Previous research on cross-cultural differences in visual attention has been inconclusive. Some studies have suggested the existence of systematic differences in global and local attention and context sensitivity, while others have produced negative or mixed results. The objective in this study was to examine the similarities and differences in holistic and analytic cognitive styles in a sample of Czech and Taiwanese university students. Two cognitive tasks were conducted: a Compound Figures Test and a free-viewing scene perception task which manipulated several focal objects and measured eye-movement patterns. An analysis of the reaction times in the Compound Figures Test showed no clear differences between either sample. An analysis of eye-movement metrics showed certain differences between the samples. While Czechs tended to focus relatively more on the focal objects measured by the number of fixations, the Taiwanese subjects spent more time fixating on the background. The results were consistent for scenes with one or two focal objects. The results of a correlation analysis of both tasks showed that they were unrelated. These results showed certain differences between the samples in visual perception but were not as systematic as the theory of holistic and analytic cognitive styles would suggest. An alternative model of cross-cultural differences in cognition and perception is discussed.

Department of Social Studies Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies Mendel University in Brno Brno Czech Republic

Division of Information and Library Studies Faculty of Arts Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Laboratory of Eye Movements and Reading Centre for the Mind Brain and Learning Department of Psychology National Chengchi University Taipei Taiwan

Erratum v

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0247219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247219. PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Nisbett R, Masuda T. Culture and point of view. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(19): 11163–11170. 10.1073/pnas.1934527100 PubMed DOI PMC

Nisbett R, Peng K, Choi I, Norenzayan A. Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychol Rev. 2001;108(2): 291–310. 10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.291 PubMed DOI

Bornstein MH, Toda S, Azuma H, Tamis-LeMonda C, Ogino M. Mother and infant activity and interaction in Japan and in the United States: II. A comparative microanalysis of naturalistic exchanges focused on the organization of infant attention. Int J Behav Dev. 1990;13(3): 289–308.

Han JJ, Leichtman MD, Wang Q. Autobiographical memory in Korean, Chinese, and American children. Dev Psychol. 1998;34(4): 701–713. 10.1037//0012-1649.34.4.701 PubMed DOI

Grossmann I, Varnum M. Social class, culture, and cognition. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2010;000(00): 1–9.

Ventura P, Pattamadilok C, Fernandes T, Klein O, Morais J, Kolinsky R. Schooling in western culture promotes context-free processing. J Exp Child Psychol. 2008;100(2): 79–88. 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.02.001 PubMed DOI

Miyamoto Y, Nisbett R, Masuda T. Culture and the physical environment holistic versus analytic perceptual affordances. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(2): 113–119. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01673.x PubMed DOI

Kӧster M, Castel J, Gruber T, Kärtner J. Visual cortical networks align with behavioral measures of context-sensitivity in early childhood. NeuroImage, 2017;163: 413–418. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.008 PubMed DOI

Tang Y, Zhao L, Lou Y, Shi Y, Fang R, Lin X, et al. Brain structure differences between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts: A comprehensive morphometry study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39(5): 2147–2155. 10.1002/hbm.23994 PubMed DOI PMC

Uskul A, Kitayama S, Nisbett R. Ecocultural basis of cognition: Farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(25): 8552–8556. 10.1073/pnas.0803874105 PubMed DOI PMC

Dong X, Talhelm T, Ren X. Teens in rice county are more interdependent and think more holistically than nearby wheat county. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2019;10(7): 966–976.

Ishii K. Culture and the mode of thought: A review. Asian J Soc Psychol. 2013;16(2): 123–132.

Ji L-J, Schwarz N, Nisbett R. Culture, autobiographical memory, and behavioral frequency reports: Measurement issues in cross-cultural studies. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2000;26(5): 585–593.

Oyserman D, Lee S. Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychol Bull. 2008;134(2): 311–342. 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311 PubMed DOI

Duan Z, Wang F, Hong J. Culture shapes how we look: Comparison between Chinese and African university students. J Eye Mov Res. 2016;9(6): 1–10.

Alotaibi A, Underwood G, Smith AD. Cultural differences in attention: Eye movement evidence from a comparative visual search task. Conscious Cogn. 2017;55: 254–265. 10.1016/j.concog.2017.09.002 PubMed DOI

Arieli S, Sagiv L. Culture and problem-solving: Congruency between the cultural mindset of individualism versus collectivism and problem type. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018;147(6): 789–814. 10.1037/xge0000444 PubMed DOI

Kardan O, Shneidman L, Krogh-Jespersen S, Gaskins S, Berman M, Woodward A. Cultural and developmental influences on overt visual attention to videos. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1): 11264 10.1038/s41598-017-11570-w PubMed DOI PMC

Knight K, Nisbett R. Culture, class, and cognition: Evidence from Italy. J Cogn Cult. 2007;7(3): 283–291.

Tutnjevič S, Lakič S. Language-mediated object categorization: A longitudinal study with 16-to 20-month-old Serbian-speaking children. Eur J Dev Psychol. 2018;15(5): 608–622.

Stachoň Z, Šašinka Č, Čeněk J, Štěrba Z, Angsuesser S, Fabrikant S, et al. Cross-cultural differences in figure-ground perception of cartographic stimuli. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci. 2019;46(1): 82–94.

Kitayama S, Ishii K, Imada T, Takemura K, Ramaswamy J. Voluntary settlement and the spirit of independence: Evidence from Japan's “northern frontier”. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 91(3), 369–384. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.369 PubMed DOI

Evans K, Rotello C, Li X, Rayner K. Short Article: Scene perception and memory revealed by eye movements and receiver-operating characteristic analyses: Does a cultural difference truly exist? Q J Exp Psychol. 2009;62(2): 276–285. PubMed PMC

Hakim N, Simons D, Zhao H, Wan X. Do easterners and westerners differ in visual cognition? A preregistered examination of three visual cognition tasks. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017;8(2): 142–152.

Rayner K, Castelhano M, Yang J. Eye movements when looking at unusual/weird scenes: Are there cultural differences? J Exp Psychol. 2009;35(1): 254–259. 10.1037/a0013508 PubMed DOI PMC

Rayner K, Li X, Williams C, Cave K, Well A. Eye movements during information processing tasks: Individual differences and cultural effects. Vision Res. 2007;47(21): 2714–2726. 10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.007 PubMed DOI PMC

Stachoň Z, Šašinka Č, Čeněk J, Angsüsser S, Kubíček P, Štěrba Z, et al. Effect of Size, Shape and Map Background in Cartographic Visualization: Experimental Study on Czech and Chinese Populations. ISPRS Int J Geoinf. 2018;7(11): 1–15.

Chiu LH. A cross-cultural comparison of cognitive styles in Chinese and American children. Int J Psychol. 1972;7(4): 235–242.

Norenzayan A, Smith E, Kim B, Nisbett R. Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cogn Sci. 2002;26(5): 653–684.

Peng K., Nisbett R. Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. Am Psychol. 1999;54(9): 741–754.

Kühnen U, Hannover B, Roeder U, Shah AA, Schubert B, Upmeyer A, et al. Cross-cultural variations in identifying embedded figures: Comparisons from the United States, Germany, Russia and Malaysia. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2001;32(3):365–371.

McKone E, Aimola DA, Fernando D, Aalders R, Leung H, Wickramariyaratne T, et al. Asia has the global advantage: Race and visual attention. Vision Res. 2010;50(16): 1540–1549. 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.010 PubMed DOI

Masuda T, Nisbett R. Culture and change blindness. Cogn Sci. 2006;30(2): 381–399. 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_63 PubMed DOI

Masuda T, Ishii K, Kimura J. When does the culturally dominant mode of attention appear or disappear? Comparing patterns of eye movement during the visual flicker task between European Canadians and Japanese. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2016;47(7): 997–1014.

Steinmetz KR, Sturkie CM, Rochester NM, Liu X, Gutchess AH. Cross-cultural differences in item and background memory: examining the influence of emotional intensity and scene congruency. Memory. 2017;26(6): 751–758. 10.1080/09658211.2017.1406119 PubMed DOI

Chua H, Boland J, Nisbett R. Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(35): 12629–12633. 10.1073/pnas.0506162102 PubMed DOI PMC

Kozhevnikov M, Evans C, Kosslyn SM. Cognitive style as environmentally sensitive individual differences in cognition: A modern synthesis and applications in education, business, and management. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014;15(1): 3–33. 10.1177/1529100614525555 PubMed DOI

Nosal CS. Psychologiczne modele umysłu [Psychological models of the mind]. Warsaw: PWN; 1990.

Hofstede G. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations London: Sage publications; 2001.

Caparos S, Linnell K, Bremner A, de Fockert J, Davidoff J. Do local and global perceptual biases tell us anything about local and global selective attention? Psychol Sci. 2013;24(2): 206–212. 10.1177/0956797612452569 PubMed DOI

Kiyokawa S, Dienes Z, Tanaka D, Yamada A, Crowe L. Cross cultural differences in unconscious knowledge. Cognition. 2012;124(1): 16–24. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.009 PubMed DOI

Nisbett R, Miyamoto Y. The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9(10): 467–473. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.004 PubMed DOI

Navon D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn Psychol. 1977;9(3): 353–383.

Kukaňová M. Porovnání dvou typů vizualizací z hlediska percepční a kognitivní zátěže a kognitivních schopností jedince. [Comparison of the two types of visualization in terms of perceptual and cognitive load, and personal cognitive abilities]. Doctoral Dissertation. Brno: Masaryk University. 2017. Available online: https://is.muni.cz/auth/th/djk1o/

Lacko D. Individuální a interkulturní rozdíly ve vnímání a myšlení. [The individual and intercultural differences in perception and cognition]. Master Thesis. Brno: Masaryk University. 2018. Available online: https://is.muni.cz/th/cf1aq/

Opach T, Popelka S, Dolezalova J, Rød JK. Star and polyline glyphs in a grid plot and on a map display: which perform better? Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci. 2018;45(5): 400–419.

Šašinka Č, Stachoň Z, Kubíček P, Tamm S, Matas A, Kukaňová M. The Impact of Global/Local Bias on Task-Solving in Map-Related Tasks Employing Extrinsic and Intrinsic Visualization of Risk Uncertainty Maps, Cartogr J. 2019; 1–17.

Šašinka Č, Morong K, Stachoň Z. The Hypothesis platform: An online tool for experimental research into work with maps and behavior in electronic environments. ISPRS Int J Geoinf. 2017;6(12): 1–22.

Popelka S, Stachoň Z, Šašinka Č, Doležalová J. EyeTribe tracker data accuracy evaluation and its interconnection with Hypothesis software for cartographic purposes. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2016: 1–14. 10.1155/2016/9172506 PubMed DOI PMC

Čeněk J, Urbánek T. Adaptace a ekvivalence testových metod: Inspirace pro psychologické testování minorit v ČR. [The adaptation and equivalence of test methods: Inspiration for psychological assessment of minorities in the Czech Republic]. Czechoslovak Psychol. 2019;63(1): 42–54.

Ægisdóttir S, Gerstein LH, Çinarbaş DC. Methodological issues in cross-cultural counselling research: Equivalence, bias, and translations. Couns Psychol. 2008;36(2): 188–219.

Van de Vijver F, Tanzer NK. Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment. Eur Rev Appl Psychol. 1998;47(4): 263–279.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39: 175–191. 10.3758/bf03193146 PubMed DOI

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (Austria); 2017. URL https://www.R-project.org/.

Voßkühler A, Nordmeier V, Kuchinke L, Jacobs AM. OGAMA (Open Gaze and Mouse Analyzer): Open-source software designed to analyze eye and mouse movements in slideshow study designs. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40(4): 1150–1162. 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1150 PubMed DOI

Caparos S, Fortier-St-Pierre S, Gosselin J, Blanchette I, Brisson B. The tree to the left, the forest to the right: Political attitude and perceptual bias. Cognition. 2015;134: 155–164. 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.006 PubMed DOI

de Fockert JW, Cooper A. Higher levels of depression are associated with reduced global bias in visual processing. Cogn Emot. 2014;28(3): 541–549. 10.1080/02699931.2013.839939 PubMed DOI

Salvucci DD, Goldberg JH. Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols In Duchowski AT, editor. Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium. New York: ACM Press; 2000. pp. 71–78.

Popelka S. Eye-tracking (nejen) v kognitivní kartografii: Praktický průvodce tvorbou a vyhodnocením experimentu [Eye-tracking (not only) in cognitive cartography: A practical guide for creation and analysis of an experiment]. Olomouc (CZ): UPOL; 2018.

von Mühlenen A, Bellaera L, Singh A, Srinivasan N. The effect of sadness on global-local processing. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018;80(5): 1072–1082. 10.3758/s13414-018-1534-7 PubMed DOI

He J, Van de Vijver F. A general response style factor: Evidence from a multi-ethnic study in the Netherlands. Pers Individ Dif. 2013;55(7): 794–800.

Hong LK. Risky shift and cautions shift: Some direct evidence on culture-value theory. Soc Psychol. 1978;41(4): 342–346.

Dong Q, Lee Y-FL. The Chinese concept of face: A perspective for business communicators. Bus Soc. 2007;20(1/2): 204–216.

Spotorno S, Faure S. Change detection in complex scenes: Hemispheric contribution and the role of perceptual and semantic factors. Perception. 2011;40(1): 5–22. 10.1068/p6524 PubMed DOI

Cuneo F, Antonietti JP, Mohr C. Unkept promises of cognitive styles: A new look at old measurements. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0203115 10.1371/journal.pone.0203115 PubMed DOI PMC

Waxman SR, Fu X, Ferguson B, Geraghty K, Leddon E, Liang J, et al. How early is infants' attention to objects and actions shaped by culture? New evidence from 24-month-olds raised in the US and China. Front Psychol. 2016;7(97): 1–10. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00097 PubMed DOI PMC

Orquin JL, Holmqvist K. Threats to the validity of eye-movement research in psychology. Behav Res Methods. 2018;50: 1645–1656. 10.3758/s13428-017-0998-z PubMed DOI

Yarbus AL. Eye movements and vision New York: Springer; 1967.

Castelhano MS, Mack ML, Henderson JM. Viewing task influences eye movement control during active scene perception. J Vis. 2009;9(3): 1–15. 10.1167/9.3.6 PubMed DOI

Greene MR, Liu T, Wolfe JM. Reconsidering Yarbus: A failure to predict observers’ task from eye movement patterns. Vision Res. 2012;62: 1–8. 10.1016/j.visres.2012.03.019 PubMed DOI PMC

Exploring cross-cultural variations in visual attention patterns inside and outside national borders using immersive virtual reality

Analytic and holistic cognitive style as a set of independent manifests: Evidence from a validation study of six measurement instruments