Components produced by additive technology are implemented in various spheres of industry, such as automotive or aerospace. This manufacturing process can lead to making highly optimized parts. There is not enough information about the quality of the parts produced by additive technologies, especially those made from metal powder. The research in this article deals with the porosity of components produced by additive technologies. The components used for the research were manufactured by the selective laser melting (SLM) method. The shape of these components is the same as the shape used for the tensile test. The investigated parts were printed with orientation in two directions, Z and XZ with respect to the machine platform. The printing strategy was "stripe". The material used for printing of the parts was SS 316L-0407. The printing parameters were laser power of 200 W, scanning speed of 650 mm/s, and the thickness of the layer was 50 µm. A non-destructive method was used for the components' porosity evaluation. The scanning was performed by CT machine METROTOM 1500. The radiation parameters used for getting 3D scans were voltage 180 kV, current 900 µA, detector resolution 1024 × 1024 px, voxel size 119.43 µm, number of projections 1050, and integration time 2000 ms. This entire measurement process responds to the computer aided quality (CAQ) technology. VG studio MAX 3.0 software was used to evaluate the obtained data. The porosity of the parts with Z and XZ orientation was also evaluated for parts' thicknesses of 1, 2, and 3 mm, respectively. It has been proven by this experimental investigation that the printing direction of the part in the additive manufacturing process under question affects its porosity.

Faculty of Materials Science and Technology in Trnava Institute of Production Technologies Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava 917 24 Trnava Slovakia

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering VŠB Technical University of Ostrava 70800 Ostrava Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

GE Celebrates Grand Opening of First Additive Manufacturing Center in Pittsburgh. [(accessed on 7 December 2020)]; Available online: https://www.ge.com/news/press-releases/ge-celebrates-grand-opening-first-additive-manufacturing-center-pittsburgh.

The LEAP Engine Performance. Execution. Technology. [(accessed on 7 December 2020)]; Available online: https://www.cfmaeroengines.com/engines/leap/

Bajaj P., Hariharan A., Kini A., Kürnsteiner P., Raabe D., Jagle E.A. Steels in additive manufacturing: A review of their microstructure and properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2020;772:138633. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2019.138633. DOI

Deev A.A., Kuznetcov P.A., Petrov S.N. Anisotropy of Mechanical Properties and its Correlation with the Structure of the Stainless Steel 316 L Produced by the SLM Method. Phys. Procedia. 2016;83:789–796. doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.081. DOI

Hitzler L., Hirsch J., Heine B., Merkel M., Hall W., Ochsner A. On the anisotropic mechanical properties of selective laser-melted stainless steel. Materials. 2017;10:1136. doi: 10.3390/ma10101136. PubMed DOI PMC

Chadha K., Tian Y., Spray J.G., Aranas C. Effect of annealing heat treatment on the microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of hot isostatic pressed 316 L stainless steel fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Metals. 2020;10:753. doi: 10.3390/met10060753. DOI

Yadollahi A., Shamsaei N., Thompson S.M., Seely D.W. Effect of process time interval and heat treatment on the mechanical and microstructural properties of direct laser deposited 316 L stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2015;644:171–183. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.07.056. DOI

Casati R., Lemke J., Vedani M. Microstructure and fracture behavior of 316 L austenitic stainless steel produced by selective laser melting. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2016;32:738. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2016.06.016. DOI

Cherry J.A., Davies H.M., Mehmood S., Lavery N.P., Brown S.G.R., Sienz J. Investigation into the effect of process parameters on microstructural and physical properties of 316 L stainless steel parts by selective laser melting. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015;76:869–879. doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-6297-2. DOI

Peterka J., Pokorny P., Vaclav S. Annals of DAAAM & Proceedings. DAAAM International Vienna; Wolkersdorf, Austria: 2008. CAM strategies and surface accuracy; pp. 1061–1062.

Hajnys J., Pagáč M., Měsíček J., Petru J., Król M. Influence of Scanning Strategy Parameters on Residual Stress in the SLM Process According to the Bridge Curvature Method for AISI 316 L Stainless Steel. Materials. 2020;13:1659. doi: 10.3390/ma13071659. PubMed DOI PMC

Hajnyš J., Pagáč M., Kotera O., Petrů J., Scholz S. Influence of Basic Process Parameters on Mechanical and Internal Properties of 316L Steel in SLM Process for Renishaw AM400. MM Sci. J. 2019:2790–2794. doi: 10.17973/MMSJ.2019_03_2018127. DOI

Carter L.N., Martin C., Withers P.J., Attallah M.M. The influence of the laser scan strategy on grain structure and cracking behaviour in SLM powder-bed fabricated nickel superalloy. J. Alloy. Compd. 2014;615:338–347. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.06.172. DOI

Tolosa I., Garciandía F., Zubiri F., Zapirain F., Esnaola A. Study of mechanical properties of AISI 316 stainless steel processed by “selective laser melting”, following different manufacturing strategies. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2010;51:639–647. doi: 10.1007/s00170-010-2631-5. DOI

Yusuf S.M., Chen Y., Boardman R., Yang S., Gao N. Investigation on porosity and microhardness of 316 L stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting. Metals. 2017;7:64. doi: 10.3390/met7020064. DOI

Verlee B., Dormal T., Lecomte-Beckers J. Density and porosity control of sintered 316L stainless steel parts produced by additive manufacturing. Powder Metall. 2012;55:260–267. doi: 10.1179/0032589912Z.00000000082. DOI

Khosravani M.R., Reinicke T. On the Use of X-ray Computed Tomography in Assessment of 3D-Printed Components. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 2020;39:75. doi: 10.1007/s10921-020-00721-1. DOI

Qi D., Hu W., Xin K., Zeng Q., Xi L., Tao R., Liao H., Deng Y., Liao B., Wu W. In-situ synchrotron X-ray tomography investigation of micro lattice manufactured with the projection micro-stereolithography (PμSL) 3D printing technique: Defects characterization and in-situ shear test. Compos. Struct. 2020;252:112710. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112710. DOI

Data Sheets—Additive Manufacturing, SS 316L-0407 Powder for Additive Manufacturing. [(accessed on 10 December 2020)]; Available online: https://resources.renishaw.com/en/details/data-sheet-ss-316l-0407-powder-for-additive-manufacturing--90802.

Arısoy Y.M., Criales L.E., Özel T., Lane B., Moylan S., Donmez A. Influence of scan strategy and process parameters on microstructure and its optimization in additively manufactured nickel alloy 625 via laser powder bed fusion. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017;90:1393–1417. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-9429-z. PubMed DOI PMC

Keshavarzkermani A., Esmaeilizadeh R., Ali U., Enrique P.D., Mahmoodkhani Y., Zhou N.Y., Bonakdar A., Toyserkani E. Controlling mechanical properties of additively manufactured hastelloy X by altering solidification pattern during laser powder-bed fusion. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2019;762:138081. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2019.138081. DOI

Leicht A., Klement U., Hryha H. Effect of build geometry on the microstructural development of 316L parts produced by additive manufacturing. Mater. Charact. 2018;143:137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.04.040. DOI

Gómez H.V., Lee C.H., Smith S.T. Dimensional metrology with X-ray CT: A comparison with CMM measurements on internal features and compliant structures. Precis. Eng. 2018;51:291–307. doi: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.08.021. DOI

Gómez H.V., Morse E.P., Hocken R.J., Smith S.T. Dimensional metrology of internal features with X-ray computed tomography; Proceedings of the 29th ASPE Annual Meeting; Boston, MA, USA. 9–14 November 2014; pp. 684–689.

Gómez H.V., Thousand J.D., Morse E.P., Smith S.T. CT measurements and their estimated uncertainty: The significance of temperature and bias determination; Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Metrology and Properties of Engineering Surfaces; Charlotte, NC, USA. 2–5 March 2015; pp. 1–8.

Li R., Shi Y., Wang Z., Wang L., Liu J., Jiang W. Densification behavior of gas and water atomized 316L stainless steel powder during selective laser melting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010;256:4350–4356. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.02.030. DOI

Simchi A. Direct laser sintering of metal powders mechanism, kinetics and microstructural features. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2006;428:148–158. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.04.117. DOI

Kruth J.P., Badrossamay M., Yasa E., Deckers J., Thijs L., Humbeeck J.V. Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Electromachining (ISEM XVI), Shanghai, China, 19–23 April 2010. SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIV PRESS; Shanghai, China: 2010. Part and material properties in selective laser melting of metals; pp. 3–14.

AlFaify A., Hughes J., Ridgway K. Controlling the porosity of 316L stainless steel parts manufactured via the powder bed fusion process. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2019;25:162–175. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-11-2017-0226. DOI

Tammas W.S., Zhao H., Léonard F., Derguti F., Todd I., Prangnell P.B. XCT analysis of the influence of melt strategies on defect population in Ti-6Al-4V components manufactured by Selective Electron Beam Melting. Mater. Charact. 2015;102:47–61. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.02.008. DOI

Ziółkowski G., Chlebus E., Szymczyk P., Kurzac J. Application of X-ray CT method for discontinuity and porosity detection in 316L stainless steel parts produced with SLM technology. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2014;14:608–614. doi: 10.1016/j.acme.2014.02.003. DOI

Research into Specific Mechanical Properties of Composites Produced by 3D-Printing Additive Continuous-Fiber Fabrication Technology