Where are we with pre-exposure prophylaxis use in Central and Eastern Europe? Data from the Euroguidelines in Central and Eastern Europe (ECEE) Network Group
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
33021049
DOI
10.1111/hiv.12960
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Eastern and Central Europe, Euroguidelines in Central and Eastern Europe (ECEE), Europe, HIV, emtricitabine, pre-exposure prophylaxis, tenofovir,
- MeSH
- emtricitabin aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- HIV infekce prevence a kontrola MeSH
- látky proti HIV aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- preexpoziční profylaxe metody statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- tenofovir aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
- Názvy látek
- emtricitabin MeSH
- látky proti HIV MeSH
- tenofovir MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV infection is an important intervention for control of the HIV epidemic. The incidence of HIV infection is increasing in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Therefore, we investigated the change in PrEP use in CEE over time. METHODS: The Euroguidelines in Central and Eastern Europe (ECEE) Network Group was initiated in February 2016 to compare standards of care for HIV and viral hepatitis infections in CEE. Data on access to PrEP were collected from 23 countries through online surveys in May-June 2017 (76 respondents) and in November 2018-May 2019 (28 respondents). RESULTS: About 34.2% of respondents stated that tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) was licensed for use in their country in 2017, and 66.7% that it was licensed for use in 2018 (P = 0.02). PrEP was recommended in national guidelines in 39.5% of responses in 2017 and 40.7% in 2018 (P = 0.378). About 70.7% of respondents were aware of "informal" PrEP use in 2017, while 66.6% were aware of this in 2018 (P = 0.698). In 2018, there were 53 centres offering PreP (the highest numbers in Poland and Romania), whereas six countries had no centres offering PreP. The estimated number of HIV-negative people on PreP in the region was 4500 in 2018. Generic TDF/FTC costs (in Euros) ranged from €10 (Romania) to €256.92 (Slovakia), while brand TDF/FTC costs ranged from €60 (Albania) to €853 (Finland). CONCLUSIONS: Although the process of licensing TDF/FTC use for PrEP has improved, this is not yet reflected in the guidelines, nor has there been a reduction in the "informal" use of PrEP. PrEP remains a rarely used preventive method in CEE countries.
Belarusian State Medical University Minsk Belarus
Belgrade University School of Medicine Infectious Diseases Hospital Belgrade Serbia
Central Research Institute of Epidemiology Federal AIDS Centre Moscow Russian Federation
Clinic for Infectious Diseases Belgrade Serbia
Department of Adults' Infectious Diseases Medical University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland
Department of Infectious Diseases University Medical Center Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia
Department of Infectious Diseases West Tallinn Central Hospital Tallinn Estonia
Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
HIV Center University Hospital Pilsen Czech Republic
HIV Out Patient Clinic Hospital for Infectious Diseases Warsaw Poland
Infectious Diseases AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center Tbilisi Georgia
Lviv Regional Public Health Center Lviv Ukraine
National Center for Disease Control and Prevention Yerevan Armenia
National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases Sofia Bulgaria
Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy Chisinau Republic of Moldova
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Biello KB, Bazzi AR, Mimiaga MJ et al. Perspectives on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) utilization and related intervention needs among people who inject drugs. Harm Reduct J 2018; 15: 55.
McCormack SM, Noseda V, Molina JM. PrEP in Europe - expectations, opportunities and barriers. J Int AIDS Soc 2016;19 (7(Suppl 6)): 21103.
Molina JM, Capitant C, Spire B et al. On-demand preexposure prophylaxis in men at high risk for HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2237-2246.
UNAIDS. Global AIDS update: miles to go: closing gaps, breaking barriers, righting injustices. 2018. Available at https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/miles-to-go_en.pdf (Accessed January 20, 2020).
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). HIV/AIDS surveillance in Europe 2019-2018 data.Stockholm: ECDC; 2019. Available at https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/hivaids-surveillance-europe-2019-2018-data (Accessed January 20, 2020).
Phillips AN, Cambiano V, Nakagawa F et al. Increased HIV incidence in men who have sex with men despite high levels of ART-induced viral suppression: analysis of an extensively documented epidemic. PLoS One 2013; 8: e55312.
European Medicines Agency. First medicine for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis recommended for approval in the EU: Truvada to enhance existing HIV prevention strategies. London, 2016.
Hayes R, Schmidt AJ, Pharris A et al. Estimating the 'PrEP Gap': how implementation and access to PrEP differ between countries in Europe and Central Asia in 2019. Euro Surveill 2019; 24 (41): 1900598.
Kowalska JD, Bursa D, Gokengin D et al. HIV health care providers are ready to introduce pre-exposure prophylaxis in central and eastern Europe and neighboring countries: data from the Euroguidelines in central and eastern Europe (ECEE) Network Group. HIV Medicine 2018; 1: 1-5.
Bourne A, Alba B, Garner A, Spiteri G, Pharris A, Noori T. Use of, and likelihood of using, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Europe and Central Asia: findings from a 2017 large geosocial networking application survey. Sex Transm Infect 2019; 95 (3): 187-192.
Koppe U, Marcus U, Albrecht S et al. Factors associated with the informal use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in Germany: a cross-sectional study. J Int AIDS Soc 2019; 22 (10): e25395.
Choopanya K, Martin M, Suntharasamai P et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailaind (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study_: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2013; 381 (9883): 2083-2090.
Baeten JM, Donnel D, Ndase P et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med 2012; 367 (5): 399-410.
Grant RM, Lama KR, Anderson PL et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. New Engl J Med 2010; 363 (27): 2587-2599.
Thigpen MC, Kebaabetswe PM, Paxton LA. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. New Engl J Med 2012; 367 (5): 423-434.
Nwokolo N, Hill A, McOwan A, Pozniak A. Rapidly declining HIV infection in MSM in central London. Lancet HIV 2019; 6 (2): e67.
Cambiano V, Miners A, Dunn D et al. Cost-effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men in the UK: a modelling study and health economic evaluation. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18 (1): 85-94.
Buchbinder SP, Havir DV. Getting to Zero San Francisco: a collective impact approach. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2019; 82 (Suppl 3): S176-S182.
McCormack S, Dunn DT, Desai M et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomized trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 53-60.