Failure properties of abdominal aortic aneurysm tissue are orientation dependent
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
33153925
DOI
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104181
PII: S1751-6161(20)30723-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Failure properties, Mechanical testing, Sample orientation,
- MeSH
- Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal * MeSH
- Anisotropy MeSH
- Biomechanical Phenomena MeSH
- Risk Assessment MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Stress, Mechanical MeSH
- Aortic Rupture * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) requires information about failure properties of aneurysmal tissue. There are large differences between reported values. Among others, studies vary in using either axially or circumferentially oriented samples. This study investigates the effect of sample orientation on failure properties. METHODS: Aneurysmal tissues from 45 patients (11 females) were harvested during open AAA repair, cut into uniaxial samples (90) and tested mechanically within 3 h. If possible, the samples were cut in both axial (49 samples) and circumferential (41 samples) directions. Wall thickness, First Piola-Kirchhoff strength Pult and ultimate tension Tult were recorded. Influence of sample orientation and other clinical parameters were investigated using non parametric tests. RESULTS: Medians of Pult (values 1100 kPa for circumferential vs. 715 kPa for axial direction, p < 10-4) and Tult (17.4 N/cm in circumferential vs. 11.2 N/cm in axial direction, p < 10-4) were significantly higher in circumferential direction. For paired data, the median of difference was 411 kPa (p < 10-3) in Pult and 7.4 N/cm (p < 10-4) in Tult in favor of circumferential direction. CONCLUSIONS: In this first study of anisotropy in AAA wall failure properties using paired comparisons, the strength in circumferential orientation was found to be higher than in axial orientation.
References provided by Crossref.org
