Psycho-social factors associated with mental resilience in the Corona lockdown
Language English Country United States Media electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
CRC1193
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) - International
777804
EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) - International
PubMed
33479211
PubMed Central
PMC7817958
DOI
10.1038/s41398-020-01150-4
PII: 10.1038/s41398-020-01150-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- COVID-19 prevention & control psychology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Mental Health * MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Multivariate Analysis MeSH
- Protective Factors MeSH
- Disease Transmission, Infectious prevention & control MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Resilience, Psychological * MeSH
- Stress, Psychological prevention & control MeSH
- Regression Analysis MeSH
- Social Factors * MeSH
- Social Support MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is not only a threat to physical health but is also having severe impacts on mental health. Although increases in stress-related symptomatology and other adverse psycho-social outcomes, as well as their most important risk factors have been described, hardly anything is known about potential protective factors. Resilience refers to the maintenance of mental health despite adversity. To gain mechanistic insights about the relationship between described psycho-social resilience factors and resilience specifically in the current crisis, we assessed resilience factors, exposure to Corona crisis-specific and general stressors, as well as internalizing symptoms in a cross-sectional online survey conducted in 24 languages during the most intense phase of the lockdown in Europe (22 March to 19 April) in a convenience sample of N = 15,970 adults. Resilience, as an outcome, was conceptualized as good mental health despite stressor exposure and measured as the inverse residual between actual and predicted symptom total score. Preregistered hypotheses (osf.io/r6btn) were tested with multiple regression models and mediation analyses. Results confirmed our primary hypothesis that positive appraisal style (PAS) is positively associated with resilience (p < 0.0001). The resilience factor PAS also partly mediated the positive association between perceived social support and resilience, and its association with resilience was in turn partly mediated by the ability to easily recover from stress (both p < 0.0001). In comparison with other resilience factors, good stress response recovery and positive appraisal specifically of the consequences of the Corona crisis were the strongest factors. Preregistered exploratory subgroup analyses (osf.io/thka9) showed that all tested resilience factors generalize across major socio-demographic categories. This research identifies modifiable protective factors that can be targeted by public mental health efforts in this and in future pandemics.
Center for Contextual Psychiatry Department of Neurosciences KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Stockholm Health Care Services Region Stockholm Stockholm Sweden
Concentris Research Management GmbH Fürstenfeldbruck Germany
Department of Cognitive Science Budapest University of Technology and Economics Budapest Hungary
Department of Counselling and Psychology Hong Kong Shue Yan University Hong Kong Hong Kong
Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology Ghent University Gent Belgium
Department of Experimental Psychology University of Oxford Oxford UK
Department of International Business Tunghai University Taichung City Taiwan
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Department of Psychiatry University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
Department of Psychological Methods University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
Department of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway
Faculty of Business and Technologies at Utena University of Applied Sciences Utena Lithuania
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia
Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
Faculty of Philosophy Berlin School of Mind and Brain Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
Faculty of Psychology University of Economics and Human Sciences Warsaw Warsaw Poland
Faculty of Psychology University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland
Faculty of Social Services and Health Care LAB University of Applied Sciences Lahti Finland
Faculty of Social Studies Department of Psychology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Freiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modelling University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod Lyon France
Institute of Psychology Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt am Main Germany
Institute of Psychology University of Tartu Tartu Estonia
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Mainz Germany
Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research Mainz Germany
Leuven Research and Development Spin off and Innovation Unit KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
Neuroimaging Center Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz Germany
PROMENTA Research Centre Department of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway
Sagol School of Neuroscience Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
School of Psychological Science Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
Swiss Center for Affective Sciences University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Sagol Brain Institute Tel Aviv Tel Aviv Israel
See more in PubMed
Pfefferbaum B, et al. The H1N1 crisis: a case study of the integration of mental and behavioral health in public health crises. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2012;6:67–71. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2012.2. PubMed DOI
Lee AM, et al. Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak. Can. J. Psychiatry. 2007;52:233–240. doi: 10.1177/070674370705200405. PubMed DOI
Reissman, D. B., Watson, P. J., Klomp, R. W., Tanielian, T. L., Prior, S. D. Pandemic influenza preparedness: adaptive responses to an evolving challenge. J. Homel. Sec. Emerg. Manag. 3, https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/jhsem/3/2/article-jhsem.2006.3.2.1233.xml (2006).
Yang H, Ma J. How an epidemic outbreak impacts happiness: factors that worsen (vs. protect) emotional well-being during the coronavirus pandemic. Psychiatry Res. 2020;289:113045. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113045. PubMed DOI PMC
Mazza C, et al. A sationwide survey of psychological distress among Italian people during the COVID-19 pandemic: immediate psychological responses and associated factors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health. 2020;17:3165. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093165. PubMed DOI PMC
Liu, C. H., Zhang, E., Wong, G. T. F., Hyun, S. & Hahm, H. C. Factors Associated with depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptomatology during the COVID-19 pandemic: clinical implications for U.S. young adult mental health. Psychiatry Res. 290, 113172 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263263/ (2020). PubMed PMC
Brooks SK, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395:912–920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Lei, L. et al. Comparison of prevalence and associated factors of anxiety and depression among people affected by versus people unaffected by quarantine during the COVID-19 epidemic in Southwestern China. Med. Sci. Monit. 26, https://www.medscimonit.com/abstract/index/idArt/924609 (2020). PubMed PMC
Tull MT, et al. Psychological outcomes associated with stay-at-home orders and the perceived impact of COVID-19 on daily life. Psychiatry Res. 2020;289:113098. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113098. PubMed DOI PMC
Odriozola-González P, Planchuelo-Gómez Á, Irurtia MJ, de Luis-García R. Psychological effects of the COVID-19 outbreak and lockdown among students and workers of a Spanish university. Psychiatry Res. 2020;290:113108. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113108. PubMed DOI PMC
Boserup, B., McKenney, M., Elkbuli, A. Alarming trends in US domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 0, https://www.ajemjournal.com/article/S0735-6757(20)30307-7/abstract (2020). PubMed PMC
Cerami, C. et al. Covid-19 outbreak in Italy: are we ready for the psychosocial and the economic crisis? Baseline findings from the PsyCovid study. Front. Psychiatry. 11, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00556/full (2020). PubMed DOI PMC
Holmes, E. A. et al. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. Lancet Psychiatry. 7, e43 (2020). PubMed PMC
Monteiro J. Keep mental health in mind. Nat Med26, 631 (2020). 10.1038/s41591-020-0914-4. PubMed PMC
Kopelovich, S. L. et al. Community mental health care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic: practical strategies for improving care for people with serious mental illness. Commun. Ment. Health J. 10.1007/s10597-020-00662-z (2020). PubMed PMC
Xiang Y-T, et al. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:228–229. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30046-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Kisely, S. et al. Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 369, https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1642 (2020). PubMed PMC
Zhang W, et al. Mental health and psychosocial problems of medical health workers during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. PPS. 2020;89:242–250. PubMed PMC
Lai J, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw. Open. 2020;3:e203976. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976. PubMed DOI PMC
Qiu J, et al. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Gen. Psychiatr. 2020;33:e100213. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213. PubMed DOI PMC
Mertens G, Gerritsen L, Duijndam S, Salemink E, Engelhard IM. Fear of the coronavirus (COVID-19): predictors in an online study conducted in March 2020. J. Anx. Dis. 2020;74:102258. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102258. PubMed DOI PMC
Gao J, et al. Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0231924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231924. PubMed DOI PMC
Zhang Y, Ma ZF. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and quality of life among local residents in Liaoning Province, China: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health. 2020;17:2381. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072381. PubMed DOI PMC
Xiao, H., Zhang, Y., Kong, D., Li, S., Yang, N. The effects of social support on sleep quality of medical staff treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in January and February 2020 in China. Med. Sci. Monit. 26, e923549-1–e923549-8 (2020). PubMed PMC
Cao W, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 2020;287:112934. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934. PubMed DOI PMC
Wang C, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health. 2020;17:1729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051729. PubMed DOI PMC
Kalisch R, et al. The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2017;1:784. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0200-8. PubMed DOI
Mancini AD, Bonanno GA. Predictors and parameters of resilience to loss: toward an individual differences model. J. Pers. 2009;77:1805–1832. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00601.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Bonanno GA, Romero SA, Klein SI. The temporal elements of psychological resilience: an integrative framework for the study of individuals, families, and communities. Psychol. Inq. 2015;26:139–169. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2015.992677. DOI
Fritz J, de Graaff AM, Caisley H, van Harmelen A-L, Wilkinson PO. A systematic review of amenable resilience factors that moderate and/or mediate the relationship between childhood adversity and mental health in young people. Front. Psychiatry. 2018;9:230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00230. PubMed DOI PMC
Kalisch R, Müller MB, Tüscher O. A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience. Behav. Brain Sci. 2015;38:e92. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1400082X. PubMed DOI
Veer, I. M. et al. Mental resilience in the Corona lockdown: first empirical insights from Europe. Preprint at 10.31234/osf.io/4z62t (2020).
Goldberg DP, et al. The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol. Med. 1997;27:191–197. doi: 10.1017/S0033291796004242. PubMed DOI
Amstadter AB, Myers JM, Kendler KS. Psychiatric resilience: longitudinal twin study. Br. J. Psychiatry. 2014;205:275–280. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.130906. PubMed DOI PMC
van Harmelen A-L, et al. Adolescent friendships predict later resilient functioning across psychosocial domains in a healthy community cohort. Psychol. Med. 2017;47:2312–2322. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000836. PubMed DOI PMC
Kalisch, R. et al. A generic solution for the operationalization and measurement of resilience and resilience processes in longitudinal observations: rationale and basic design of the MARP and LORA studies. Preprint at 10.31234/osf.io/jg238 (2020).
Tofighi D, MacKinnon DP. RMediation: an R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behav. Res. Methods. 2011;43:692–700. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Wainwright, M. Statistical learning with sparsity: the Lasso and generalizations, https://www.crcpress.com/Statistical-Learning-with-Sparsity-The-Lasso-and-Generalizations/Hastie-Tibshirani-Wainwright/p/book/9781498712163 (Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 2015).
Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw. 2010;33:1–22. doi: 10.18637/jss.v033.i01. PubMed DOI PMC
Krstajic D, Buturovic LJ, Leahy DE, Thomas S. Cross-validation pitfalls when selecting and assessing regression and classification models. J. Cheminform. 2014;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-6-10. PubMed DOI PMC
Romppel, M. et al. Cross‐cultural measurement invariance of the General Health Questionnaire‐12 in a German and a Colombian population sample. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 26, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6877231/ (2017). PubMed PMC
Rodrigo, M. F., Molina, J. G., Losilla, J.-M., Vives, J., Tomás J. M. Method effects associated with negatively and positively worded items on the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): results from a cross-sectional survey with a representative sample of Catalonian workers. BMJ Open. 9, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924827/ (2019). PubMed PMC
Jeronimus BF, Kotov R, Riese H, Ormel J. Neuroticism’s prospective association with mental disorders halves after adjustment for baseline symptoms and psychiatric history, but the adjusted association hardly decays with time: a meta-analysis on 59 longitudinal/prospective studies with 443 313 participants. Psychol. Med. 2016;46:2883–2906. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716001653. PubMed DOI
Ungar M. What Works - a Manual for Designing Programs that Build Resilience (Resilience Research Center, 2019).
Joyce, et al. Road to resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysis of resilience training programmes and interventions. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e017858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017858. PubMed DOI PMC
Smith BW, et al. The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2008;15:194–200. doi: 10.1080/10705500802222972. PubMed DOI
Alford B. A., Beck A. T. The Integrative Power of Cognitive Therapy p. 197 (Guilford, 1997).
Heber E, et al. The benefit of web- and computer-based interventions for stress: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 2017;19:e32. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5774. PubMed DOI PMC
Joyce, et al. Resilience@work mindfulness program: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial with first responders. J. Med. Internet Res. 2019;21:e12894. doi: 10.2196/12894. PubMed DOI PMC
Kazlauskas E, Eimontas J, Olff M, Zelviene P, Andersson G. Adherence predictors in internet-delivered self-help intervention for life stressors-related adjustment disorder. Front. Psychiatry. 2020;11:137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00137. PubMed DOI PMC
van Buschbach S, van der Meer CAI, Dijkman L, Olff M, Bakker A. Web-based peer support education program for health care professionals. Jt Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 2020;46:227–231. PubMed
Li W, et al. Progression of mental health services during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020;16:1732–1738. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.45120. PubMed DOI PMC
Allison, P. D. In Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Vol. 160, https://methods.sagepub.com/book/fixed-effects-regression-models (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009).
A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic