OBJECTIVES: The first objective of our study was to determine the radiation exposure received by patients during tin-filtrated ultra-low-dose computed tomography (TFULDCT) of sacroiliac joints and to compare those to conventional X-ray doses. For comparison, we added a cohort examined by low-dose CT (LDCT) without tin filtration. The second objective was to compare the results of TFULDCT and X-ray in the detection of sacroiliitis. METHODS: Our retrospective study covered 45 patients, who were examined for suspected axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). The first group underwent TFULDCT as well as conventional radiography (CR); the second group underwent LDCT only without tin filtration. Effective doses of TFULDCT, LDCT and CR were calculated by an experienced medical physicist. TFULDCT and CR were independently evaluated by three investigators, who decided on the presence or absence of rheumatoid inflammatory bone changes. The results were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: In our cohort, the median effective dose for TFULDCT was 0.11 mSv, range (0.06-0.40 mSv), for LDCT 0.5 mSv (0.29-0.89 mSv), and for CR 0.25 mSv (0.06-1.87 mSv). We proved that TFULDCT produces a significantly lower percentage of uncertain results (23.3%; 95% CI: 11.3-41.6%) than CR (66.7%; 95% CI: 48.3-81.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Tin filtration helps to reduce CT radiation exposure to values lower than those resulting from CR. TFULDCT offers better overall diagnostic performance than CR. Our results prove that TFULDCT can replace CR in the diagnosis of sacroiliitis in the radiographical stage of AxSpA.

Biomedical Center Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Czech Republic

Clinical Rheumatology University hospital in Plzen Czech Republic

Department of Imaging methods University hospital in Plzen Czech Republic

Division of Medical physics University hospital in Plzen Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Lambert RG, Bakker PA, van der Heijde D, Weber U, Rudwaleit M, Hermann KGA, Sieper J, Baraliakos X, Bennett A, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, Dougados M, Pedersen SJ, Jurik AG, Maksymowych WP, Marzo-Ortega H, Ostergaad M, Poddubnyy D, Reijnierse M, van den Bosch F, van der Horst-Bruinsma I, Landewé R. Defining active sacroiliitis on MRI for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: update by the ASAS MRI working group. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;0:1-6. PubMed DOI

Diekhoff T, Hermann KG, Greese J, Schwenke C, Poddubnyy D, Hamm B, Sieper J. Comparison of MRI with radiography for detecting structural lesions of the sacroiliac joint using CT as standard of reference: results from the SIMACT study. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1502-8. PubMed DOI

Sykes MP, Doll H, Senqupta R, Gaffney K. Delay to diagnosis in axial spondyloarthritis: are we improving in the UK? Rheumatology 2015;54:2283-84. PubMed DOI

Pavelka K. Early diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis. Vnitr Lek 2006; 52(7-8):726-9. PubMed

Slobodin G, Hussein H, Rosner I, Eshed I. Sacroiliitis - early diagnosis is key. J Inflamm Res 2018;11:339-44. PubMed DOI

Devauchelle-Pensec V, D´Agostino MA, Marion J, Lapier M, Jousse-Joulin S, Colin D, Chary-Vackenaere I, Loeuille ChM, Aegerter P, Guis S, Gaudin P, Breban M, Saraux A.. Computed tomography scanning facilitates the diagnosis of sacroiliitis in patients with suspected spondylarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:1412-27. DOI

Geijer M, Göthlin GG, Göthlin JH. The clinical utility of computed tomography compared to conventional radiography in diagnosing sacroiliitis. A retrospective study on 910 patients and literature review. J Rheumatol 2007;34:1561-65. PubMed

Maksymowych W, Lambert R. Low-dose CT for spondyloarthritis - a brilliant new chapter? Nat Rev Rheumatol 2018;14:130-31. PubMed DOI

de Bruin F, de Koning A, van den Berg R, Baraliakos X, Braun J, Ramiro S, van Gaalen F, Reijnierse M, van der Heijde D. Development of the CT Syndesmophyte Score (CTSS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: data from the SIAS cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77(3):371-77. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212553 PubMed DOI

de Koning A, de Bruin F, van den Berg R, Ramiro S, Baraliakos X, Braun J, van Gaalen FA, Reijnierse M,van der Heijde D. Low-dose CT detects more progression of bone formation in comparison to conventional radiography in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results from the SIAS cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:293-99. PubMed DOI

Rego, S, Yu, L, Bruesewitz, M, Vrieze, T, Kofler, J, McCollough, C. CARE Dose4D CT Automatic Exposure Control System: Physics Principles and Practical Hints. Radiological Society of North America 2007 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2007, Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2007/5011233.html

Haubenreisser H, Meyer M, Sudarski S, Allmendinger T, Schoenberg SO, Henzler T. Unenhanced third-generation dual-source chest CT using a tin filter for spectral shaping at 100 kVp. Eur J Radiol 2015;84:1608-13. DOI

White paper. Shaping the beam. Versatile filtration for unique diagnostic potential within Siemens Healthineers CT. Mark Woods, Marcus Brehm. Available from: https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/computed-tomography/technologies-and-innovations/tin-filter (accessed on July 10, 2020)

Lell MM, May MS, Brand M, Eller A, Buder T, Hofmann E, Uder M, Wuest W. Imaging the Parasinus Region with a Third-Generation Dual-Source CT and the Effect of Tin Filtration on Image Quality and Radiation Dose. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36(7):1225-30. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4270 PubMed DOI

Martini K, Higashigaito K, Barth BK, Baumueller S, Alkadhi H, Frauenfelder T. Ultralow-dose CT with tin filtration for detection of solid and sub solid pulmonary nodules: a phantom study. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20150389. PubMed DOI

https://www.smartbmicalculator.com/

Agresti, A, and Coull, BA. Approximate is Better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions, The American Statistician 1998;52:119-26. DOI

Brink JA, Morin RL. Size-specific dose estimation for CT: How should it be used and what does it mean? Radiology 2012;265:666-68. PubMed DOI

Sukupova L. What does CTDIvol mean and is this parameter suitable for the determination of patient´s doses? Ces Radiol 2015;69(3):194-200.

Seiber JA, Boone JM, Wootton-Gorges SL, Lamba R. Dose is not always what it seems: where very misleading values can result from volume CT dose index and dose length product. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11(3):233-37. PubMed DOI

Lee Ch. How to estimate effective dose for CT patients. Eur Radiol 2020;30:1825-27. DOI

Chahal BS, Kwan AL, Dillon SS, Olubaniyi BO, Jhiandri GS, Neilson MM, Lambert RG. Radiation exposure to the sacroiliac joint from low-dose CT compared with radiography. AJR 2018;211:1-5. PubMed DOI

Jurik AG, Hansen J, Puhakka KB. Effective radiation dose from semicoronal CT of the sacroiliac joints in comparison with axial CT and conventional radiography. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2820-25. DOI

Bocker Puhakka K, Jurik AG, Egund N, Schiottz-Christensen B, Stengaard-Pedersen K, van Overeem Hansen G, Vallo Christiansen JV. Imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondylarthropathy, Assessment of abnormalities by MR in comparison with radiography and CT. Acta Radiologica 2003;44:218-29. PubMed DOI