• This record comes from PubMed

Psycho-social factors associated with mental resilience in the Corona lockdown

. 2021 Jan 21 ; 11 (1) : 67. [epub] 20210121

Language English Country United States Media electronic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
CRC1193 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) - International
777804 EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) - International

Links

PubMed 33479211
PubMed Central PMC7817958
DOI 10.1038/s41398-020-01150-4
PII: 10.1038/s41398-020-01150-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is not only a threat to physical health but is also having severe impacts on mental health. Although increases in stress-related symptomatology and other adverse psycho-social outcomes, as well as their most important risk factors have been described, hardly anything is known about potential protective factors. Resilience refers to the maintenance of mental health despite adversity. To gain mechanistic insights about the relationship between described psycho-social resilience factors and resilience specifically in the current crisis, we assessed resilience factors, exposure to Corona crisis-specific and general stressors, as well as internalizing symptoms in a cross-sectional online survey conducted in 24 languages during the most intense phase of the lockdown in Europe (22 March to 19 April) in a convenience sample of N = 15,970 adults. Resilience, as an outcome, was conceptualized as good mental health despite stressor exposure and measured as the inverse residual between actual and predicted symptom total score. Preregistered hypotheses (osf.io/r6btn) were tested with multiple regression models and mediation analyses. Results confirmed our primary hypothesis that positive appraisal style (PAS) is positively associated with resilience (p < 0.0001). The resilience factor PAS also partly mediated the positive association between perceived social support and resilience, and its association with resilience was in turn partly mediated by the ability to easily recover from stress (both p < 0.0001). In comparison with other resilience factors, good stress response recovery and positive appraisal specifically of the consequences of the Corona crisis were the strongest factors. Preregistered exploratory subgroup analyses (osf.io/thka9) showed that all tested resilience factors generalize across major socio-demographic categories. This research identifies modifiable protective factors that can be targeted by public mental health efforts in this and in future pandemics.

Center for Contextual Psychiatry Department of Neurosciences KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

Center for Psychiatric Disorders Research University in Bratislava Science Park Comenius Bratislava Slovak Republic

Center for Psychiatry Research Department of Women's and Children's Health Karolinska Institutet Center of Neurodevelopmental Disorders Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Health Care Services Region Stockholm Stockholm Sweden

Center for Studies and Research in Cognitive Neuroscience Department of Psychology University of Bologna Bologna Italy

Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience and MINDLab Department of Clinical Medicine Århus University Århus Denmark

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Stockholm Health Care Services Region Stockholm Stockholm Sweden

Clinical Psychology Unit for Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland

College of Inter faculty Individual Studies in Mathematics and Natural Sciences University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland

Concentris Research Management GmbH Fürstenfeldbruck Germany

Curtin Autism Research Group School of Occupational Therapy Social Work and Speech Pathology Curtin University Perth WA Australia

Department of Cognitive Science Budapest University of Technology and Economics Budapest Hungary

Department of Counselling and Psychology Hong Kong Shue Yan University Hong Kong Hong Kong

Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology Ghent University Gent Belgium

Department of Experimental Psychology University of Oxford Oxford UK

Department of International Business Tunghai University Taichung City Taiwan

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz Germany

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

Department of Psychiatry Faculty of Medicine Comenius University in Bratislava Bratislava Slovak Republic

Department of Psychiatry Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy University Hospital Frankfurt Frankfurt am Main Germany

Department of Psychiatry Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics Psychiatric University Hospital University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Department of Psychiatry University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

Department of Psychological Methods University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Psychology Faculty of Arts Comenius University in Bratislava Bratislava Slovak Republic

Department of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway

Division of Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy Department of Psychology University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands

Faculty of Business and Technologies at Utena University of Applied Sciences Utena Lithuania

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia

Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany

Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel

Faculty of Philosophy Berlin School of Mind and Brain Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany

Faculty of Psychology University of Economics and Human Sciences Warsaw Warsaw Poland

Faculty of Psychology University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland

Faculty of Social Services and Health Care LAB University of Applied Sciences Lahti Finland

Faculty of Social Studies Department of Psychology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Freiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modelling University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany

Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod Lyon France

Institute of Psychology Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt am Main Germany

Institute of Psychology University of Tartu Tartu Estonia

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Mainz Germany

Laboratory for Behavioral Neurology and Imaging of Cognition Department of Neuroscience Medical School University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland

Laboratory for Experimental Psychology Department of Psychology University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia

Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research Mainz Germany

Leuven Research and Development Spin off and Innovation Unit KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

Neuroimaging Center Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz Germany

PROMENTA Research Centre Department of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway

Research Division of Mind and Brain Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany

Research Group Social Stress and Family Health Max Planck Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig Germany

Sagol School of Neuroscience Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel

School of Psychological Science Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel

Sleep Research Unit 1st Department of Psychiatry National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece

Swiss Center for Affective Sciences University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland

Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Sagol Brain Institute Tel Aviv Tel Aviv Israel

University of Bergamo Bergamo Italy

University of Tehran Tehran Iran

See more in PubMed

Pfefferbaum B, et al. The H1N1 crisis: a case study of the integration of mental and behavioral health in public health crises. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2012;6:67–71. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2012.2. PubMed DOI

Lee AM, et al. Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak. Can. J. Psychiatry. 2007;52:233–240. doi: 10.1177/070674370705200405. PubMed DOI

Reissman, D. B., Watson, P. J., Klomp, R. W., Tanielian, T. L., Prior, S. D. Pandemic influenza preparedness: adaptive responses to an evolving challenge. J. Homel. Sec. Emerg. Manag. 3, https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/jhsem/3/2/article-jhsem.2006.3.2.1233.xml (2006).

Yang H, Ma J. How an epidemic outbreak impacts happiness: factors that worsen (vs. protect) emotional well-being during the coronavirus pandemic. Psychiatry Res. 2020;289:113045. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113045. PubMed DOI PMC

Mazza C, et al. A sationwide survey of psychological distress among Italian people during the COVID-19 pandemic: immediate psychological responses and associated factors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health. 2020;17:3165. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093165. PubMed DOI PMC

Liu, C. H., Zhang, E., Wong, G. T. F., Hyun, S. & Hahm, H. C. Factors Associated with depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptomatology during the COVID-19 pandemic: clinical implications for U.S. young adult mental health. Psychiatry Res. 290, 113172 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263263/ (2020). PubMed PMC

Brooks SK, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395:912–920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Lei, L. et al. Comparison of prevalence and associated factors of anxiety and depression among people affected by versus people unaffected by quarantine during the COVID-19 epidemic in Southwestern China. Med. Sci. Monit. 26, https://www.medscimonit.com/abstract/index/idArt/924609 (2020). PubMed PMC

Tull MT, et al. Psychological outcomes associated with stay-at-home orders and the perceived impact of COVID-19 on daily life. Psychiatry Res. 2020;289:113098. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113098. PubMed DOI PMC

Odriozola-González P, Planchuelo-Gómez Á, Irurtia MJ, de Luis-García R. Psychological effects of the COVID-19 outbreak and lockdown among students and workers of a Spanish university. Psychiatry Res. 2020;290:113108. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113108. PubMed DOI PMC

Boserup, B., McKenney, M., Elkbuli, A. Alarming trends in US domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 0, https://www.ajemjournal.com/article/S0735-6757(20)30307-7/abstract (2020). PubMed PMC

Cerami, C. et al. Covid-19 outbreak in Italy: are we ready for the psychosocial and the economic crisis? Baseline findings from the PsyCovid study. Front. Psychiatry. 11, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00556/full (2020). PubMed DOI PMC

Holmes, E. A. et al. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. Lancet Psychiatry. 7, e43 (2020). PubMed PMC

Monteiro J. Keep mental health in mind. Nat Med26, 631 (2020). 10.1038/s41591-020-0914-4. PubMed PMC

Kopelovich, S. L. et al. Community mental health care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic: practical strategies for improving care for people with serious mental illness. Commun. Ment. Health J. 10.1007/s10597-020-00662-z (2020). PubMed PMC

Xiang Y-T, et al. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:228–229. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30046-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Kisely, S. et al. Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 369, https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1642 (2020). PubMed PMC

Zhang W, et al. Mental health and psychosocial problems of medical health workers during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. PPS. 2020;89:242–250. PubMed PMC

Lai J, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw. Open. 2020;3:e203976. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976. PubMed DOI PMC

Qiu J, et al. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Gen. Psychiatr. 2020;33:e100213. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213. PubMed DOI PMC

Mertens G, Gerritsen L, Duijndam S, Salemink E, Engelhard IM. Fear of the coronavirus (COVID-19): predictors in an online study conducted in March 2020. J. Anx. Dis. 2020;74:102258. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102258. PubMed DOI PMC

Gao J, et al. Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0231924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231924. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhang Y, Ma ZF. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and quality of life among local residents in Liaoning Province, China: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health. 2020;17:2381. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072381. PubMed DOI PMC

Xiao, H., Zhang, Y., Kong, D., Li, S., Yang, N. The effects of social support on sleep quality of medical staff treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in January and February 2020 in China. Med. Sci. Monit. 26, e923549-1–e923549-8 (2020). PubMed PMC

Cao W, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 2020;287:112934. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934. PubMed DOI PMC

Wang C, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health. 2020;17:1729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051729. PubMed DOI PMC

Kalisch R, et al. The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2017;1:784. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0200-8. PubMed DOI

Mancini AD, Bonanno GA. Predictors and parameters of resilience to loss: toward an individual differences model. J. Pers. 2009;77:1805–1832. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00601.x. PubMed DOI PMC

Bonanno GA, Romero SA, Klein SI. The temporal elements of psychological resilience: an integrative framework for the study of individuals, families, and communities. Psychol. Inq. 2015;26:139–169. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2015.992677. DOI

Fritz J, de Graaff AM, Caisley H, van Harmelen A-L, Wilkinson PO. A systematic review of amenable resilience factors that moderate and/or mediate the relationship between childhood adversity and mental health in young people. Front. Psychiatry. 2018;9:230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00230. PubMed DOI PMC

Kalisch R, Müller MB, Tüscher O. A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience. Behav. Brain Sci. 2015;38:e92. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1400082X. PubMed DOI

Veer, I. M. et al. Mental resilience in the Corona lockdown: first empirical insights from Europe. Preprint at 10.31234/osf.io/4z62t (2020).

Goldberg DP, et al. The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol. Med. 1997;27:191–197. doi: 10.1017/S0033291796004242. PubMed DOI

Amstadter AB, Myers JM, Kendler KS. Psychiatric resilience: longitudinal twin study. Br. J. Psychiatry. 2014;205:275–280. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.130906. PubMed DOI PMC

van Harmelen A-L, et al. Adolescent friendships predict later resilient functioning across psychosocial domains in a healthy community cohort. Psychol. Med. 2017;47:2312–2322. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000836. PubMed DOI PMC

Kalisch, R. et al. A generic solution for the operationalization and measurement of resilience and resilience processes in longitudinal observations: rationale and basic design of the MARP and LORA studies. Preprint at 10.31234/osf.io/jg238 (2020).

Tofighi D, MacKinnon DP. RMediation: an R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behav. Res. Methods. 2011;43:692–700. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x. PubMed DOI PMC

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Wainwright, M. Statistical learning with sparsity: the Lasso and generalizations, https://www.crcpress.com/Statistical-Learning-with-Sparsity-The-Lasso-and-Generalizations/Hastie-Tibshirani-Wainwright/p/book/9781498712163 (Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 2015).

Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw. 2010;33:1–22. doi: 10.18637/jss.v033.i01. PubMed DOI PMC

Krstajic D, Buturovic LJ, Leahy DE, Thomas S. Cross-validation pitfalls when selecting and assessing regression and classification models. J. Cheminform. 2014;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-6-10. PubMed DOI PMC

Romppel, M. et al. Cross‐cultural measurement invariance of the General Health Questionnaire‐12 in a German and a Colombian population sample. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 26, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6877231/ (2017). PubMed PMC

Rodrigo, M. F., Molina, J. G., Losilla, J.-M., Vives, J., Tomás J. M. Method effects associated with negatively and positively worded items on the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): results from a cross-sectional survey with a representative sample of Catalonian workers. BMJ Open. 9, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924827/ (2019). PubMed PMC

Jeronimus BF, Kotov R, Riese H, Ormel J. Neuroticism’s prospective association with mental disorders halves after adjustment for baseline symptoms and psychiatric history, but the adjusted association hardly decays with time: a meta-analysis on 59 longitudinal/prospective studies with 443 313 participants. Psychol. Med. 2016;46:2883–2906. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716001653. PubMed DOI

Ungar M. What Works - a Manual for Designing Programs that Build Resilience (Resilience Research Center, 2019).

Joyce, et al. Road to resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysis of resilience training programmes and interventions. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e017858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017858. PubMed DOI PMC

Smith BW, et al. The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2008;15:194–200. doi: 10.1080/10705500802222972. PubMed DOI

Alford B. A., Beck A. T. The Integrative Power of Cognitive Therapy p. 197 (Guilford, 1997).

Heber E, et al. The benefit of web- and computer-based interventions for stress: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 2017;19:e32. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5774. PubMed DOI PMC

Joyce, et al. Resilience@work mindfulness program: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial with first responders. J. Med. Internet Res. 2019;21:e12894. doi: 10.2196/12894. PubMed DOI PMC

Kazlauskas E, Eimontas J, Olff M, Zelviene P, Andersson G. Adherence predictors in internet-delivered self-help intervention for life stressors-related adjustment disorder. Front. Psychiatry. 2020;11:137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00137. PubMed DOI PMC

van Buschbach S, van der Meer CAI, Dijkman L, Olff M, Bakker A. Web-based peer support education program for health care professionals. Jt Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 2020;46:227–231. PubMed

Li W, et al. Progression of mental health services during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020;16:1732–1738. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.45120. PubMed DOI PMC

Allison, P. D. In Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Vol. 160, https://methods.sagepub.com/book/fixed-effects-regression-models (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009).

Newest 20 citations...

See more in
Medvik | PubMed

A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic

. 2021 Aug ; 5 (8) : 1089-1110. [epub] 20210802

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...