Quality of life in patients with metastatic prostate cancer following treatment with cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide (CARD): an analysis of a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 study
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze IV, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
32926841
DOI
10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30449-6
PII: S1470-2045(20)30449-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- androgeny genetika MeSH
- androsteny aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- antagonisté androgenů aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- benzamidy MeSH
- fenylthiohydantoin aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky analogy a deriváty MeSH
- kvalita života MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metastázy nádorů MeSH
- nádory prostaty rezistentní na kastraci farmakoterapie epidemiologie patologie MeSH
- nitrily MeSH
- přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- taxoidy aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze IV MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- abiraterone MeSH Prohlížeč
- androgeny MeSH
- androsteny MeSH
- antagonisté androgenů MeSH
- benzamidy MeSH
- cabazitaxel MeSH Prohlížeč
- enzalutamide MeSH Prohlížeč
- fenylthiohydantoin MeSH
- nitrily MeSH
- taxoidy MeSH
BACKGROUND: In the CARD study, cabazitaxel significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and the alternative androgen signalling-targeted inhibitor. Here, we report the quality-of-life outcomes from the CARD study. METHODS: CARD was a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 study involving 62 clinical sites across 13 European countries. Patients (aged ≥18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2) with confirmed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) by means of an interactive voice-web response system to receive cabazitaxel (25 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks, 10 mg daily prednisone, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) versus abiraterone (1000 mg orally once daily plus 5 mg prednisone twice daily) or enzalutamide (160 mg orally daily). Stratification factors were ECOG performance status, time to disease progression on the previous androgen signalling-targeted inhibitor, and timing of the previous androgen signalling-targeted inhibitor. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival; here, we present more detailed analyses of pain (assessed using item 3 on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form [BPI-SF]) and symptomatic skeletal events, alongside preplanned patient-reported outcomes, assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire and the EuroQoL-5 dimensions, 5 level scale (EQ-5D-5L). Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Pain response was analysed in the intention-to-treat population with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of BPI-SF item 3, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were analysed in the intention-to-treat population with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of either FACT-P or EQ-5D-5L (PRO population). Analyses of skeletal-related events were also done in the intention-to-treat population. The CARD study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02485691, and is no longer enrolling. FINDINGS: Between Nov 17, 2015, and Nov 28, 2018, of 303 patients screened, 255 were randomly assigned to cabazitaxel (n=129) or abiraterone or enzalutamide (n=126). Median follow-up was 9·2 months (IQR 5·6-13·1). Pain response was observed in 51 (46%) of 111 patients with cabazitaxel and 21 (19%) of 109 patients with abiraterone or enzalutamide (p<0·0001). Median time to pain progression was not estimable (NE; 95% CI NE-NE) with cabazitaxel and 8·5 months (4·9-NE) with abiraterone or enzalutamide (hazard ratio [HR] 0·55, 95% CI 0·32-0·97; log-rank p=0·035). Median time to symptomatic skeletal events was NE (95% CI 20·0-NE) with cabazitaxel and 16·7 months (10·8-NE) with abiraterone or enzalutamide (HR 0·59, 95% CI 0·35-1·01; log-rank p=0·050). Median time to FACT-P total score deterioration was 14·8 months (95% CI 6·3-NE) with cabazitaxel and 8·9 months (6·3-NE) with abiraterone or enzalutamide (HR 0·72, 95% CI 0·44-1·20; log-rank p=0·21). There was a significant treatment effect seen in changes from baseline in EQ-5D-5L utility index score in favour of cabazitaxel over abiraterone or enzalutamide (p=0·030) but no difference between treatment groups for change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale (p=0·060). INTERPRETATION: Since cabazitaxel improved pain response, time to pain progression, time to symptomatic skeletal events, and EQ-5D-5L utility index, clinicians and patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer can be reassured that cabazitaxel will not reduce quality of life when compared with treatment with a second androgen signalling-targeted inhibitor. FUNDING: Sanofi.
Department of Clinical Therapeutics Oncology Unit Alexandra Hospital Athens Greece
Department of Urology Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg Asklepios Klinik Altona Hamburg Germany
Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
e Octubre University Hospital Madrid Spain
Englander Institute for Precision Medicine Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY USA
Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam Netherlands
Georges Pompidou European Hospital Paris Descartes University Paris France
Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées BÉGIN Saint Mandé France
Institut de Recherche Clinique Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain Belgium
Institut Jean Godinot Reims France
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Naples Italy
Landspitali University Hospital Reykjavik Iceland
Palacky University Medical School and Teaching Hospital Olomouc Czech Republic
Sanofi Europe Medical Oncology Paris France
Sanofi Global Medical Oncology Cambridge MA USA
Studienpraxis Urologie Nürtingen Germany
The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden Hospital London UK
Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Vall d'Hebron University Hospital Barcelona Spain
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02485691