Spatial and Temporal Trends in Contamination of the Czech Part of the Elbe River by Mercury Between 1991 and 2016
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
FVHE/Vecerek/ITA2020
Veterinary and Pharmacetical University Brno
LM2018121
Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports
02.1.01/0.0/0.0/18_046/0015975
Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports
857560
European Union
PubMed
32970223
DOI
10.1007/s00128-020-03005-6
PII: 10.1007/s00128-020-03005-6
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Heavy metals, Pollution, Risk assessment, Total mercury,
- MeSH
- Spatio-Temporal Analysis MeSH
- Water Pollutants, Chemical analysis MeSH
- Cyprinidae growth & development MeSH
- Risk Assessment MeSH
- Food Contamination analysis MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Environmental Monitoring methods MeSH
- Rivers chemistry MeSH
- Mercury analysis MeSH
- Muscles chemistry MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Water Pollutants, Chemical MeSH
- Mercury MeSH
We summarized available data concerning contamination of the Czech part of the Elbe River by mercury and assessed the potential risks to humans connected with the consumption of contaminated fish. Total mercury concentrations were evaluated in dorsal muscle of chub (Squalius cephalus) and bream (Abramis brama) that were collected at 11 sampling sites in the period from 1991 to 2016. Significant differences among sites were found for both species. The highest contamination was observed near the non-ferrous Kovohute metal works at Celakovice and also downstream from the Spolana chemical plant at Neratovice. A significant decline in contamination with time (concentrations decreasing from 1.65 to 0.22 mg kg-1; p = 0.004) was revealed in chub downstream from the Spolana plant. Calculated hazard indices (HIs) were below 1, therefore, adverse health effects on the general Czech population connected with the consumption of fish from the Elbe River were not expected.
References provided by Crossref.org