Preformed T cell alloimmunity and HLA eplet mismatch to guide immunosuppression minimization with tacrolimus monotherapy in kidney transplantation: Results of the CELLIMIN trial
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
33725408
DOI
10.1111/ajt.16563
PII: S1600-6135(22)08681-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- biomarker, clinical decision-making, clinical research/practice, clinical trial, immunobiology, immunosuppression/immune modulation, immunosuppressive regimens - minimization/withdrawal, kidney transplantation/nephrology, rejection: acute,
- MeSH
- imunosupresiva terapeutické užití MeSH
- imunosupresivní léčba MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- přežívání štěpu MeSH
- rejekce štěpu etiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- T-lymfocyty MeSH
- takrolimus * terapeutické užití MeSH
- testování histokompatibility MeSH
- transplantace ledvin * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- imunosupresiva MeSH
- takrolimus * MeSH
Personalizing immunosuppression is a major objective in transplantation. Transplant recipients are heterogeneous regarding their immunological memory and primary alloimmune susceptibility. This biomarker-guided trial investigated whether in low immunological-risk kidney transplants without pretransplant DSA and donor-specific T cells assessed by a standardized IFN-γ ELISPOT, low immunosuppression (LI) with tacrolimus monotherapy would be non-inferior regarding 6-month BPAR than tacrolimus-based standard of care (SOC). Due to low recruitment rates, the trial was terminated when 167 patients were enrolled. ELISPOT negatives (E-) were randomized to LI (n = 48) or SOC (n = 53), E+ received the same SOC. Six- and 12-month BPAR rates were higher among LI than SOC/E- (4/35 [13%] vs. 1/43 [2%], p = .15 and 12/48 [25%] vs. 6/53 [11.3%], p = .073, respectively). E+ patients showed similarly high BPAR rates than LI at 6 and 12 months (12/55 [22%] and 13/66 [20%], respectively). These differences were stronger in per-protocol analyses. Post-hoc analysis revealed that poor class-II eplet matching, especially DQ, discriminated E- patients, notably E-/LI, developing BPAR (4/28 [14%] low risk vs. 8/20 [40%] high risk, p = .043). Eplet mismatch also predicted anti-class-I (p = .05) and anti-DQ (p < .001) de novo DSA. Adverse events were similar, but E-/LI developed fewer viral infections, particularly polyoma-virus-associated nephropathy (p = .021). Preformed T cell alloreactivity and HLA eplet mismatch assessment may refine current baseline immune-risk stratification and guide immunosuppression decision-making in kidney transplantation.
CHU Nantes Laboratoire d'immunologie CIMNA Nantes France
Department of Nephrology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Department of Nephrology University Medical Center Regensburg Regensburg Germany
HLA Laboratory Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
Immunology Department University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla IDIVAL Santander Spain
Nephrology and Transplantation Laboratory IDIBELL Barcelona University Barcelona Spain
Transplant Laboratory Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
van de Luijtgaarden MWM, Noordzij M, Wanner C, et al. Renal replacement therapy in Europe-a summary of the 2009 ERA-EDTA registry annual report. Clin Kidney J. 2012;5:109-119. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndtplus/sfr182
Coemans M, Süsal C, Döhler B, et al. Analyses of the short- and long-term graft survival after kidney transplantation in Europe between 1986 and 2015. Kidney Int. 2018;94:964-973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2018.05.018
Kaplan B, Srinivas TR, Meier-Kriesche HU. Factors associated with long-term renal allograft survival. Ther Drug Monit. 2002;24(1):36-39. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007691-200202000-00007
Sellarés J, de Freitas DG, Mengel M, et al. Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:388-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03840.x
Copley HC, Elango M, Kosmoliaptsis V. Assessment of human leukocyte antigen immunogenicity: current methods, challenges and opportunities. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2018;23:477-485. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000544
Tambur AR, Campbell P, Chong AS, et al. Sensitization in transplantation: assessment of risk (STAR) 2019 working group meeting report [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 27]. Am J Transplant. 2020;20(10):2652-2668. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15937
Naesens M, Anglicheau D. Precision transplant medicine: biomarkers to the rescue. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29:24-34. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2017010004
Amir AL, D'Orsogna LJA, Roelen DL, et al. Allo-HLA reactivity of virus-specific memory T cells is common. Blood. 2010;115:3146-3157. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-07-234906
Heeger PS. T-cell allorecognition and transplant rejection: a summary and update. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:525-533. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00123.x
Issa F, Schiopu A, Wood KJ. Role of T cells in graft rejection and transplantation tolerance. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2010;6(1):155-169. https://doi.org/10.1586/eci.09.64
Valujskikh A. Memory T cells in allograft rejection. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;601:247-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72005-0_26
Bestard O, Crespo E, Stein M, et al. Cross-validation of IFN-γ Elispot assay for measuring alloreactive memory/effector T cell responses in renal transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:1880-1890. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12285
Ashoor I, Najafian N, Korin Y, et al. Standardization and cross validation of alloreactive IFNγ ELISPOT assays within the clinical trials in organ transplantation consortium. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:1871-1879. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12286
Yamada Y, Boskovic S, Aoyama A, et al. Overcoming memory T-cell responses for induction of delayed tolerance in nonhuman primates. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:330-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03795.x
Heeger PS, Greenspan NS, Kuhlenschmidt S, et al. Pretransplant frequency of donor-specific, IFN-gamma-producing lymphocytes is a manifestation of immunologic memory and correlates with the risk of posttransplant rejection episodes. J Immunol. 1999;163:2267-2275.
Hricik DE, Augustine J, Nickerson P, et al. Interferon gamma ELISPOT testing as a risk-stratifying biomarker for kidney transplant injury: results from the CTOT-01 multicenter study. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(12):3166-3173. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13401
Poggio ED, Clemente M, Hricik DE, Heeger PS. Panel of reactive T cells as a measurement of primed cellular alloimmunity in kidney transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:564-572. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2005030293
Bestard O, Cruzado JM, Lucia M, et al. Prospective assessment of antidonor cellular alloreactivity is a tool for guidance of immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Kidney Int. 2013;84:1226-1236. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2013.236
Haas M, Loupy A, Lefaucheur C, et al. The Banff 2017 Kidney Meeting Report: Revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next-generation clinical trials. Am J Transplant. 2018;18:293-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14625
Gragert L, Madbouly A, Freeman J, Maiers M. Six-locus high resolution HLA haplotype frequencies derived from mixed-resolution DNA typing for the entire US donor registry. Hum Immunol. 2013;74:1313-1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2013.06.025
Klitz W, Maiers M, Spellman S, et al. New HLA haplotype frequency reference standards: high-resolution and large sample typing of HLA DR-DQ haplotypes in a sample of European Americans. Tissue Antigens. 2003;62:296-307. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0039.2003.00103.x
Duquesnoy RJ. Clinical usefulness of HLAMatchmaker in HLA epitope matching for organ transplantation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2008;20:594-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2008.06.010
Wiebe C, Rush DN, Nevins TE, et al. Class II eplet mismatch modulates tacrolimus trough levels required to prevent donor-specific antibody development. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:3353-3362. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2017030287
Hricik DE, Formica RN, Nickerson P, et al. Adverse outcomes of tacrolimus withdrawal in immune-quiescent kidney transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:3114-3122. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2014121234
Wiebe C, Rush DN, Gibson IW, et al. Evidence for the alloimmune basis and prognostic significance of BL T cell-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant. 2020;20(9):2499-2508. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15860
Meneghini M, Crespo E, Niemann M, et al. Donor/recipient HLA molecular mismatch scores predict primary Humoral and Cellular alloimmunity in Kidney transplantation. In press. Front Immunol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.623276
Wiebe C, Kosmoliaptsis V, Pochinco D, et al. A Comparison of HLA molecular mismatch methods to determine HLA immunogenicity. Transplantation. 2018;102:1338-1343. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002117
Wiebe C, Pochinco D, Blydt-Hansen TD, et al. Class II HLA epitope matching-A strategy to minimize de novo donor-specific antibody development and improve outcomes. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:3114-3122. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12478
Crespo E, Lucia M, Cruzado JM, et al. Pre-transplant donor-specific T-cell alloreactivity is strongly associated with early acute cellular rejection in kidney transplant recipients not receiving T-cell depleting induction therapy. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117618. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117618
Lúcia M, Luque S, Crespo E, et al. Preformed circulating HLA-specific memory B cells predict high risk of humoral rejection in kidney transplantation. Kidney Int. 2015;88(4):874-887. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2015.205
Andree H, Nickel P, Nasiadko C, et al. Identification of dialysis patients with panel-reactive memory T cells before kidney transplantation using an allogeneic cell bank. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:573-580. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2005030299