Cardiovascular End Points and Mortality Are Not Closer Associated With Central Than Peripheral Pulsatile Blood Pressure Components
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
32639894
PubMed Central
PMC7340226
DOI
10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.14787
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- blood pressure, morbidity, mortality, population, risk,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hypertenze mortalita patofyziologie MeSH
- kardiovaskulární nemoci mortalita patofyziologie MeSH
- krevní tlak fyziologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- měření krevního tlaku MeSH
- rizikové faktory kardiovaskulárních chorob MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Pulsatile blood pressure (BP) confers cardiovascular risk. Whether associations of cardiovascular end points are tighter for central systolic BP (cSBP) than peripheral systolic BP (pSBP) or central pulse pressure (cPP) than peripheral pulse pressure (pPP) is uncertain. Among 5608 participants (54.1% women; mean age, 54.2 years) enrolled in nine studies, median follow-up was 4.1 years. cSBP and cPP, estimated tonometrically from the radial waveform, averaged 123.7 and 42.5 mm Hg, and pSBP and pPP 134.1 and 53.9 mm Hg. The primary composite cardiovascular end point occurred in 255 participants (4.5%). Across fourths of the cPP distribution, rates increased exponentially (4.1, 5.0, 7.3, and 22.0 per 1000 person-years) with comparable estimates for cSBP, pSBP, and pPP. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios, expressing the risk per 1-SD increment in BP, were 1.50 (95% CI, 1.33-1.70) for cSBP, 1.36 (95% CI, 1.19-1.54) for cPP, 1.49 (95% CI, 1.33-1.67) for pSBP, and 1.34 (95% CI, 1.19-1.51) for pPP (P<0.001). Further adjustment of cSBP and cPP, respectively, for pSBP and pPP, and vice versa, removed the significance of all hazard ratios. Adding cSBP, cPP, pSBP, pPP to a base model including covariables increased the model fit (P<0.001) with generalized R2 increments ranging from 0.37% to 0.74% but adding a second BP to a model including already one did not. Analyses of the secondary end points, including total mortality (204 deaths), coronary end points (109) and strokes (89), and various sensitivity analyses produced consistent results. In conclusion, associations of the primary and secondary end points with SBP and pulse pressure were not stronger if BP was measured centrally compared with peripherally.
Center for Primary Care and Public Health Unisanté University of Lausanne Switzerland
Department of Cardiology Shanghai General Hospital
Department of Medicine Turku University Hospital and University of Turku Finland
Department of Medicine University of Padua Italy
Department of Pharmacology and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht
Division of Nephrology University Hospital of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
Faculty of Medicine Charles University Pilsen Czech Republic
Hypertension Unit Department of Hypertension and Diabetology Medical University of Gdańsk Poland
NPA Alliance for the Promotion of Preventive Medicine Mechelen Belgium
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Murray CJ, Ezzati M, Flaxman AD, Lim S, Lozano R, Michaud C, Naghavi M, Salomon JA, Shibuya K, Vos T, et al. GBD 2010: design, definitions, and metrics. Lancet. 2012;380:2063–2066. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61899-6. PubMed
O’Rourke MF, Safar ME. Relationship between aortic stiffening and microvascular disease in brain and kidney: cause and logic of therapy. Hypertension. 2005;46:200–204. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000168052.00426.65. PubMed
Staessen JA, Gasowski J, Wang JG, Thijs L, Den Hond E, Boissel JP, Coope J, Ekbom T, Gueyffier F, Liu L, et al. Risks of untreated and treated isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly: meta-analysis of outcome trials. Lancet. 2000;355:865–872. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)07330-4. PubMed
Mitchell GF, Wang N, Palmisano JN, Larson MG, Hamburg NM, Vita JA, Levy D, Benjamin EJ, Vasan RS. Hemodynamic correlates of blood pressure across the adult age spectrum: noninvasive evaluation in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2010;122:1379–1386. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.914507. PubMed PMC
Kaess BM, Rong J, Larson MG, Hamburg NM, Vita JA, Cheng S, Aragam J, Levy D, Benjamin EJ, Vasan RS, et al. Relations of central hemodynamics and aortic stiffness with left ventricular structure and function: the framingham heart study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e002693. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002693. PubMed PMC
Vasan RS, Short MI, Niiranen TJ, Xanthakis V, DeCarli C, Cheng S, Seshadri S, Mitchell GF. Interrelations between arterial stiffness, target organ damage, and cardiovascular disease outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e012141. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012141. PubMed PMC
McEniery CM, Cockcroft JR, Roman MJ, Franklin SS, Wilkinson IB. Central blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:1719–1725. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht565. PubMed PMC
Pauca AL, O’Rourke MF, Kon ND. Prospective evaluation of a method for estimating ascending aortic pressure from the radial artery pressure waveform. Hypertension. 2001;38:932–937. doi: 10.1161/hy1001.096106. PubMed
World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018.
Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Zdrojewski T, Williams K, Thanassoulis G, Furberg CD, Peterson ED, Vasan RS, Sniderman AD. Apolipoprotein B improves risk assessment of future coronary heart disease in the Framingham Heart Study beyond LDL-C and non-HDL-C. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015;22:1321–1327. doi: 10.1177/2047487315569411. PubMed
Yang WY, Melgarejo JD, Thijs L, Zhang ZY, Boggia J, Wei FF, Hansen TW, Asayama K, Ohkubo T, Jeppesen J, et al. International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes (IDACO) Investigators. Association of office and ambulatory blood pressure with mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. JAMA. 2019;322:409–420. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9811. PubMed PMC
Gillespie BW. Use of generalized R-squared in Cox regression APHA Scientific Session and Event Listing 2006. Available at: http://apha.confex.com/apha/134am/techprogram/paper_135906.htm.
Gu YM, Thijs L, Li Y, Asayama K, Boggia J, Hansen TW, Liu YP, Ohkubo T, Björklund-Bodegård K, Jeppesen J, et al. International Database on Ambulatory blood pressure in relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes (IDACO) Investigators. Outcome-driven thresholds for ambulatory pulse pressure in 9938 participants recruited from 11 populations. Hypertension. 2014;63:229–237. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02179. PubMed PMC
Boutouyrie P, Bussy C, Lacolley P, Girerd X, Laloux B, Laurent S. Association between local pulse pressure, mean blood pressure, and large-artery remodeling. Circulation. 1999;100:1387–1393. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.13.1387. PubMed
Covic A, Goldsmith DJ, Panaghiu L, Covic M, Sedor J. Analysis of the effect of hemodialysis on peripheral and central arterial pressure waveforms. Kidney Int. 2000;57:2634–2643. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00124.x. PubMed
Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Lee ET, Galloway JM, Ali T, Umans JG, Howard BV. Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension. 2007;50:197–203. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.089078. PubMed
Wang KL, Cheng HM, Chuang SY, Spurgeon HA, Ting CT, Lakatta EG, Yin FC, Chou P, Chen CH. Central or peripheral systolic or pulse pressure: which best relates to target organs and future mortality? J Hypertens. 2009;27:461–467. doi: 10.1097/hjh.0b013e3283220ea4. PubMed PMC
DeLoach SS, Appel LJ, Chen J, Joffe MM, Gadegbeku CA, Mohler ER, III, Parsa A, Perumal K, Rafey MA, Steigerwalt SP, et al. Aortic pulse pressure is associated with carotid IMT in chronic kidney disease: report from Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort. Am J Hypertens. 2009;22:1235–1241. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2009.156. PubMed PMC
Manisty CH, Zambanini A, Parker KH, Davies JE, Francis DP, Mayet J, McG Thom SA, Hughes AD Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcome Trial Investigators. Differences in the magnitude of wave reflection account for differential effects of amlodipine- versus atenolol-based regimens on central blood pressure: an Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcome Trial substudy. Hypertension. 2009;54:724–730. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.125740. PubMed
Nakayama Y, Tsumura K, Yamashita N, Yoshimaru K, Hayashi T. Pulsatility of ascending aortic pressure waveform is a powerful predictor of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 2000;101:470–472. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.5.470. PubMed
Willum-Hansen T, Staessen JA, Torp-Pedersen C, Rasmussen S, Thijs L, Ibsen H, Jeppesen J. Prognostic value of aortic pulse wave velocity as index of arterial stiffness in the general population. Circulation. 2006;113:664–670. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.579342. PubMed
Williams B, Lacy PS, Thom SM, Cruickshank K, Stanton A, Collier D, Hughes AD, Thurston H, O’Rourke M CAFE Investigators; Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial Investigators; CAFE Steering Committee and Writing Committee. Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study. Circulation. 2006;113:1213–1225. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595496. PubMed
Jankowski P, Kawecka-Jaszcz K, Czarnecka D, Brzozowska-Kiszka M, Styczkiewicz K, Loster M, Kloch-Badełek M, Wiliński J, Curyło AM, Dudek D Aortic Blood Pressure and Survival Study Group. Pulsatile but not steady component of blood pressure predicts cardiovascular events in coronary patients. Hypertension. 2008;51:848–855. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.101725. PubMed
Redelinghuys M, Norton GR, Scott L, Maseko MJ, Brooksbank R, Majane OH, Sareli P, Woodiwiss AJ. Relationship between urinary salt excretion and pulse pressure and central aortic hemodynamics independent of steady state pressure in the general population. Hypertension. 2010;56:584–590. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.156323. PubMed
Mitchell GF, Hwang SJ, Vasan RS, Larson MG, Pencina MJ, Hamburg NM, Vita JA, Levy D, Benjamin EJ. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2010;121:505–511. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.886655. PubMed PMC
Boutouyrie P, Bussy C, Hayoz D, Hengstler J, Dartois N, Laloux B, Brunner H, Laurent S. Local pulse pressure and regression of arterial wall hypertrophy during long-term antihypertensive treatment. Circulation. 2000;101:2601–2606. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.22.2601. PubMed
Pini R, Cavallini MC, Palmieri V, Marchionni N, Di Bari M, Devereux RB, Masotti G, Roman MJ. Central but not brachial blood pressure predicts cardiovascular events in an unselected geriatric population: the ICARe Dicomano Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:2432–2439. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.031. PubMed
Dart AM, Gatzka CD, Kingwell BA, Willson K, Cameron JD, Liang YL, Berry KL, Wing LM, Reid CM, Ryan P, et al. Brachial blood pressure but not carotid arterial waveforms predict cardiovascular events in elderly female hypertensives. Hypertension. 2006;47:785–790. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000209340.33592.50. PubMed
Safar ME, Blacher J, Pannier B, Guerin AP, Marchais SJ, Guyonvarc’h PM, London GM. Central pulse pressure and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension. 2002;39:735–738. doi: 10.1161/hy0202.098325. PubMed
Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1318–1327. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.061. PubMed
Segers P, Mahieu D, Kips J, Van Bortel LM. The use of a generalized transfer function: different processing, different results! J Hypertens. 2007;25:1783–1787. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282ef5c5f. PubMed
Bos WJ, Verrij E, Vincent HH, Westerhof BE, Parati G, van Montfrans GA. How to assess mean blood pressure properly at the brachial artery level. J Hypertens. 2007;25:751–755. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32803fb621. PubMed
Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure