BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have investigated age-based declines in semen traits, but the impact of paternal age on semen parameter values remains inconclusive. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to detect an impact of age on semen quality was studied in healthy nonsmoking men exposed to traffic air pollution. METHODS: Semen samples from 150 Prague City policemen aged 23 to 63 years were examined for standard semen parameters, sperm DNA fragmentation and high DNA stainability. RESULTS: A significant positive correlation was found between age and %DFI (r = .359, P < .001), and negative correlations were found between age and sperm vitality (r = -.247, P < .001), the % acrosome-intact sperm (r = -.202, P = .013) and the % normal sperm heads (r = -.204, P = .012). A weak but significant negative correlation was found for high DNA stainability (% HDS) vs age (r = -.161, P = .050). No significant correlation was detected between male age and the other investigated semen quality parameters. At ages of 23 to 30, 31 to 40, 41 to 50, and 51 to 63 years, the mean %DFI values were 12.7 ± 7.18, 14.7 ± 7.42, 19.6 ± 11.25, and 34.2 ± 15.08, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study shows a strong relationship (P < .001) between the age of men and sperm DNA fragmentation in an occupational cohort at risk of exposure to heavy traffic-related air pollution in a large city center.

Department of Genetic Toxicology and Epigenetics Institute of Experimental Medicine Czech Academy of Science Prague Czech Republic

Department of Genetics and Reproduction Central European Institute of Technology Veterinary Research Institute Brno Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Bergh C, Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB. Parental age and child outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(6):1036‐1046. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.04.026. PubMed DOI

Sharma R, Agarwal A, Rohra VK, Assidi M, Abu‐Elmagd M, Turki RF. Effects of increased paternal age on sperm quality, reproductive outcome and associated epigenetic risks to offspring. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:35. 10.1186/s12958-015-0028-x. PubMed DOI PMC

Johnson SL, Dunleavy J, Gemmell NJ, Nakagawa S. Consistent age‐dependent declines in human semen quality: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2015;19:22‐33. 10.1016/j.arr.2014.10.007. PubMed DOI

Chen Q, Zhao JY, Xue X, Zhu GX. The association between sperm DNA fragmentation and reproductive outcomes following intrauterine insemination, a meta analysis. Reprod Toxicol. 2019;86:50‐55. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.03.004. PubMed DOI

Deng C, Li T, Xie Y, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation index influences assisted reproductive technology outcome: a systematic review and meta‐analysis combined with a retrospective cohort study. Andrologia. 2019;51(6):e13263. 10.1111/and.13263. PubMed DOI

Esteves SC, Santi D, Simoni M. An update on clinical and surgical interventions to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men. Andrology. 2020;8(1):53‐81. 10.1111/andr.12724. PubMed DOI

Humm KC, Sakkas D. Role of increased male age in IVF and egg donation: is sperm DNA fragmentation responsible. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):30‐36. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.024. PubMed DOI

McQueen DB, Zhang J, Robins JC. Sperm DNA fragmentation and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(1):54‐60.e3. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.03.003. PubMed DOI

Tan J, Taskin O, Albert A, Bedaiwy MA. Association between sperm DNA fragmentation and idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(6):951‐960. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.029. PubMed DOI

Bisht S, Faiq M, Tolahunase M, Dada R. Oxidative stress and male infertility. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14(8):470‐485. 10.1038/nrurol.2017.69. PubMed DOI

Muratori M, Baldi E. Effects of FSH on sperm DNA fragmentation: review of clinical studies and possible mechanisms of action. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:734. 10.3389/fendo.2018.00734. PubMed DOI PMC

Agarwal A, Majzoub A, Esteves SC, Ko E, Ramasamy R, Zini A. Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5(6):935‐950. 10.21037/tau.2016.10.03. PubMed DOI PMC

Javed A, Talkad MS, Ramaiah MK. Evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation using multiple methods: a comparison of their predictive power for male infertility. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2019;46(1):14‐21. 10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.14. PubMed DOI PMC

Evenson DP, Larson KL, Jost LK. Sperm chromatin structure assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparisons with other techniques. Andrology Lab Corner J Androl. 2002;23(1):25‐43. PubMed

World Health Organization . Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Fith ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2010.

Mortimer D. Sperm fertilizing ability testing. In: Mortimer D, ed. Practical Laboratory Andrology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994:209‐212.

Rubes J, Rybar R, Prinosilova P, et al. Genetic polymorphisms influence the susceptibility of men to sperm DNA damage associated with exposure to air pollution. Mutat Res. 2010;683(1–2):9‐15. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.09.010. PubMed DOI

Langone JJ, Van Vunakis H. Radioimmunoassay of nicotine, cotinine, and gamma‐(3‐pyridyl)‐gamma‐oxo‐N‐methylbutyramide. Methods Enzymol. 1982;84:628‐640. 10.1016/0076-6879(82)84050-0. PubMed DOI

Belloc S, Benkhalifa M, Cohen‐Bacrie M, Dalleac A, Amar E, Zini A. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid damage in normozoospermic men is related to age and sperm progressive motility. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(6):1588‐1593. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.006. PubMed DOI

Das M, Al‐Hathal N, San‐Gabriel M, et al. High prevalence of isolated sperm DNA damage in infertile men with advanced paternal age. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(6):843‐848. 10.1007/s10815-013-0015-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Mettler AD, Govindarajan M, Srinivas S, Mithraprabhu S, Evenson D, Mahendran T. Male age is associated with sperm DNA/chromatin integrity. Aging Male. 2019;1‐8. 10.1080/13685538.2019.1600496. PubMed DOI

Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Vagnini LD, et al. The effects of male age on sperm DNA damage: an evaluation of 2,178 semen samples. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2018;22(4):323‐330. 10.5935/1518-0557.20180047. PubMed DOI PMC

Plastira K, Msaouel P, Angelopoulou R, et al. The effects of age on DNA fragmentation, chromatin packaging and conventional semen parameters in spermatozoa of oligoasthenoteratozoospermic patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24(10):437‐443. 10.1007/s10815-007-9162-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Kim MK, Park JK, Jeon Y, Seok SH, Chang EM, Lee WS. Effects of paternal age on human embryo development in in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2019;46(1):22‐29. 10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.22. PubMed DOI PMC

Yang H, Li G, Jin H, Guo Y, Sun Y. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation index on assisted reproductive technology outcomes and its relationship with semen parameters and lifestyle. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(4):356‐365. 10.21037/tau.2019.06.22. PubMed DOI PMC

Evenson DP, Djira G, Kasperson K, Christianson J. Relationships between the age of 25,445 men attending infertility clinics and sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA®) defined sperm DNA and chromatin integrity. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(2):311‐320. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.028. PubMed DOI

Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A, et al. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):174‐179. 10.1093/humrep/del326. PubMed DOI

Virro MR, Larson‐Cook KL, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1289‐1295. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.063. PubMed DOI

Rubes J, Selevan SG, Sram RJ, Evenson DP, Perreault SD. GSTM1 genotype influences the susceptibility of men to sperm DNA damage associated with exposure to air pollution. Mutat Res. 2007;625:20‐28. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.05.012. PubMed DOI

Darbandi S, Darbandi M, Khorshid HRK, et al. The effect of paternal age on semen quality and fertilization outcome in men with normal sperm DNA compaction, reactive oxygen species, and total antioxidant capacity levels. Turk J Urol. 2019;45(3):164‐170. 10.5152/tud.2019.74944. PubMed DOI PMC

Evenson DP, Brannian J, Hansen K, Kasperson K, Christianson J. Relationships between sperm DNA fragmentation, age of donors and patients and children with psychic disorders. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(suppl 3):e97. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.330. DOI

Jerre E, Bungum M, Evenson D, Giwercman A. Sperm chromatin structure assay high DNA stainability sperm as a marker of early miscarriage after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertility and Sterility. 2019;112(1):46‐53.e2. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.03.013. PubMed DOI

Vinnakota C, Cree L, Peek J, Morbeck DE. Incidence of high sperm DNA fragmentation in a targeted population of subfertile men. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2019;65(6):451‐457. 10.1080/19396368.2019.1668077. PubMed DOI

Moskovtsev SI, Willis J, Mullen JB. Age‐related decline in sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity in patients evaluated for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):496‐499. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.075. PubMed DOI

Kaarouch I, Bouamoud N, Madkour A, et al. Paternal age: negative impact on sperm genome decays and IVF outcomes after 40 years. Mol Reprod Dev. 2018;85(3):271‐280. 10.1002/mrd.22963. PubMed DOI

Egeberg Palme DL, Rehfeld A, Bang AK, et al. Viable acrosome‐intact human spermatozoa in the ejaculate as a marker of semen quality and fertility status. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(3):361‐371. 10.1093/humrep/dex380. PubMed DOI

Rahiminia T, Hosseini A, Anvari M, Ghasemi‐Esmailabad S, Talebi AR. Modern human sperm freezing: effect on DNA, chromatin and acrosome integrity. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56(4):472‐476. 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.02.004. PubMed DOI

Yuan M, Huang L, Leung WT, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation valued by SCSA and its correlation with conventional sperm parameters in male partner of recurrent spontaneous abortion couple. Biosci Trends. 2019;13(2):152‐159. 10.5582/bst.2018.01292. PubMed DOI