• This record comes from PubMed

Biotic homogenization destabilizes ecosystem functioning by decreasing spatial asynchrony

. 2021 Jun ; 102 (6) : e03332. [epub] 20210430

Language English Country United States Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
31988102 National Natural Science Foundation of China
2017YFC0503906 National Key Research and Development Program of China
DFG FZT 118 Synthesis Centre of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig

Our planet is facing significant changes of biodiversity across spatial scales. Although the negative effects of local biodiversity (α diversity) loss on ecosystem stability are well documented, the consequences of biodiversity changes at larger spatial scales, in particular biotic homogenization, that is, reduced species turnover across space (β diversity), remain poorly known. Using data from 39 grassland biodiversity experiments, we examine the effects of β diversity on the stability of simulated landscapes while controlling for potentially confounding biotic and abiotic factors. Our results show that higher β diversity generates more asynchronous dynamics among local communities and thereby contributes to the stability of ecosystem productivity at larger spatial scales. We further quantify the relative contributions of α and β diversity to ecosystem stability and find a relatively stronger effect of α diversity, possibly due to the limited spatial scale of our experiments. The stabilizing effects of both α and β diversity lead to a positive diversity-stability relationship at the landscape scale. Our findings demonstrate the destabilizing effect of biotic homogenization and suggest that biodiversity should be conserved at multiple spatial scales to maintain the stability of ecosystem functions and services.

Agricultural Research Service Grassland Soil and Water Research Laboratory U S Department of Agriculture Temple Texas 76502 USA

Centre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station CNRS and Paul Sabatier University Moulis 09200 France

Centro de Modelación y Monitoreo de Ecosistemas Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Mayor José Toribio Molina 29 Santiago 8340589 Chile

Department of Biogeography BayCEER University of Bayreuth Bayreuth 95440 Germany

Department of Biology Wilfrid Laurier University Waterloo Ontario N2L 3C5 Canada

Department of Botany Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia České Budějovice 37005 Czech Republic

Department of Disturbance Ecology BayCEER University of Bayreuth Bayreuth 95440 Germany

Department of Ecology Evolution and Behavior University of Minnesota St Paul Minnesota USA

Department of Ecology Evolution and Organismal Biology Iowa State University Ames Iowa USA

Department of Forest Resources University of Minnesota St Paul Minnesota 55108 USA

Department of Functional Ecology Institute of Botany Czech Academy of Sciences Třeboň 37901 Czech Republic

Department of Geography Remote Sensing Laboratories University of Zurich Winterthurerstrasse 190 Zurich 8057 Switzerland

Department of Plant Sciences University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3RB UK

Experimental Plant Ecology Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology Greifswald University Greifswald 17487 Germany

German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle Jena Leipzig Leipzig 04103 Germany

Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales 2751 Australia

Institute of Biology Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg Am Kirchtor 1 Halle 06108 Germany

Institute of Biology Leipzig University Leipzig 04103 Germany

Institute of Entomology Biology Centre CAS České Budějovice 37005 Czech Republic

Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education Institute of Ecology College of Urban and Environmental Sciences Peking University Beijing 100871 China

Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group Wageningen University Wageningen 6700 AA The Netherlands

UCD School of Mathematics and Statistics University College Dublin Dublin 4 Ireland

See more in PubMed

Barton, P. S. , Cunningham S. A., Manning A. D., Gibb H., Lindenmayer D. B., and Didham R. K.. 2013. The spatial scaling of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 22:639–647.

Blowes, S. A. , et al. 2019. The geography of biodiversity change in marine and terrestrial assemblages. Science 366:339–345. PubMed

Blüthgen, N. , et al. 2016. Land use imperils plant and animal community stability through changes in asynchrony rather than diversity. Nature Communications 7:10697. PubMed PMC

Collins, S. L. , et al. 2018. Temporal heterogeneity increases with spatial heterogeneity in ecological communities. Ecology 99:858–865. PubMed

Craven, D. , et al. 2018. Multiple facets of biodiversity drive the diversity–stability relationship. Nature Ecology and Evolution 2:1579–1587. PubMed

de Mazancourt, C. , et al. 2013. Predicting ecosystem stability from community composition and biodiversity. Ecology Letters 16:617–625. PubMed

Delsol, R. , Loreau M., and Haegeman B.. 2018. The relationship between the spatial scaling of biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Global Ecology and Biogeography 27:439–449. PubMed PMC

Dornelas, M. , et al. 2014. Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss. Science 344:296–299. PubMed

Ebeling, A. , Lind E. W., Meyer S. T., Barnes A. D., Borer E. T., Eisenhauer N., and Weisser W. W.. 2020. Contrasting effects of plant diversity on β‐ and γ‐diversity of grassland invertebrates. Ecology, 101, e03057. 10.1002/ecy.3057 PubMed DOI

Engen, S. , Lande R., Saether B. E., and Bregnballe T.. 2005. Estimating the pattern of synchrony in fluctuating populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 74:601–611.

Germain, R. M. , Strauss S. Y., and Gilbert B.. 2017. Experimental dispersal reveals characteristic scales of biodiversity in a natural landscape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114:4447–4452. PubMed PMC

Gonzalez, A. , et al. 2020. Scaling‐up biodiversity‐ecosystem functioning research. Ecology Letters 23:757–776. PubMed PMC

Grace, J. B. , et al. 2016. Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness. Nature 529:390–393. PubMed

Gross, K. , et al. 2013. Species richness and the temporal stability of biomass production: a new analysis of recent biodiversity experiments. American Naturalist 183:1–12. PubMed

Hallett, L. M. , et al. 2014. Biotic mechanisms of community stability shift along a precipitation gradient. Ecology 95:1693–1700. PubMed

Hautier, Y. , et al. 2018. Local loss and spatial homogenization of plant diversity reduce ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature Ecology and Evolution 2:50–56. PubMed

Hector, A. , et al. 2010. General stabilizing effects of plant diversity on grassland productivity through population asynchrony and overyielding. Ecology 91:2213–2220. PubMed

Hooper, D. , et al. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75:3–35.

Isbell, F. , et al. 2015. Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes. Nature 526:574–577. PubMed

Isbell, F. , et al. 2017. Linking the influence and dependence of people on biodiversity across scales. Nature 546:65–72. PubMed PMC

Jost, L. 2007. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88:2427–2439. PubMed

Koricheva, J. , Gurevitch J., and Mengersen, K. editors. 2013. Handbook of meta‐analysis in ecology and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Kraft, N. J. , et al. 2011. Disentangling the drivers of β diversity along latitudinal and elevational gradients. Science 333:1755–1758. PubMed

Lefcheck, J. S. 2016. piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modelling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7:573–579.

Lockwood, J. , and McKinney M.. 2001. Biotic homogenization. Springer, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Loreau, M. , et al. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294:804–808. PubMed

Loreau, M. , and de Mazancourt C.. 2008. Species synchrony and its drivers: neutral and nonneutral community dynamics in fluctuating environments. American Naturalist 172:E48–E66. PubMed

Magurran, A. E. , Dornelas M., Moyes F., Gotelli N. J., and McGill B.. 2015. Rapid biotic homogenization of marine fish assemblages. Nature Communications 6:8405. PubMed PMC

McGlinn, D. J. , et al. 2019. Measurement of biodiversity (MoB): A method to separate the scale‐dependent effects of species abundance distribution, density, and aggregation on diversity change. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10:258–269.

McGranahan, D. A. , et al. 2016. Temporal variability in aboveground plant biomass decreases as spatial variability increases. Ecology 97:555–560. PubMed

Mellin, C. , Bradshaw C., Fordham D., and Caley M.. 2014. Strong but opposing b‐diversity–stability relationships in coral reef fish communities. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 281:20131993. PubMed PMC

Meyfroidt, P. , et al. 2018. Middle‐range theories of land system change. Global Environmental Change 53:52–67.

Mori, A. S. , Isbell F., Fujii S., Makoto K., Matsuoka S., and Osono T.. 2016. Low multifunctional redundancy of soil fungal diversity at multiple scales. Ecology Letters 19:249–259. PubMed

Nakagawa, S. , and Schielzeth H.. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4:133–142.

Oehri, J. , Schmid B., Schaepman‐Strub G., and Niklaus P. A.. 2020. Landscape diversity promotes landscape‐level functioning. Nature Communications 11:154. PubMed PMC

Pasari, J. R. , Levi T., Zavaleta E. S., and Tilman D.. 2013. Several scales of biodiversity affect ecosystem multifunctionality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110:10219–10222. PubMed PMC

Tilman, D. , Isbell F., and Cowles J. M.. 2014. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 45:471–493.

Thompson, P. L. , Rayfield B., and Gonzalez A.. 2015. Robustness of the spatial insurance effects of biodiversity to habitat loss. Evolutionary Ecology Research 16:445–460.

Tilman, D. , Reich P. B., and Knops J. M.. 2006. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade‐long grassland experiment. Nature 441:629–632. PubMed

van der Plas, F. 2016. Biotic homogenization can decrease landscape‐scale forest multifunctionality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113:3557–3562. PubMed PMC

Wang, S. , et al. 2017. An invariability‐area relationship sheds new light on the spatial scaling of ecological stability. Nature Communications 8:15211. PubMed PMC

Wang, S. , Lamy T., Hallett L. M., and Loreau M.. 2019. Stability and synchrony across ecological hierarchies in heterogeneous metacommunities: linking theory to data. Ecography 42:1200–1211.

Wang, S. , and Loreau M.. 2014. Ecosystem stability in space: α, β and γ variability. Ecology Letters 17:891–901. PubMed

Wang, S. , and Loreau M.. 2016. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability across scales in metacommunities. Ecology Letters 19:510–518. PubMed PMC

Wang, Y. , et al. 2020. Biotic stability mechanisms in Inner Mongolian grassland. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 287:20200675. PubMed PMC

Whittaker, R. H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251.

Wilcox, K. R. , et al. 2017. Asynchrony among local communities stabilizes ecosystem function of metacommunities. Ecology Letters 20:1534–1545. PubMed PMC

Zhang, Y. , He N., Loreau M., Pan Q., and Han X.. 2018. Scale dependence of the diversity–stability relationship in a temperate grassland. Journal of Ecology 106:1277–1285. PubMed PMC

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...