In this paper, a new approach for the periodical testing and the functionality evaluation of a fetal heart rate monitor device based on ultrasound principle is proposed. The design and realization of the device are presented, together with the description of its features and functioning tests. In the designed device, a relay element, driven by an electric signal that allows switching at two specific frequencies, is used to simulate the fetus and the mother's heartbeat. The simulator was designed to be compliant with the standard requirements for accurate assessment and measurement of medical devices. The accuracy of the simulated signals was evaluated, and it resulted to be stable and reliable. The generated frequencies show an error of about 0.5% with respect to the nominal one while the accuracy of the test equipment was within ±3% of the test signal set frequency. This value complies with the technical standard for the accuracy of fetal heart rate monitor devices. Moreover, the performed tests and measurements show the correct functionality of the developed simulator. The proposed equipment and testing respect the technical requirements for medical devices. The features of the proposed device make it simple and quick in testing a fetal heart rate monitor, thus providing an efficient way to evaluate and test the correlation capabilities of commercial apparatuses.

Department of Biomedical Technology Faculty of Biomedical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague nam Sitna 3105 272 01 Kladno Czech Republic

Department of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science VSB Technical University of Ostrava 17 listopadu 2172 15 708 00 Ostrava Poruba Czech Republic

Department of Engineering University of Roma Tre Via Vito Volterra 62 00146 Rome Italy

Malaysia Japan International Institute of Technology Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra 54100 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Moorman A., Webb S., Brown N.A., Lamers W., Anderson R.H. Development of the heart: (1) formation of the cardiac chambers and arterial trunks. Heart. 2003;89:806–814. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.7.806. PubMed DOI PMC

Makrydimas G., Sebire N.J., Lolis D., Vlassis N., Nicolaides K.H. Fetal loss following ultrasound diagnosis of a live fetus at 6–10 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2003;22:368–372. doi: 10.1002/uog.204. PubMed DOI

von Steinburg S.P., Boulesteix A., Lederer C., Grunow S., Schiermeier S., Hatzmann W., Schneider K.M., Daumer M. What is the “normal” fetal heart rate? PeerJ. 2013;1:e82. doi: 10.7717/peerj.82. PubMed DOI PMC

Davey B. Diagnosis and management of heart failure in the fetus. Minerva Pediatrica. 2012;64:471–492. PubMed PMC

European Health Information Gateway. [(accessed on 4 June 2020)]; Available online: https://gateway.euro.who.int/en/indicators/hfa_82-1160-fetal-deaths-per-1000-births/

Matonia A. Modelling of non-invasively recorded maternal and fetal electrocardiographic signals. Biocybern. Biomed. Eng. 2005;25:27–39.

Reinhard J. Intrapartum Heart Rate Ambiguity: A Comparison of Cardiotocogram and Abdominal Fetal Electrocardiogram with Maternal Electrocardiogram. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2013;75:101–108. doi: 10.1159/000345059. PubMed DOI

Martinek R. Non-Invasive Fetal Monitoring: A Maternal Surface ECG Electrode Placement-Based Novel Approach for Optimization of Adaptive Filter Control Parameters Using the LMS and RLS Algorithms. Sensors. 2017;17:1154. doi: 10.3390/s17051154. PubMed DOI PMC

Adam G.K. Design and Development of Embedded Control System for a Lime Delivery Machine. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2009;42:102–107. doi: 10.3182/20090210-3-CZ-4002.00023. DOI

Majernik J., Mad’ar M., Mojzisova J. Integration of Virtual Patients in Education of Veterinary Medicine; Proceedings of the 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems; Prague, Czech Republic. 3–6 September 2017; pp. 185–188.

Pillarisetty L.S., Bragg B.N. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2020. [(accessed on 20 July 2020)]. Late Decelerations. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539820/ PubMed

Jezewski J. Is Abdominal Fetal Electrocardiography an Alternative to Doppler Ultrasound for FHR Variability Evaluation? Front. Physiol. 2017;8:305. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00305. PubMed DOI PMC

Martinek R. A Phonocardiographic-Based Fiber-Optic Sensor and Adaptive Filtering System for Noninvasive Continuous Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring. Sensors. 2017;17:890. doi: 10.3390/s17040890. PubMed DOI PMC

Grepl J. Advanced Computer and Communication Engineering Technology. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2016. Real time signal detection and computer visualization of the patient respiration; pp. 783–793.

Jezewski J., Roj D., Wrobel J., Horoba K. A novel technique for fetal heart rate estimation from Doppler ultrasound signal. Biomed. Eng. Online. 2011;10:92. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-92. PubMed DOI PMC

Rozanek M. Variability of Vital Signs in Simulations with Mannequin in Education of Bioengineers; Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on E-Health and Bioengineering Conference; Sinaia, Romania. 22–24 June 2017; pp. 611–614.

Knaus J.V. Ambulatory Gynecology. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2018. pp. 1–415.

Kurjak A. CRC Handbook of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Volume 1. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2019. pp. 1–360.

Keder L., Olsen M.E., editors. Gynecologic Care. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2018. pp. 1–464.

Sameni R., Clifford G.D. A Review of Fetal ECG Signal Processing; Issues and Promising Directions. Open Pacing Electrophysiol. Ther. J. 2010;3:4–20. doi: 10.2174/1876536X01003010004. PubMed DOI PMC

Wladimiroff J.W., Seelen J.C. Fetal heart action in early pregnancy. Development of fetal vagal function. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1972;2:55–63. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(72)90065-2. DOI

Peterek T. Principal component analysis and fuzzy clustering of SA HRV during the Orthostatic challenge; Proceedings of the 2012 35th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP); Prague, Czech Republic. 3–4 July 2012.

Fluke Prosim 8 Manual. [(accessed on 20 July 2020)]; Available online: https://www.flukebiomedical.com/sites/default/files/resources/prosim8_umeng0300.pdf.

Bibbo D. Design and Development of a Novel Invasive Blood Pressure Simulator for Patient’s Monitor Testing. Sensors. 2020;20:259. doi: 10.3390/s20010259. PubMed DOI PMC

Goncalves H. Comparison of the effect of different sampling modes on computer analysis of cardiotocograms. Comput. Biol. Med. 2015;64:62–66. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.06.011. PubMed DOI

Cesarelli M. Simulation of foetal phonocardiographic recordings for testing of FHR extraction algorithms. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2012;107:513–523. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.11.008. PubMed DOI

van der Hout-van der Jagt M.B., Oei S.G., Bovendeerd P.H.M. A mathematical model for simulation of early decelerations in the cardiotocogram during labor. Med. Eng. Phys. 2012;34:579–589. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.09.004. PubMed DOI

Martinek R. A novel LabVIEW-based multi-channel non-invasive abdominal maternal-fetal electrocardiogram signal generator. Physiol. Meas. 2016;37:238–256. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/37/2/238. PubMed DOI

Mert A., Sezdi M., Akan A. A test and simulation device for Doppler-based fetal heart rate monitoring. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2015;23:1187–1194. doi: 10.3906/elk-1306-224. DOI

Minnalkodi N.S. Cardio tocograph: Admission test and outcome. J. Evol. Med Dent. Sci. 2015;4:16747–16753. doi: 10.14260/jemds/2015/2508. DOI

Pinas A., Chandraharan E. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2016;30:33–47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.022. PubMed DOI

Hamelmann P., Mischi M., Kolen A.F., van Laar J.O.E.H., Vullings R., Bergmans J.W.M. Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Implemented by Dynamic Adaptation of Transmission Power of a Flexible Ultrasound Transducer Array. Sensors. 2019;19:1195. doi: 10.3390/s19051195. PubMed DOI PMC

Series 50 Fetal Monitors. 7th ed. Philps; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2020. [(accessed on 20 July 2020)]. p. 98. Available online: http://www.frankshospitalworkshop.com/equipment/documents/ecg/service_manuals/Philips_Series_50_-_Service_manual.pdf.

Heart and Cardiac Muscle Physiology. J. Physiol. 1994;475:77–87. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020101. DOI

Modern Trends and Applications of Intelligent Methods in Biomedical Signal and Image Processing