alessandri G., Mancabelli L., Gering E., Mangifesta M., Milani C., Lugli G.A., Viappiani A., Duranti S., Turroni F., et al. Untangling the cecal microbiota of feral chickens by culturomic and metagenomic analyses. Environ. Microbiol. 2017;19:4771–4783. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13943. PubMed DOI
Stanley D., Hughes R.J., Geier M.S., Moore R.J. Bacteria within the Gastrointestinal Tract Microbiota correlated with improved growth and feed conversion: Challenges presented for the identification of performance enhancing probiotic bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:187. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00187. PubMed DOI PMC
Stanley D., Geier M.S., Chen H., Hughes R.J., Moore R.J. Comparison of fecal and cecal microbiotas reveals qualitative similarities but quantitative differences. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:51. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0388-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Willson N.L., Nattrass G.S., Hughes R.J., Moore R.J., Stanley D., Hynd P.I., Forder R.E.A. Correlations between intestinal innate immune genes and cecal microbiota highlight potential for probiotic development for immune modulation in poultry. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018;102:9317–9329. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9281-1. PubMed DOI
Medvecky M., Cejkova D., Polansky O., Karasova D., Kubasova T., Cizek A., Rychlik I. Whole genome sequencing and function prediction of 133 gut anaerobes isolated from chicken caecum in pure cultures. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:561. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4959-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Schnorr S.L., Candela M., Rampelli S., Centanni M., Consolandi C., Basaglia G., Turroni S., Biagi E., Peano C., Severgnini M., et al. Gut microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3654. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4654. PubMed DOI PMC
Gorvitovskaia A., Holmes S.P., Huse S.M. Interpreting Prevotella and Bacteroides as biomarkers of diet and lifestyle. Microbiome. 2016;4:15. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0160-7. PubMed DOI PMC
Whittle G., Shoemaker N.B., Salyers A.A. The role of Bacteroides conjugative transposons in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2002;59:2044–2054. doi: 10.1007/s000180200004. PubMed DOI PMC
Kazimierczak K.A., Flint H.J., Scott K.P. Comparative analysis of sequences flanking tet(W) resistance genes in multiple species of gut bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006;50:2632–2639. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01587-05. PubMed DOI PMC
Ammor M.S., Florez A.B., van Hoek A.H., de Los Reyes-Gavilan C.G., Aarts H.J., Margolles A., Mayo B. Molecular characterization of intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistance in lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008;14:6–15. doi: 10.1159/000106077. PubMed DOI
Melville C.M., Scott K.P., Mercer D.K., Flint H.J. Novel tetracycline resistance gene, tet(32), in the Clostridium-related human colonic anaerobe K10 and its transmission in vitro to the rumen anaerobe Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001;45:3246–3249. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3246-3249.2001. PubMed DOI PMC
Naito M., Sato K., Shoji M., Yukitake H., Ogura Y., Hayashi T., Nakayama K. Characterization of the Porphyromonas gingivalis conjugative transposon CTnPg1: Determination of the integration site and the genes essential for conjugal transfer. Microbiology. 2011;157:2022–2032. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.047803-0. PubMed DOI
Buckwold S.L., Shoemaker N.B., Sears C.L., Franco A.A. Identification and characterization of conjugative transposons CTn86 and CTn9343 in Bacteroides fragilis strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;73:53–63. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01669-06. PubMed DOI PMC
Schmid S., Bevilacqua C., Crutz-Le Coq A.M. Alternative sigma factor sigmaH activates competence gene expression in Lactobacillus sakei. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-32. PubMed DOI PMC
Inniss N.L., Prehna G., Morrison D.A. The pneumococcal sigma(X) activator, ComW, is a DNA-binding protein critical for natural transformation. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:11101–11118. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007571. PubMed DOI PMC
Kubasova T., Kollarcikova M., Crhanova M., Karasova D., Cejkova D., Sebkova A., Matiasovicova J., Faldynova M., Sisak F., Babak V., et al. Gut anaerobes capable of chicken caecum colonisation. Microorganisms. 2019;7:597. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7120597. PubMed DOI PMC
Host Species Adaptation of Obligate Gut Anaerobes Is Dependent on Their Environmental Survival